The New California Republic wrote:Baranil wrote:No I am not. I am basing it off of the number of transgender individuals at the three schools, their genders and how the transition rate for females has grown far faster than the overall transition rate, which females contribute to. So stop with the false assumptions and start actually reading what I have said.
Your sample size is pathetically small, so much so that it is utterly statistically insignificant.
That's why I have also backed it up with how the article says that the number of female-to-male transgendered individuals is increasing quicker than the total number of transgendered individuals.
And besides, if the number of transgendered individuals was a 50/50 split for both genders then there would be a microscopic 0.00009536743% chance of all of the individuals being born the same gender under the assumption that there is a 50/50 split, which is not the case as a higher number of all-girls schools than all-boys schools and a higher number of teenage boys than teenage girls means that there are more people who were born male than born female at all of our schools, which makes that number even more unreasonably small.








