Ah yes, the old "Bernie didn't win so we need to abandon everything he stood for to punish the country for not worshipping him" take.
-drinks-
Advertisement
by Vassenor » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:35 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:36 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Ors Might » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:36 pm
by Telconi » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:36 pm
by New Socialist South Africa » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:42 pm
Ors Might wrote:New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Fair enough. Which policies in particular are you hoping that he denounces?
Other posters have gone into detail on this before but the main ones for me are
1. His troubling positions on responding to sexual assault allegations as illustrated in the Dear Colleague letter he had a hand in writing. While it is a good general rule to treat those coming forward with accusations with compassion and understanding, there’s a difference between not being dismissive of accusations and believing accusations regardless of how few details seem to be adding up. The latter is what Biden has argued for in the letter.
2. His gun control policies. I’m going to be honest, I am not in anyway a fan of gun control. While I doubt anyone could roll infringements back completely, I could accept Biden denouncing creating any further infringements. Otherwise he and I just aren’t going to be compatible on this issue.
3. Biden is at best partially complicit in the drone strikes that characterized a significant part of Obama’s administration. While yes he has indicated more restraint in this than Obama did (the interview where this happened escapes me), I would like to see a Biden more committed to lowering the amount of conflicts my nation has a hand in.
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.
by Cisairse » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:43 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:https://medium.com/@srwm1138/im-a-bernie-volunteer-here-s-how-joe-biden-can-win-bernie-voters-6da47bbf4d52
This is required reading. If you still don't understand afterwards, you're the problem.
by Ors Might » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:47 pm
New Socialist South Africa wrote:Ors Might wrote:Other posters have gone into detail on this before but the main ones for me are
1. His troubling positions on responding to sexual assault allegations as illustrated in the Dear Colleague letter he had a hand in writing. While it is a good general rule to treat those coming forward with accusations with compassion and understanding, there’s a difference between not being dismissive of accusations and believing accusations regardless of how few details seem to be adding up. The latter is what Biden has argued for in the letter.
2. His gun control policies. I’m going to be honest, I am not in anyway a fan of gun control. While I doubt anyone could roll infringements back completely, I could accept Biden denouncing creating any further infringements. Otherwise he and I just aren’t going to be compatible on this issue.
3. Biden is at best partially complicit in the drone strikes that characterized a significant part of Obama’s administration. While yes he has indicated more restraint in this than Obama did (the interview where this happened escapes me), I would like to see a Biden more committed to lowering the amount of conflicts my nation has a hand in.
Fair enough. Honestly, I do think on point 1 we could have been a lot clearer and just have said that all allegations of rape and sexual assault should be taken seriously and be investigated, that would have saved him a lot of trouble. He could be a lot clearer now, though I'm sure he would be criticised if he did say anything about that, with many on the right, and probably also some on the left, accusing him of back-tracking now that there is a sexual assault allegation against him.
On point 3 I completely agree.
On point 2 I personally disagree. I do think that there should be certain gun control laws. I think if people need to complete a driver's licence in order to prove that they know how to operate a car safely, that it also makes sense for people to complete a really basic practical test to show they know how to load and unload a gun safely, turn the safety on a gun on and off, and explain where they can keep it safely to ensure that a child can't easily access it. That's my personal view though, and it's fine if we disagree on that. I suspect Biden won't denounce gun control laws, though I doubt he will push all that far on implementing new ones either. That might be a sticking point for you, but honestly we will just have to wait and see.
by New Socialist South Africa » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:54 pm
Ors Might wrote:New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Fair enough. Honestly, I do think on point 1 we could have been a lot clearer and just have said that all allegations of rape and sexual assault should be taken seriously and be investigated, that would have saved him a lot of trouble. He could be a lot clearer now, though I'm sure he would be criticised if he did say anything about that, with many on the right, and probably also some on the left, accusing him of back-tracking now that there is a sexual assault allegation against him.
On point 3 I completely agree.
On point 2 I personally disagree. I do think that there should be certain gun control laws. I think if people need to complete a driver's licence in order to prove that they know how to operate a car safely, that it also makes sense for people to complete a really basic practical test to show they know how to load and unload a gun safely, turn the safety on a gun on and off, and explain where they can keep it safely to ensure that a child can't easily access it. That's my personal view though, and it's fine if we disagree on that. I suspect Biden won't denounce gun control laws, though I doubt he will push all that far on implementing new ones either. That might be a sticking point for you, but honestly we will just have to wait and see.
Your points could be addressed with comprehensive firearm education starting pretty early in their schooling, something I’ve advocated in the gun control threads, but aside from the questionable ethics in making someone complete a test to exercise their rights, I don’t disagree with your concerns.
Like I said though, Biden actively refusing to go any further on gun control would be enough for me to ignore for the time being that we fundamentally disagree on gun rights. For now I’ll wait and see but I don’t have high hopes.
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.
by Necroghastia » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:05 pm
by Vassenor » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:11 pm
Necroghastia wrote:South Odreria 2 wrote:I already said I'm voting for Biden. If you'd rather bash me than help Biden win, that's your decision.
Apparently if you don't like Biden and still wish to criticize him you're part of the problem, even if you've already said you're willing to go vote for him over Trump.
But it's the Bernie Bros that can't handle anyone talking smack about their candidate, of course.
by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:16 pm
Vassenor wrote:Necroghastia wrote:Apparently if you don't like Biden and still wish to criticize him you're part of the problem, even if you've already said you're willing to go vote for him over Trump.
But it's the Bernie Bros that can't handle anyone talking smack about their candidate, of course.
I mean no one seems willing to point to a definite explanation for how he's a guaranteed loss beyond "he's not Sanders". Especially given that he keeps polling stronger against Trump than Hillary did at the same points.
And I'm not the one screeching about how people who dont support Sanders are part of some nebulous problem.
by The Black Forrest » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:16 pm
by The Black Forrest » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:19 pm
by Gormwood » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:20 pm
by Vassenor » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:22 pm
by Gormwood » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:27 pm
by Cisairse » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:27 pm
Gormwood wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So how is four more years of Trump in keeping with what he wants? Especially since he's batting for Biden now.
Accelerationist fantasy that a GOP lock on government will somehow provoke a progressive uprising and a new golden age of socialism. Nevermind a conservative Supreme Court will strike down any and all progressive laws the GOP challenges in court.
by Gormwood » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:36 pm
Cisairse wrote:Gormwood wrote:Accelerationist fantasy that a GOP lock on government will somehow provoke a progressive uprising and a new golden age of socialism. Nevermind a conservative Supreme Court will strike down any and all progressive laws the GOP challenges in court.
Also, if that was the case, then wouldn't the '18 midterm elections been exactly that? Considering the GOP had a lock on government for two years?
I've said this before, but I feel like the bernie bros who actually think stuff like that are just privileged nonvoters who actually have no stake in the outcome of the election.
by Ngelmish » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:37 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:https://medium.com/@srwm1138/im-a-bernie-volunteer-here-s-how-joe-biden-can-win-bernie-voters-6da47bbf4d52
This is required reading. If you still don't understand afterwards, you're the problem.
by Idzequitch » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:40 pm
by Gormwood » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:42 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Ors Might wrote:I still don’t understand how supporting Biden is standing up for what Bernie stood for.
Biden is a fair bit closer to Bernie on the issues than Trump is. Biden isn't Sanders, but if you stand for Bernie-style progressive values, one would think that the guy in the center is far and away preferable to the guy on the far other side of the political spectrum. Yet many Sanders supporters seem to want to throw all semblence of progress away because they didn't get all the progress they hoped for.
by Cisairse » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:42 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Ors Might wrote:I still don’t understand how supporting Biden is standing up for what Bernie stood for.
Biden is a fair bit closer to Bernie on the issues than Trump is. Biden isn't Sanders, but if you stand for Bernie-style progressive values, one would think that the guy in the center is far and away preferable to the guy on the far other side of the political spectrum. Yet many Sanders supporters seem to want to throw all semblence of progress away because they didn't get all the progress they hoped for.
by Vassenor » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:43 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Ors Might wrote:I still don’t understand how supporting Biden is standing up for what Bernie stood for.
Biden is a fair bit closer to Bernie on the issues than Trump is. Biden isn't Sanders, but if you stand for Bernie-style progressive values, one would think that the guy in the center is far and away preferable to the guy on the far other side of the political spectrum. Yet many Sanders supporters seem to want to throw all semblence of progress away because they didn't get all the progress they hoped for.
by Tarsonis » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:45 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:https://medium.com/@srwm1138/im-a-bernie-volunteer-here-s-how-joe-biden-can-win-bernie-voters-6da47bbf4d52
This is required reading. If you still don't understand afterwards, you're the problem.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arcturus Novus, Dumb Ideologies, Europa Undivided, Floofybit, Jerzylvania, Khedivate-of-Egypt, Nihil Aeternum, Philjia, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Two Jerseys, Uvolla
Advertisement