Couvade syndrome. Which includes anxiety, nausea, mood swing, changes in sex drive, weight gain, and generalized physical pain.
How do you not know this stuff?
Advertisement
by Galloism » Sun May 24, 2020 4:29 pm
by Gormwood » Sun May 24, 2020 4:37 pm
by Galloism » Sun May 24, 2020 4:39 pm
by Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories » Sun May 24, 2020 4:39 pm
New haven america wrote:Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:
Biden personally has been campaigning to cut welfare for his entire political career. He brags about it.
He wants welfare reform to keep people from gaming the system.
Tbh, I don't agree with the way he wants to do it, but I also don't disagree that it needs to be fixed either because it does.
by Mirjt » Sun May 24, 2020 4:50 pm
Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:New haven america wrote:I mean, that's a blatant lie as they've spent the past 30 or so years trying to make life easier for the working/lower-middle classes with things like welfare expansions, supporting impoverish and marginalized groups, trying to raise taxes on the wealthiest and close tax loopholes, etc...
For the record: This "Both Sides are the Same" nonsense was rhetoric started by hardcore Bernie supporters to make him seem more likeable and then the Right took the idea and ran with it to excuse their corruption. We've been over this dozens of times, you're only repeating propaganda, and you likely won't use an argument for it that hasn't already been used and disproven hundreds of times already.
Biden personally has been campaigning to cut welfare for his entire political career. He brags about it.
by New haven america » Sun May 24, 2020 4:50 pm
Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:New haven america wrote:He wants welfare reform to keep people from gaming the system.
Tbh, I don't agree with the way he wants to do it, but I also don't disagree that it needs to be fixed either because it does.
1. I don't know about you, but when I'm on the lookout for people who have been stealing money, I'd look at people who have money, before people who don't. 2. Tightening the tax code and properly investigating tax avoidance and evasion would easily bring a hundred times more revenue into the public purse than auditing every single welfare claimant would.
3. The US has been living under Austerity for decades, and the welfare state, as much as it ever existed in the States, has been cut to the bone. 4. Biden has spent over four decades of his career calling for cuts to social security. 5. He's not going to be the man to rely on, and electing him guarantees that the Democrats lose support that they will have to spend a long time out in the cold winning back.
by South Odreria 2 » Sun May 24, 2020 4:53 pm
New haven america wrote:Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:
1. I don't know about you, but when I'm on the lookout for people who have been stealing money, I'd look at people who have money, before people who don't. 2. Tightening the tax code and properly investigating tax avoidance and evasion would easily bring a hundred times more revenue into the public purse than auditing every single welfare claimant would.
3. The US has been living under Austerity for decades, and the welfare state, as much as it ever existed in the States, has been cut to the bone. 4. Biden has spent over four decades of his career calling for cuts to social security. 5. He's not going to be the man to rely on, and electing him guarantees that the Democrats lose support that they will have to spend a long time out in the cold winning back.
1. Which is what he wants to do
2A. Which the Dems have been for, for years. Or do you think AOC is fine with letting millionaires and billionaires keep their off shore accounts
2B. You know you can be for 2 things at once, right?
3. By Right Wingers
4. Actually, the US is the only country in the world with something like social security (Canada has a similar system, but it also goes through welfare), most other nations just fold that type of stuff in with general welfare assistance. And while I may disagree with his opinion on it, there still remains the fact that A. Most Dems support SS, and B. He can't actually do anything to cut or get rid of it, cause that would have to go through Congress, and as such wouldn't make it out of the House.
5. I don't think that's how it works, because him winning the election implies that at least ~1/2 of the voters support him.
You know, if you wanted Bernie to get picked, why didn't his supporters go out and vote for him when it mattered?
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Baja California Autonoma » Sun May 24, 2020 5:05 pm
New haven america wrote:Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:
1. I don't know about you, but when I'm on the lookout for people who have been stealing money, I'd look at people who have money, before people who don't. 2. Tightening the tax code and properly investigating tax avoidance and evasion would easily bring a hundred times more revenue into the public purse than auditing every single welfare claimant would.
3. The US has been living under Austerity for decades, and the welfare state, as much as it ever existed in the States, has been cut to the bone. 4. Biden has spent over four decades of his career calling for cuts to social security. 5. He's not going to be the man to rely on, and electing him guarantees that the Democrats lose support that they will have to spend a long time out in the cold winning back.
1. Which is what he wants to do
2A. Which the Dems have been for, for years. Or do you think AOC is fine with letting millionaires and billionaires keep their off shore accounts
2B. You know you can be for 2 things at once, right?
3. By Right Wingers
4. Actually, the US is the only country in the world with something like social security (Canada has a similar system, but it also goes through welfare), most other nations just fold that type of stuff in with general welfare assistance. And while I may disagree with his opinion on it, there still remains the fact that A. Most Dems support SS, and B. He can't actually do anything to cut or get rid of it, cause that would have to go through Congress, and as such wouldn't make it out of the House.
5. I don't think that's how it works, because him winning the election implies that at least ~1/2 of the voters support him.
You know, if you wanted Bernie to get picked, why didn't his supporters go out and vote for him when it mattered?
by New haven america » Sun May 24, 2020 5:24 pm
Baja California Autonoma wrote:New haven america wrote:1. Which is what he wants to do
2A. Which the Dems have been for, for years. Or do you think AOC is fine with letting millionaires and billionaires keep their off shore accounts
2B. You know you can be for 2 things at once, right?
3. By Right Wingers
4. Actually, the US is the only country in the world with something like social security (Canada has a similar system, but it also goes through welfare), most other nations just fold that type of stuff in with general welfare assistance. And while I may disagree with his opinion on it, there still remains the fact that A. Most Dems support SS, and B. He can't actually do anything to cut or get rid of it, cause that would have to go through Congress, and as such wouldn't make it out of the House.
5. I don't think that's how it works, because him winning the election implies that at least ~1/2 of the voters support him.
You know, if you wanted Bernie to get picked, why didn't his supporters go out and vote for him when it mattered?
1. Can you stop attacking Bernie people for not voting. I voted, I made it a point to vote because it mattered. 2. Don't attack people's opinions like this. It strains the emotion because you're being lumped in even if you went to vote into this generalization. I cared. I wanted him to win. I'll vote for Biden but I hate what I thought was my political party because if has to shame people into supporting it with fear or dislike of Trump than being decent people themselves who go to as much effort as Trump to appease his base. He'll win because his base at least respects him. 3. I font see Biden capable of motivating anyone to any kind of cause or vision because he lacks it. 4. This is what you want though, and we seem to be punished for expressing dissent against the state of things but I at least will vote for Biden even though I'm going to hate myself and feel like a fucking tool for people who don't even keep up with the Republicans. 5. I'd like to be part of a party that is united, but Biden is what we get, not what we want. 6. Don't generalize against the people you want to vote for Biden because not everyone is as magnanimous yo say'I have a 7. vote and would like to use it but I fear for minorities, gay people, Wymyn and anyone who doesn't fit into the hate filled america trump wants to make. Begrudgingly and fighting all way, I'll vote for Biden'.
by Baja California Autonoma » Sun May 24, 2020 5:26 pm
by Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories » Sun May 24, 2020 5:32 pm
by New haven america » Sun May 24, 2020 5:34 pm
Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:The Establishment Democrats rely on people gritting their teeth and voting for candidates they despise in the General, after they stitch up the Primary. It's an insult to democracy, and helping perpetuate it by submitting yourself to their extortion is utterly unconscionable, in my opinion.
by South Odreria 2 » Sun May 24, 2020 5:35 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by New haven america » Sun May 24, 2020 5:39 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Bernie’s campaign strategy is not the topic of this thread.
by Centai Mal » Sun May 24, 2020 5:42 pm
by Centai Mal » Sun May 24, 2020 5:45 pm
New haven america wrote:South Odreria 2 wrote:Bernie’s campaign strategy is not the topic of this thread.
Sure it is.
What would you like to talk about? The reliance on almost solely youth voter turnout to coast along? The flawed outreach to and subsequent mixed reception amongst Blacks and Hispanics? Hiring the same stupid campaign team that lost him 2016? Not reeling in his campaign manager or publicity manager who spent most of their time attacking the other candidates against his wishes or people who were on the fence about him?
by Centai Mal » Sun May 24, 2020 5:50 pm
Mirjt wrote:Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories wrote:
Biden personally has been campaigning to cut welfare for his entire political career. He brags about it.
Which would definitely put me and my family at risk. My mother is an elderly, deaf, widow and relies on social security. Me and my brother live off of SSDI, as our disabilities (we both have Asperger's/High Functioning Autism and ADHD, in addition I have Generalized Anxiety Disorder with some OCD symptoms and Seasonal Affective Disorder, and my brother has depression and migraines so severe he sometimes can't get out of bed) make it difficult for us to obtain and retain work, not to mention the many other illness and disabilities in my extended family.
Also, despite the conservatism of several of my extended family, I have multi-racial relatives as well (mexican, cuban, and african american descent), that I am not convinced are safe under Trump or Biden. My extended family also lives in poverty and has many children in any given household (several members of my family may live together in multi-generational households instead of having their own home and work together to take care of each other), and some members are reliant on medicare, medicaid, food stamps, and other social safety net programs.
by Galloism » Sun May 24, 2020 5:54 pm
New haven america wrote:Also, fun fact, man/woman and male/female evolved almost entirely separately from each other.
by Galloism » Sun May 24, 2020 5:55 pm
by Centai Mal » Sun May 24, 2020 6:05 pm
by Galloism » Sun May 24, 2020 6:06 pm
Centai Mal wrote:Galloism wrote:That's the other term for it, and it's a real thing.
But absolutely not what the question was about and you absolutely know it. The question was asking if there's an analogue between "female" BC treating things like endo, and male birth control. You chose to use the more medical sounding term for a psychosomatic illness, which was quite a bit sneaky
by Albrenia » Sun May 24, 2020 6:08 pm
Centai Mal wrote:Galloism wrote:That's the other term for it, and it's a real thing.
But absolutely not what the question was about and you absolutely know it. The question was asking if there's an analogue between "female" BC treating things like endo, and male birth control. You chose to use the more medical sounding term for a psychosomatic illness, which was quite a bit sneaky
by Centai Mal » Sun May 24, 2020 6:14 pm
Galloism wrote:Centai Mal wrote:But absolutely not what the question was about and you absolutely know it. The question was asking if there's an analogue between "female" BC treating things like endo, and male birth control. You chose to use the more medical sounding term for a psychosomatic illness, which was quite a bit sneaky
It's no less real than gender dysphoria, and that's a real illness that needs treatment (namely, transitioning).
by South Odreria 2 » Sun May 24, 2020 6:15 pm
Galloism wrote:Centai Mal wrote:But absolutely not what the question was about and you absolutely know it. The question was asking if there's an analogue between "female" BC treating things like endo, and male birth control. You chose to use the more medical sounding term for a psychosomatic illness, which was quite a bit sneaky
It's no less real than gender dysphoria, and that's a real illness that needs treatment (namely, transitioning).
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Imperializt Russia, Shrillland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement