Play Untitled Goose Game. Embrace the honk, and it will all come to you in good time.
Advertisement
by New haven america » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:26 pm
by New haven america » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:26 pm
by Luziyca » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:31 pm
by New haven america » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:33 pm
by Chechenastan » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:33 pm
by Gravlen » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:34 pm
A Dallas judge ruled Thursday that a father and mother will maintain joint custody of their children after a long court battle in which a 7-year-old’s gender became a central issue — and a crusade for conservative media and politicians, including Texas’ governor.
Gov. Greg Abbott, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, and other politicians have latched on to reports in conservative media highlighting the father’s contention that the mother intended to force the child to undergo hormone therapy and puberty blockers to change the child’s biological gender.
In her ruling Thursday, Judge Kim Cooks noted there was never an order for the child to undergo such treatment.
Additionally, records show that Georgulas asked the court to require mutual written consent, which would ensure she and Younger agree on a course of action before the child undergoes any such treatment. Her request also noted the child “is not yet at the age where treatment with hormonal expressions, puberty blockers, and/or transgendered reassignment surgery is medically considered.”
On Thursday, the judge prohibited both parents from commenting publicly on the case until the children are 18.
Cooks said in her ruling Thursday that both parents will need to consent to those decisions. Additionally, Younger will not be required to identify the child as a girl, as Georgulas wanted.
But the judge admonished Younger for bringing media attention to the case. She said the father had legitimate concerns at first but later courted controversy “at the cost of protection and privacy of his children.”
Younger has received about $130,000 in donations from his publicity campaign, Cooks said.
by Gravlen » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:37 pm
Chechenastan wrote:How new is this information?
Judge Kim Cooks has ruled that the father and mother of 7-year-old James Younger will remain in joint managing conservatorship and both have a say in his medical treatment.
Judge Kim Cooks in the 255th Family District Court ruled today that seven-year-old James Younger and his twin brother would remain under a joint managing conservatorship under their parents, Jeff Younger and Anne Georgulas.
Cooks also gave the two parents joint decision making over all medical, dental, and psychiatric care for the twin boys, indicating that both the father and mother need to consent to the use of puberty blockers or other aspects of a “medical transition.”
Attorney fees are split.
Cooks also issued a gag order on the father.
by Chechenastan » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:39 pm
by Aureumterra » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:39 pm
Zapato wrote:Jeffrey Younger is a bad man, a horrible abusive father, and a shit human being in general. Fuck him with a rake.
by The East Marches II » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:40 pm
Gravlen wrote:While the Jury found in favor of the mother and awarded her sole custody, the judge overruled the jury and kept joint custody.A Dallas judge ruled Thursday that a father and mother will maintain joint custody of their children after a long court battle in which a 7-year-old’s gender became a central issue — and a crusade for conservative media and politicians, including Texas’ governor.
The mother still got some of what she originally wanted.Gov. Greg Abbott, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, and other politicians have latched on to reports in conservative media highlighting the father’s contention that the mother intended to force the child to undergo hormone therapy and puberty blockers to change the child’s biological gender.
In her ruling Thursday, Judge Kim Cooks noted there was never an order for the child to undergo such treatment.
Additionally, records show that Georgulas asked the court to require mutual written consent, which would ensure she and Younger agree on a course of action before the child undergoes any such treatment. Her request also noted the child “is not yet at the age where treatment with hormonal expressions, puberty blockers, and/or transgendered reassignment surgery is medically considered.”
The judge went on to ask the parents (the father) to shut the fuck up.On Thursday, the judge prohibited both parents from commenting publicly on the case until the children are 18.Cooks said in her ruling Thursday that both parents will need to consent to those decisions. Additionally, Younger will not be required to identify the child as a girl, as Georgulas wanted.
But the judge admonished Younger for bringing media attention to the case. She said the father had legitimate concerns at first but later courted controversy “at the cost of protection and privacy of his children.”
And let's not forget that the father is a successful grifter:Younger has received about $130,000 in donations from his publicity campaign, Cooks said.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2019/10/24/dallas-child-custody-battle-hinges-on-7-year-olds-gender-identity-draws-attention-of-abbott-cruz/
by Gravlen » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:40 pm
by True Refuge » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:41 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:Imagine my surprise when all the claims made in the ridiculously loaded and hyperbolic OP are blown out of the water in the first page, and yet there are 35 more pages to go in the thread.
The regular Trans thread is protected by runes which prevent debate being had. This is an open-season NSG trans thread so naturally a lot of activity flows through the bottleneck.
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by Necroghastia » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:41 pm
by Aureumterra » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:42 pm
by Aureumterra » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:50 pm
by Saiwania » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:52 pm
by True Refuge » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:54 pm
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by Cekoviu » Thu Oct 24, 2019 4:54 pm
Saiwania wrote:If the child was born a male, he's a boy so far as I'm concerned. I condemn this mother and rebuke her. It should be grounds for divorcing her in my opinion. In a more just and traditional society, maybe even if this were still the 1950s- a judge trying to force any kid to change sex or gender would be fired and barred from that office.
Besides which, children in general almost never know what they truly want. I really doubt that this kid really wants to transition. This path should be discouraged in the strongest possible terms from my perspective.
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Frogstar, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Shrillland, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Umeria, Xmara, Zurkerx
