Advertisement

by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:26 am

by Loben The 2nd » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:27 am

by Kannap » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:47 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Aureumterra » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:48 am

by Kannap » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:50 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:53 am
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:53 am

by Gormwood » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:53 am
Kannap wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Sometimes the only choices you can make are bad ones. But you still have to choose.
Actually, there is no requirement to vote for either the Democratic or Republican candidate; nor a law requiring people to vote for the presidential election. So actually, you don't have to choose.

by Ifreann » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:53 am
Vassenor wrote:Ifreann wrote:Yes, criticising America's saviour, the chosen one, is nothing but sanctimony, or support for Trump, or some other bad thing. Praise Biden! He will lead America into the light!
You know exactly to what I am referring.
No, I don't. A tone-deaf and stupid remark about police dealing with unarmed suspects in everyday situations is not "protesters should be shot".
So enlighten us - where did he say protesters should be shot?

by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:55 am
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>

by Gormwood » Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:58 am

by Kannap » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:03 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by South Odreria 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:11 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:26 pm

by -SARS- » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:31 pm
Kannap wrote:-SARS- wrote:My roommate was arguing the same thing the other day. I don't get it.
It's easier to hit the center of mass - the torso - than it is to hit the legs, much smaller targets. Besides, if you have time to get an aim on said smaller target, you have time to run and therefore not pull the trigger. Firearms are lethal tools and, as inhumane as killing somebody is, shooting to maim is also grossly inhumane. Shooting to maim also leaves no room to really argue self defense or immediate action when you have to take the forethought and plan to shoot somebody specifically in the leg.

by Valrifell » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:34 pm

by Kannap » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:35 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Kannap wrote:
Maybe the question is what can the DNC do to keep more Democrats falling in line rather than abandoning the party?
Every third party and unaligned voter wants to think their vote is the belle of the ball. Yet counter intuitively they carve themselves into ever increasing intractable fracturing to the point they don't become worth courting. If you lose two votes chasing one, you've wasted your time. Spending time trying to string together the People's Front of Judah and the Judain's People's Front when knitted together that coalition is only worth half a point or a point and in doing so you ignored a larger demographic that isn't as into political hipsterism, you've wasted your time.
I'm empathetic to the third party vote because I've been doing it practically since I could vote before a lot of this board was even born. I've grown immune to the level of smug self satisfaction of my confreres as if we were the only voters of integrity. This getting into a race to the bottom where third party voters and major party voters do the dozens to see how much they can call the other out for not giving a shit or whatever misses the point, and I'm afraid its' on the side of the third party folk. Your level of purity or how finely crafted and immovable your platform is misses the point. If you want third party votes to matter even slightly enough to get that 5% (and if you don't know what's important about 5% and why its important, are you really interested in third parties or do you just think it makes you sound cool?) you have to form a coalition. I don't know who gave you the impression that elections are won by being the rightest or the most ideologically pure, it's by getting more people to vote with you than against you. If you're going to dogmatically scold major party supporters for shaming you into voting for them...well, it's not going to work for you either.
Never mind that if you're a third party voter only every four years and somehow think that's going to topple the major parties, I ask again...are you really interested in third parties are do you just want to look cool?
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:35 pm
Valrifell wrote:West Leas Oros 2 wrote:No. But unfortunately, as long as 2 party propagandists have their way, the third parties won’t gather enough support. So it’s important to fight against that propaganda.
It's not just a self-perpetuating cycle based on propaganda from the top down. If that were true, then you have to ask yourself why two parties always emerge after the end of a great political transition, even after the Era of Good Feelings when only one was dominant. You'd also have to ask why countries like Britain tend to struggle with the same thing, while ostensibly a mulitparty system, it's more or less down to two major coalitions spearheaded by two parties. Very little different from the big tents of the US.
Instead, it's the inherent workings of the First Past the Post system that encourages voters to rally into two diametrically opposed broad camps.
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>

by Valrifell » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:36 pm
Kannap wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Every third party and unaligned voter wants to think their vote is the belle of the ball. Yet counter intuitively they carve themselves into ever increasing intractable fracturing to the point they don't become worth courting. If you lose two votes chasing one, you've wasted your time. Spending time trying to string together the People's Front of Judah and the Judain's People's Front when knitted together that coalition is only worth half a point or a point and in doing so you ignored a larger demographic that isn't as into political hipsterism, you've wasted your time.
I'm empathetic to the third party vote because I've been doing it practically since I could vote before a lot of this board was even born. I've grown immune to the level of smug self satisfaction of my confreres as if we were the only voters of integrity. This getting into a race to the bottom where third party voters and major party voters do the dozens to see how much they can call the other out for not giving a shit or whatever misses the point, and I'm afraid its' on the side of the third party folk. Your level of purity or how finely crafted and immovable your platform is misses the point. If you want third party votes to matter even slightly enough to get that 5% (and if you don't know what's important about 5% and why its important, are you really interested in third parties or do you just think it makes you sound cool?) you have to form a coalition. I don't know who gave you the impression that elections are won by being the rightest or the most ideologically pure, it's by getting more people to vote with you than against you. If you're going to dogmatically scold major party supporters for shaming you into voting for them...well, it's not going to work for you either.
Never mind that if you're a third party voter only every four years and somehow think that's going to topple the major parties, I ask again...are you really interested in third parties are do you just want to look cool?
Am I, somebody who's been a Democrat until recently, not allowed to be displeased with the Democratic Party?

by Kannap » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:39 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:43 pm
Kannap wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Every third party and unaligned voter wants to think their vote is the belle of the ball. Yet counter intuitively they carve themselves into ever increasing intractable fracturing to the point they don't become worth courting. If you lose two votes chasing one, you've wasted your time. Spending time trying to string together the People's Front of Judah and the Judain's People's Front when knitted together that coalition is only worth half a point or a point and in doing so you ignored a larger demographic that isn't as into political hipsterism, you've wasted your time.
I'm empathetic to the third party vote because I've been doing it practically since I could vote before a lot of this board was even born. I've grown immune to the level of smug self satisfaction of my confreres as if we were the only voters of integrity. This getting into a race to the bottom where third party voters and major party voters do the dozens to see how much they can call the other out for not giving a shit or whatever misses the point, and I'm afraid its' on the side of the third party folk. Your level of purity or how finely crafted and immovable your platform is misses the point. If you want third party votes to matter even slightly enough to get that 5% (and if you don't know what's important about 5% and why its important, are you really interested in third parties or do you just think it makes you sound cool?) you have to form a coalition. I don't know who gave you the impression that elections are won by being the rightest or the most ideologically pure, it's by getting more people to vote with you than against you. If you're going to dogmatically scold major party supporters for shaming you into voting for them...well, it's not going to work for you either.
Never mind that if you're a third party voter only every four years and somehow think that's going to topple the major parties, I ask again...are you really interested in third parties are do you just want to look cool?
Am I, somebody who's been a Democrat until recently, not allowed to be displeased with the Democratic Party?

by Cisairse » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:51 pm
by Post War America » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:51 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Kannap wrote:
Maybe the question is what can the DNC do to keep more Democrats falling in line rather than abandoning the party?
Every third party and unaligned voter wants to think their vote is the belle of the ball. Yet counter intuitively they carve themselves into ever increasing intractable fracturing to the point they don't become worth courting. If you lose two votes chasing one, you've wasted your time. Spending time trying to string together the People's Front of Judah and the Judain's People's Front when knitted together that coalition is only worth half a point or a point and in doing so you ignored a larger demographic that isn't as into political hipsterism, you've wasted your time.
I'm empathetic to the third party vote because I've been doing it practically since I could vote before a lot of this board was even born. I've grown immune to the level of smug self satisfaction of my confreres as if we were the only voters of integrity. This getting into a race to the bottom where third party voters and major party voters do the dozens to see how much they can call the other out for not giving a shit or whatever misses the point, and I'm afraid its' on the side of the third party folk. Your level of purity or how finely crafted and immovable your platform is misses the point. If you want third party votes to matter even slightly enough to get that 5% (and if you don't know what's important about 5% and why its important, are you really interested in third parties or do you just think it makes you sound cool?) you have to form a coalition. I don't know who gave you the impression that elections are won by being the rightest or the most ideologically pure, it's by getting more people to vote with you than against you. If you're going to dogmatically scold major party supporters for shaming you into voting for them...well, it's not going to work for you either.
Never mind that if you're a third party voter only every four years and somehow think that's going to topple the major parties, I ask again...are you really interested in third parties are do you just want to look cool?
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by South Odreria 2 » Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:53 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Alternate Garza, American Legionaries, Kubra, Mutualist Chaos, Nilokeras, Rary, Riviere Renard, Socialistic Britain, Stellar Colonies, Super Pakistan, The Corparation, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Umeria, Zurkerx
Advertisement