NATION

PASSWORD

What age should people get their first cell phones?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What age?

7 or under
8
6%
8-9
5
4%
10-11
19
14%
12-13
44
33%
14-15
28
21%
16-17
18
14%
18-20
4
3%
21+ or never
7
5%
 
Total votes : 133

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30581
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:48 am

The New California Republic wrote:Negative numbers. Throw one in the womb.


That late?

Individual spermatozoa should have a mobile phone attached to the centriole between the head and the flagellum at the moment the motile sperm cell is created.

The ovum is then equipped with a sim card, so that fertilisation allows the phone to be activated.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17884
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kiruri » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:53 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Negative numbers. Throw one in the womb.


That late?

Individual spermatozoa should have a mobile phone attached to the centriole between the head and the flagellum at the moment the motile sperm cell is created.

The ovum is then equipped with a sim card, so that fertilisation allows the phone to be activated.

What about wifi? I mean... being stuck with the data plan gigs kinda makes no sense nowadays
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:54 am

For one of those talk/text only kids phones:
1. When they are frequently away from mom and dad, ie at sleepovers or when they can go around a store by themselves while parents shop

I'd say 7-10, depending on the kid

For a smartphone:
Whenever they are
1. Deemed mature enough to take care of it
2. Have demonstrated good online behavior on computers/tablets
3. Have had a long discussion with their parents about what is/isn't safe and acceptable behavior on social media.
4*. Maybe when they improve their school grades, if they aren't doing well. A little incentive.

I'd say 12-14, depending on the kid
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:55 am

Ethel mermania wrote:When the person can pay for it theirownselves

Tbh that would be enough of an incentive for kids to find ways to make money early on, making them more resourceful in general
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Lillorainen
Senator
 
Posts: 4153
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Lillorainen » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:55 am

I had my first cell phone when I was at my first larger class trip, around 11 or 12 or something - it was a normal phone with a keyboard, and I've been extremely proud to be the first in the family who had a color display. :D - Yes, that was in the pre-smartphone era ... but still, it is an age I'd consider it appropriate to have a cell phone - round about, at least. It also depends on the circumstances and the level of maturity, so there are too many factors playing in for a generalizing statement. I think, that it shouldn't be too soon, especially when we're talking about smartphones (and yes, I'd consider pre-school age way too soon, at least for the use of a web-enabled device without parental control - I'd be fine with limited-access communication devices, though, if the circumstances require that), but I also wouldn't want to wait too long, for an early, but already two-figure age may be a good age to start learning to use these devices in a responsible manner, at least in theory. But as I said, it depends on the individual circumstances.
So yeah, I'm everything else but technophobic, quite on the contrary, but I do consider maturity and responsibility factors one shouldn't neglect.
Since Lillorainen's geography is currently being overhauled a 'tiny' bit, most information on it posted before December 12, 2018, is not entirely reliable anymore. Until there's a new, proper factfile, everything you might need to know can be found here. Thank you. #RetconOfDoom (Very late update, 2020/08/30 - it's still going on ...)

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67465
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:56 am

Aureumterra wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:When the person can pay for it theirownselves

Tbh that would be enough of an incentive for kids to find ways to make money early on, making them more resourceful in general


Why stop at cellphones? Make kids buy all their toys and video games and technology themselves.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:58 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Negative numbers. Throw one in the womb.


That late?

Individual spermatozoa should have a mobile phone attached to the centriole between the head and the flagellum at the moment the motile sperm cell is created.

The ovum is then equipped with a sim card, so that fertilisation allows the phone to be activated.


Seems the wrong way around to me. Each sperm could have a sim card, and the one that reaches the ovum fixes which company you are with.

Still let's cut to the chase and have Youtube influencers promoting the idea of having a government chip implanted in everyone.

Thumbs up, the government liked your thought
Last edited by An Alan Smithee Nation on Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:00 am

Kannap wrote:
Aureumterra wrote:Tbh that would be enough of an incentive for kids to find ways to make money early on, making them more resourceful in general


Why stop at cellphones? Make kids buy all their toys and video games and technology themselves.

Only toy should be tree bark.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:01 am

Diopolis wrote:
Kannap wrote:
Why stop at cellphones? Make kids buy all their toys and video games and technology themselves.

Only toy should be tree bark.

You joke, but when I was a preschool teacher, one of the other teachers only allowed "organic" toys in her room. She even had blunted/sanded sticks for supervised play.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Azad Bengal
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Jun 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Azad Bengal » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:02 am

i got my first proper smartphone when i was like 12 or 13. around ~13 is where i'd say kids are reasonably responsible enough to be given, i mean you cant really hang with people these days without one so teens who don't are p handicapped.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:08 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Diopolis wrote:Only toy should be tree bark.

You joke, but when I was a preschool teacher, one of the other teachers only allowed "organic" toys in her room. She even had blunted/sanded sticks for supervised play.

I am joking, but I genuinely don't approve of electronic toys for young(pre-school aged) children, and think plastics should be kept to a minimum. Those blunted sticks are exactly what three year olds should be playing with.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163846
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:15 am

Diopolis wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:You joke, but when I was a preschool teacher, one of the other teachers only allowed "organic" toys in her room. She even had blunted/sanded sticks for supervised play.

I am joking, but I genuinely don't approve of electronic toys for young(pre-school aged) children, and think plastics should be kept to a minimum. Those blunted sticks are exactly what three year olds should be playing with.

Why play with plastics when you can whip your friends with poison ivy or find strange mushrooms and eat them.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129504
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:16 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Negative numbers. Throw one in the womb.


That late?

Individual spermatozoa should have a mobile phone attached to the centriole between the head and the flagellum at the moment the motile sperm cell is created.

The ovum is then equipped with a sim card, so that fertilisation allows the phone to be activated.

Kinky
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:25 am

Ifreann wrote:
Diopolis wrote:I am joking, but I genuinely don't approve of electronic toys for young(pre-school aged) children, and think plastics should be kept to a minimum. Those blunted sticks are exactly what three year olds should be playing with.

Why play with plastics when you can whip your friends with poison ivy or find strange mushrooms and eat them.

Identifying usable plants is important for children to learn, yes.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Duravia
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Feb 18, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Duravia » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:27 am

I think 13 is a good age to get a first cellphone. Better not to make people screen addicts too young.

User avatar
Freed Bavaria
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Apr 03, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Freed Bavaria » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:32 am

I got my first smart phone when I went into high school. (6 years ago) I think that it was the right time for me as I went from going to a local school to an out of town school so the communication was really what I needed.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:34 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Negative numbers. Throw one in the womb.


That late?

Individual spermatozoa should have a mobile phone attached to the centriole between the head and the flagellum at the moment the motile sperm cell is created.

The ovum is then equipped with a sim card, so that fertilisation allows the phone to be activated.

I suppose it'd give them motivation to get there. :p
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Ghost Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1475
Founded: Feb 14, 2014
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Ghost Land » Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:59 am

Satuga wrote:Honestly it depends on the circumstances you find yourself in, if your kid has to walk to the bus stop or school on their own, give them a god damn phone. Or even if you're away for a long time while your child is still home, give them a phone. Me personally however I think no matter what a child should have a phone at least by 7th or 8th grade, mostly because I know for a fact that it's likely your kid will at least get teased about not having a phone.

That's what the landline/home phone is for!
Forum account/puppet of 60s Music.
Originally joined 24 April 2012.
All lives matter. Race, age, and gender are unimportant.
Me OOC
Awesome/Funny Quotes
Right-wing libertarian
This nation reflects the OPPOSITE of my views.
Pro: Donald Trump, tougher border laws, 1st/2nd Amendments, benevolent dictators, libertarianism, capitalism
Anti: Democratic Party, The Clintons, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, abortion, gun control, #MeToo, communism, racism and racial nationalism, affirmative action, SJWs

User avatar
Dytarma
Minister
 
Posts: 2230
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Dytarma » Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:04 am

If someone has to say, "Can I use your phone to call my mom/dad?" on a regular basis (not including cases of troubles or dead phones) then they should get a phone. That age I think is around 13-14 since they' could stay at school for sports or clubs.
Last edited by Dytarma on Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
I don't acknowledge the existence of genders and I'm pro death on abortion. All babies must die (sc).
Master Dispatch (or everything I don't want deleted)
Dytarma's Birthday
Don't know what else to put, so I'm -0.50 left and -0.41 libertarian according to The Political Compass

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:05 am

Mirial Magna wrote:I'd say when they start working, because it is actually somewhat handy to have a computer that can fit in your pocket.

So probably either 16-17 or 18-20.


That makes sense for a smart phone. A method of contacting their parents remotely is useful far earlier.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203834
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:34 am

I’d start with junior high aged kids. But check how responsible they are too.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Mirial Magna
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Feb 20, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirial Magna » Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:35 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Mirial Magna wrote:I'd say when they start working, because it is actually somewhat handy to have a computer that can fit in your pocket.

So probably either 16-17 or 18-20.


That makes sense for a smart phone. A method of contacting their parents remotely is useful far earlier.

That's what I mean.

As for a flip phone, probably once they start going to school.
Abril 8, 4020: The Republic has tracked General Grievous to Utapau! Perhaps this terrible clone war is finally coming to an end, even if we are on the losing side.

We do not use NS stats, but we do use the outcome of events.
❂Put this in your sig if you don't trust China on account of them being asshoe.❂
------------ Me and the boys sneaking into this signature.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:11 am

I think around 13 is an appropriate time. Before that is reasonable if it's needed by the kid, like if they're going to be staying home alone, babysitting, riding public transit, etc. I definitely don't think it's a good idea to place an expensive, fragile electronic device in the hands of a very small child (like younger than 7-ish), but there may be a few situations in which case it would be necessary. It's not really a big deal whether they own a phone as long as they can exercise some self-control, which is by no means a given but can also occur, so it should be judged on a case-by-case basis.

In cases where younger kids are being given access to their own personal electronic devices, I'm in favor of reasonable content filtering measures, such as by placing DNS filters on pornography, malware, and gambling content, but I don't like extremely stringent measures that invade privacy or prevent access to normal services (such as by logging all DNS requests, filtering popular websites that sometimes feature harmful content like YouTube, etc.).
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:26 am

I got my first (2003 vintage) phone when I was 6, about the same time I got my first computer which lived in my room. I got my first smartphone (is an n95 a smartphone) when I was 11. First iPhone when I was like 14, but that was more because of the learning curve of using a touchscreen.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Agarntrop
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9845
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Agarntrop » Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:27 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I got my first (2003 vintage) phone when I was 6, about the same time I got my first computer which lived in my room. I got my first smartphone (is an n95 a smartphone) when I was 11. First iPhone when I was like 14, but that was more because of the learning curve of using a touchscreen.

6?!?!?!
Labour Party (UK), Progressive Democrat (US)
Left Without Edge
Former Senator Barry Anderson (R-MO)

Governor Tara Misra (R-KY)

Representative John Atang (D-NY03)

Governor Max Smith (R-AZ)

State Senator Simon Hawkins (D-IA)

Join Land of Hope and Glory - a UK political RP project

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ifreann, Infected Mushroom, Singaporen Empire, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads