Corrian wrote:Probably Buttigieg, even though he's disappointing.
Yeah, Biden and Buttigieg have polarizing policies, sadly enough.
Advertisement

by Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:39 am
Corrian wrote:Probably Buttigieg, even though he's disappointing.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:45 am

by Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:48 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:51 am
Imperial Joseon wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.
It's basically Sanders versus Biden.

by Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:53 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I didn't say that. It's Sanders vs. Everyone. This is NOT a first past the post race, however much Sanders wishes it was.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:59 am

by Sougra » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:01 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

by Imperial Joseon » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:02 am
by Shofercia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:54 am

by Sougra » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:58 am

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:58 am
Shofercia wrote:Is Iowa still counting?![]()
Well done Nevada, way to show America how to do a Caucus!

by Page » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:16 am

by Idzequitch » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:28 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Sougra wrote:Yep. As for Buttigieg, if you're supporting Sanders, you want him to end up below 15% so he doesn't get delegates (at least, that's how I understand the rules working out).
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:29 am

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:39 am
Idzequitch wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.
See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support.
Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.

by Juristonia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:49 am
Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Philjia » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:44 am
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

by United States of Devonta » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:16 am
Idzequitch wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Buttigieg will get delegates. Because he will get 15+ in at least one of the four congressional districts. District 2 should give him 2 delegates, district 4 should give him 1. Then a couple of at-large. It's really not much from a pool of 36 delegates.
Considering the polls, I think of Buttigieg's result in Iowa as an outlier. At most, a warning about midwestern rural states still to come. He notably failed to carry through in New Hampshire and now he's done badly in Nevada. Not saying he's finished, but that Sanders shouldn't see him as a threat.
See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support. Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.
Ask Devonta a Question/Embassy ProgramUS Air Force E-4Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan
Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

by United States of Devonta » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:18 am
Juristonia wrote:Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.
It's kind of ironic how much time he keeps spending on calling Sanders toxic and divisive.
Ask Devonta a Question/Embassy ProgramUS Air Force E-4Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan
Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

by Pasong Tirad » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:43 am
Kruiven wrote:Lmao Pete is using his whole speech to rail against Sanders. He keeps using the talking point can't nominate a factional candidate which is extremely funny given Sanders won almost every category of voters today.

by Unstoppable Empire of Doom » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:59 am
United States of Devonta wrote:Idzequitch wrote:See, I think opposite here. Buttigieg did well in Iowa, and then he followed up with a surge in NH. He didn't win of course, but he was not polling second there before Iowa. Now he's pulling 15% from a state where he was supposed to struggle due to lack of appeal to minorities, and mostly polled in single digits, and he actually got a reasonable amount of Hispanic support. Among those in the moderate lane, I'd say Buttigieg is the only one who's trending in a positive direction. I don't think he'll have enough to stop Sanders. Frankly I don't think anyone will. But he may actually have the best shot of anyone at this point. The real test will be whether he can pull out anything resembling a decent showing in SC.
Comoared to Sanders number with Latinos he did piss poor. And w/ blacks he got a total of 2% of the vote. That doesent sit well with SC.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:02 am
Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:United States of Devonta wrote:
Comoared to Sanders number with Latinos he did piss poor. And w/ blacks he got a total of 2% of the vote. That doesent sit well with SC.
Buttigieg has taken virtually no advertisements in sc. Sanders has.
Democrats are going to have a tough election after this primary as their platform has shifted so much from their traditional base. Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:09 am
Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.

by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:18 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:Going over the differences between them has left me massively disappointed as I dont see a single moderate candidate.
Exactly. The 'choosing which public toilet to use' is a political cliche but this time it really does look messy. How much do MAGA hats cost nowadays? Asking for a friend..
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Astaziaa, Bendary, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Past beans, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Yasuragi
Advertisement