Australian rePublic wrote:Ancapistanana wrote:ah yes.
It isn't misleading, thank you for affirming that.
most of us are insulting you for opinions you do hold, like, oh, I don't know...
THAT YOU THINK OBAMA IS A MUSLIM
also, not everyone who wants to save the planet is leftist. The thing is that the most vocal and supported leftists are, and the most vocal and supported right-wingers are literally slaves to big oil and gas companies.
What you were saying from your original post is clear as day, you were saying
"since some people bought seaside property, their argument is bad!"
And now that you have received appropriate backlash, you are trying to morph the argument into politics, when it really isn't.
When the fuck did I say that Obama was a Muslim? I'm pretty sure that I've never, ever called Obama a Muslim. I might have said that some people think he's a Muslim, but that doesn't mean I agree with them. Unless you're refering to the fact that I called him Barrok Hussein Obama- in that case- well- that's the guy's name! I'm not the one who named him. Calling someone by their name=/= making assumptions about one's religion. It = calling someone on by his name, nothing more, nothing less.
Now as for your next argument- I actually agree with you. Irrespective of whether or not climate change is anthropogenic- we need to save the world. I just think that listening to millionares yelling us for not having as much money as they do isn't the right way to do it. There are much better ways to save the world than listening to the likes of Al Gore yell at me because I can't afford all this green technology isn't the best way to do it- a conclusion I would have eventually come to, if you didn't make stupid assumptions about what my assumptions would be instead of giving me a chance to speak. In fact, the very fact that you just stupidly pulled the assumption that I think Obama is a Muslim out of your thin air tells me that you're much you're interested in drawing stupid conclusions about what I believe in than having an honest discussion. Seriously, when the fuck did I say, or even imply, that Obama was a Muslim? I'm not debating with people who speak on my behalf, plain amd simple. Now as for my statement about the 97% of climate scientists statistic being misleading, go on then, refute it
oh shit, it is his name.
Nevermind, sorry about that, I was wrong in that.
While yes, the 97% argument is misleading, it doesn't change the fact that earth is going to fucking die.
And, you seem to have not said anything about my last argument, which is that you're earlier argument you said
"because these people bought seaside homes, their argument is null!"
People refuted that, and you dodged responding to them, and now since that failed, you are trying to morph the argument into a matter of politics, which it really isn't.
and while that test itself may have been wrong, it's no secret that there is an overwhelming consensus that humans are accelerating climate change.
Those whom claim we don't are almost always not scientists, nor have they even the slightest idea of science nor the climate.
