The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
I'm "mad" (actually just acadamically unimpressed rather than "mad" as you put it) at historical revisionists and hypocrites. You asked a simple question and you got a simple answer. Can you provide evidence that I'm not acadamically unimpressed at them? Do think that I secretly like them?
History contains politics, some of it more than others. Either way a good historian can take an objective viewpoint.
It's physically impossible to take an objective viewpoint, due to subconscious biases and such.
Even if there is subconscious bias they're at least trying to be objective, which is a lot better than purposely giving a one-sided view. For example, a host of a political debate has his own political views and maybe he's a member of one of the parties, but you don't know that because he gives everyone a roughly fair chance to have their say.