NATION

PASSWORD

Legalization of hard drugs

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:26 am

Recreational drug use should not be legal, or at least not permitted by society.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:31 am

WikiPlay wrote:All stuff that is good for the economy is banned in Europe : steroids are banned, dextro-amphetamine is banned meanwhile the life quality and the economic benefits of smoking tabacco, and the alcohol are not beneficial to our economy and wellbeing.

That's something that I don't understand. Maybe someone is smarter then me but...

Unhealthy things are mostly taxed or regulated inside the European Union because we tend to have strong social healthcare programs. In many nations, taxes from alcohol and tobacco are used for healthcare. Because of our public healthcare, the state can't afford you to be too unhealthy. That is why coca cola in europe has less sugar in it and why legal drugs are highly taxed. You use drugs, you are more likely to have medical problems, you pay tax for healthcare

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:33 am

Sundiata wrote:Recreational drug use should not be legal, or at least not permitted by society.

Not sure if it should be legal, but decriminalization can really help. I agree with you that drugs should not be viewed as something completely normal by our society.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:35 am

Gunyria wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Recreational drug use should not be legal, or at least not permitted by society.

Not sure if it should be legal, but decriminalization can really help. I agree with you that drugs should not be viewed as something completely normal by our society.


Alcohol and Sugar are perfectly normal however. Despite them being argueably more dangerous to health than marijuana. Specifically the later.

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:35 am

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
People choose behaviors which lead to the condition not the condition.

Are you calling diabetes a product of "behaviours?"

It can be

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:37 am

Xianders wrote:I think this is complete nonsense.

Can you at least tell us which part of it? I can't even say if you are pro or anti drugs from your message

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:45 am

Nakena wrote:
Gunyria wrote:Not sure if it should be legal, but decriminalization can really help. I agree with you that drugs should not be viewed as something completely normal by our society.


Alcohol and Sugar are perfectly normal however. Despite them being argueably more dangerous to health than marijuana. Specifically the later.

USA tried to ban alcohol and we all know how that went. Someone already said it here, but alcohol is so deep rooted into our society and culture that people can't give it up

Conserning the sugar, we all know it is unhealthy but we can decide to stop consuming it (at least most of the people). Sugar does not stimulate your brain in such way that you need more and more to get satisfied each time. On the other hand, you can't consume the same amount of crystal meth forever and feel satisfied. After some time, you need bigger dose

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:48 am

Gunyria wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Recreational drug use should not be legal, or at least not permitted by society.

Not sure if it should be legal, but decriminalization can really help. I agree with you that drugs should not be viewed as something completely normal by our society.

While we should not tolerate recreational drug use, more emphasis should be put on rehabilitating drug users.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 10:56 am

Sundiata wrote:
Gunyria wrote:Not sure if it should be legal, but decriminalization can really help. I agree with you that drugs should not be viewed as something completely normal by our society.

While we should not tolerate recreational drug use, more emphasis should be put on rehabilitating drug users.

Yes that is true. We should put more effort into rehabilitation and reintegration of former addicts so they can be once more part of our society. Otherwise they could come back to drugs from frustration.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15697
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Major-Tom » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:03 am

Ethel mermania wrote:In these times of global panic a little valium in the water supply may not be a bad idea.


We can have a little valium, as a treat.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15697
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Major-Tom » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:06 am

In all seriousness, I'd err towards decriminalizing hard drugs, that way those caught shooting up heroin or smoking meth still oughta be mandated to take part in some form of rehabilitation, since we don't want chronic hard drug users all over the place. It's the Portuguese method, you don't slap hard drug users with any fines or criminal penalties, nothing for the record, but you have to/are at least strongly encouraged to seek rehabilitation if caught.

As for softer drugs, such as marijuana, shrooms and other psychedelics, just legalize it and strictly regulate it.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:07 am

Gunyria wrote:
Nakena wrote:
Alcohol and Sugar are perfectly normal however. Despite them being argueably more dangerous to health than marijuana. Specifically the later.

USA tried to ban alcohol and we all know how that went. Someone already said it here, but alcohol is so deep rooted into our society and culture that people can't give it up

Conserning the sugar, we all know it is unhealthy but we can decide to stop consuming it (at least most of the people). Sugar does not stimulate your brain in such way that you need more and more to get satisfied each time. On the other hand, you can't consume the same amount of crystal meth forever and feel satisfied. After some time, you need bigger dose


Uhm, you're unfortunatly somewhat wrong there. Really sugar is the most underestimated of all.

Btw weed or LSD aren't doing that.

(and i believe opoids etc and meth should probably remain restricted)

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:18 am

Major-Tom wrote:In all seriousness, I'd err towards decriminalizing hard drugs, that way those caught shooting up heroin or smoking meth still oughta be mandated to take part in some form of rehabilitation, since we don't want chronic hard drug users all over the place. It's the Portuguese method, you don't slap hard drug users with any fines or criminal penalties, nothing for the record, but you have to/are at least strongly encouraged to seek rehabilitation if caught.

As for softer drugs, such as marijuana, shrooms and other psychedelics, just legalize it and strictly regulate it.

I also believe it should be regulated in public. I mean enjoy that you are free to get high at home or in some bar but why should I inhale someone's marijuana smoke while I am waiting at the bus stop for example?

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:20 am

Gunyria wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:In all seriousness, I'd err towards decriminalizing hard drugs, that way those caught shooting up heroin or smoking meth still oughta be mandated to take part in some form of rehabilitation, since we don't want chronic hard drug users all over the place. It's the Portuguese method, you don't slap hard drug users with any fines or criminal penalties, nothing for the record, but you have to/are at least strongly encouraged to seek rehabilitation if caught.

As for softer drugs, such as marijuana, shrooms and other psychedelics, just legalize it and strictly regulate it.

I also believe it should be regulated in public. I mean enjoy that you are free to get high at home or in some bar but why should I inhale someone's marijuana smoke while I am waiting at the bus stop for example?


I do agree with you on that. Generally public alcohol consumption should also be limited. Its just anti-social behaviour and disorderly conduct.

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:22 am

Nakena wrote:
Gunyria wrote:I also believe it should be regulated in public. I mean enjoy that you are free to get high at home or in some bar but why should I inhale someone's marijuana smoke while I am waiting at the bus stop for example?


I do agree with you on that. Generally public alcohol consumption should also be limited. Its just anti-social behaviour and disorderly conduct.

Yep. The last thing you want to see n hear when you are outside with your kids is some drunk dude shouthing how nice your boobs are

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:23 am

Gunyria wrote:
Nakena wrote:
I do agree with you on that. Generally public alcohol consumption should also be limited. Its just anti-social behaviour and disorderly conduct.

Yep. The last thing you want to see n hear when you are outside with your kids is some drunk dude shouthing how nice your boobs are


The proper punishment for such behaviour should be a little public whipping. Nothing extreme or too hurtful. More shaming.

Or short of that a nice fine.
Last edited by Nakena on Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:26 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15697
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Major-Tom » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:24 am

Nakena wrote:
Gunyria wrote:I also believe it should be regulated in public. I mean enjoy that you are free to get high at home or in some bar but why should I inhale someone's marijuana smoke while I am waiting at the bus stop for example?


I do agree with you on that. Generally public alcohol consumption should also be limited. Its just anti-social behaviour and disorderly conduct.


I agree with both of y'all, unless it's a designated beach or sort of "party row" sort of district a select few cities have, I think cities and municipalities by and large should try to curb public alcohol or marijuana consumption.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:25 am

Major-Tom wrote:
Nakena wrote:
I do agree with you on that. Generally public alcohol consumption should also be limited. Its just anti-social behaviour and disorderly conduct.


I agree with both of y'all, unless it's a designated beach or sort of "party row" sort of district a select few cities have, I think cities and municipalities by and large should try to curb public alcohol or marijuana consumption.


Party row or designated destricts should of course be exempts from such regulations. Ultimatively it would probably up to munticipalities anyways.

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:27 am

Nakena wrote:
Gunyria wrote:Yep. The last thing you want to see n hear when you are outside with your kids is some drunk dude shouthing how nice your boobs are


The proper punishment for such behaviour should be a little public whipping. Nothing extreme or hurtful. More shaming.

Or short of that a nice fine.

Well, disagree with that. Punishment shall be fine in that case. I am against public shaming and here is the reason why. Imagine you lost your beloved person. You are desperate and depressed. You go to bar and you drink a bit too much to feel better. Than you don't even know what you are doing and the last thing you want is to be publicly shamed... combination of depression, shame and public rejection is the best recipe for suicide

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:29 am

Gunyria wrote:
Nakena wrote:
The proper punishment for such behaviour should be a little public whipping. Nothing extreme or hurtful. More shaming.

Or short of that a nice fine.

Well, disagree with that. Punishment shall be fine in that case. I am against public shaming and here is the reason why. Imagine you lost your beloved person. You are desperate and depressed. You go to bar and you drink a bit too much to feel better. Than you don't even know what you are doing and the last thing you want is to be publicly shamed... combination of depression, shame and public rejection is the best recipe for suicide


Fair enough.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:24 pm

Gunyria wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Are you calling diabetes a product of "behaviours?"

It can be

Only type 2 diabetes in particular can be a product of behaviour. This notion that "diabetes" is a product of behaviours falsely smears type 1 diabetics as causing their own condition through their own lifestyle, which isn't even remotely true. Taxpayers refuse to provide the supplies they need on the basis that of the narrative that it's the natural consequence of their lifestyle, and this narrative is a complete lie.

Please refrain from spreading such misconceptions from now on.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:25 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Execution should be reserved for acts that are either coercive (eg. murder, maybe rape) or severely deceptive . (Eg. Madoff-level ponzi schemes.) Drug dealing is a consensual transaction. If the warnings about the risk of addiction have failed to deter people from doing harder drugs, take it up with those who cried wolf about weed. They're the reason people aren't convinced.


We don't excuse murderers because their victims were too stupid to realize getting killed kills you. Drug dealing is murder.

Nonsense. All kinds of things people do have risks to life and limb. Drugs would be a much lesser risk to life and limb if society embraced the harm reduction approach.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:27 pm

Gunyria wrote:
Nakena wrote:
Alcohol and Sugar are perfectly normal however. Despite them being argueably more dangerous to health than marijuana. Specifically the later.

USA tried to ban alcohol and we all know how that went. Someone already said it here, but alcohol is so deep rooted into our society and culture that people can't give it up

Conserning the sugar, we all know it is unhealthy but we can decide to stop consuming it (at least most of the people). Sugar does not stimulate your brain in such way that you need more and more to get satisfied each time. On the other hand, you can't consume the same amount of crystal meth forever and feel satisfied. After some time, you need bigger dose

You were saying?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Gunyria
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gunyria » Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:30 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
Gunyria wrote:USA tried to ban alcohol and we all know how that went. Someone already said it here, but alcohol is so deep rooted into our society and culture that people can't give it up

Conserning the sugar, we all know it is unhealthy but we can decide to stop consuming it (at least most of the people). Sugar does not stimulate your brain in such way that you need more and more to get satisfied each time. On the other hand, you can't consume the same amount of crystal meth forever and feel satisfied. After some time, you need bigger dose

You were saying?

Oh boi it might be. I know I can live without sugar. And if it is addictive, it can't get you high. After you eat 10 spoons o fsugar you still know what you are doing. Try to smoke 10 pots and tell me how did it go

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Mar 19, 2020 12:31 pm

Gunyria wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:You were saying?

Oh boi it might be. I know I can live without sugar. And if it is addictive, it can't get you high. After you eat 10 spoons o fsugar you still know what you are doing. Try to smoke 10 pots and tell me how did it go

"Pots?"

You know how to vapourize metal?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Bisofeyr, Duvniask, Elejamie, Europa Undivided, Hrstrovokia, Ineva, Likhinia, Longweather, Nikolaias, Ovstylap, Shidei, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Wyrese Empire, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads