NATION

PASSWORD

What Would It Take for You to Vote for Biden?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

How do you plan to vote? (Someone asked for this poll)

Biden (because I support Biden)
106
8%
Biden (because he's the lesser of two evils)
253
19%
Trump (for some reason)
264
20%
Third Party (or Independent)
117
9%
Write-In (maybe Bernie)
33
2%
I don't know right now
33
2%
I don't know (but I am not voting for Biden and/or Trump)
27
2%
I don't plan to vote
31
2%
I am against electoral politics
49
4%
I can't vote (under voting age, not a citizen, disenfrancisement, etc...)
428
32%
 
Total votes : 1341

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:41 pm

Nazeroth wrote:
Garbage rhetoric wrapped in left wing word salad

Not to mention im not shocked you dont know shit about firearms

I grew up in a major city, you should be more shocked that I've used them at all, frankly. And I hardly think the position that most civilians don't need and shouldn't have heavy weapons is a radical one? But I concede that "assault weapons" bans largely based on a weapon's appearance are flawed, and that I don't have enough expertise to be in charge of deciding which types of ammunition should be allowed and which don't.

Admitting you don't know things rather than blustering and pressing on regardless is generally a virtue, not a failure.

Major-Tom wrote:
Telconi wrote:
If Biden suddenly became a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment I'd spend the rest of my days until November pounding pavement for him


That easy, huh? This is why I want more Pro 2A Dems, for my own support of Gun Rights, but also because it would turn off way less voters like yourself.

If Biden actually made an about-face like this, Tel would say it was in bad faith and that the Democrats would never go for it (and probably be correct, frankly). He says things like this about hypotheticals, but it's easy to make grand pronouncements about what you'd do in totally fictional situations (that happen to be convenient for other arguments you're making in the real world).
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:42 pm

Nazeroth wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
That easy, huh? This is why I want more Pro 2A Dems, for my own support of Gun Rights, but also because it would turn off way less voters like yourself.

Edit:



See what I mean?



Shame the dems have an authortarian hard on for disarming people 8)

The assumption that it's a bad faith effort to "disarm" the populace rather than a policy proposal to reduce our absolutely bananas level of gun violence is just wild.
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:43 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Menorahs and yarmulkes don't have souls or families or communities either. But the people who own them do.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here?
Telconi wrote:
Guns have value, ballots don't.

A democratic system of government has no value?

You really do find new ways to plumb the depths, Tel.


Just trying to find your beliefs.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Nazeroth
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5060
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazeroth » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:46 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
Garbage rhetoric wrapped in left wing word salad

Not to mention im not shocked you dont know shit about firearms

I grew up in a major city, you should be more shocked that I've used them at all, frankly. And I hardly think the position that most civilians don't need and shouldn't have heavy weapons is a radical one? But I concede that "assault weapons" bans largely based on a weapon's appearance are flawed, and that I don't have enough expertise to be in charge of deciding which types of ammunition should be allowed and which don't.

Admitting you don't know things rather than blustering and pressing on regardless is generally a virtue, not a failure.

Major-Tom wrote:
That easy, huh? This is why I want more Pro 2A Dems, for my own support of Gun Rights, but also because it would turn off way less voters like yourself.

If Biden actually made an about-face like this, Tel would say it was in bad faith and that the Democrats would never go for it (and probably be correct, frankly). He says things like this about hypotheticals, but it's easy to make grand pronouncements about what you'd do in totally fictional situations (that happen to be convenient for other arguments you're making in the real world).



Biden wont make an about face because he is an authortarian and authortarians tend to not want the people well armed
Comically Evil Member of the Anti-Democracy League
Government: Tyrannical Feudal Despotism
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you..."
"The meek will inherit nothing..."
"Behold and despair fools"
"We will sail to a billion worlds...we will sail until every light has been extinguished"

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:47 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
Garbage rhetoric wrapped in left wing word salad

Not to mention im not shocked you dont know shit about firearms

I grew up in a major city, you should be more shocked that I've used them at all, frankly. And I hardly think the position that most civilians don't need and shouldn't have heavy weapons is a radical one? But I concede that "assault weapons" bans largely based on a weapon's appearance are flawed, and that I don't have enough expertise to be in charge of deciding which types of ammunition should be allowed and which don't.

Admitting you don't know things rather than blustering and pressing on regardless is generally a virtue, not a failure.

Major-Tom wrote:
That easy, huh? This is why I want more Pro 2A Dems, for my own support of Gun Rights, but also because it would turn off way less voters like yourself.

If Biden actually made an about-face like this, Tel would say it was in bad faith and that the Democrats would never go for it (and probably be correct, frankly). He says things like this about hypotheticals, but it's easy to make grand pronouncements about what you'd do in totally fictional situations (that happen to be convenient for other arguments you're making in the real world).


Yes, hypotheticals are hypothetical.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Nazeroth
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5060
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazeroth » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:47 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:

Shame the dems have an authortarian hard on for disarming people 8)

The assumption that it's a bad faith effort to "disarm" the populace rather than a policy proposal to reduce our absolutely bananas level of gun violence is just wild.


Disarming the population is always in bad faith

Dosnt matter if its the gop or dnc that does it

Though the dems seem to LOVE the idea
Comically Evil Member of the Anti-Democracy League
Government: Tyrannical Feudal Despotism
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you..."
"The meek will inherit nothing..."
"Behold and despair fools"
"We will sail to a billion worlds...we will sail until every light has been extinguished"

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:49 pm

Nazeroth wrote:
Senkaku wrote:I grew up in a major city, you should be more shocked that I've used them at all, frankly. And I hardly think the position that most civilians don't need and shouldn't have heavy weapons is a radical one? But I concede that "assault weapons" bans largely based on a weapon's appearance are flawed, and that I don't have enough expertise to be in charge of deciding which types of ammunition should be allowed and which don't.

Admitting you don't know things rather than blustering and pressing on regardless is generally a virtue, not a failure.


If Biden actually made an about-face like this, Tel would say it was in bad faith and that the Democrats would never go for it (and probably be correct, frankly). He says things like this about hypotheticals, but it's easy to make grand pronouncements about what you'd do in totally fictional situations (that happen to be convenient for other arguments you're making in the real world).



Biden wont make an about face because he is an authortarian and authortarians tend to not want the people well armed

What do you think authoritarianism is? Like what does it consist of to you?

Nazeroth wrote:
Senkaku wrote:The assumption that it's a bad faith effort to "disarm" the populace rather than a policy proposal to reduce our absolutely bananas level of gun violence is just wild.


Disarming the population is always in bad faith

Dosnt matter if its the gop or dnc that does it

Though the dems seem to LOVE the idea

Really? You don't think anyone could possibly in good faith see school shootings or the violence on the South Side of Chicago and come to earnestly believe that civilians don't need access to this kind of firepower?
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Nazeroth
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5060
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazeroth » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:52 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:

Biden wont make an about face because he is an authortarian and authortarians tend to not want the people well armed

What do you think authoritarianism is? Like what does it consist of to you?

Nazeroth wrote:
Disarming the population is always in bad faith

Dosnt matter if its the gop or dnc that does it

Though the dems seem to LOVE the idea

Really? You don't think anyone could possibly in good faith see school shootings or the violence on the South Side of Chicago and come to earnestly believe that civilians don't need access to this kind of firepower?


No because they must be willfully ignorant of their surroundings. They have an abundance of knowledge at their fingertips and they refuse to use it.
Comically Evil Member of the Anti-Democracy League
Government: Tyrannical Feudal Despotism
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you..."
"The meek will inherit nothing..."
"Behold and despair fools"
"We will sail to a billion worlds...we will sail until every light has been extinguished"

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:55 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:

Shame the dems have an authortarian hard on for disarming people 8)

The assumption that it's a bad faith effort to "disarm" the populace rather than a policy proposal to reduce our absolutely bananas level of gun violence is just wild.


It's irrelevant what his motivations are. The desired effects are unacceptable.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Nouveau Yathrib
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1030
Founded: Jul 27, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Nouveau Yathrib » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:23 pm

https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/

As president, Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example, by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.

The Biden Plan will:
* Ensure the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions no later than 2050. On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama-Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track. And, he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that: 1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025, 2) makes a historic investment in clean energy and climate research and innovation, 3) incentivizes the rapid deployment of clean energy innovations across the economy, especially in communities most impacted by climate change.
* Build a stronger, more resilient nation. On day one, Biden will make smart infrastructure investments to rebuild the nation and to ensure that our buildings, water, transportation, and energy infrastructure can withstand the impacts of climate change.  Every dollar spent toward rebuilding our roads, bridges, buildings, the electric grid, and our water infrastructure will be used to prevent, reduce, and withstand a changing climate. As President, Biden will use the convening power of government to boost climate resilience efforts by developing regional climate resilience plans, in partnership with local universities and national labs, for local access to the most relevant science, data, information, tools, and training.
* Rally the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change. Climate change is a global challenge that requires decisive action from every country around the world. Joe Biden knows how to stand with America’s allies, stand up to adversaries, and level with any world leader about what must be done. He will not only recommit the United States to the Paris Agreement on climate change – he will go much further than that. He will lead an effort to get every major country to ramp up the ambition of their domestic climate targets. He will make sure those commitments are transparent and enforceable, and stop countries from cheating by using America’s economic leverage and power of example. He will fully integrate climate change into our foreign policy and national security strategies, as well as our approach to trade.
* Stand up to the abuse of power by polluters who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities. Vulnerable communities are disproportionately impacted by the climate emergency and pollution. The Biden Administration will take action against fossil fuel companies and other polluters who put profit over people and knowingly harm our environment and poison our communities’ air, land, and water, or conceal information regarding potential environmental and health risks. The Biden plan will ensure that communities across the country from Flint, Michigan to Harlan, Kentucky to the New Hampshire Seacoast have access to clean, safe drinking water. And he’ll make sure the development of solutions is an inclusive, community-driven process.
* Fulfill our obligation to workers and communities who powered our industrial revolution and subsequent decades of economic growth. This is support they’ve earned for fueling our country’s industrial revolution and decades of economic growth. We’re not going to leave any workers or communities behind.
And, Vice President Biden has committed that Biden for President will not accept contributions from oil, gas and coal corporations or executives.
I still can't believe that Brazil lost to Germany 1:7. Copy and paste onto your sig if you were alive when this happened.

This account is the predecessor state of Jamilkhuze and Syfenq. This is how they're different, and this is why they exist.

We are currently in the year 2181. About Us | Factbooks | Past and Future History | OOC Info | Public Relations | iiWiki | Q&A

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do."

-Edward Everett Hale

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:27 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/

As president, Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example, by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.

The Biden Plan will:
* Ensure the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions no later than 2050. On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama-Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track. And, he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that: 1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025, 2) makes a historic investment in clean energy and climate research and innovation, 3) incentivizes the rapid deployment of clean energy innovations across the economy, especially in communities most impacted by climate change.
* Build a stronger, more resilient nation. On day one, Biden will make smart infrastructure investments to rebuild the nation and to ensure that our buildings, water, transportation, and energy infrastructure can withstand the impacts of climate change.  Every dollar spent toward rebuilding our roads, bridges, buildings, the electric grid, and our water infrastructure will be used to prevent, reduce, and withstand a changing climate. As President, Biden will use the convening power of government to boost climate resilience efforts by developing regional climate resilience plans, in partnership with local universities and national labs, for local access to the most relevant science, data, information, tools, and training.
* Rally the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change. Climate change is a global challenge that requires decisive action from every country around the world. Joe Biden knows how to stand with America’s allies, stand up to adversaries, and level with any world leader about what must be done. He will not only recommit the United States to the Paris Agreement on climate change – he will go much further than that. He will lead an effort to get every major country to ramp up the ambition of their domestic climate targets. He will make sure those commitments are transparent and enforceable, and stop countries from cheating by using America’s economic leverage and power of example. He will fully integrate climate change into our foreign policy and national security strategies, as well as our approach to trade.
* Stand up to the abuse of power by polluters who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities. Vulnerable communities are disproportionately impacted by the climate emergency and pollution. The Biden Administration will take action against fossil fuel companies and other polluters who put profit over people and knowingly harm our environment and poison our communities’ air, land, and water, or conceal information regarding potential environmental and health risks. The Biden plan will ensure that communities across the country from Flint, Michigan to Harlan, Kentucky to the New Hampshire Seacoast have access to clean, safe drinking water. And he’ll make sure the development of solutions is an inclusive, community-driven process.
* Fulfill our obligation to workers and communities who powered our industrial revolution and subsequent decades of economic growth. This is support they’ve earned for fueling our country’s industrial revolution and decades of economic growth. We’re not going to leave any workers or communities behind.
And, Vice President Biden has committed that Biden for President will not accept contributions from oil, gas and coal corporations or executives.

I understand that a quick transition to net-zero is basically politically impossible but Jesus Mary and Joseph my whole generation is so fucked lol
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7170
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:28 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/

As president, Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example, by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.

The Biden Plan will:
* Ensure the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions no later than 2050. On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama-Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track. And, he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that: 1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025, 2) makes a historic investment in clean energy and climate research and innovation, 3) incentivizes the rapid deployment of clean energy innovations across the economy, especially in communities most impacted by climate change.
* Build a stronger, more resilient nation. On day one, Biden will make smart infrastructure investments to rebuild the nation and to ensure that our buildings, water, transportation, and energy infrastructure can withstand the impacts of climate change.  Every dollar spent toward rebuilding our roads, bridges, buildings, the electric grid, and our water infrastructure will be used to prevent, reduce, and withstand a changing climate. As President, Biden will use the convening power of government to boost climate resilience efforts by developing regional climate resilience plans, in partnership with local universities and national labs, for local access to the most relevant science, data, information, tools, and training.
* Rally the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change. Climate change is a global challenge that requires decisive action from every country around the world. Joe Biden knows how to stand with America’s allies, stand up to adversaries, and level with any world leader about what must be done. He will not only recommit the United States to the Paris Agreement on climate change – he will go much further than that. He will lead an effort to get every major country to ramp up the ambition of their domestic climate targets. He will make sure those commitments are transparent and enforceable, and stop countries from cheating by using America’s economic leverage and power of example. He will fully integrate climate change into our foreign policy and national security strategies, as well as our approach to trade.
* Stand up to the abuse of power by polluters who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities. Vulnerable communities are disproportionately impacted by the climate emergency and pollution. The Biden Administration will take action against fossil fuel companies and other polluters who put profit over people and knowingly harm our environment and poison our communities’ air, land, and water, or conceal information regarding potential environmental and health risks. The Biden plan will ensure that communities across the country from Flint, Michigan to Harlan, Kentucky to the New Hampshire Seacoast have access to clean, safe drinking water. And he’ll make sure the development of solutions is an inclusive, community-driven process.
* Fulfill our obligation to workers and communities who powered our industrial revolution and subsequent decades of economic growth. This is support they’ve earned for fueling our country’s industrial revolution and decades of economic growth. We’re not going to leave any workers or communities behind.
And, Vice President Biden has committed that Biden for President will not accept contributions from oil, gas and coal corporations or executives.

Is the point that they haven't bothered updating it or that 2050 is a good enough date and not too late despite what the current climate data suggests? :p

Seriously though i advise you look use the updated plans for your argument. There are degrees of insufficiency and if i took his word for it his new plans are somewhere i would be happy with ish.
Last edited by Uiiop on Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Dominioan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1127
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dominioan » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:32 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nouveau Yathrib wrote:https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/


I understand that a quick transition to net-zero is basically politically impossible but Jesus Mary and Joseph my whole generation is so fucked lol

I mean, hopefully when they say “net zero by 2050” they mean a huge crackdown in the start then slowing down near the end.
Help i'm addicted to pain so I keep coming back to this site
Direct rule from Oklahoma City
Cool person

I've read 1984, so I can confirm this is in fact 1984

BOOMER SOONER
CHOP ON

User avatar
Nouveau Yathrib
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1030
Founded: Jul 27, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Nouveau Yathrib » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:33 pm

Uiiop wrote:
Nouveau Yathrib wrote:https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/

-snip-


Is the point that they haven't bothered updating it or that 2050 is a good enough date and not too late despite what the current climate data suggests? :p

Seriously though i advise you look use the updated plans for your argument. There are degrees of insufficiency and i took his word for it his new plans are somewhere i would be happy with ish.


There won't be any new updated plans if Biden doesn't win.
I still can't believe that Brazil lost to Germany 1:7. Copy and paste onto your sig if you were alive when this happened.

This account is the predecessor state of Jamilkhuze and Syfenq. This is how they're different, and this is why they exist.

We are currently in the year 2181. About Us | Factbooks | Past and Future History | OOC Info | Public Relations | iiWiki | Q&A

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do."

-Edward Everett Hale

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7170
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:43 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Uiiop wrote:Is the point that they haven't bothered updating it or that 2050 is a good enough date and not too late despite what the current climate data suggests? :p

Seriously though i advise you look use the updated plans for your argument. There are degrees of insufficiency and i took his word for it his new plans are somewhere i would be happy with ish.


There won't be any new updated plans if Biden doesn't win.

There wouldn't be any of the old plans either if you're being consistent about this.
The people opting out know what he says on paper. They don't trust him to actually do it. Your point?
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:43 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Uiiop wrote:Is the point that they haven't bothered updating it or that 2050 is a good enough date and not too late despite what the current climate data suggests? :p

Seriously though i advise you look use the updated plans for your argument. There are degrees of insufficiency and i took his word for it his new plans are somewhere i would be happy with ish.


There won't be any new updated plans if Biden doesn't win.


Oh, we will, but carbon output won't be the concern.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Dominioan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1127
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dominioan » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:45 pm

Uiiop wrote:
Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
There won't be any new updated plans if Biden doesn't win.

There wouldn't be any of the old plans either if you're being consistent about this.
The people opting out know what he says on paper. They don't trust him to actually do it. Your point?

I mean, if he wins, at least there’s a chance. We all know that Trump will actively work against stopping climate change.
Help i'm addicted to pain so I keep coming back to this site
Direct rule from Oklahoma City
Cool person

I've read 1984, so I can confirm this is in fact 1984

BOOMER SOONER
CHOP ON

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7170
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:50 pm

Dominioan wrote:
Uiiop wrote:There wouldn't be any of the old plans either if you're being consistent about this.
The people opting out know what he says on paper. They don't trust him to actually do it. Your point?

I mean, if he wins, at least there’s a chance. We all know that Trump will actively work against stopping climate change.

I suppose. Partly the reason i'm voting for him. But pointing to that website is not really proof of that chance.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Dominioan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1127
Founded: Dec 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dominioan » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:52 pm

Uiiop wrote:
Dominioan wrote:I mean, if he wins, at least there’s a chance. We all know that Trump will actively work against stopping climate change.

I suppose. Partly the reason i'm voting for him. But pointing to that website is not really proof of that chance.

I literally hate both candidates. I just wish that I lived somewhere where centrism is not considered radical left.
Help i'm addicted to pain so I keep coming back to this site
Direct rule from Oklahoma City
Cool person

I've read 1984, so I can confirm this is in fact 1984

BOOMER SOONER
CHOP ON

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17607
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:23 pm

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Senkaku wrote:Yeah, I know the concept of assault weapons bans is flawed. But I'm not sure why Nazeroth thinks it's flawed enough to be worth supporting authoritarian consolidation by the far right- isn't the whole theory of being allowed to own heavier weaponry than you really need for hunting or sport that in case of a tyrannical government, you can rise up? What is the point of allowing American democracy to kick the bucket so long as the new order lets you keep the weapons? Seems rather backwards to me.


Quick question... how is 55gr 5.56 fall into "Heavier weaponry then you really need for hunting or sport" when 147gr 30-06 or 175gr 7.62 doesn't?

Indeed, in many states the former is considered too small for hunting purposes.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17607
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Sat Aug 29, 2020 4:29 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:

Biden wont make an about face because he is an authortarian and authortarians tend to not want the people well armed

What do you think authoritarianism is? Like what does it consist of to you?

Nazeroth wrote:
Disarming the population is always in bad faith

Dosnt matter if its the gop or dnc that does it

Though the dems seem to LOVE the idea

Really? You don't think anyone could possibly in good faith see school shootings or the violence on the South Side of Chicago and come to earnestly believe that civilians don't need access to this kind of firepower?

The overwhelming majority of gun violence in this country is committed with handguns, which no one seems to want to regulate. Assault rifles are a tiny irrelevant drop in the bucket that happens to be high profile.
Quite frankly it's a red flag that dem politicians refuse to do the basic research necessary to know this before making policy proposals. Not that Trump is any better, though.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Rusozak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5991
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Rusozak » Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Diopolis wrote:
Senkaku wrote:What do you think authoritarianism is? Like what does it consist of to you?


Really? You don't think anyone could possibly in good faith see school shootings or the violence on the South Side of Chicago and come to earnestly believe that civilians don't need access to this kind of firepower?

The overwhelming majority of gun violence in this country is committed with handguns, which no one seems to want to regulate. Assault rifles are a tiny irrelevant drop in the bucket that happens to be high profile.
Quite frankly it's a red flag that dem politicians refuse to do the basic research necessary to know this before making policy proposals. Not that Trump is any better, though.


High profile because incidents with assault rifles tend to have a lot of victims. I agree handguns are an issue too, but the assault rifle problem isn't negligible. Assault rifles are made for killing a lot of people very quickly. No one needs one for self defense or hunting.
NOTE: This nation's government style, policies, and opinions in roleplay or forum 7 does not represent my true beliefs. It is purely for the enjoyment of the game.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:56 pm

Rusozak wrote:
Diopolis wrote:The overwhelming majority of gun violence in this country is committed with handguns, which no one seems to want to regulate. Assault rifles are a tiny irrelevant drop in the bucket that happens to be high profile.
Quite frankly it's a red flag that dem politicians refuse to do the basic research necessary to know this before making policy proposals. Not that Trump is any better, though.


High profile because incidents with assault rifles tend to have a lot of victims. I agree handguns are an issue too, but the assault rifle problem isn't negligible. Assault rifles are made for killing a lot of people very quickly. No one needs one for self defense or hunting.


No one? That's a pretty bold claim.

It's also worth noting that rather someone needs one isn't the point, the point is they're specifically targeting weapons which have minimal impact on murder numbers, discounting the idea that they're legitimately trying to reduce murder numbers. Which leaves us with two reasonable explanations, they're either woefully unfit to draft legislation, or they have a sinister motive for the legislation they do draft.
Last edited by Telconi on Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Steppe Khanate
Envoy
 
Posts: 277
Founded: Apr 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Steppe Khanate » Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:58 pm

I can understand why Bernie Sanders would become popular among younger people with little experience in the real world, economic populism has always relied on a sense of naivety and idealism.

I do have a question for the Sanders supporters here, when economic populists like Bernie Sanders say they will “tax the rich,” who do you think has their taxes raised?
The Steppe Khanate| Степпе Кhанате | תטעפּפּע כּהאַנאַטע
WE ARE NOT AN ISLAMIC NATION, IN OUR TIMELINE, THE TURKS NEVER CAME
Not Mongol, but a mix of all Steppe cultures
This is my 3rd nation, I used to be Jupcount a year ago, but it ceased to exist due to inactivity
I KNOW HOW TO PLAY NS AND RP, I’M NOT NEW TO THIS
Steppe News Network|Dushenger loses T. Council Seat to Uralistan newcomer Feshnork Errgosh|Khan Appoints new Attorney General, Dr. Shgon Khemesh|Khan signs royal decree to reduce heavy taxes in the Ulanbaatar City District

User avatar
Picairn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8825
Founded: Feb 21, 2020
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Picairn » Sat Aug 29, 2020 7:01 pm

Steppe Khanate wrote:I can understand why Bernie Sanders would become popular among younger people with little experience in the real world, economic populism has always relied on a sense of naivety and idealism.

I do have a question for the Sanders supporters here, when economic populists like Bernie Sanders say they will “tax the rich,” who do you think has their taxes raised?

The irony here is that Scandinavian countries raise taxes on both the rich and the poor to pay for their programs. Sales tax in those nations are through the roof.
Picairn's Ministry of Foreign Relations
Minister: Edward H. Cornell
WA Ambassador: John M. Terry (Active)
Factbook | Constitution | Newspaper
Albrenia wrote:With great power comes great mockability.

Proctopeo wrote:I'm completely right and you know it.

Moralityland wrote:big corporations allied with the communist elite
Social democrat, passionate political observer, and naval warfare enthusiast.
Listen here Jack, we're going to destroy malarkey.
♔ The Empire of Picairn ♔
-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-—————————-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-
Kyrusia's words live on forever!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Des-Bal, Fractalnavel, Grinning Dragon, Habsburg Mexico, Myrensis, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Tarsonis, Umeria, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army, Wrekstaat, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads