Advertisement
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:16 pm
by Communal concils » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:16 pm
Cisairse wrote:Diopolis wrote:Probably.
1) The fashion industry is dominated by homosexuals and creates a culture which allows homosexuals a spot, so that they feel less pressure to properly masculine pursuits.
2) The fashion industry promotes every variety of sexual degeneracy, most notably through an increasing sexualization of attire which leads to sexuality itself as attire, feeding the idea of a separate gay culture.
Toxic heterosexuality is degeneracy.
by Cisairse » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:16 pm
Communal concils wrote:Kowani wrote:…No, this is basic socioeconomics. Stalin failed to establish communism because the workers did not own the MOP, the value-form and commodity production was not abolished, and currency was still used as a unit of account.
The lack of equality is just more crap on the shit sandwich.
1. I don't care about Communism as a viable option for humanity. It is pointless and utopian to think it will happen.
2. I don't really care about the social liberalism that contemporary "Marxist" like to embrace.
by Kowani » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:18 pm
Communal concils wrote:Kowani wrote:…No, this is basic socioeconomics. Stalin failed to establish communism because the workers did not own the MOP, the value-form and commodity production was not abolished, and currency was still used as a unit of account.
The lack of equality is just more crap on the shit sandwich.
1. I don't care about Communism as a viable option for humanity. It is pointless and utopian to think it will happen.
2. I don't really care about the social liberalism that contemporary "Marxist" like to embrace.
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:er homosexuality is surely genetic
by Cisairse » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:19 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:er homosexuality is surely genetic
by Cekoviu » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:20 pm
Diopolis wrote:Cekoviu wrote:1) that doesn't actually increase the number of people who are gay or really even further any political goals that might be associated with homosexuality
2) increasing sexualization in fashion is a thing, but it doesn't specifically contribute to homosexuality what
1) This assumes homosexuality is entirely immutable and genetic, when in reality there are substantial environmental contributors. This is probably a minor one in comparison to endocrine disruptors, however.
2) Homosexuality as an identity is almost entirely a product of this idea of sexuality as the most important thing about any given body.
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:do u enjoy being wrong, or its just accident?
by Italios » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:21 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:21 pm
Cekoviu wrote:good rebuttal, you've showed me that my opinion was wrong and i will now more carefully consider my political positions in the future
by Cisairse » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:21 pm
by Communal concils » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:21 pm
Kowani wrote:Communal concils wrote:
1. I don't care about Communism as a viable option for humanity. It is pointless and utopian to think it will happen.
2. I don't really care about the social liberalism that contemporary "Marxist" like to embrace.
But you’re a leftist.
Yet you seem to understand nothing about leftism whatsoever.
Interesting.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:23 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:23 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:23 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:23 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:24 pm
by Cekoviu » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:24 pm
Cisairse wrote:I always felt that criticisms of LGBT people as having "no personality" other than their self-described sexual or gender identity was super disingenuous, because most people have no personality whatsoever.
by The Archbishopric of York » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:24 pm
by Cisairse » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:25 pm
by Kowani » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:25 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:26 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Cisairse wrote:I always felt that criticisms of LGBT people as having "no personality" other than their self-described sexual or gender identity was super disingenuous, because most people have no personality whatsoever.
it's not something universal to LGBT ppl, and i'd wager that more than not don't make it their personality. it's just that those who do are very visible by their very nature.
and i don't think you're right that most people lack a personality. i think you need to look closer.Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:if only that was true
it could be if you made an attempt at an argument!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Fartsniffage, Foxyshire, Glorious Freedonia, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Jerzylvania, Mystery7, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Tiami, Tungstan, Valrifall
Advertisement