Ifreann wrote:Novus America wrote:
Not just important to me, important to Bolivians. Yes many are quite mad with Evo’s actions and want him held to account. Again even the left wing Guardian has acknowledged he has things to answer for.
Well unfortunately there was a coup and he had to flee the country, so there's no possibility of any allegations against him having a fair hearing. Or do you think he should return to Bolivia and submit himself to the justice of the military who are no longer bound by the law and the government that is locking up members of his party for "sedition"?And even though there may be no jury here, you are still trying to do it just to smear the US despite your lack of any real evidence.
So who the fuck do you think I am trying to prejudice? Do you imagine that there are people who are remotely politically aware who don't know about America's history of overthrowing South American governments?
And what kind of standards are you expecting us to operate under here? We can't talk about America's fondness for coups because that's not allowed in court, yet you are not remotely restricted in talking about alleged wrongdoing by Evo Morales.
It is more complicated than that as I have said many times.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washin ... utType=amp
It is not as simple as “the military forced him”.
But sure, he does not have to return until after the elections. He can stay in Mexico. Nobody is forcing him to leave Mexico.
Oh you can certainly point out the US has supported some coups in the past, but if you claim that is “evidence” the US is behind any coup, you are going to be called out for making a BS claim without sufficient evidence.






