MAGAThread XIX: Hambergers, Noble Prizes, & Disinfectant

[The Huskar Social Union]

I mean im a nationalist i can do that


Though im more of a leftwing nationalist so i will substitute fatherland for motherland, and throw in some slogans about anti imperialism and the brits being at it again.

Leftwing nationalists>Rightwing globalists

Im not a hardcore nationalist though so i cant commit full time to the old Nationalist Propaganda thing. 2-3 days at most per week.

[Northern Davincia]

I am really optimistic for the future of the GOP though, the younger generation of Republicans seems to be more third positionist and realizes that unchained capitalism sucks. Ron DeSantis, Josh Hawley, and Madison Cawthorne particularly, but many others as well. The old Reaganers and Trumpists will be inevitably gone from the scene eventually, so I have faith… for now

If only people would realised that fascism sucks even more than unfettered capitalism.

"Capitalists have used their wealth to gain unequalled access to government. What will fix it? Giving that government the right to kill dissidents! That should do it"

That is not where the general trend is going at all.

[Vassenor]

Kushner's coronavirus team shied away from a national strategy, believing that the virus was hitting Democratic states hardest and that they could blame governors, report says

Weaponising a pandemic to kill opposition voters and then blame the other party. That's fucking low.

[Kowani]

Kushner's coronavirus team shied away from a national strategy, believing that the virus was hitting Democratic states hardest and that they could blame governors, report says

Weaponising a pandemic to kill opposition voters and then blame the other party. That's fucking low.

…It’s like-Sunday morning Cartoon villains with these people.

[Vapormancer]

Kushner's coronavirus team shied away from a national strategy, believing that the virus was hitting Democratic states hardest and that they could blame governors, report says

Weaponising a pandemic to kill opposition voters and then blame the other party. That's fucking low.

…It’s like-Sunday morning Cartoon villains with these people.

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

[Kowani]

…It’s like-Sunday morning Cartoon villains with these people.

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

Well, most of this is true.

[Kexholm and Karelia]

…It’s like-Sunday morning Cartoon villains with these people.

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

Apparently large gatherings are only bad if it’s Trump supporters, black lives matter protests are fine. And they say their side supports science

[Vassenor]

…It’s like-Sunday morning Cartoon villains with these people.

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

So let's see your sources then, since you complained about the article being light on them. Or are you just scrambling to save your narrative?

[Vassenor]

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

Apparently large gatherings are only bad if it’s Trump supporters, black lives matter protests are fine. And they say their side supports science

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

[Proctopeo]

Apparently large gatherings are only bad if it’s Trump supporters, black lives matter protests are fine. And they say their side supports science

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

I have a PhD and a Nobel Peace Prize in Science, and I can assure you, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with people for hours is still a transmission risk, even with all other conditions optimal.

[Neutraligon]

Apparently large gatherings are only bad if it’s Trump supporters, black lives matter protests are fine. And they say their side supports science

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

Mind linking the studies?

[Vassenor]

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

Mind linking the studies?

"BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND COVID-19"

Furthermore, we find no evidence that urban protests reignited COVID-19 case growth during the more than three weeks following protest onset. We conclude that predictions of broad negative public health consequences of Black Lives Matter protests were far too narrowly conceived.

[Kowani]

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

I have a PhD and a Nobel Peace Prize in Science, and I can assure you, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with people for hours is still a transmission risk, even with all other conditions optimal.

…You realize the “Nobel Peace Prize in Science” isn’t a thing.

Mind linking the studies?

"BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND COVID-19"

Furthermore, we find no evidence that urban protests reignited COVID-19 case growth during the more than three weeks following protest onset. We conclude that predictions of broad negative public health consequences of Black Lives Matter protests were far too narrowly conceived.

Oh, now that’s interesting.

[Vapormancer]

Vanity Fair's story is very nice but it is light on sources. The reality is far darker. We could not set up such a testing plan even if we wanted to. This government can no longer enforce order or the laws so long as one claims your righteous protests spreading the disease are for saving black lives. Furthermore, we have the industrial apparatus of a third world country functionally speaking. We can't make sterile cotton swabs in bulk. That is how pathetic and enervated our industry is. But this is a much much better narrative than the truth and if the 1619 lady has taught us anything, it is that the only truth that matters is the one which is published.

So let's see your sources then, since you complained about the article being light on them. Or are you just scrambling to save your narrative?

You mean that we are pathetic and can't make what we need en masse? Or did you mean the ongoing protests as proof civil authority can not or will not enforce lockdown orders for ideological reasons despite the spread? I can provide your proof but if I go out of my way, will you just pretend that what I quote isn't saying what it is saying as you did last time? I don't want to put in effort if you won't engage in good faith.

[Galloism]

Mind linking the studies?

"BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND COVID-19"

Furthermore, we find no evidence that urban protests reignited COVID-19 case growth during the more than three weeks following protest onset. We conclude that predictions of broad negative public health consequences of Black Lives Matter protests were far too narrowly conceived.

LOL

Did you read this study?

It basically says "Yes, protestors likely spread covid-19, but because it made normal people shetler more away from the protests, it was counteracted by non protestors. This effect was increased in protests that involved violence, as it increased sheltering behavior by those not in the protests."

[Galloism]

I have a PhD and a Nobel Peace Prize in Science, and I can assure you, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with people for hours is still a transmission risk, even with all other conditions optimal.

…You realize the “Nobel Peace Prize in Science” isn’t a thing.

"BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND COVID-19"

Oh, now that’s interesting.

I mean, basically, it scared non protestors into staying home more. This effect was stronger when the protests turned violent.

[Vapormancer]

Mind linking the studies?

"BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND COVID-19"

Furthermore, we find no evidence that urban protests reignited COVID-19 case growth during the more than three weeks following protest onset. We conclude that predictions of broad negative public health consequences of Black Lives Matter protests were far too narrowly conceived.

Edit: Lol Gallo read it, well done lad.

You mean like the science saying the protests haven't lead to spikes?

I have a PhD and a Nobel Peace Prize in Science, and I can assure you, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with people for hours is still a transmission risk, even with all other conditions optimal.

Ah yes, also it is well done when you are screaming in that crowd without a mask on. Very very good hygienic behavior.

[Proctopeo]

I have a PhD and a Nobel Peace Prize in Science, and I can assure you, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with people for hours is still a transmission risk, even with all other conditions optimal.

…You realize the “Nobel Peace Prize in Science” isn’t a thing.

That was part of the joke, thank you for noticing.

[Kowani]

…You realize the “Nobel Peace Prize in Science” isn’t a thing.


Oh, now that’s interesting.

I mean, basically, it scared non protestors into staying home more. This effect was stronger when the protests turned violent.

Hey, if it works, it works. Mind you, they do note that it’s possible that among a specific demographic-protesters-the risks of Covid-19 might be higher, but there’s no actual data on that, which is something I’d like to see investigated at some point.

[Galloism]

I mean, basically, it scared non protestors into staying home more. This effect was stronger when the protests turned violent.

Hey, if it works, it works. Mind you, they do note that it’s possible that among a specific demographic-protesters-the risks of Covid-19 might be higher, but there’s no actual data on that, which is something I’d like to see investigated at some point.

I’d like to take this opportunity to note the lifesaving power of hurricanes.

[Kowani]

Hey, if it works, it works. Mind you, they do note that it’s possible that among a specific demographic-protesters-the risks of Covid-19 might be higher, but there’s no actual data on that, which is something I’d like to see investigated at some point.

I’d like to take this opportunity to note the lifesaving power of hurricanes.

...What?

[Galloism]

I’d like to take this opportunity to note the lifesaving power of hurricanes.

...What?

If we got a hurricane, it would make people largely stay home and social distance. Which would save lives.

[Kowani]

...What?

If we got a hurricane, it would make people largely stay home and social distance. Which would save lives.

…No, it destroys homes and leaves people unable to social distance.

[Valrifell]

...What?

If we got a hurricane, it would make people largely stay home and social distance. Which would save lives.

Let's not forget that a bunch of Floridians wanted to group up and shoot hurricane Irma.

[Galloism]

If we got a hurricane, it would make people largely stay home and social distance. Which would save lives.

…No, it destroys homes and leaves people unable to social distance.

Depends how strong the hurricane is. (Cat 3 and above are probably bad)