Dooom35796821595 wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
If we adopted Labours platform we'd still be spending less than around half of successful European countries on public spending, and we'd still have lower tax rates than most of them.
And all of those countries have high debts and deficits. When exactly are these debts supposed to be paid? Or are we ok with more and more of the annual government spending going towards paying interest on loans?
The Corbyn manifesto is fully costed dude, we know where the money is coming from. Taxes. The figures are right there, and nobody has debunked them. They just keep spamming "HOW YOU GONNA PAY FOR IT?!"
We've told you. At length. In the manifesto. Is what you mean; "Can we simply the math enough so that a Tory voter can understand it?"?
Probably not, I don't understand the figures either, but economists say they check out. but I can simplify the concept for you;
Tax the rich.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng ... de-details
The deficit we're talking is a negligible figure compared to the overall spending ambitions of the Labour Party, which again, put us in the midst of European nations in terms of expenditure and taxation, not as some far left dystopia.