It's Fox News, everyone in the Democratic party is a socialist.
Advertisement

by Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:32 pm

by Galloism » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:33 pm
Telconi wrote:Galloism wrote:That’s mixed. Unlike Biden’s support of NAFTA.
You don’t realize how much union workers absolutely hate NAFTA now. When Trump starts hammering on NAFTA, and Biden defends it, the union vote will collapse.
It's basically the devil. Almost as bad as gay people and immigrants.

by Pasong Tirad » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:33 pm
San Lumen wrote:Idzequitch wrote:So sticking with the status quo is better? Biden is basically a male version of Hillary. Time and again the Dems have gone with the Clintons and Bidens in their party in the name of electability. How has that gone for you?
I rather not hand Trump a second term and wipe out all the gains we made in 2018.

by Major-Tom » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:33 pm
San Lumen wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
I don't see how he would be a disaster. As Galloism acutely pointed out, Republicans could take a Manchin-type Democrat in a General and lambast that hypothetical candidate as a "radical socialist."
The dedicated Republican base, the people who genuinely believe every attack ad the brain trust at Fox pumps out like sludge, they're not going to vote for a Democrat no matter what. That's 90% of registered GOP members. They're fully entitled to their own opinions, but they're not going to change them for any Democrat.
The Republicans have lost slivers of their support, in the suburbs, in some urban areas. But they haven't lost their base. In many ways, us Democrats have lost significant portions of our base. The reason behind that is the Dems we ran. I mean, you look at counties in crucial swing states like Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, PA, where entire families voted Democratic for generations. It was tradition. And in 2016, they turned. It wasn't because the Dems swung left, it was because they abandoned the ideas of fair trade, worker's protection, and protecting Union workers.
And once a Biden's or Klobuchar's record of being identical to HRC on every issue, but even less pro-worker comes into the spotlight in a General Election, those same people from those same counties won't hesitate to write a blank check for a second Trump term.
yeah if only we ran Bernie types in every race we'd win. In that case Governor Andrew Gillam says hi

by Nazeroth » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:33 pm


by Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:33 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Nazeroth wrote:
our model does suck, i agree, but i think it's a monopoly of medical companies issue, not a capitalism issue itself.
I think there's some nuance, and I'm sure that when push comes to shove, all the blame can't be directly attributed to "just capitalism." America follows a relatively Laissez-Faire model in terms of our capitalistic policies, but capitalism is a spectrum, there are models that are more humanistic and more moderate in terms of economic policy, provisions of a welfare state, what have you.
The Insurance companies and pharmaceutical hegemonies, however, are a direct result of our specific model of capitalism. I mean, you can still be a full-fledged capitalist and still say "well, the government has a right to intervene in the healthcare sector." Plenty of capitalist countries do it, it's not inherently a socialist ideal.

by Pasong Tirad » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:34 pm

by Kargintina the Third » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:34 pm

by Major-Tom » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:34 pm
Telconi wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
I think there's some nuance, and I'm sure that when push comes to shove, all the blame can't be directly attributed to "just capitalism." America follows a relatively Laissez-Faire model in terms of our capitalistic policies, but capitalism is a spectrum, there are models that are more humanistic and more moderate in terms of economic policy, provisions of a welfare state, what have you.
The Insurance companies and pharmaceutical hegemonies, however, are a direct result of our specific model of capitalism. I mean, you can still be a full-fledged capitalist and still say "well, the government has a right to intervene in the healthcare sector." Plenty of capitalist countries do it, it's not inherently a socialist ideal.
The problem is that the overwhelming narrative is that government intervention is "Socialist"

by San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:35 pm

by Nazeroth » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:35 pm

by Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:35 pm

by Cisairse » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:35 pm

by Galloism » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:35 pm

by Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:36 pm

by Idzequitch » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:36 pm
San Lumen wrote:Idzequitch wrote:So sticking with the status quo is better? Biden is basically a male version of Hillary. Time and again the Dems have gone with the Clintons and Bidens in their party in the name of electability. How has that gone for you?
I rather not hand Trump a second term and wipe out all the gains we made in 2018.


by San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:36 pm
Galloism wrote:San Lumen wrote:and Sanders a self described Socialist who wants to raise taxes will win them?
He has a much better shot than Biden, because he’s been talking about fair trade forever.
Seriously. VP sanders was one of Trump’s nightmare election scenarios - unironically.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/ ... on-picking

by Pasong Tirad » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:36 pm

by Galloism » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:37 pm
San Lumen wrote:Galloism wrote:He has a much better shot than Biden, because he’s been talking about fair trade forever.
Seriously. VP sanders was one of Trump’s nightmare election scenarios - unironically.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/ ... on-picking
yeah because I believe anything that comes out his mouth

by San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:37 pm
Pasong Tirad wrote:San Lumen wrote:
I really hope your right because many people dont want to pay more taxes. And Medicare for all is not affordable. It would bankrupt the country.
People are ok with their taxes going up and in exchange theu never have to pay a premium or whatever the hell those are ever again. Medicare for all is affordable. If a 2-decade long war in the Middle East didn't bankrupt America, fucking healthcare reform won'r do it.

by Nazeroth » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:37 pm

by Kargintina the Third » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:38 pm
Pasong Tirad wrote:San Lumen wrote:
I really hope your right because many people dont want to pay more taxes. And Medicare for all is not affordable. It would bankrupt the country.
People are ok with their taxes going up and in exchange theu never have to pay a premium or whatever the hell those are ever again. Medicare for all is affordable. If a 2-decade long war in the Middle East didn't bankrupt America, fucking healthcare reform won'r do it.

by San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:38 pm
Nazeroth wrote:Cisairse wrote:
A decent amount of people believed that he was. Hell, a non-zero amount of people legitimately believed he was a Muslim, and a prominent member of the Republican party believed he wasn't a natural-born citizen :^)
not sensible people
this guy is a literal, self-admitted socialist
imagine if Trump said " Yes I am actually a Fascist"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anti-Byzantine Empire, Berlin and Hanover, Bracadun, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, GCMG, Kashimura, Khardsland, Major-Tom, Neu California, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Paddy O Fernature, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Ambis, The Black Hand of Nod, Thermodolia, USS Monitor
Advertisement