Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:12 am
Check your sarcasm detector.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
The Black Forrest wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
If it’s democracy, then the Reps are using a democratic tactic by not showing up to vote. It’s annoying? Sure. Should they show up and work by voting? Probably. But this is not an uncommon tactic.
It’s a tatic that should be nipped in the bud. If I don’t show up for a project because I think it’s a waste of time; I would be punished. Obviously goverment works different and they are safe behind “if the people don’t like it they will vote us out”
Galloism wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Why not just vote abstain then?
Because that's tactically foolish.
Imagine you're a defense attorney, and you have come across incontrovertible proof of your client's guilt, but the prosecution doesn't have it. And you have a really good shot at getting her off. Should you send your evidence to the prosecution? Why or why not?
San Lumen wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Sure but is she willing to deal with the possible repercussions? I mean, I understand the frustration. They did this just a few months ago. As a citizen I’m really tired myself of the constant imbecility of all politicians in this country and the fact that nothing seems to get done, but for all intents and purposes, this is part of these Reps jobs. It’s just annoying as all fuck.
What repercussions?The Emerald Legion wrote:
Pretty much. Yes. Republican politics works perfectly well with little to no budget.
Ok then tell your republicans leaders in your state to have their members not show up at all. Let us know how it goes.
Diopolis wrote:They’re doing their job for their constituents- protecting them from the effects of a bill they oppose.
The Emerald Legion wrote:San Lumen wrote:By using it constantly though it makes them appear as not believing in democracy or free and fair elections.
Quite honestly. Fuck democracy. Democracy is a tool to ensure freedom. Where it fails to do such it should obviously be held to account.
That's why we have these legal tricks built into our government.
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Why not just vote abstain then?
Because in Oregon, voting for them is losing. By not showing up and grinding things to a halt, the bill doesn’t pass.
The governor could alternatively send the police after them and forcibly bring them back to the floor. But that would turn them into “martyrs” to the constituents they claim to represent.
Galloism wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
It’s a tatic that should be nipped in the bud. If I don’t show up for a project because I think it’s a waste of time; I would be punished. Obviously goverment works different and they are safe behind “if the people don’t like it they will vote us out”
It's worth noting they could - in Oregon, the governor can send the police to round up legislators to vote.
At the federal level, a majority of present legislators can vote for the same thing if quorum can't be reached.
It's a nuclear option though, and rarely exercised.
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:The Emerald Legion wrote:
Quite honestly. Fuck democracy. Democracy is a tool to ensure freedom. Where it fails to do such it should obviously be held to account.
That's why we have these legal tricks built into our government.
Democracy is freedom and liberty and should never be fucked.
Climate bills do not stop freedom.Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Because in Oregon, voting for them is losing. By not showing up and grinding things to a halt, the bill doesn’t pass.
The governor could alternatively send the police after them and forcibly bring them back to the floor. But that would turn them into “martyrs” to the constituents they claim to represent.
I see but it still looks childish and downright foolish to do that.
Thermodolia wrote:San Lumen wrote:No they arent. Shutting down the government isnt doing their job. Its acting like spoiled children. How about they just refuse to do their jobs at all and not show up anymore?
They where voted in to do this. They are doing their jobs. You might not like it but they are doing their jobs
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Galloism wrote:Because that's tactically foolish.
Imagine you're a defense attorney, and you have come across incontrovertible proof of your client's guilt, but the prosecution doesn't have it. And you have a really good shot at getting her off. Should you send your evidence to the prosecution? Why or why not?
You send it beacuse it is due process.
It's also legally required to do so during discovery process.