The morality of casual sex

[Celritannia]

Correct amondo.

Better than me. The longest relationship I've had is the current one and the shortest I had lasted a week.

I remember that one. There was this girl named Sophia that I had a crush on and when I asked her out, she said yes. We went to this burger place and we had a pretty good time but a week later she ditched me for a methhead.

#DetroitProblems

[Kernen]

I remember when I first met the girl of my dreams...and then I met the next girl of my dreams and the next and the next and the next and the next...

...and then I grew the hell up and realized it was my dick doing the thinking and that no relationship lasts forever and soul mates aren't a thing. I've been with my current girlfriend for over two years now and while I wouldnt mind us being together forever, I don't get my hopes up.

Soulmates are a thing. And before someone starts talking about "ipsit dixie", Rojava didn't have to provide a source for his claim that they aren't so I don't either thanks.

Ipse dixit. Its Latin.

And Rojava made a claim about their personal and subjective experiences. That does not require a source or rational reasoning. It is held out as personal experience. Your claims, conversely, are not.

My Evidence professor would fail you for failing to make this distinction. Of course, he was an asshole, so to spite him, I will merely admonish you for not looking at the purpose of the proffered claim in evaluating it.

[Cekoviu]

They don't have season 4 yet though, which is an absolute travesty.

What are you talking about ? Season 4 has been on Netflix for months. At least over here.

Are you from Europe? It's not on Netflix yet in the US, or wasn't around three days ago.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

The vast majority of marriages of which I speak were about love, at least in (significant) part.

No.

Yes.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

Yeah bro because everyone owned a castle and was part of the so-called 'aristocracy' back then

Now you are taking the comment out of proportion.

But even working class people wanted to their daughter or son to marry someone respectable.

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

[Celritannia]

No.

Yes.

Then you do not understand history.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

Difference being that a hundred years ago what I am saying was perfectly normal and nearly every single marriage was like that

No, no it wasn't.

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

[Kernen]

Now you are taking the comment out of proportion.

But even working class people wanted to their daughter or son to marry someone respectable.

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

Today, respectability and virginity have little in common.

[Celritannia]

Now you are taking the comment out of proportion.

But even working class people wanted to their daughter or son to marry someone respectable.

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

Pahaha, sure, why not?
Difference is, the family has no input on what their children do now.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

Difference being that a hundred years ago what I am saying was perfectly normal and nearly every single marriage was like that

lol, no.

Most people back then married because of money.

lol, yes.

See my other posts on this.

[The Alma Mater]

What are you talking about ? Season 4 has been on Netflix for months. At least over here.

Are you from Europe? It's not on Netflix yet in the US, or wasn't around three days ago.

Yes. I just checked and here the final episode was added january 31st...
I hope you get it soon.

[Kernen]

No, no it wasn't.

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

You, too, can request sources for unsupported claims.

[Celritannia]

No, no it wasn't.

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

My friend, social history was a major part of my university degree. And it doesn't take a genius to look up the history of marriage.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

Yes.

Then you do not understand history.

How so?

[New haven america]

lol, no.

Most people back then married because of money.

lol, yes.

See my other posts on this.

Well most of your posts up to this point have been wrong, unsourced, or had shitty sources, so imma say that they're all equally wrong until proven otherwise.

[Kernen]

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

My friend, social history was a major part of my university degree. And it doesn't take a genius to look up the history of marriage.

Cite sources. Provide evidence.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

Today, respectability and virginity have little in common.

Unfortunately.

[New haven america]

No, no it wasn't.

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

You can ask for sources too y'know.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

Pahaha, sure, why not?
Difference is, the family has no input on what their children do now.

The family does, actually. It's called social pressure.

[The Alma Mater]

Today, respectability and virginity have little in common.

Unfortunately.

Well, in the old days people got married because they were pregnant.

[Kernen]

Today, respectability and virginity have little in common.

Unfortunately.

Virginity has no intrinsic value. Social desirability does.

[Celritannia]

Pahaha, sure, why not?
Difference is, the family has no input on what their children do now.

The family does, actually. It's called social pressure.

Not today it does not.

[Munkcestrian RepubIic]

Yes, yes it was.

To think you guys were demanding I provide sources to prove my claims when all I get is "no you're wrong".

My friend, social history was a major part of my university degree. And it doesn't take a genius to look up the history of marriage.

Poly degree or Oxbridge

[The Alma Mater]

The family does, actually. It's called social pressure.

Not today it does not.

Depends on the country. In many African and Asian countries there certainly is.

[West Leas Oros 2]

And? Most people today would want their son or daughter to marry someone respectable.

Today, respectability and virginity have little in common.

To be honest, those two things seem completely disconnected. I don’t see any correlation between the two, either historically or in contemporary times. Respectable people come in all sorts. Virgins come in all sorts. The two things are independent variables.