goddamn individualists and your isolation kink
Advertisement
by Diopolis » Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:23 am
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
i'd be okay with that, but if people are allowed to personally own alcohol (which this system would require), i'd worry that public intoxication will increase or stagnate and we don't want that
by Fahran » Sat Jun 13, 2020 11:51 am
Cekoviu wrote:yes, teaching people about consent reduces the occurrence of sexual assault when a person is sober or otherwise working at full capacity, but the point of drinking is that it weakens boundaries and inhibits proper decision-making.
Cekoviu wrote:the kind of person who would have a tough guy "i'm okay to drive" attitude is likely not going to be receptive to shaming -- look at how defensive that type of man gets when anyone brings up the phrase "toxic masculinity" and think about how you'd manage to get them to not be overconfident in their driving abilities
Cekoviu wrote:imagine believing in gr**co-roman paganism in 2020, even ironically. smdh fahran, you're better than this
by Luminesa » Sat Jun 13, 2020 12:56 pm
Diopolis wrote:Cekoviu wrote:yes, teaching people about consent reduces the occurrence of sexual assault when a person is sober or otherwise working at full capacity, but the point of drinking is that it weakens boundaries and inhibits proper decision-making.
So men and women should drink separately.The kind of person who would have a tough guy "i'm okay to drive" attitude is likely not going to be receptive to shaming -- look at how defensive that type of man gets when anyone brings up the phrase "toxic masculinity" and think about how you'd manage to get them to not be overconfident in their driving abilities
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
by Luminesa » Sat Jun 13, 2020 12:57 pm
by Northern Davincia » Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:03 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Fahran » Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:09 pm
Luminesa wrote:I’m gonna drink (mostly iced tea) sitting by whoever I want, and if they’re rude that’s not something that can be blamed on me.
by Luminesa » Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:15 pm
by Diopolis » Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:20 pm
by Luminesa » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:19 pm
by New haven america » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:35 pm
Diopolis wrote:Cekoviu wrote:yes, teaching people about consent reduces the occurrence of sexual assault when a person is sober or otherwise working at full capacity, but the point of drinking is that it weakens boundaries and inhibits proper decision-making.
So men and women should drink separately.The kind of person who would have a tough guy "i'm okay to drive" attitude is likely not going to be receptive to shaming -- look at how defensive that type of man gets when anyone brings up the phrase "toxic masculinity" and think about how you'd manage to get them to not be overconfident in their driving abilities
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
by Cekoviu » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:43 pm
New haven america wrote:Diopolis wrote:So men and women should drink separately.
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
Actually, a lot of areas consider a woman getting even slightly intoxicated and having sex with a guy as rape on his part regardless of his possible intoxication level or area of where it happened or where they got intoxicated.
by New haven america » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:47 pm
Cekoviu wrote:New haven america wrote:Actually, a lot of areas consider a woman getting even slightly intoxicated and having sex with a guy as rape on his part regardless of his possible intoxication level or area of where it happened or where they got intoxicated.
aKsHuAlLy what about this completely irrelevant weaselly nonsense
by Kowani » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:47 pm
New haven america wrote:Diopolis wrote:So men and women should drink separately.
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
Actually, a lot of areas consider a woman getting even slightly intoxicated and having sex with a guy as rape on his part regardless of his possible intoxication level or area of where it happened or where they got intoxicated.
by New haven america » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:48 pm
Kowani wrote:New haven america wrote:Actually, a lot of areas consider a woman getting even slightly intoxicated and having sex with a guy as rape on his part regardless of his possible intoxication level or area of where it happened or where they got intoxicated.
And this is relevant to what Dio said…how?
New haven america wrote:Cekoviu wrote:aKsHuAlLy what about this completely irrelevant weaselly nonsense
It makes their points that drinking in private or seperationism isn't actually going to legally lower the amount of sexual assault during intoxication through alcohol because any sex done while intoxicated can be considered rape even if it's only slightly or was agreed to beforehand.
Come on, I expect better from you, next time you post aKsHuAlLy I expect a worthwhile point or idea.
by Cisairse » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:49 pm
Diopolis wrote:Cekoviu wrote:yes, teaching people about consent reduces the occurrence of sexual assault when a person is sober or otherwise working at full capacity, but the point of drinking is that it weakens boundaries and inhibits proper decision-making.
So men and women should drink separately.The kind of person who would have a tough guy "i'm okay to drive" attitude is likely not going to be receptive to shaming -- look at how defensive that type of man gets when anyone brings up the phrase "toxic masculinity" and think about how you'd manage to get them to not be overconfident in their driving abilities
By relocating drinking from bars to private homes, that's how.
by New haven america » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:50 pm
by Salus Maior » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:52 pm
by Diopolis » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:53 pm
New haven america wrote:Cekoviu wrote:aKsHuAlLy what about this completely irrelevant weaselly nonsense
It makes their points that drinking in private or seperationism isn't actually going to legally lower the amount of sexual assault during intoxication through alcohol because any sex done while intoxicated can be considered rape even if it's only slightly or was agreed to beforehand.
Come on, I expect better from you, next time you post aKsHuAlLy I expect a worthwhile point or idea.
by Kowani » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:55 pm
New haven america wrote:Kowani wrote:And this is relevant to what Dio said…how?New haven america wrote:It makes their points that drinking in private or seperationism isn't actually going to legally lower the amount of sexual assault during intoxication through alcohol because any sex done while intoxicated can be considered rape even if it's only slightly or was agreed to beforehand.
Come on, I expect better from you, next time you post aKsHuAlLy I expect a worthwhile point or idea.
Bolded for your viewing ease.
by New haven america » Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:59 pm
by Diopolis » Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:01 pm
New haven america wrote:Kowani wrote:…If people are drinking separately, sexual activity is less likely to happen.
Depends as what you define as separately: Different rooms, different buildings, different areas of town? Also, that doesn't change the fact that drinking in private doesn't help with that because the law still applies regardless of where the person got drunk.
Also, drunk people are really good at finding other drunk people out and about.
So no, Dio's laws won't actually do much to help in that case.
by Cisairse » Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:02 pm
Diopolis wrote:New haven america wrote:Depends as what you define as separately: Different rooms, different buildings, different areas of town? Also, that doesn't change the fact that drinking in private doesn't help with that because the law still applies regardless of where the person got drunk.
Also, drunk people are really good at finding other drunk people out and about.
So no, Dio's laws won't actually do much to help in that case.
The whole point being that there won't be drunk people out and about...?
by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:02 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Almighty Biden, Attestaltarragaby, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bhadeshistan, Bienenhalde, Bobismh, Cerula, Dumb Ideologies, Duvniask, Floofybit, Giovanniland, Hidrandia, Juristonia, Kannap, Maximum Imperium Rex, Neonian Imperium, Niolia, Pale Dawn, Picairn, Post War America, Shearoa, Solstice Isle, Southland, Souverain Revachol, Stratonesia, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, The Selkie, Theodorable, Tungstan, West Lobotomia
Advertisement