NATION

PASSWORD

MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which would be your favored candidate for the 2020 Republican Party presidential nomination?

Donald Trump
47
27%
Rocky De La Fuente
5
3%
Joe Walsh
4
2%
Bill Weld
23
13%
Bob Ely
0
No votes
Zoltan Istvan
6
3%
None of the above/other
30
17%
David Hasselhoff
58
34%
 
Total votes : 173

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7076
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:52 pm


He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.
Fly me to the moon on an irradiated manhole cover.
- Free speech
- Weapons rights
- Democracy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Racial equality
- Gender/sexual equality
- Voting rights
- Universal healthcare
- Workers rights
- Drug decriminalization
- Cannabis legalization
- Due process
- Rehabilitative justice
- Religious freedom
- Choice
- Environmental protections
- Secularism
ANTI
- Fascism/Nazism
- Conservatism
- Nationalism
- Authoritarianism/Totalitarianism
- Traditionalism
- Ethnic/racial supremacy
- Racism
- Sexism
- Transphobia
- Homophobia
- Religious extremism
- Laissez-faire capitalism
- Warmongering
- Accelerationism
- Isolationism
- Theocracy
- Anti-intellectualism
- Climate change denialism

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:55 pm



B-But what about all of that corruption, surely you d-don't want to send money to a c-country with so much corruption.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:00 pm


This is being discussed in the "All Things Impeachment" thread, where it belongs.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:54 pm

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.


I would not be so sure. The GOP controlled Senate has announced its own investigation into Joe Biden and as it has recently been surfaced someone in the FBI may have manipulated documents in 2016 in relation to the "russia probe".

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Nov 22, 2019 7:02 pm

Nakena wrote:
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.


I would not be so sure. The GOP controlled Senate has announced its own investigation into Joe Biden and as it has recently been surfaced someone in the FBI may have manipulated documents in 2016 in relation to the "russia probe".

Zurkerx wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
CNN had some coverage on the IG report in the middle of Wolf Blitzer's show yesterday about an FBI lawyer potentially having altered documents in regards to Carter Page. CNN has admitted to firing most of their investigative staff and they are little better than a wire service at this point, so I think it can be safely assumed to be a .gov leak. Taken with a hefty dose of salt, that IG report will make for good drama near the season finale of Trump series 3.


You're right about the FBI, but it was a document, not documents. The conduct of this FBI Lawyer didn’t alter the report's findings that the surveillance application of Page had a proper legal and factual basis and this person was ousted. Both sides, especially the GOP and Trump will cherry pick the report no doubt and be over joyed drama queens looking to make it exciting, but I think you're going to be somewhat disappointed that it's not going to have the bombshells that'll undermine the Russian Investigation, especially when Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to testify on the 11th I believe to confirm and clarify the report.

Basically what I'm saying is like Democrats whom are going to be disappointed in failing to impeach Trump, Republicans are going to be disappointed too with the FISA Report.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.


User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:47 pm



I thought you were in favor of dear leader Xi and Canada becoming a chicom dominion.
Last edited by Nakena on Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:50 pm

Nakena wrote:


I thought you were in favor of dear leader Xi and Canada becoming a chicom dominion.



Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10958
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:53 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Nakena wrote:
I would not be so sure. The GOP controlled Senate has announced its own investigation into Joe Biden and as it has recently been surfaced someone in the FBI may have manipulated documents in 2016 in relation to the "russia probe".

Zurkerx wrote:
You're right about the FBI, but it was a document, not documents. The conduct of this FBI Lawyer didn’t alter the report's findings that the surveillance application of Page had a proper legal and factual basis and this person was ousted. Both sides, especially the GOP and Trump will cherry pick the report no doubt and be over joyed drama queens looking to make it exciting, but I think you're going to be somewhat disappointed that it's not going to have the bombshells that'll undermine the Russian Investigation, especially when Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to testify on the 11th I believe to confirm and clarify the report.

Basically what I'm saying is like Democrats whom are going to be disappointed in failing to impeach Trump, Republicans are going to be disappointed too with the FISA Report.


I would like to add to this (and my apologies for posting in that thread about that: it came up). So, it wasn't a document that was altered (as I posted a few links a few posts back) but rather an email was changed and then inserted without it being vetted. So essentially, they did the correct procedures in terms of gathering evidence and presenting it in the legal fashion but failed to check and verify if the information was true. The whole investigation wasn't ran properly.



Trying to get a Chinese Trade Deal: the short term benefits are what politicians do anyway these days.
Last edited by Zurkerx on Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:55 pm

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Nakena wrote:
I thought you were in favor of dear leader Xi and Canada becoming a chicom dominion.



Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.


Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25688
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:10 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:

Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.


Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.

Cute that you think the PRC will ever give us what we want on trade. But I guess any excuse to stick the knife into our democratic values, right?

Just because Hong Kong is doomed doesn't mean we shouldn't still speak up. Speaking up for people seeking freedom in dictatorships has traditionally been one of our better routines.
Last edited by Senkaku on Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 pm

Senkaku wrote:Speaking up for people seeking freedom in dictatorships has traditionally been one of our better routines.


How little that does and why the threat is a bigger one I wrote here.

Speaking up wont cutting it.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:15 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.

Cute that you think the PRC will ever give us what we want on trade. But I guess any excuse to stick the knife into our democratic values, right?


I personally don't think the PRC will ever be an ideal trade partner but from Trumps position it's the right call to at least try, more stock market troubles from continuing the trade war is not something anyone in the GOP should want going into 2020.

Tbh unless you're on board with wiping the PRC from the face of the earth those democratic values are little more than a way for us to pat ourselves on the back and feel good about it. It won't change anything in Hong Kong and down the line they will still become part of the PRC and lose all those rights.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm

So what happened to all the trash talk of the tariffs and trade war pwning China?
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Senkaku wrote:Cute that you think the PRC will ever give us what we want on trade. But I guess any excuse to stick the knife into our democratic values, right?


I personally don't think the PRC will ever be an ideal trade partner but from Trumps position it's the right call to at least try, more stock market troubles from continuing the trade war is not something anyone in the GOP should want going into 2020.

Tbh unless you're on board with wiping the PRC from the face of the earth those democratic values are little more than a way for us to pat ourselves on the back and feel good about it. It won't change anything in Hong Kong and down the line they will still become part of the PRC and lose all those rights.


Thats preferable but not horribly likely unless you're, and I think you are, here advocating a preemptive strike (and war) as long as the US are still able to do so, while getting away (as in survive without) with it.

I believe however that the PRC is not going to last forever and suffers from inherent instabilities already as we speak. An economic crisis or two could weaken the Beijing clique. That does not mean that there shouldn be a containment policy against the PRC for the time being.
Last edited by Nakena on Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:30 pm

Gormwood wrote:So what happened to all the trash talk of the tariffs and trade war pwning China?


It has been hurting China, but their system is inherently superior to our own in this matter and state control over their economy and a unified government makes it far easier to them to roll with it and keep up the trade war on their end.

Nakena wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I personally don't think the PRC will ever be an ideal trade partner but from Trumps position it's the right call to at least try, more stock market troubles from continuing the trade war is not something anyone in the GOP should want going into 2020.

Tbh unless you're on board with wiping the PRC from the face of the earth those democratic values are little more than a way for us to pat ourselves on the back and feel good about it. It won't change anything in Hong Kong and down the line they will still become part of the PRC and lose all those rights.


Thats preferable but not horribly likely unless you're, and I think you are, here advocating a preemptive strike (and war) as long as the US are still able to do so, while getting away (as in survive without) with it.

I believe however that the PRC is not going to last forever and suffers from inherent instabilities already as we speak. An economic crisis or two could weaken the Beijing clique. That does not mean that there shouldn be a containment policy against the PRC for the time being.


I think the PRC is here to stay tbh. The international community is too spineless to actually try and do anything to them and they have more than enough internal power to keep people down and the CPC on top.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:37 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:I think the PRC is here to stay tbh. The international community is too spineless to actually try and do anything to them and they have more than enough internal power to keep people down and the CPC on top.


The PRC will not fall because of the international community doing something but due internal reasons. They are already in an critical phase of their "dynastic" cycle right now, and they're afraid things going bad. Which is the reason why they are resorting to aggressive measures. Would the CCP leadership be more confident, then they wouldn do that. But they are in fear and paranoia, that things could get out of control.

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:38 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:

Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.


Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.


Freedom over trade deals. Allways.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:41 pm

Nakena wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:I think the PRC is here to stay tbh. The international community is too spineless to actually try and do anything to them and they have more than enough internal power to keep people down and the CPC on top.


The PRC will not fall because of the international community doing something but due internal reasons. They are already in an critical phase of their "dynastic" cycle right now, and they're afraid things going bad. Which is the reason why they are resorting to aggressive measures. Would the CCP leadership be more confident, then they wouldn do that. But they are in fear and paranoia, that things could get out of control.


The most that'll happen is another Tiananmen and they'll stick around, imo.

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.


Freedom over trade deals. Allways.


We'll see how much that freedom matters when the PLA crushes it under tank tread and we just sit back and watch : ^ )
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:48 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:The most that'll happen is another Tiananmen and they'll stick around, imo.


Dangers for the CCP come not so much from "democracy" loving students or so but generalized social unrest or general hysteria that can be easily caused by shifts and economic troubles and other factors. The biggest danger to the CCP rule are certain volatilities of the chinese "Volkscharacter" that can break through occassionally in orgies of destruction, chaos and mass hysteria. They are well aware of that. Tiananmen might have led to that if it hadn be contained early on. Things could go very ugly then.

Neko-Koku was, for his many odd takes, right on this one.

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:We'll see how much that freedom matters when the PLA crushes it under tank tread and we just sit back and watch : ^ )


In HK they're trying to slide the protests out for now. No Tanks. Yet.
Last edited by Nakena on Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:31 pm

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN1XW2A2

Looks like Donald Trump is going to have to replace the entire senior administration of the Navy, because they don't want this Navy SEAL back, Richard Spencer included.

Makes you wonder just how atrocious the guy's behavior was that Trump figured he was a good guy. My guess is, simply posing with a teenaged ISIS fighter's corpse isn't even the worst of it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-g ... ng-2019-11

Also... Yeah. Because a fucking active duty soldier wearing his uniform to a formal hearing is suspicious.

Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:41 pm

The Rich Port wrote:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-seals-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-navy-secretary-backs-seals-expulsion-review-despite-trump-objection-idUSKBN1XW2A2

Looks like Donald Trump is going to have to replace the entire senior administration of the Navy, because they don't want this Navy SEAL back, Richard Spencer included.

Makes you wonder just how atrocious the guy's behavior was that Trump figured he was a good guy. My guess is, simply posing with a teenaged ISIS fighter's corpse isn't even the worst of it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-g ... ng-2019-11

Also... Yeah. Because a fucking active duty soldier wearing his uniform to a formal hearing is suspicious.

Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.


The SEAL did a lot of shit they couldn't prove in a court martial but know he did. Sniping a teenage girl picking flowers, firing machine guns into villages with no specific target, stabbing the boy he had his photo taken with to death....things like that.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66792
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:49 pm

The Rich Port wrote:Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.


You're only just learning this now?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:09 pm

The Rich Port wrote:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-seals-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-navy-secretary-backs-seals-expulsion-review-despite-trump-objection-idUSKBN1XW2A2

Looks like Donald Trump is going to have to replace the entire senior administration of the Navy, because they don't want this Navy SEAL back, Richard Spencer included.

Makes you wonder just how atrocious the guy's behavior was that Trump figured he was a good guy. My guess is, simply posing with a teenaged ISIS fighter's corpse isn't even the worst of it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-g ... ng-2019-11

Also... Yeah. Because a fucking active duty soldier wearing his uniform to a formal hearing is suspicious.

Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.

Now imagine how the Republicans would have responded if Bill Clinton wanted to purge any part of the miliary.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:12 pm

Vassenor wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.


You're only just learning this now?

Why do I get the feeling the asslickers he fills the purge with will all be Neidermeyer-grade stupid fucks that'll get a lot of service personnel killed?
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Aureumterra III, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Beyaz Toros, El Lazaro, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hurdergaryp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Temecula, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Republica de Sierra Nevada, San Lumen, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, The Merry-Men, Valrifall, Worble Grubblo

Advertisement

Remove ads