NATION

PASSWORD

2020 US General Election Thread IV: The Battle Begins

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you think will win South Carolina?

Sanders
27
59%
Warren
0
No votes
Biden
18
39%
Buttigieg
0
No votes
Klobuchar
1
2%
Steyer
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 46

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81193
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:34 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
And your alternative is what? You cannot please 100 percent of the people. Someone will always disagree hence why no referendum or contested election ever gets 100 percent of the vote.

Put an end to FPTP so that minorities have greater say in decisions. It is inevitable that some will be unhappy, but that is no excuse to retain a system where half the population is at odds with the other half for supremacy. Democracy should not be a zero-sum game.

What system would you have in its place/

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55566
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:35 pm

Kargintina the Third wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
It leads to the dark side.

But as we know now you can easily turn back to good as long as you fall in love with a plucky scavenger


Oh don’t bring up that horrid movie. The leaked script was WAY better then Skywalker.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81193
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:35 pm

Nazeroth wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If you understand this why do you therefore call for elected officials imprisonment and violence against those who disagree?


because individuals like yourself will surley attempt to get anyone standing in the way of tyrannical authority be imprisoned.


Im sorry but were is the tyranny and who is being imprisioned unfairly?

User avatar
Nazeroth
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5060
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazeroth » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:36 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
because individuals like yourself will surley attempt to get anyone standing in the way of tyrannical authority be imprisoned.


Im sorry but were is the tyranny and who is being imprisioned unfairly?


If he were to make such calls he would be imprisoned, something I'm sure you would agree with.
Comically Evil Member of the Anti-Democracy League
Government: Tyrannical Feudal Despotism
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you..."
"The meek will inherit nothing..."
"Behold and despair fools"
"We will sail to a billion worlds...we will sail until every light has been extinguished"

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:36 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:So, I see there was another poll released in NH today. The breakdown:

Sanders 29%
Biden 22%
Warren 16%
Buttigieg 10%
Klobuchar 5%

No one else got above 5%. This confirms other trends we have seen: Sanders continues to lead although the rest behind him seems to be up in the air. For Biden, he has maintained somewhere around 14-17% so this is a poll he's doing better in. Same for Warren, who has seen her support range from 10-13%. Buttigieg on the other hand, sees a big drop from his 15-18% range. Needless to say, Sanders is likely to win there. The question, can he win in Iowa, and bigly too? Because if so, his chances of winning go up.

And Democrats will blow a winnable election

They will do that anyway.
San Lumen wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:Put an end to FPTP so that minorities have greater say in decisions. It is inevitable that some will be unhappy, but that is no excuse to retain a system where half the population is at odds with the other half for supremacy. Democracy should not be a zero-sum game.

What system would you have in its place/

Parliamentary legislature with ranked voter choice. The Speaker of the House would effectively be Prime Minister. A semi-presidential republic, if you will.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81193
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:38 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:And Democrats will blow a winnable election

They will do that anyway.
San Lumen wrote:What system would you have in its place/

Parliamentary legislature with ranked voter choice. The Speaker of the House would effectively be Prime Minister. A semi-presidential republic, if you will.

Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.

But by your logic no system is fair because someone voted for the person or persons who lost therefore they are not represented by them.
Last edited by San Lumen on Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:41 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:They will do that anyway.

Parliamentary legislature with ranked voter choice. The Speaker of the House would effectively be Prime Minister. A semi-presidential republic, if you will.

Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.

But by your logic no system is fair because someone voted for the person or persons who lost therefore they are not represented by them.

I am not seeking a "fair" system, but a fairer system where less people are left out. Sanders is electable as far as Democrats go.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55566
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:42 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.

But by your logic no system is fair because someone voted for the person or persons who lost therefore they are not represented by them.

I am not seeking a "fair" system, but a fairer system where less people are left out. Sanders is electable as far as Democrats go.

Who is being left out?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Necroghastia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9587
Founded: May 11, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Necroghastia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:42 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:They will do that anyway.

Parliamentary legislature with ranked voter choice. The Speaker of the House would effectively be Prime Minister. A semi-presidential republic, if you will.

Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.

But by your logic no system is fair because someone voted for the person or persons who lost therefore they are not represented by them.

You mixed up Sanders' and Biden's names, methinks.
The Land of Spooky Scary Skeletons!

Pronouns: she/her

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:44 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:I am not seeking a "fair" system, but a fairer system where less people are left out. Sanders is electable as far as Democrats go.

Who is being left out?

With FPTP, 49% of the population at most.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81193
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:44 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.

But by your logic no system is fair because someone voted for the person or persons who lost therefore they are not represented by them.

I am not seeking a "fair" system, but a fairer system where less people are left out. Sanders is electable as far as Democrats go.

Lets have an election for Governor. In RCV or IRV which if im not mistaken is very similar if not the same thing lets say after the ballots are counted one person gets 50 percent of the vote. Under that system they win outright and no more counting is done. is that fair to you?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:47 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Who said anything about a plot? I understand he was elected, It isn't difficult for me to grasp seeing as I've grasped it continuously over the preceding decades since I was taught basic civics in school.

I don't know Inslee's beliefs.


If you understand this why do you therefore call for elected officials imprisonment and violence against those who disagree?


Because the electoral system has naught to do with the elected official being scum.

I don't advocate for violence against people who disagree, I advocate for people who advocate for evil policy to have their franchise stripped.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81193
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:47 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If you understand this why do you therefore call for elected officials imprisonment and violence against those who disagree?


Because the electoral system has naught to do with the elected official being scum.

I don't advocate for violence against people who disagree, I advocate for people who advocate for evil policy to have their franchise stripped.


So in other words anyone who disagrees with you should not be allowed to vote.

User avatar
United States of Devonta
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6164
Founded: Sep 20, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby United States of Devonta » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Because the electoral system has naught to do with the elected official being scum.

I don't advocate for violence against people who disagree, I advocate for people who advocate for evil policy to have their franchise stripped.


So in other words anyone who disagrees with you should not be allowed to vote.


Can we not go through with this again, its settled, Telconi hates Democracy and anyone with an opposing opinion.
US Air Force E-4
Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan

Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25682
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:55 pm

San Lumen wrote:Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.


you have the political instincts of a sea cucumber

Northern Davincia wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:Who is being left out?

With FPTP, 49% of the population at most.

I'm on board w a semi-presidential system tbh, it always blows my fucking mind that people like and want to stick with FPTP
night shift staph

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:55 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Because the electoral system has naught to do with the elected official being scum.

I don't advocate for violence against people who disagree, I advocate for people who advocate for evil policy to have their franchise stripped.


So in other words anyone who disagrees with you should not be allowed to vote.


For probably the four thousandth time, no. But alas, I think this is never going to end.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:57 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:I am not seeking a "fair" system, but a fairer system where less people are left out. Sanders is electable as far as Democrats go.

Lets have an election for Governor. In RCV or IRV which if im not mistaken is very similar if not the same thing lets say after the ballots are counted one person gets 50 percent of the vote. Under that system they win outright and no more counting is done. is that fair to you?

Sure. At the very least, it narrows down the ballot to those most acceptable to the people. The real benefits of RCV comes in legislatures, not executives.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55566
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:58 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:Who is being left out?

With FPTP, 49% of the population at most.


Oh I understand now. Yea. I have never been comfortable with that one.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:59 pm

Senkaku wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Sanders is unelectable. Biden would win in my view but Democrats seem keen on shooting themselves in the foot.


you have the political instincts of a sea cucumber

Northern Davincia wrote:With FPTP, 49% of the population at most.

I'm on board w a semi-presidential system tbh, it always blows my fucking mind that people like and want to stick with FPTP

FPTP is simple, that is why people like it. Many people are willing to accept things that hurt them as long as it makes sense to them.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10940
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:01 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:So, I see there was another poll released in NH today. The breakdown:

Sanders 29%
Biden 22%
Warren 16%
Buttigieg 10%
Klobuchar 5%

No one else got above 5%. This confirms other trends we have seen: Sanders continues to lead although the rest behind him seems to be up in the air. For Biden, he has maintained somewhere around 14-17% so this is a poll he's doing better in. Same for Warren, who has seen her support range from 10-13%. Buttigieg on the other hand, sees a big drop from his 15-18% range. Needless to say, Sanders is likely to win there. The question, can he win in Iowa, and bigly too? Because if so, his chances of winning go up.

And Democrats will blow a winnable election


Not in NH they won't at least: Trump is not popular there. Of course, Sanders is viewed more of a risk for the General but, we should remind ourselves the Republicans took that same risk too, and won. Not that I think Sanders will face significant challenges in places like Florida or Ohio, but I do think he has a decent shot at winning if he can turn the economic argument against Trump.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:03 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:With FPTP, 49% of the population at most.


Oh I understand now. Yea. I have never been comfortable with that one.


I think the most effective way of addressing this is robust protections. The 49% losing wouldn't be in such a hard place if they knew their well-being was effectively protected.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53322
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:06 pm

Zurkerx wrote:
San Lumen wrote:And Democrats will blow a winnable election


Not in NH they won't at least: Trump is not popular there. Of course, Sanders is viewed more of a risk for the General but, we should remind ourselves the Republicans took that same risk too, and won. Not that I think Sanders will face significant challenges in places like Florida or Ohio, but I do think he has a decent shot at winning if he can turn the economic argument against Trump.


The big concern with Sanders imo is that Trump could dumb a lot of his ideas down to "Bernie is gonna raise your taxes, and it's not gonna be just a little bit okay, he's gonna raise them a lot." and just hammer him on things like that.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Nazeroth
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5060
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazeroth » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:07 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
Not in NH they won't at least: Trump is not popular there. Of course, Sanders is viewed more of a risk for the General but, we should remind ourselves the Republicans took that same risk too, and won. Not that I think Sanders will face significant challenges in places like Florida or Ohio, but I do think he has a decent shot at winning if he can turn the economic argument against Trump.


The big concern with Sanders imo is that Trump could dumb a lot of his ideas down to "Bernie is gonna raise your taxes, and it's not gonna be just a little bit okay, he's gonna raise them a lot." and just hammer him on things like that.


oh Trump will eat him alive on the debate stage with that stuff
Comically Evil Member of the Anti-Democracy League
Government: Tyrannical Feudal Despotism
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you..."
"The meek will inherit nothing..."
"Behold and despair fools"
"We will sail to a billion worlds...we will sail until every light has been extinguished"

User avatar
Kargintina the Third
Senator
 
Posts: 4070
Founded: Dec 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Kargintina the Third » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:09 pm

Nazeroth wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The big concern with Sanders imo is that Trump could dumb a lot of his ideas down to "Bernie is gonna raise your taxes, and it's not gonna be just a little bit okay, he's gonna raise them a lot." and just hammer him on things like that.


oh Trump will eat him alive on the debate stage with that stuff

Biden is so think skinned he would get slaughtered on the debate stage. Trump just has to call him sleepy joe once during a silent period and Biden will melt into the stage.
Representative Earl Tenson (R-MT-All)

Senate candidate Christina Mudale (R-AL)

Senator Nickolai Dernilski (D-OH)

Houston Mayor Harold Baines (D-TX)

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25682
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:10 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
Not in NH they won't at least: Trump is not popular there. Of course, Sanders is viewed more of a risk for the General but, we should remind ourselves the Republicans took that same risk too, and won. Not that I think Sanders will face significant challenges in places like Florida or Ohio, but I do think he has a decent shot at winning if he can turn the economic argument against Trump.


The big concern with Sanders imo is that Trump could dumb a lot of his ideas down to "Bernie is gonna raise your taxes, and it's not gonna be just a little bit okay, he's gonna raise them a lot." and just hammer him on things like that.

Those are also things he would say about every other Democrat lol

the problem with constantly crying socialism with Obama and Clinton is now that you actually have a socialist in the game, the outrage can't get cranked up much further about it :p
night shift staph

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Astaziaa, Bendary, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Past beans, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads