by Iwassoclose » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:39 pm
by Munkcestrian Republic » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:41 pm
by Anglia-Saxia » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:43 pm
by Magnum Exitium » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:43 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Ahh yes, the best right-wing conversations start off with who's first or second in the thread.
by The British American Colonies » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:46 pm
by D V » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:47 pm
Magnum Exitium wrote:No. This is ridiculous lol. Elderly people have significantly more life experience than the younger generation and will make far better decisions. This is crazier than "voters should be 16", because at least that one isn't completely dumb
by Iwassoclose » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:48 pm
Magnum Exitium wrote:No. This is ridiculous lol. Elderly people have significantly more life experience than the younger generation and will make far better decisions. This is crazier than "voters should be 16", because at least that one isn't completely dumb
by Luxenermy » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:49 pm
by Jetan » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:51 pm
Magnum Exitium wrote:No. This is ridiculous lol. Elderly people have significantly more life experience than the younger generation and will make far better decisions. This is crazier than "voters should be 16", because at least that one isn't completely dumb
by Newmanistan » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:57 pm
Iwassoclose wrote:Just like there is an age restriction for when people can vote there should also be an age restriction for when people have to stop voting.
These group of people are most actively chased after by politicians to the determinant of young people who are the main or future participants in the economy and future of a country.
Do you agree with this proposition?
by Samadhi » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:57 pm
by Iwassoclose » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:57 pm
Luxenermy wrote:I have a tingly feeling this thread was started by the kind of person who complains all the time about "boomers" on twitter and treats the older generation as a scapegoat for all the world's problems.
Jesus christ mate, of course, they should vote.
by Major-Tom » Thu Nov 07, 2019 1:58 pm
by Page » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:01 pm
by Cappuccina » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:03 pm
Page wrote:Let old people vote, let 16 year olds vote, let convicts and prisoners vote.
by Page » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:05 pm
by San Lumen » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:07 pm
Iwassoclose wrote:Just like there is an age restriction for when people can vote there should also be an age restriction for when people have to stop voting.
These group of people are most actively chased after by politicians to the determinant of young people who are the main or future participants in the economy and future of a country.
Do you agree with this proposition?
by Costa Fierro » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:07 pm
by Jetan » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:08 pm
by Cappuccina » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:08 pm
by Jabberwocky » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:09 pm
by Cappuccina » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:13 pm
Jabberwocky wrote:I'm 66. I question whether YOUNG people are qualified to vote. So many seem ignorant of history. Small wonder...they have so little of it themselves.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Galactic Powers, Kastopoli Salegliari, Keltionialang, Shrillland, The Lone Alliance, Welskerland
Advertisement