Virginia declares emergency Militias threaten to seize Gov.

[Diopolis]

None of that has anything to do with resources or speech.

So Cal has domination over Nor Cal water supplys, this even results in there being water rationing for us here in the North.

as for speech, sure, they havn't quite gotten there, but they did get to weapons and resources.

Or the extra regulations thrown on red area industry’s. Their goal is to punish red voters.

[Rojava Free State]

Which brings up why we're allowing children to vote.

its obvious, children are very easy to control and influence which makes them great voters which is PERFECT if your ideology dominates the education system

I wonder what party is DEEP inside the ass of education?....hmmmm

remember, any good totalitarian state needs to have the youth vote.

To be fair, education in my area seemed to be more controlled by conservatives than liberals, which is why they had an abstinence only health class and why they wanted to change th AP history curriculum to make it more "American friendly." Lmao, yeah let's not teach the horny teens how to use protection and then watch as blue waffle spreads like captain trips, and why don't we also modify the history class because it's uncomfortable to talk about the evil things America has done. Can't let actual historical events and facts get in the way of our mindless, cowardly salute to the flag

[Holy Tedalonia]

its obvious, children are very easy to control and influence which makes them great voters which is PERFECT if your ideology dominates the education system

I wonder what party is DEEP inside the ass of education?....hmmmm

remember, any good totalitarian state needs to have the youth vote.

To be fair, education in my area seemed to be more controlled by conservatives than liberals, which is why they had an abstinence only health class and why they wanted to change th AP history curriculum to make it more "American friendly." Lmao, yeah let's not teach the horny teens how to use protection and then watch as blue waffle spreads like captain trips, and why don't we also modify the history class because it's uncomfortable to talk about the evil things America has done. Can't let actual historical events and facts get in the way of our mindless, cowardly salute to the flag

I'm pretty sure history's "E for Everyone" until college regardless, save for maybe slavery and the holocaust. People in general don't like teaching about atrocities even at the highschool level. Other atrocities tend to be overlooked due to lack of time or "E rating" things.

As for me, went to a public school in Texas. They didn't teach me how to use protection (for sex), but we're competent enough to inform of their existence and suggested I pursue them for protection.

And nothing's wrong in saluting the American flag. To many they salute America for the many good things that it has done, not the bad. Nothing wrong in doing that.

[Rojava Free State]

To be fair, education in my area seemed to be more controlled by conservatives than liberals, which is why they had an abstinence only health class and why they wanted to change th AP history curriculum to make it more "American friendly." Lmao, yeah let's not teach the horny teens how to use protection and then watch as blue waffle spreads like captain trips, and why don't we also modify the history class because it's uncomfortable to talk about the evil things America has done. Can't let actual historical events and facts get in the way of our mindless, cowardly salute to the flag

I'm pretty sure history's "E for Everyone" until college regardless, save for maybe slavery and the holocaust. People in general don't like teaching about atrocities even at the highschool level. Other atrocities tend to be overlooked due to lack of time or "E rating" things.

As for me, went to a public school in Texas. They didn't teach me how to use protection (for sex), but we're competent enough to inform of their existence and suggested I pursue them for protection.

And nothing's wrong in saluting the American flag. To many they salute America for the many good things that it has done, not the bad. Nothing wrong in doing that.

I don't mean literally saluting the flag. I mean figuratively as in telling everyone how great America is but leaving out the bad parts and making it seem like we're a utopia.

And the kids in my area probably needed to be taught that in school, since they were not competent enough to learn on their own

[Diopolis]

I'm pretty sure history's "E for Everyone" until college regardless, save for maybe slavery and the holocaust. People in general don't like teaching about atrocities even at the highschool level. Other atrocities tend to be overlooked due to lack of time or "E rating" things.

As for me, went to a public school in Texas. They didn't teach me how to use protection (for sex), but we're competent enough to inform of their existence and suggested I pursue them for protection.

And nothing's wrong in saluting the American flag. To many they salute America for the many good things that it has done, not the bad. Nothing wrong in doing that.

I don't mean literally saluting the flag. I mean figuratively as in telling everyone how great America is but leaving out the bad parts and making it seem like we're a utopia.

And the kids in my area probably needed to be taught that in school, since they were not competent enough to learn on their own

The counterpoint, of course, is that the education system also doesn’t teach how to balance a checkbook, or patch a pair of pants, or cook for yourself, or do your taxes. All of which have to be taught at some point, even if they’re easy.

[Garbanzony]

Example: California, the state I LIVE in

the democrat control the large dense urban areas FILLED with most of the nations homeless and declared themselves sanctuary cities

Gov newsom just passed a bill that gives illegals 25 and younger acess to medicare(i think teusday)

First they said " we just want high capacity mags"

then it all went down hill after that.

None of that has anything to do with resources or speech.

I believe they first defined an "assault weapon" as any semi-auto rifle capable of accepting magazines that hold more than 25 rounds. then Feinstein came to power and shit hit the fan real quick.

[Diopolis]

None of that has anything to do with resources or speech.

I believe they first defined an "assault weapon" as any semi-auto rifle capable of accepting magazines that hold more than 25 rounds. then Feinstein came to power and shit hit the fan real quick.

So any semiauto rifle with removable magazine, which turns into any with a non-tubular magazine. So basically banning any centerfire semiauto rifle.

[Satuga]

None of that has anything to do with resources or speech.

I believe they first defined an "assault weapon" as any semi-auto rifle capable of accepting magazines that hold more than 25 rounds. then Feinstein came to power and shit hit the fan real quick.

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

[Ifreann]

I believe they first defined an "assault weapon" as any semi-auto rifle capable of accepting magazines that hold more than 25 rounds. then Feinstein came to power and shit hit the fan real quick.

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

Never in my many years on the internet have I seen someone use "assault weapon" in the sense you describe. Did you come up with this yourself?

[The Black Forrest]

I believe they first defined an "assault weapon" as any semi-auto rifle capable of accepting magazines that hold more than 25 rounds. then Feinstein came to power and shit hit the fan real quick.

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

If I verbally assault a person do I have to register my mouth?

[Satuga]

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

If I verbally assault a person do I have to register my mouth?

Clearly.

[Holy Tedalonia]

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

If I verbally assault a person do I have to register my mouth?

Don't point your assault weapon at me!

[Satuga]

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

Never in my many years on the internet have I seen someone use "assault weapon" in the sense you describe. Did you come up with this yourself?

It's in the fucking name:
Assault: make a physical attack on.
Weapon:a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.

[Cisairse]

None of that has anything to do with resources or speech.

So Cal has domination over Nor Cal water supplys, this even results in there being water rationing for us here in the North.

Can you be more specific with what you're saying here? I really don't understand what you mean by SoCal "dominating" NorCal.

as for speech, sure, they havn't quite gotten there, but they did get to weapons and resources.

Yeah they haven't "gotten there" and they never will, because it's an illogical conspiracy theory with no basis in fact.

[Cisairse]

Never in my many years on the internet have I seen someone use "assault weapon" in the sense you describe. Did you come up with this yourself?

It's in the fucking name:
Assault: make a physical attack on.
Weapon:a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.

You do realize that 'assault weapon' has a legal definition, right? And that said legal definition in no way resembles yours?

[Satuga]

It's in the fucking name:
Assault: make a physical attack on.
Weapon:a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.

You do realize that 'assault weapon' has a legal definition, right? And that said legal definition in no way resembles yours?

Legal definition: the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features.

You notice that word primarily right? That means mostly not only.

[Cisairse]

You do realize that 'assault weapon' has a legal definition, right? And that said legal definition in no way resembles yours?

Legal definition: the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features.

You notice that word primarily right? That means mostly not only.

That is not the legal definition.

[Holy Tedalonia]

Never in my many years on the internet have I seen someone use "assault weapon" in the sense you describe. Did you come up with this yourself?

It's in the fucking name:
Assault: make a physical attack on.
Weapon:a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.

It's just a way to classify a gun. Missiles aren't considered assault weapon, even though they are the most capable of killing us all. Whether it be ICBMs or nuclear missiles. Don't take the name litterally.

[Galloism]

An "Assault weapon" is any weapon used to commit assault or harm another person, it's literally in the fucking name. It's not designated to any single category. Similar to "Assault rifle" which would be any rifle used to commit assault or harm. This is what the retarded media cant seem to grasp.

If I verbally assault a person do I have to register my mouth?

Today I learned Black Forrest has learned to command the Thu'um.

[Ifreann]

Never in my many years on the internet have I seen someone use "assault weapon" in the sense you describe. Did you come up with this yourself?

It's in the fucking name:
Assault: make a physical attack on.
Weapon:a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.

So that's a yes, you've come up with it yourself. I'm afraid that this isn't how anyone uses the phrase "assault weapon". And you can scream all you want about the definitions of those two words, but that's not really how English works.

[Satuga]

Legal definition: the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features.

You notice that word primarily right? That means mostly not only.

That is not the legal definition.

Well considering the term seems to fluctuate between places https://www.theregreview.org/2018/11/14/kopel-defining-assault-weapons/
show me your legal definition instead of just saying "that's not it".

[Holy Tedalonia]

You do realize that 'assault weapon' has a legal definition, right? And that said legal definition in no way resembles yours?

Legal definition: the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features.

You notice that word primarily right? That means mostly not only.

So if I get a hunting rifle with a scope and detachable magazine, it should be considered a assault weapon?

[Cisairse]

That is not the legal definition.

Well considering the term seems to fluctuate between places https://www.theregreview.org/2018/11/14/kopel-defining-assault-weapons/
show me your legal definition instead of just saying "that's not it".

And what was that definition? Could you give us an example of an assault weapon?

"Assault weapon" is defined in H.R. 3355 § 110102(b) (codified back then as 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(30)):


Note that this definition is not absolute. There are many firearm models that are explicitly by-name exempted from this definition. The list of exempt firearms is listed in H.R. 3355 § 110106, Appendix A.

What makes assault weapons so deadly?

I'll defer to my previously-posted source about the mass shooting rate for that one.

[Grinning Dragon]

Well considering the term seems to fluctuate between places https://www.theregreview.org/2018/11/14/kopel-defining-assault-weapons/
show me your legal definition instead of just saying "that's not it".

"Assault weapon" is defined in H.R. 3355 § 110102(b) (codified back then as 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(30)):


Note that this definition is not absolute. There are many firearm models that are explicitly by-name exempted from this definition. The list of exempt firearms is listed in H.R. 3355 § 110106, Appendix A.



I'll defer to my previously-posted source about the mass shooting rate for that one.

So again, a made up classification based on cosmetics not on function.

[Cisairse]

So again, a made up classification based on cosmetics not on function.

Say what you will about the definition, but that's the legal definition.

All laws are made up.