NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread XII: The Lockdown

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the UK Take a Harder Line Against Russia on the Basis of the ISC Report?

Yes
56
67%
No
14
17%
No *vote amended by GRU*
13
16%
 
Total votes : 83

User avatar
Chan Island
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6824
Founded: Nov 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chan Island » Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:24 am

Vassenor wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Opinium Poll, 8-9 July 2020, as a general election:
uk politics reddit thread

Changes:

CON: 322 (-43)
LAB: 248 (+46)
SNP: 50 (+2)
L-DEM: 6 (-5)
GRN: 1 (-)
PLAID: 4 (-)
SPKR: 1 (-)

Seat Changes:

Seat changes:

Conservative to Labour:

Aberconwy

Birmingham Northfield

Blyth Valley

Bolton North East

Bridgend

Burnley

Bury North

Bury South

Chingford and Woodford Green

Chipping Barnet

Clwyd South

Darlington

Delyn

Derby North

Dewsbury

Don Valley

North West Durham

Gedling

Hastings and Rye

Hendon

Heywood and Middleton

High Peak

Hyndburn

Keighley

Kensington

Leigh

Lincoln

Peterborough

Pudsey

Reading West

Redcar

Rother Valley

Sedgefield

Southport

Stoke-on-Trent Central

Stroud

Truro and Falmouth

Vale of Clwyd

Wakefield

Warrington South

Watford

West Bromwich East

Wolverhampton South West

Wrexham

Wycombe

Ynys Mon

Liberal Democrat to SNP:

Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross

Edinburgh West

North East Fife

Orkney and Shetland

SNP to Conservative:

Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock

Gordon

Liberal Democrat to Conservative:

Westmorland and Lonsdale


This is the last post i made about Opinium Polls for 18th June if you want to compare the results:


But I thought we were supposed to be on for eternal Tory rule.


Considering the Tories are still the largest party in that poll, that is still holding true.

Also, looking at that- if Tim Farron was to lose his seat that would actually be somewhat sad. Especially to a Tory.
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=513597&p=39401766#p39401766
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18405
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Celritannia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:30 am

Chan Island wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
But I thought we were supposed to be on for eternal Tory rule.


Considering the Tories are still the largest party in that poll, that is still holding true.

Also, looking at that- if Tim Farron was to lose his seat that would actually be somewhat sad. Especially to a Tory.


It would at least lead to a better opposition front between Labour and the SNP.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist

User avatar
Agarntrop
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9845
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Agarntrop » Sun Jul 12, 2020 10:38 am

Chan Island wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
But I thought we were supposed to be on for eternal Tory rule.


Considering the Tories are still the largest party in that poll, that is still holding true.

Also, looking at that- if Tim Farron was to lose his seat that would actually be somewhat sad. Especially to a Tory.

I like Tim Farron, but nowadays the libdems are incredibly odious and I don't really pity them.
Labour Party (UK), Progressive Democrat (US)
Left Without Edge
Former Senator Barry Anderson (R-MO)

Governor Tara Misra (R-KY)

Representative John Atang (D-NY03)

Governor Max Smith (R-AZ)

State Senator Simon Hawkins (D-IA)

Join Land of Hope and Glory - a UK political RP project

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11824
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 11:14 am

Vassenor wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Opinium Poll, 8-9 July 2020, as a general election:
uk politics reddit thread

Changes:

CON: 322 (-43)
LAB: 248 (+46)
SNP: 50 (+2)
L-DEM: 6 (-5)
GRN: 1 (-)
PLAID: 4 (-)
SPKR: 1 (-)

Seat Changes:

Seat changes:

Conservative to Labour:

Aberconwy

Birmingham Northfield

Blyth Valley

Bolton North East

Bridgend

Burnley

Bury North

Bury South

Chingford and Woodford Green

Chipping Barnet

Clwyd South

Darlington

Delyn

Derby North

Dewsbury

Don Valley

North West Durham

Gedling

Hastings and Rye

Hendon

Heywood and Middleton

High Peak

Hyndburn

Keighley

Kensington

Leigh

Lincoln

Peterborough

Pudsey

Reading West

Redcar

Rother Valley

Sedgefield

Southport

Stoke-on-Trent Central

Stroud

Truro and Falmouth

Vale of Clwyd

Wakefield

Warrington South

Watford

West Bromwich East

Wolverhampton South West

Wrexham

Wycombe

Ynys Mon

Liberal Democrat to SNP:

Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross

Edinburgh West

North East Fife

Orkney and Shetland

SNP to Conservative:

Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock

Gordon

Liberal Democrat to Conservative:

Westmorland and Lonsdale


This is the last post i made about Opinium Polls for 18th June if you want to compare the results:


But I thought we were supposed to be on for eternal Tory rule.

If that poll was the results we'd get another Tory minority government with DUP support so, yes, Tory hegemony is still on.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Jul 12, 2020 11:34 am

https://outline.com/FAT6HX

First is a plan for an unelected oversight body that would hold any new devolved bills to a “market impact test”, which the Scottish government believes would have jeopardised Scotland-only initiatives such as free university tuition, minimum unit pricing for alcohol or the introduction of a smoking ban before the rest of the UK.

Second is the proposal for a “mutual recognition regime” requiring regulatory standards in one part of the UK to be automatically accepted in others. Jeremy Miles, the Welsh counsel general and minister for European transition, said this would “drive a coach and horses through the capacity of individual governments in different parts of the UK to deliver policy objectives in their economies”.

In practice this could leave them unable to reject UK government decisions on, for example, chlorinated chicken or genetically modified (GM) organisms, he said, adding: “If the UK government does what it tends to do, which is to deregulate, it will create intolerable pressures on the UK in terms of internal market.”


lmao this is literally what the UK claims the EU did to it but with england doing it to the rest of the UK absolutely amazing
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Kragholm Free States
Diplomat
 
Posts: 954
Founded: Mar 19, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Kragholm Free States » Sun Jul 12, 2020 11:41 am

Souseiseki wrote:https://outline.com/FAT6HX

First is a plan for an unelected oversight body that would hold any new devolved bills to a “market impact test”, which the Scottish government believes would have jeopardised Scotland-only initiatives such as free university tuition, minimum unit pricing for alcohol or the introduction of a smoking ban before the rest of the UK.

Second is the proposal for a “mutual recognition regime” requiring regulatory standards in one part of the UK to be automatically accepted in others. Jeremy Miles, the Welsh counsel general and minister for European transition, said this would “drive a coach and horses through the capacity of individual governments in different parts of the UK to deliver policy objectives in their economies”.

In practice this could leave them unable to reject UK government decisions on, for example, chlorinated chicken or genetically modified (GM) organisms, he said, adding: “If the UK government does what it tends to do, which is to deregulate, it will create intolerable pressures on the UK in terms of internal market.”


lmao this is literally what the UK claims the EU did to it but with england doing it to the rest of the UK absolutely amazing


Sounds bad, but honestly I can't muster up much sympathy for Scotland whinging that they might not get to keep doing their usual schtick of being even more authoritarian than the rest of the UK while hiding behind Mel Gibson Screeching.
Formerly New Aerios, Est. 2012.
I don't use NS stats, here's my perpetually WIP factbooks.
Obligatory Political Compass:
Econ: 3.88 (R), Soc: -4.97 (L)
Civil Libertarian, Monarchist, Decentralist, Economic Localist, Englishman.
Old posts not necessarily representative of current views.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:17 pm

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/12/health/b ... index.html

So the UK wont wear masks ? why are you all listening to Trump ?
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:26 pm

Souseiseki wrote:https://outline.com/FAT6HX

First is a plan for an unelected oversight body that would hold any new devolved bills to a “market impact test”, which the Scottish government believes would have jeopardised Scotland-only initiatives such as free university tuition, minimum unit pricing for alcohol or the introduction of a smoking ban before the rest of the UK.

Second is the proposal for a “mutual recognition regime” requiring regulatory standards in one part of the UK to be automatically accepted in others. Jeremy Miles, the Welsh counsel general and minister for European transition, said this would “drive a coach and horses through the capacity of individual governments in different parts of the UK to deliver policy objectives in their economies”.

In practice this could leave them unable to reject UK government decisions on, for example, chlorinated chicken or genetically modified (GM) organisms, he said, adding: “If the UK government does what it tends to do, which is to deregulate, it will create intolerable pressures on the UK in terms of internal market.”


lmao this is literally what the UK claims the EU did to it but with england doing it to the rest of the UK absolutely amazing

So it stops Scotland doing its usual nanny state thing, or at least it stops it doing more than England?

This is a good thing.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59284
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:26 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:Opinium Poll, 8-9 July 2020, as a general election:
uk politics reddit thread

Changes:

CON: 322 (-43)
LAB: 248 (+46)
SNP: 50 (+2)
L-DEM: 6 (-5)
GRN: 1 (-)
PLAID: 4 (-)
SPKR: 1 (-)

Seat Changes:

Seat changes:

Conservative to Labour:

Aberconwy

Birmingham Northfield

Blyth Valley

Bolton North East

Bridgend

Burnley

Bury North

Bury South

Chingford and Woodford Green

Chipping Barnet

Clwyd South

Darlington

Delyn

Derby North

Dewsbury

Don Valley

North West Durham

Gedling

Hastings and Rye

Hendon

Heywood and Middleton

High Peak

Hyndburn

Keighley

Kensington

Leigh

Lincoln

Peterborough

Pudsey

Reading West

Redcar

Rother Valley

Sedgefield

Southport

Stoke-on-Trent Central

Stroud

Truro and Falmouth

Vale of Clwyd

Wakefield

Warrington South

Watford

West Bromwich East

Wolverhampton South West

Wrexham

Wycombe

Ynys Mon

Liberal Democrat to SNP:

Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross

Edinburgh West

North East Fife

Orkney and Shetland

SNP to Conservative:

Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock

Gordon

Liberal Democrat to Conservative:

Westmorland and Lonsdale


This is the last post i made about Opinium Polls for 18th June if you want to compare the results:

If there was an election held tomorrow and this was the result, do you believe Keir Starmer should resign as leader of the Labour party or would you believe he should stay on?
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18405
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Celritannia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:29 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:https://outline.com/FAT6HX



lmao this is literally what the UK claims the EU did to it but with england doing it to the rest of the UK absolutely amazing

So it stops Scotland doing its usual nanny state thing, or at least it stops it doing more than England?

This is a good thing.


You mean actually helping people?

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:34 pm

Celritannia wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:So it stops Scotland doing its usual nanny state thing, or at least it stops it doing more than England?

This is a good thing.


You mean actually helping people?

Read what souse said again. It'll prevent Scotland from enacting measures that impact the market too much or which create regulations that are stricter than the rest of the UK.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:35 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Opinium Poll, 8-9 July 2020, as a general election:
uk politics reddit thread

Changes:

CON: 322 (-43)
LAB: 248 (+46)
SNP: 50 (+2)
L-DEM: 6 (-5)
GRN: 1 (-)
PLAID: 4 (-)
SPKR: 1 (-)

Seat Changes:

Seat changes:

Conservative to Labour:

Aberconwy

Birmingham Northfield

Blyth Valley

Bolton North East

Bridgend

Burnley

Bury North

Bury South

Chingford and Woodford Green

Chipping Barnet

Clwyd South

Darlington

Delyn

Derby North

Dewsbury

Don Valley

North West Durham

Gedling

Hastings and Rye

Hendon

Heywood and Middleton

High Peak

Hyndburn

Keighley

Kensington

Leigh

Lincoln

Peterborough

Pudsey

Reading West

Redcar

Rother Valley

Sedgefield

Southport

Stoke-on-Trent Central

Stroud

Truro and Falmouth

Vale of Clwyd

Wakefield

Warrington South

Watford

West Bromwich East

Wolverhampton South West

Wrexham

Wycombe

Ynys Mon

Liberal Democrat to SNP:

Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross

Edinburgh West

North East Fife

Orkney and Shetland

SNP to Conservative:

Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock

Gordon

Liberal Democrat to Conservative:

Westmorland and Lonsdale


This is the last post i made about Opinium Polls for 18th June if you want to compare the results:

If there was an election held tomorrow and this was the result, do you believe Keir Starmer should resign as leader of the Labour party or would you believe he should stay on?

Resign, only because I don't want a prosecutor in charge of the country and the tories aren't acting like they want to win next time around.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Kragholm Free States
Diplomat
 
Posts: 954
Founded: Mar 19, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Kragholm Free States » Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:37 pm

Celritannia wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:So it stops Scotland doing its usual nanny state thing, or at least it stops it doing more than England?

This is a good thing.


You mean actually helping people?


Who is helped by artificially bumping up the price of booze? It's not going to stop people from being alcoholics, that's simply not how addiction works. It's just going to make alcoholics poorer, which does far more harm than good when they can't afford things like food or shelter. It's just a typically shit neo-Puritan policy designed around punishing vices rather than aiding those who suffer from them.

I'm all for devolution of power, which is why I think this oversight body is generally a bad idea. I just really wish Scotland didn't consistently choose to exercise its devolved power in such a dickish way.
Last edited by Kragholm Free States on Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:43 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Formerly New Aerios, Est. 2012.
I don't use NS stats, here's my perpetually WIP factbooks.
Obligatory Political Compass:
Econ: 3.88 (R), Soc: -4.97 (L)
Civil Libertarian, Monarchist, Decentralist, Economic Localist, Englishman.
Old posts not necessarily representative of current views.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:13 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
You mean actually helping people?

Read what souse said again. It'll prevent Scotland from enacting measures that impact the market too much or which create regulations that are stricter than the rest of the UK.


Now explain what makes those regulations actually objectively bad.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:20 pm

Vassenor wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:Read what souse said again. It'll prevent Scotland from enacting measures that impact the market too much or which create regulations that are stricter than the rest of the UK.


Now explain what makes those regulations actually objectively bad.

Free tuition? I used to believe in it, however then I began to wonder why my friends who didn't go to university should fund my degree. It's also something Scotland can't afford.
Smoking bans are wrong as they restrict the liberty not just of the patron but of the business owner.
Kragholm pointed out what's wrong with the minimum unit pricing.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:22 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Now explain what makes those regulations actually objectively bad.

Free tuition? I used to believe in it, however then I began to wonder why my friends who didn't go to university should fund my degree. It's also something Scotland can't afford.
Smoking bans are wrong as they restrict the liberty not just of the patron but of the business owner.
Kragholm pointed out what's wrong with the minimum unit pricing.


So it's bad because fuck you got mine?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:26 pm

Vassenor wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:Free tuition? I used to believe in it, however then I began to wonder why my friends who didn't go to university should fund my degree. It's also something Scotland can't afford.
Smoking bans are wrong as they restrict the liberty not just of the patron but of the business owner.
Kragholm pointed out what's wrong with the minimum unit pricing.


So it's bad because fuck you got mine?

uhm...no. It's bad because a bunch of people who don't go to university and will never benefit from it are having to pay to assist others to go through universities, and to open up doors for them that they can't open for themselves. Also, Scotland can't afford it.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Hrythingland
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 467
Founded: Dec 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingland » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:38 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So it's bad because fuck you got mine?

uhm...no. It's bad because a bunch of people who don't go to university and will never benefit from it are having to pay to assist others to go through universities, and to open up doors for them that they can't open for themselves. Also, Scotland can't afford it.

Those people benefit indirectly from the skills that certain degrees provide. Though I think, and I say this as a humanities student myself, that most folk ought to pay for university degrees and only those in Medicine or scientific fields ought to have the option of free tuition. There should be schemes to bring in high achieving poor students to do humanities degrees but by and large we should pay our own way. Bear in mind that uni fees are no deterrent to many people. Because when you get within a certain earning bracket then it is just slowly deducted piecemeal from your salary like a tax. You never see that money. I know a fair few folk from families where they are eligible for full student loan and maintenance fees, which with a job on the side means that they can live fairly comfortably through the year.
Kingdom of the Hrythingas
Hrýðingríċe
ᛒᛠᛚᚢᚳᚹᛠᛚᛘ ᚢᚾᚹᛖᚩᚱᚦᛋᚳᛁᛈᛖ ᛒᛖᚠᚩᚱᚪᚾ

SAXON NATIONALISM|WODENISM|MARTIALISM

State type: Elective Monarchy
Leader: Hrythwealda (King) Wynmar II, Earl of Ashwold,
Capital: Ingwineburgh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Holy Wodenic Rite
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42050
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:39 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So it's bad because fuck you got mine?

uhm...no. It's bad because a bunch of people who don't go to university and will never benefit from it are having to pay to assist others to go through universities, and to open up doors for them that they can't open for themselves. Also, Scotland can't afford it.


Horseshit. Free access to university allows people from poor backgrounds to achieve their potential to the betterment of both society and the state. If it's free to all then it becomes based on merit rather than birth.

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:42 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:uhm...no. It's bad because a bunch of people who don't go to university and will never benefit from it are having to pay to assist others to go through universities, and to open up doors for them that they can't open for themselves. Also, Scotland can't afford it.


Horseshit. Free access to university allows people from poor backgrounds to achieve their potential to the betterment of both society and the state. If it's free to all then it becomes based on merit rather than birth.

I don't have a student loan, but I thought that the repayments for those were designed so they were as light a burden as possible, while still making the person who actually received the service pay for it?
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42050
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:48 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Horseshit. Free access to university allows people from poor backgrounds to achieve their potential to the betterment of both society and the state. If it's free to all then it becomes based on merit rather than birth.

I don't have a student loan, but I thought that the repayments for those were designed so they were as light a burden as possible, while still making the person who actually received the service pay for it?


You think that because you're rich. It doesn't work that way.

My brother came from a working class family and has ended up with about £50,000 debt to get a medical degree. He can pay it, he finished it. Things happen though and some people don't finish. All the current system does is make poor people afraid they'll be thousands of pound in debt before they even start life. It punishes poor people and supports rich people. Which is why you like it.
Last edited by Fartsniffage on Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:53 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:I don't have a student loan, but I thought that the repayments for those were designed so they were as light a burden as possible, while still making the person who actually received the service pay for it?


You think that because you're rich. It doesn't work that way.

My brother came from a working class family and has ended up with about £50,000 debt to get a medical degree. He can pay it, he finished it. Things happen though and some people don't finish. All the current system does is make poor people afraid they'll be thousands of pound in debt before they even start life. It punishes poor people and supports rich people. Which is why you like it.

Do these people have to pay back an amount they can't afford? How many houses have been repossessed due to student debt repayments in England?
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:53 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So it's bad because fuck you got mine?

uhm...no. It's bad because a bunch of people who don't go to university and will never benefit from it are having to pay to assist others to go through universities, and to open up doors for them that they can't open for themselves. Also, Scotland can't afford it.


the country as a whole benefits from having an educated populace because our economy is built on services and high skilled work. if the tuition weren't free they'd probably take out government loans most of which would end up written off anyway. just like healthcare, you will end up paying for it one way or another and the "well if they don't use it personally clearly they get no benefit so why should the pay" way of thinking is extremely shortsighted and wrong. you can't even call it selfish because it directly benefits you if you think about it so a selfish person would be supporting it anyway.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42050
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:55 pm

CoraSpia wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You think that because you're rich. It doesn't work that way.

My brother came from a working class family and has ended up with about £50,000 debt to get a medical degree. He can pay it, he finished it. Things happen though and some people don't finish. All the current system does is make poor people afraid they'll be thousands of pound in debt before they even start life. It punishes poor people and supports rich people. Which is why you like it.

Do these people have to pay back an amount they can't afford? How many houses have been repossessed due to student debt repayments in England?


Don't be dense. If you're in a family that lives from paycheque to paycheque then amassing that kind of debt is daunting. Try to imagine you're not loaded, I'm sure you can get it.

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby CoraSpia » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:59 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
CoraSpia wrote:Do these people have to pay back an amount they can't afford? How many houses have been repossessed due to student debt repayments in England?


Don't be dense. If you're in a family that lives from paycheque to paycheque then amassing that kind of debt is daunting. Try to imagine you're not loaded, I'm sure you can get it.

When I was going from school to university, we had a woman in from the local uni who explained how the student loan system worked. She was very clear that what happened was that a small amount of your income would be garnished in order to pay for it and that it wasn't like an ordinary debt. The initial fear might be uncomfortable, but it's not like they don't try as hard as possible to get it into peoples heads that it's not going to cause them problems.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Inferior, Navessa, Ors Might, Ozral, The Kharkivan Cossacks

Advertisement

Remove ads