Advertisement
by Unstoppable Empire of Doom » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:51 pm
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:53 pm
Neutraligon wrote:There is nothing particularly healthier about eating organic. There is debate as to the health risks of AGH animals when it comes to human consumption, as there has been no conclusive study (there have been studies, just not any that has come up with conclusive results). AGH has been linked to worse medical situations for the cows however.
by Neutraligon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:32 pm
Imperial Joseon wrote:Neutraligon wrote:There is nothing particularly healthier about eating organic. There is debate as to the health risks of AGH animals when it comes to human consumption, as there has been no conclusive study (there have been studies, just not any that has come up with conclusive results). AGH has been linked to worse medical situations for the cows however.
Maybe, it's just human psychology, but I prefer the ancient way of eating food, which means without AGHs.
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:34 pm
by Neanderthaland » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:45 pm
Imperial Joseon wrote:Neutraligon wrote:There is nothing particularly healthier about eating organic. There is debate as to the health risks of AGH animals when it comes to human consumption, as there has been no conclusive study (there have been studies, just not any that has come up with conclusive results). AGH has been linked to worse medical situations for the cows however.
Maybe, it's just human psychology, but I prefer the ancient way of eating food, which means without AGHs.
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:51 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Imperial Joseon wrote:
Maybe, it's just human psychology, but I prefer the ancient way of eating food, which means without AGHs.
The ancient way?
by Neanderthaland » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:54 pm
Imperial Joseon wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:The ancient way?
Without AGHs, not raw food, as I have already explained.
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:55 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Imperial Joseon wrote:
Without AGHs, not raw food, as I have already explained.
But your explanation for it - that methods of food consumption are better when they're ancient - is clearly terrible.
I mean, where are you even going to find raw mammoth meat riddled with tapeworm cysts to eat without cooking?
by Neanderthaland » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:58 pm
Imperial Joseon wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:But your explanation for it - that methods of food consumption are better when they're ancient - is clearly terrible.
I mean, where are you even going to find raw mammoth meat riddled with tapeworm cysts to eat without cooking?
I already said it meant without AGHs, not necessarily raw food. Did you read my previous post?
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:58 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Yes Gim, I am accusing you of a sort of fallacious reasoning.
Whereby you think an explanation for a behavior is justified with an appeal to tradition in one context, but find it totally unreasonable when applied consistently.
by Neanderthaland » Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:01 pm
Imperial Joseon wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:Yes Gim, I am accusing you of a sort of fallacious reasoning.
Whereby you think an explanation for a behavior is justified with an appeal to tradition in one context, but find it totally unreasonable when applied consistently.
Maybe, it's just human psychology, but I prefer the ancient way of eating food, which means without AGHs.
by Albrenia » Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:03 pm
Neanderthaland wrote:Imperial Joseon wrote:
Maybe, it's just human psychology, but I prefer the ancient way of eating food, which means without AGHs.
Yes Gim, I understand that. That's the appeal to tradition.
But you don't appeal to tradition in any other context regarding food. You don't find it a compelling argument. Which undermines your main argument. That is the point I have been making.
by Neanderthaland » Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:04 pm
Albrenia wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:Yes Gim, I understand that. That's the appeal to tradition.
But you don't appeal to tradition in any other context regarding food. You don't find it a compelling argument. Which undermines your main argument. That is the point I have been making.
This is a very odd argument for someone with a caveman flag to be making.
by Imperial Joseon » Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:07 pm
by Jello Biafra » Fri Feb 28, 2020 9:33 am
Ifreann wrote:It's my suspicion that a lot of opposition to GMOs would wither away if we stopped letting products be advertised as "GMO free", "organic", "natural", etc., unless the manufacturer could convince an independent panel that these terms refers to real, specific, legitimately and demonstrably beneficial features of their product. I bet that most people only care about GMOs because when they buy their groceries they see things advertised as GMO free and think, maybe subconsciously, that GMOs must be bad if this tin of beans is saying they don't have any.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Atrito, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, HISPIDA, Ifreann, Kannap, Omphalos, Orioni 2, Philjia, Sarolandia, Tungstan, Washington-Columbia, Zurkerx
Advertisement