Godular wrote:La xinga wrote:Didn't I already tell you a proof a decent amount of time ago that you dismissed because "it cannot be reproduced" even though religion doesn't work that way?
Claiming that something 'doesn't work that way' is a cheap evasion. If you can't meet our standards, you have no business claiming equivalent stature.
So tell me a proof about Atheism, this time it should involve cherries dropping atomic bombs on Toyota, Japan.
You can't? Well, if you can meet my standards, you see where this is going?
You never disproved that, so it remains as a proof. Just because it doesn't meet your "standards", that does not meet it is not a proof.