by Pacomia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:14 am
by Rojava Free State » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:23 am
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by Pacomia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:29 am
Rojava Free State wrote:When Republicans and Democrats pass a bipartisan law, it's usually horrible.
by Grinning Dragon » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:30 am
by Pacomia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:34 am
Grinning Dragon wrote:Thanks, I've already contacted by phone and email to my reps to oppose this bill.
by Stellar Colonies » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:40 am
Floofybit wrote:Your desired society should be one where you are submissive and controlled
Primitive Communism wrote:What bodily autonomy do men need?
Techocracy101010 wrote:If she goes on a rampage those saggy wonders are as deadly as nunchucks
Parmistan wrote:It's not ALWAYS acceptable when we do it, but it's MORE acceptable when we do it.
Theodorable wrote:Jihad will win.
Distruzio wrote:All marriage outside the Church is gay marriage.
Khardsland wrote:Terrorism in its original definition is a good thing.
I try to be objective, but I do have some biases.
North Californian.
Stellar Colonies is a loose galactic confederacy.
The Confederacy & the WA.
Add 1200 years.
by Pacomia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 1:46 pm
by Vassenor » Thu Mar 19, 2020 2:22 pm
by Rojava Free State » Thu Mar 19, 2020 2:23 pm
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by Gagium » Thu Mar 19, 2020 2:28 pm
Pacomia wrote:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-bill-governments-not-so-secret-plan-scan-every-message-online
https://www.theverge.com/interface/2020 ... atch-group
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/ea ... ech-online
Congress is currently using all the coronavirus news as a way to silently push the EARN it act into law, which would remove end-to-end transmission and allow the government to listen to all of your calls and read all of your messages.
by The Liberated Territories » Thu Mar 19, 2020 2:30 pm
by Mizrad » Thu Mar 19, 2020 2:33 pm
by Rojava Free State » Thu Mar 19, 2020 5:23 pm
Mizrad wrote:Possibly stupid question, does anyone have a reliable website that shows how a congressperson voted? Both for this bill and for others? I have a hard time tracking down complete lists online for stuff like this.
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Mar 19, 2020 5:47 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Galloism » Thu Mar 19, 2020 5:51 pm
Vassenor wrote:OK, serious question.
Here's the fulltext of the bill in question. What exactly are the parts we're concerned with?
(a) In General.—Section 230(e) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(6) NO EFFECT ON CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION LAW.—
“(A) LIABILITY OF PROVIDERS OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE.—Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—
“(i) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, if the conduct underlying the claim—
“(I) constitutes a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of that title; or
“(II) is considered a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of that title by operation of subsection (a)(2) of such section 2255;
“(ii) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code; or
“(iii) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law if the conduct underlying the claim—
“(I) would constitute a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code; or
“(II) would be considered a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code, for purposes of subsection (a)(1) of section 2255 of that title, by operation of subsection (a)(2) of such section 2255.
by Pacomia » Fri Mar 20, 2020 12:10 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Question: Does doing this during an emergency prove intent to "hide" it, or leave open ot interpretation that it's about the need to track people during an emergency?
London pushed for more surveillance out in the open, with less pressing need for it than a crime-infested country like the USA, and that didn't seem to damage the political reputations of those involved. Why would Americans be any different?
by Vassenor » Fri Mar 20, 2020 1:37 am
Galloism wrote:Vassenor wrote:OK, serious question.
Here's the fulltext of the bill in question. What exactly are the parts we're concerned with?(a) In General.—Section 230(e) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(6) NO EFFECT ON CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION LAW.—
“(A) LIABILITY OF PROVIDERS OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE.—Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—
“(i) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, if the conduct underlying the claim—
“(I) constitutes a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of that title; or
“(II) is considered a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of that title by operation of subsection (a)(2) of such section 2255;
“(ii) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code; or
“(iii) any claim in a civil action brought against a provider of an interactive computer service under State law if the conduct underlying the claim—
“(I) would constitute a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code; or
“(II) would be considered a violation of section 2252 or section 2252A of title 18, United States Code, for purposes of subsection (a)(1) of section 2255 of that title, by operation of subsection (a)(2) of such section 2255.
by True Refuge » Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:11 am
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users:
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
Section 230 was developed in response to a pair of lawsuits against Internet service providers in the early 1990s that had different interpretations of whether the services providers should be treated as publishers or distributors of content created by its users. It was also pushed by the tech industry and other experts that language in the proposed CDA making providers responsible for indecent content posted by users that could extend to other types of questionable free speech. After passage of the Telecommunications Act, the CDA was challenged in courts and ruled by the Supreme Court in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) to be partially unconstitutional, leaving the Section 230 provisions in place. Since then, several legal challenges have validated the constitutionality of Section 230. Section 230 protections are not limitless, requiring providers to remove criminal material such as copyright infringement; more recently, Section 230 was amended by the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act in 2018 to require the removal of material violating federal and state sex trafficking laws.
Passed at a time where Internet use was just starting to expand in both breadth of services and range of consumers in the United States, Section 230 has frequently been referred as a key law that has allowed the Internet to flourish, often referred to as "The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet".
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by James_xenoland » Fri Mar 20, 2020 4:37 am
Pacomia wrote:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/earn-it-bill-governments-not-so-secret-plan-scan-every-message-online
https://www.theverge.com/interface/2020 ... atch-group
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/ea ... ech-online
Congress is currently using all the coronavirus news as a way to silently push the EARN it act into law, which would remove end-to-end transmission and allow the government to listen to all of your calls and read all of your messages.
I see this as yet another instance of the government exploiting a case where the news is focused on something else, then doing a power grab while no one is looking.
What do you think?
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
Rikese wrote:From a 14 year old saying that children should vote, to a wankfest about whether or not God exists. Good job, you have all achieved new benchmarks in stupidity.
by Rojava Free State » Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:32 am
Pacomia wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Question: Does doing this during an emergency prove intent to "hide" it, or leave open ot interpretation that it's about the need to track people during an emergency?
London pushed for more surveillance out in the open, with less pressing need for it than a crime-infested country like the USA, and that didn't seem to damage the political reputations of those involved. Why would Americans be any different?
Well, the American culture is one of supporting unabridged liberty, to a further extent than most other nations. We see this as a statist bill that will take away one of our vital freedoms, and we're not too happy about it.
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by New Bremerton » Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:46 am
by Ethel mermania » Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:31 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Greater Cesnica, ImperialRussia, Kastopoli Salegliari, Kostane, Neanderthaland
Advertisement