MAGAThread XVIII: The Authority Is Total

[Greater Miami Shores]

If this article is true, I strongly disagree. It is a nice way of cleaning house, clearing traitors and never Trumpers from President Trump's administration policies and goals, nothing to do with retaliation against those that have testified. I would do the same if I were President of the USA or any democratic nation like my native Cuba for example if it were a democratic nation, or any other democratic nation under the circumstances of traitors on my administration's policies and goals.

You clearly have no idea what treason is. It is defined in the constitution as being specifically limited to levying war against the US, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Plus people have a right to disagree with the president. It’s called the first amendment. You have yet to show how everyone who has testified is lying

Contrary to your views of me not your facts, I do know and understand what treason is. The only thing I agree with you on, people have a right to disagree with the president or any world leader, which is exactly what I did with Zurkerx and you right now, and posted to Zurkerx and you. I have never on any posts and threads stated we cant disagree with President Trump, any US President, world leader or any nation persons. Thank you for your post San Lumen, I consider I have answered very clearly. I think I am doing very well today for at least once, unlike what my many critics usually claim.

[Greater Miami Shores]

traitors

Let the Hate flow through you?

Guess what Austria-Bohemia-Hungary and I am being very honest, I hate all star war movies. But I love the original Star Trek and the next generation, and I hate the new Star Trek movies. So this post of yours to make your point against me, does not work, I respectfully consider it irrelevant since I hate all star war movies. I once went to see one movie with one of my girl cousins and her brother my guy cousin, he loved it, and we hated it, I cant repeat the words she used to tell him so, why did you bring me to see this x x x so and so.

[San Lumen]

You clearly have no idea what treason is. It is defined in the constitution as being specifically limited to levying war against the US, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Plus people have a right to disagree with the president. It’s called the first amendment. You have yet to show how everyone who has testified is lying

Contrary to your views of me not your facts, I do know and understand what treason is. The only thing I agree with you on, people have a right to disagree with the president or any world leader, which is exactly what I did with Zurkerx and you right now, and posted to Zurkerx and you. I have never on any posts and threads stated we cant disagree with President Trump, any US President, world leader or any nation persons. Thank you for your post San Lumen, I consider I have answered very clearly. I think I am doing very well today for at least once, unlike what my many critics usually claim.

If you knew what treason is you wouldn’t have used the word in the manner you did. And please stop using nation names it’s annoying.

[Necroghastia]

You clearly have no idea what treason is. It is defined in the constitution as being specifically limited to levying war against the US, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Plus people have a right to disagree with the president. It’s called the first amendment. You have yet to show how everyone who has testified is lying

Contrary to your views of me not your facts, I do know and understand what treason is. The only thing I agree with you on, people have a right to disagree with the president or any world leader, which is exactly what I did with Zurkerx and you right now, and posted to Zurkerx and you. I have never on any posts and threads stated we cant disagree with President Trump, any US President, world leader or any nation persons. Thank you for your post San Lumen, I consider I have answered very clearly. I think I am doing very well today for at least once, unlike what my many critics usually claim.

Then why did you call these people traitors?

[Greater Miami Shores]

Contrary to your views of me not your facts, I do know and understand what treason is. The only thing I agree with you on, people have a right to disagree with the president or any world leader, which is exactly what I did with Zurkerx and you right now, and posted to Zurkerx and you. I have never on any posts and threads stated we cant disagree with President Trump, any US President, world leader or any nation persons. Thank you for your post San Lumen, I consider I have answered very clearly. I think I am doing very well today for at least once, unlike what my many critics usually claim.

Then why did you call these people traitors?

Re read my post in context, I called them traitors to President Trumps policies and goals and nothing else.

[Necroghastia]

Then why did you call these people traitors?

Re read my post in context, I called them traitors to President Trumps policies and goals and nothing else.

In which case, how is it not retaliation for testifying?

[San Lumen]

Then why did you call these people traitors?

Re read my post in context, I called them traitors to President Trumps policies and goals and nothing else.

yeah how dare anyone who works for the administration or for the government not be 100 percent in lockstep with the president

[Totenborg]

Nah son. Uncritically supporting someone I don't personally know and respect isn't my bag.

So I presume by your logic, you don't support or respect the Democrats against President Trump.

Re-read my post. The word, "uncritically" is important.

[Greater Miami Shores]

Re read my post in context, I called them traitors to President Trumps policies and goals and nothing else.

In which case, how is it not retaliation for testifying?

Good Post and question Necroghastia, very well. I stated it is not retaliation for testifying, it is to keep loyal persons who support President Trump's policies and goals. A few of the ambassadors and other diplomats or officials who have debunked the Democrat claims against President Trump and the same time don't seem, by their other statements, don't seem to have President Trumps policies and goals in mind, and are upset the President has used Rudy Giuliani for example.

Not because Rudy Giuliani is crooked and corrupt as President Trump which many Democrats and anti Trumpers on nation states and the world seem to believe and wish it were true. Many US Presidents and world leaders have used persons they trust to achieve foreign policy goals by passing their ambassadors they don't fully trust. As several VIP Republicans have pointed out.

You will probably strongly disagree with my views and my fellow Republicans views, but their is nothing wrong with that on both sides the right and the left, it is called arguments, debate and discuss. If we all agreed on all issues including this one, we would have nothing to argue, debate and discuss on nation states.

Why do I say this, because it seems the other side always seems to want me to agree with their views as right and my views and my fellow Republicans views as wrong. I am not saying you are one of those, but just in case, I don't know. I have answered and covered these questions on previous posts and threads according to my abilities, boy am I going to get put down for this one, not from you from others who read it. Good Post and question Necroghastia.

[Greater Miami Shores]

So I presume by your logic, you don't support or respect the Democrats against President Trump.

Re-read my post. The word, "uncritically" is important.

So do you support the Democrats against President Trump uncritically or critically ?

[San Lumen]

In which case, how is it not retaliation for testifying?

Good Post and question Necroghastia, very well. I stated it is not retaliation for testifying, it is to keep loyal persons who support President Trump's policies and goals. A few of the ambassadors and other diplomats or officials who have debunked the Democrat claims against President Trump and the same time don't seem, by their other statements, don't seem to have President Trumps policies and goals in mind, and are upset the President has used Rudy Giuliani for example.

Not because Rudy Giuliani is crooked and corrupt as President Trump which many Democrats and anti Trumpers on nation states and the world seem to believe and wish it were true. Many US Presidents and world leaders have used persons they trust to achieve foreign policy goals by passing their ambassadors they don't fully trust. As several VIP Republicans have pointed out.

You will probably strongly disagree with my views and my fellow Republicans views, but their is nothing wrong with that on both sides the right and the left, it is called arguments, debate and discuss. If we all agreed on all issues including this one, we would have nothing to argue, debate and discuss on nation states.

Why do I say this, because it seems the other side always seems to want me to agree with their views as right and my views and my fellow Republicans views as wrong. I am not saying you are one of those, but just in case, I don't know. I have answered and covered these questions on previous posts and threads according to my abilities, boy am I going to get put down for this one, not from you from others who read it. Good Post and question Necroghastia.

Yeah how dare anyone in the administration not be 100 percent in lockstep with the President.

And please stop using nation names in your post. If you quote them there is no need to do it.

[Bear Stearns]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

[Greater Miami Shores]

Good Post and question Necroghastia, very well. I stated it is not retaliation for testifying, it is to keep loyal persons who support President Trump's policies and goals. A few of the ambassadors and other diplomats or officials who have debunked the Democrat claims against President Trump and the same time don't seem, by their other statements, don't seem to have President Trumps policies and goals in mind, and are upset the President has used Rudy Giuliani for example.

Not because Rudy Giuliani is crooked and corrupt as President Trump which many Democrats and anti Trumpers on nation states and the world seem to believe and wish it were true. Many US Presidents and world leaders have used persons they trust to achieve foreign policy goals by passing their ambassadors they don't fully trust. As several VIP Republicans have pointed out.

You will probably strongly disagree with my views and my fellow Republicans views, but their is nothing wrong with that on both sides the right and the left, it is called arguments, debate and discuss. If we all agreed on all issues including this one, we would have nothing to argue, debate and discuss on nation states.

Why do I say this, because it seems the other side always seems to want me to agree with their views as right and my views and my fellow Republicans views as wrong. I am not saying you are one of those, but just in case, I don't know. I have answered and covered these questions on previous posts and threads according to my abilities, boy am I going to get put down for this one, not from you from others who read it. Good Post and question Necroghastia.

Yeah how dare anyone in the administration not be 100 percent in lockstep with the President.

And please stop using nation names in your post. If you quote them there is no need to do it.

While I would like my diplomats and government ministers to give me different advice on all issues If I were President of America, my native Cuba or any nation. I would expect my diplomat and government ministers to carry out my policies and goals strictly and loyally once I make the decisions, if they do not I have a right and duty to fire them.

[Totenborg]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

IS ALMOST CERTAINLY ALSO GUILTY OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS

[San Lumen]

Yeah how dare anyone in the administration not be 100 percent in lockstep with the President.

And please stop using nation names in your post. If you quote them there is no need to do it.

While I would like my diplomats and government ministers to give me different advice on all issues If I were President of America, my native Cuba or any nation. I would expect my diplomat and government ministers to carry out my policies and goals strictly and loyally once I make the decisions, if they do not I have a right and duty to fire them.

Even if what you ordered is against the law or unconstitutional or flat out insane?

[The Rich Port]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

Yeah it's all fun and games until he tries to pull some bullshit to repeal gay marriage.

Well, at least he'll be easier to impeach. Nobody likes him except Evangelicals.

[Greater Miami Shores]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

No Bear Stearns my friend since we agree on a lot of issues. I still prefer to say President Trump and Vice President Pence. Then in 2025 say President Pence and his future Vice President, which I hope is either Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. The first Cuban American Hispanic Latino Vice President of America - The USA.

[Bear Stearns]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

No Bear Stearns my friend since we agree on a lot of issues. I still prefer to say President Trump and Vice President Pence. Then in 2025 say President Pence and his future Vice President, which I hope is either Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. The first Cuban American Hispanic Latino Vice President of America - The USA.

If solely looking at policy (except the trade war), with Trump we got George Bush's third term.

With Pence we will get see what President Dick Cheney would have been like. Hope you're ready for war in Iran, Venezuela, and Ukraine all at once.

[Bear Stearns]

Everybody say it with me

P R E S I D E N T
P E N C E

Yeah it's all fun and games until he tries to pull some bullshit to repeal gay marriage.

Well, at least he'll be easier to impeach. Nobody likes him except Evangelicals.

>this is what liberals actually believe

You guys said George Bush was going to make us a theocracy and before that that Dan Quayle was going to do the same.

[Greater Miami Shores]

While I would like my diplomats and government ministers to give me different advice on all issues If I were President of America, my native Cuba or any nation. I would expect my diplomat and government ministers to carry out my policies and goals strictly and loyally once I make the decisions, if they do not I have a right and duty to fire them.

Even if what you ordered is against the law or unconstitutional or flat out insane?

If you are refereeing to President Trump as an example, President Trump has not done anything wrong and the Democrats against him for political reasons have not proven he has done anything wrong. Re read my posts today of Monday November 18 2019. The best day of posting I have ever had on nation states on the Trump impeachment threads.

[Totenborg]

Even if what you ordered is against the law or unconstitutional or flat out insane?

If you are refereeing to President Trump as an example, President Trump has not done anything wrong and the Democrats against him for political reasons have not proven he has done anything wrong. Re read my posts today of Monday November 18 2019. The best day of posting I have ever had on nation states on the Trump impeachment threads.

Dude, just admit that literally nothing could convince you of Trump's lack of fitness to hold office.

[Greater Miami Shores]

No Bear Stearns my friend since we agree on a lot of issues. I still prefer to say President Trump and Vice President Pence. Then in 2025 say President Pence and his future Vice President, which I hope is either Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. The first Cuban American Hispanic Latino Vice President of America - The USA.

If solely looking at policy (except the trade war), with Trump we got George Bush's third term.

With Pence we will get see what President Dick Cheney would have been like. Hope you're ready for war in Iran, Venezuela, and Ukraine all at once.

Darn Bear Stearns, you missed my favorite either under President Trump or President Pence if President Trump is removed from office or resigns. While I would favor the overthrow of Iran and Venezuela's dictatorship governments one way or the other. A US naval blockade of Cuba, nothing goes in, nothing goes out until the undemocratic Cuban military mafia regime of Fidel, Raúl and Diaz-Canel falls from within and without.

[Neutraligon]

If solely looking at policy (except the trade war), with Trump we got George Bush's third term.

With Pence we will get see what President Dick Cheney would have been like. Hope you're ready for war in Iran, Venezuela, and Ukraine all at once.

Darn Bear Stearns, you missed my favorite either under President Trump or President Pence if President Trump is removed from office or resigns. While I would favor the overthrow of Iran and Venezuela's dictatorship governments one way or the other. A US naval blockade of Cuba, nothing goes in, nothing goes out until the undemocratic Cuban military mafia regime of Fidel, Raúl and Diaz-Canel falls from within and without.

What does all this have to do with the impeachment?

[Greater Miami Shores]

Darn Bear Stearns, you missed my favorite either under President Trump or President Pence if President Trump is removed from office or resigns. While I would favor the overthrow of Iran and Venezuela's dictatorship governments one way or the other. A US naval blockade of Cuba, nothing goes in, nothing goes out until the undemocratic Cuban military mafia regime of Fidel, Raúl and Diaz-Canel falls from within and without.

What does all this have to do with the impeachment?

Neutraligion, I tried to connected to the impeachment by my comment of: if President Trump is removed from office or resigns. Since Bear Stearns posted get ready for President Pence and wars in Iran and Venezuela. Implying President Trump might be removed from office by the impeachment process. So I stated I would love to see the Iran and Venezuelan regimes overthrown and the Cuban regime overthrown as well through a US Naval Blockade of Cuba. If Bear Sterns had not made the above comment I never would have brought up Iran, Venezuela or Cuba, my pet issue on NS for obvious reasons. This is how this whole thing got started. This is how these back and forth s got started.

[The Black Forrest]

Damn it, they promised me she couldn't get out!

Nah Farnhamia is cool she puts me down from time to time, when she thinks or knows I deserve it, she advices me with constructive suggestions and advice, which I admit I clearly need, but with respect, this is a compliment Farnhamia.

GMS Alberto.

No Fran is real. Just look for the Van Dyke beard.