Page 5 of 499

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:55 pm
by Fahran
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Babylon Berlin is a documentary.

I've been watching that. It's quite interesting. I get why the military wanted to coup the republic so bad.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:56 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire
Italios wrote:
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote: well again by modern standards he was short, but by contemporary not.

The effect of male height on male outcomes is fairly well documented, I think — but ultimately, it's not something that affects political power. It's probably just correlation. People who "obtain power" tend to be more ambitious, height might correlate with ambition, or ruthlessness, or whatever. Who knows.

I could look it up but lazy.

oh i agree that on the second point, there probably is a moderate correlation between height and earning, although it's pretty hard to control other factors that add to earning power in these types of study. but logically, a tall person might have marginally more impressiveness or a more commanding nature which would affect income, but i don't think this is enough to translate into other forms of personal relations

this might present us with a problem - if and when the b-urgeoisie are indisposed, we may be left with a significant shorter genetic pool, which we would maybe have to take actions against
have you ever read any incel theory?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:56 pm
by Washington Resistance Army
Daily reminder that Orthodoxy is the one true Christianity :^)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:56 pm
by The East Marches II
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:
Luminesa wrote:I'm just letting you know that if you get the clap, you're not gonna be able to be admitted in these circumstances. I'm saving your health and your health insurers from both having strokes.

you have to have sex first to have a sexually transmitted disease lol


Note gentlemen how the Anglo betrays his greatest ally and plants the knife in the happy merchant's back.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:56 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire
babylon berlin owns

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:57 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire
The East Marches II wrote:
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:you have to have sex first to have a sexually transmitted disease lol


Note gentlemen how the Anglo betrays his greatest ally and plants the knife in the happy merchant's back.
we arent called perfidious albion for nothing

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:57 pm
by LRON
Nap the Magnificent wrote:
LRON wrote:Hamburg, dear boy! In my defense it was the 1980's and I was up to my eyeballs in peyote and other psychedelic narcotics. We were all disgusting then.

Anyone else and I would disgusted but tbh I have to respect the lack of fucks given

Thank you, I believe. It is important for a man to settle down!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:58 pm
by Italios
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:
Italios wrote:oh i agree that on the second point, there probably is a moderate correlation between height and earning, although it's pretty hard to control other factors that add to earning power in these types of study. but logically, a tall person might have marginally more impressiveness or a more commanding nature which would affect income, but i don't think this is enough to translate into other forms of personal relations

this might present us with a problem - if and when the b-urgeoisie are indisposed, we may be left with a significant shorter genetic pool, which we would maybe have to take actions against
have you ever read any incel theory?

the two sentences of ramblings i've read are more than enough. i know what they're getting at but i don't think height and physical appearance contribute enough to make an individual gain power solely off that. at least not political power with actual meaning, celebrity influence is a different story.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:58 pm
by The East Marches II
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:babylon berlin owns


I surprisingly liked it. It's been a while since a show could fool me.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:58 pm
by Fahran
LRON wrote:
Nap the Magnificent wrote:LRON didnt you say you visited a sex show in Berlin or something

Hamburg, dear boy! In my defense it was the 1980's and I was up to my eyeballs in peyote and other psychedelic narcotics. We were all disgusting then.

Hunter Thompson?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:58 pm
by The East Marches II
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Note gentlemen how the Anglo betrays his greatest ally and plants the knife in the happy merchant's back.
we arent called perfidious albion for nothing


Gott strafe England, er strafe es!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:59 pm
by Nap the Magnificent
LRON wrote:
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Anyone else and I would disgusted but tbh I have to respect the lack of fucks given

Thank you, I believe. It is important for a man to settle down!
Can you really have said to settle down when you have a mistress

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:59 pm
by Italios
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Babylon Berlin is a documentary.
The East Marches II wrote:
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:babylon berlin owns


I surprisingly liked it. It's been a while since a show could fool me.

lol my almost 80 year old grandpa watches that show, you people keep snitching on yourselves for being geriatric

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:00 pm
by Nap the Magnificent
Italios wrote:
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Babylon Berlin is a documentary.
The East Marches II wrote:
I surprisingly liked it. It's been a while since a show could fool me.

lol my almost 80 year old grandpa watches that show, you people keep snitching on yourselves for being geriatric
Maybe he just wants to revisit what life was like before the camps

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:01 pm
by The East Marches II
Italios wrote:
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Babylon Berlin is a documentary.
The East Marches II wrote:
I surprisingly liked it. It's been a while since a show could fool me.

lol my almost 80 year old grandpa watches that show, you people keep snitching on yourselves for being geriatric


Was that necessary? I'm routinely accused by this thread of being a turbo oldfag.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:01 pm
by Cekoviu
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Daily reminder that Orthodoxy is the one true Christianity :^)

this ^

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:01 pm
by The East Marches II
I can say with some certainty that God is English, that is all.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:01 pm
by Fahran
The East Marches II wrote:Was that necessary? I'm routinely accused by this thread of being a turbo oldfag.

Calling the truth a mere accusation is a little dishonest, Marches. :^)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:02 pm
by LRON
Nap the Magnificent wrote:
LRON wrote:Thank you, I believe. It is important for a man to settle down!
Can you really have said to settle down when you have a mistress

I do not see how they are contradictory at all, dear boy. I consider it the duty and privilege of every successful man to have at least one mistress!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:02 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire
Italios wrote:
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote: have you ever read any incel theory?

the two sentences of ramblings i've read are more than enough. i know what they're getting at but i don't think height and physical appearance contribute enough to make an individual gain power solely off that. at least not political power with actual meaning, celebrity influence is a different story.
not political, that's probably true

Shorter men VERY rarely have attractive partners. There, I said it. If anyone wants evidence when lockdown is over go outside for a couple hours and just watch people.

Genetics at work. Women aren't any more or less genetically influenced than men when mate selecting.

However the comment I just made is very politically incorrect. It's verboten. It's actually a verboten observation as well.

The topic of whether genetics plays a part in whether a person acquires political power is SO verboten that it makes me think there msut be something true about it.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:03 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire
The East Marches II wrote:
Italios wrote:lol my almost 80 year old grandpa watches that show, you people keep snitching on yourselves for being geriatric


Was that necessary? I'm routinely accused by this thread of being a turbo oldfag.
tg me, I unironically want to know how old you are

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:04 pm
by Nap the Magnificent
LRON wrote:
Nap the Magnificent wrote:Can you really have said to settle down when you have a mistress

I do not see how they are contradictory at all, dear boy. I consider it the duty and privilege of every successful man to have at least one mistress!

Fucking lol

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:04 pm
by The East Marches II
Fahran wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:Was that necessary? I'm routinely accused by this thread of being a turbo oldfag.

Calling the truth a mere accusation is a little dishonest, Marches. :^)


It is a little late for an Ides of Marches reenactment!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:07 pm
by Italios
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:
Italios wrote:the two sentences of ramblings i've read are more than enough. i know what they're getting at but i don't think height and physical appearance contribute enough to make an individual gain power solely off that. at least not political power with actual meaning, celebrity influence is a different story.
not political, that's probably true

Shorter men VERY rarely have attractive partners. There, I said it. If anyone wants evidence when lockdown is over go outside for a couple hours and just watch people.

Genetics at work. Women aren't any more or less genetically influenced than men when mate selecting.

However the comment I just made is very politically incorrect. It's verboten. It's actually a verboten observation as well.

The topic of whether genetics plays a part in whether a person acquires political power is SO verboten that it makes me think there msut be something true about it.

lol i never thought i would end up passionately defending the struggle of the short man but. i think it's really hard to make that generalization because what is considered attractive really differs wildly from person to person. like yes, we have societal norms and conventions, but these a) change a lot especially because of consumer culture and b) when it comes to down to assigning someone attractive or not, it really changes from person to person.

it's probably true genetics contribute to power acquisition in other ways. but, not more than class

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:09 pm
by Bienenhalde
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Daily reminder that Orthodoxy is the one true Christianity :^)


Orthodox Christians are fine as long as they are not the macho obnoxious types who support Putin and his puppet Patriarch Kyrill.