NATION

PASSWORD

2020 US General Election Thread IV: The Battle Begins

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you think will win South Carolina?

Sanders
27
59%
Warren
0
No votes
Biden
18
39%
Buttigieg
0
No votes
Klobuchar
1
2%
Steyer
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 46

User avatar
Imperial Joseon
Minister
 
Posts: 2920
Founded: Dec 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:39 am

Corrian wrote:Probably Buttigieg, even though he's disappointing.


Yeah, Biden and Buttigieg have polarizing policies, sadly enough.
Champions - Sporting World Cup 10 (U-18),

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:45 am

Sougra wrote:
Corrian wrote:His went up, then dropped, and Buttigieg went up.

Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).


Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Imperial Joseon
Minister
 
Posts: 2920
Founded: Dec 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:48 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).


Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.


It's basically Sanders versus Biden.
Champions - Sporting World Cup 10 (U-18),

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:51 am

Imperial Joseon wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.


It's basically Sanders versus Biden.


I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Imperial Joseon
Minister
 
Posts: 2920
Founded: Dec 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:53 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.


You didn't say that; I said that.
Champions - Sporting World Cup 10 (U-18),

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:59 am

Imperial Joseon wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.


You didn't say that; I said that.


Ah. Well I agree that despite a terrible start, Biden is the most likely to arrive at the Convention in second place.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Sougra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 664
Founded: Mar 20, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sougra » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:01 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).


Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

I don't think it was an outlier. I think that him spending a lot of time, money, and resources in there, (as well as, to my knowledge, being one of the few, if not the only one with TV ads near the end of the day of the caucus in a state that has a lot of old people) made it so that he cemented himself as enough people's first or second option to end up in essentially a tie with Bernie. That momentum carried over to New Hampshire, as well as both being very white states which he does well in.

Sanders probably shouldn't see him as a threat. I think his biggest threats right now are Biden (in some Super Tuesday states), but especially Bloomberg. However, he needs to make sure that he gets a majority of delegates and not just a plurality, so that nothing happens at the convention as well as inspiring confidence in the voters that he can win big.
"Nobody here on NSG is sane, including me."



Just in case, often when I discuss something, it's under the pretense of the Socratic Method or the devil's advocate, so just know that I don't always advocate for what I'm saying. Thank you.

Also, I have a habit of editing posts soon after they're made to correct minor errors. Please be aware of that.

User avatar
Imperial Joseon
Minister
 
Posts: 2920
Founded: Dec 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:02 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Imperial Joseon wrote:
You didn't say that; I said that.


Ah. Well I agree that despite a terrible start, Biden is the most likely to arrive at the Convention in second place.


Honestly, I've admired Biden, ever since he was the VP for the Obama administration, although that doesn't mean I support Biden all the way. Sanders is the guy for me.
Champions - Sporting World Cup 10 (U-18),

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:54 am

Is Iowa still counting? :P

Well done Nevada, way to show America how to do a Caucus!
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Sougra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 664
Founded: Mar 20, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sougra » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:58 am

Shofercia wrote:Is Iowa still counting? :P

Well done Nevada, way to show America how to do a Caucus!

Iowa may as well have been the same day as South Carolina, Super Tuesday, or even further considering how long it'll take them to count everything.

Nevada could've done better, but they at least saved themselves from being an utter embarrassment.
"Nobody here on NSG is sane, including me."



Just in case, often when I discuss something, it's under the pretense of the Socratic Method or the devil's advocate, so just know that I don't always advocate for what I'm saying. Thank you.

Also, I have a habit of editing posts soon after they're made to correct minor errors. Please be aware of that.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:58 am

Shofercia wrote:Is Iowa still counting? :P


Re-counting, yes.

Well done Nevada, way to show America how to do a Caucus!


It's not Election Night standard tho. Stopped at 50% counted and I think they've gone home for the night.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16832
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:16 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Imperial Joseon wrote:
It's basically Sanders versus Biden.


I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.


No, but if Sanders has a strong plurality when the Democratic Convention starts, there will be a popular mandate for him to get the nomination.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6334
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:24 am

Shofercia wrote:Is Iowa still counting? :P

I swear, the election's going to be over when Iowa finishes their damn recount.
One of these days, I'm going to burst a blood vessel in my brain.

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16873
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:28 am

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).


Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support. Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.
Retirement Announcement
I'm temporarily permanently retired from NSG. Maybe.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:29 am

Page wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.


No, but if Sanders has a strong plurality when the Democratic Convention starts, there will be a popular mandate for him to get the nomination.


I don't put a lot of stock in First Past The Post. The strength of the mandate, imo, depends on percentage for Sanders, percentage for the second runner, and the margin between those.

If Sanders is over 40% and no-one else over 25% then I think the popular mandate will prevail.

If it's like 35% and a contender at 30% I think there will be a quite different sentiment. One of "the base isn't behind either of these, we need to start over" which will be done with a series of votes at the convention. Of course Sanders will still be in it, and of course he might win that way.

It's important to remember that the votes the DNC can directly influence are only the automatic delegates. Most of the delegates (and certainly those necessary to get from 30% to 51%) are delegates chosen by the candidates.
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:39 am

Idzequitch wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support.


This is from exit polls? I haven't read that yet.

Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.


Well OK. You're not disagreeing with me much at all. Among "the field" behind Sanders someone necessarily must be leader, and it's Buttigieg, but despite his good showings in the first two contests he is not uniting the non-Sanders vote. If he was, he'd have at least come second tonight. And that's what I meant by "not a threat" to Sanders.

In another sense, of keeping Sanders from getting an outright majority of delegates ... everyone is a threat.

Could Buttigieg become the nominee? Primaries so far say Sure. Polling disagrees. Super Tuesday will tell!
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6067
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Juristonia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:49 am

Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.

It's kind of ironic how much time he keeps spending on calling Sanders toxic and divisive.
Damn the man! Save the Empire!
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11553
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:44 am

The next rodeo is South Carolina, which will probably be a good state for Biden as SC has a large black population and he generally polls well in that demographic. Still, Sanders is closing the gap in polling there and his win in Nevada might help push him ahead.
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
United States of Devonta
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6164
Founded: Sep 20, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby United States of Devonta » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:16 am

Idzequitch wrote:
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.

Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support. Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.


Comoared to Sanders number with Latinos he did piss poor. And w/ blacks he got a total of 2% of the vote. That doesent sit well with SC.
Last edited by United States of Devonta on Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
US Air Force E-4
Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan

Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

User avatar
United States of Devonta
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6164
Founded: Sep 20, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby United States of Devonta » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:18 am

Juristonia wrote:
Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.

It's kind of ironic how much time he keeps spending on calling Sanders toxic and divisive.


His concession speech was just toxic
US Air Force E-4
Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan

Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11653
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:43 am

Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.

"We need someone who can unite the party, which is why we should choose someone other than the person who's gotten the most votes in every state so far."

User avatar
Unstoppable Empire of Doom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1798
Founded: Dec 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Unstoppable Empire of Doom » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:59 am

United States of Devonta wrote:
Idzequitch wrote:See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support. Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.


Comoared to Sanders number with Latinos he did piss poor. And w/ blacks he got a total of 2% of the vote. That doesent sit well with SC.

Buttigieg has taken virtually no advertisements in sc. Sanders has.

Democrats are going to have a tough election after this primary as their platform has shifted so much from their traditional base. Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.
Whoever said "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink" has clearly never drown a horse.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:02 am

Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:
United States of Devonta wrote:
Comoared to Sanders number with Latinos he did piss poor. And w/ blacks he got a total of 2% of the vote. That doesent sit well with SC.

Buttigieg has taken virtually no advertisements in sc. Sanders has.

Democrats are going to have a tough election after this primary as their platform has shifted so much from their traditional base. Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.


Write in Clinton. The betting markets say she has a 6% chance of the nomination!!
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:09 am

Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.


Exactly. The 'choosing which public toilet to use' is a political cliche but this time it really does look messy. How much do MAGA hats cost nowadays? Asking for a friend..
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Nobel Hobos 2
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14114
Founded: Dec 04, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:18 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.


Exactly. The 'choosing which public toilet to use' is a political cliche but this time it really does look messy. How much do MAGA hats cost nowadays? Asking for a friend..


Seriously now, would you vote Hillary Clinton ahead of the current field?
I report offenses if and only if they are crimes.
No footwear industry: citizens cannot afford new shoes.
High rate of Nobel prizes and other academic achievements.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Astaziaa, Bendary, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Past beans, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads