He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.
Advertisement

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:52 pm

by Telconi » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:55 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:00 pm

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:54 pm
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 22, 2019 7:02 pm
Nakena wrote:The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:He digs the grave of his presidency deeper everyday.
I would not be so sure. The GOP controlled Senate has announced its own investigation into Joe Biden and as it has recently been surfaced someone in the FBI may have manipulated documents in 2016 in relation to the "russia probe".
Zurkerx wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
CNN had some coverage on the IG report in the middle of Wolf Blitzer's show yesterday about an FBI lawyer potentially having altered documents in regards to Carter Page. CNN has admitted to firing most of their investigative staff and they are little better than a wire service at this point, so I think it can be safely assumed to be a .gov leak. Taken with a hefty dose of salt, that IG report will make for good drama near the season finale of Trump series 3.
You're right about the FBI, but it was a document, not documents. The conduct of this FBI Lawyer didn’t alter the report's findings that the surveillance application of Page had a proper legal and factual basis and this person was ousted. Both sides, especially the GOP and Trump will cherry pick the report no doubt and be over joyed drama queens looking to make it exciting, but I think you're going to be somewhat disappointed that it's not going to have the bombshells that'll undermine the Russian Investigation, especially when Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to testify on the 11th I believe to confirm and clarify the report.
Basically what I'm saying is like Democrats whom are going to be disappointed in failing to impeach Trump, Republicans are going to be disappointed too with the FISA Report.

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 pm

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:47 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/11/22/trump-says-he-might-veto-legislation-that-aims-protect-human-rights-hong-kong-because-bill-would-impact-china-trade-talks/
What the fuck is he doing

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:50 pm
Nakena wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/11/22/trump-says-he-might-veto-legislation-that-aims-protect-human-rights-hong-kong-because-bill-would-impact-china-trade-talks/
What the fuck is he doing
I thought you were in favor of dear leader Xi and Canada becoming a chicom dominion.

by Zurkerx » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:53 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Nakena wrote:
I would not be so sure. The GOP controlled Senate has announced its own investigation into Joe Biden and as it has recently been surfaced someone in the FBI may have manipulated documents in 2016 in relation to the "russia probe".Zurkerx wrote:
You're right about the FBI, but it was a document, not documents. The conduct of this FBI Lawyer didn’t alter the report's findings that the surveillance application of Page had a proper legal and factual basis and this person was ousted. Both sides, especially the GOP and Trump will cherry pick the report no doubt and be over joyed drama queens looking to make it exciting, but I think you're going to be somewhat disappointed that it's not going to have the bombshells that'll undermine the Russian Investigation, especially when Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to testify on the 11th I believe to confirm and clarify the report.
Basically what I'm saying is like Democrats whom are going to be disappointed in failing to impeach Trump, Republicans are going to be disappointed too with the FISA Report.
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/11/22/trump-says-he-might-veto-legislation-that-aims-protect-human-rights-hong-kong-because-bill-would-impact-china-trade-talks/
What the fuck is he doing

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:55 pm

by Senkaku » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:10 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.
Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 pm
Senkaku wrote:Speaking up for people seeking freedom in dictatorships has traditionally been one of our better routines.

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:15 pm
Senkaku wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.
Cute that you think the PRC will ever give us what we want on trade. But I guess any excuse to stick the knife into our democratic values, right?

by Gormwood » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:22 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Senkaku wrote:Cute that you think the PRC will ever give us what we want on trade. But I guess any excuse to stick the knife into our democratic values, right?
I personally don't think the PRC will ever be an ideal trade partner but from Trumps position it's the right call to at least try, more stock market troubles from continuing the trade war is not something anyone in the GOP should want going into 2020.
Tbh unless you're on board with wiping the PRC from the face of the earth those democratic values are little more than a way for us to pat ourselves on the back and feel good about it. It won't change anything in Hong Kong and down the line they will still become part of the PRC and lose all those rights.

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:30 pm
Gormwood wrote:So what happened to all the trash talk of the tariffs and trade war pwning China?
Nakena wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I personally don't think the PRC will ever be an ideal trade partner but from Trumps position it's the right call to at least try, more stock market troubles from continuing the trade war is not something anyone in the GOP should want going into 2020.
Tbh unless you're on board with wiping the PRC from the face of the earth those democratic values are little more than a way for us to pat ourselves on the back and feel good about it. It won't change anything in Hong Kong and down the line they will still become part of the PRC and lose all those rights.
Thats preferable but not horribly likely unless you're, and I think you are, here advocating a preemptive strike (and war) as long as the US are still able to do so, while getting away (as in survive without) with it.
I believe however that the PRC is not going to last forever and suffers from inherent instabilities already as we speak. An economic crisis or two could weaken the Beijing clique. That does not mean that there shouldn be a containment policy against the PRC for the time being.

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:37 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:I think the PRC is here to stay tbh. The international community is too spineless to actually try and do anything to them and they have more than enough internal power to keep people down and the CPC on top.

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:38 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Straw maning. I have allways made my support clear for a free hong kong.
Hong Kong will cease to be free in a few decades and nothing short of a war will change that. Trump is, tbh, making the right call by trying to focus on trade instead.

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:41 pm
Nakena wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:I think the PRC is here to stay tbh. The international community is too spineless to actually try and do anything to them and they have more than enough internal power to keep people down and the CPC on top.
The PRC will not fall because of the international community doing something but due internal reasons. They are already in an critical phase of their "dynastic" cycle right now, and they're afraid things going bad. Which is the reason why they are resorting to aggressive measures. Would the CCP leadership be more confident, then they wouldn do that. But they are in fear and paranoia, that things could get out of control.

by Nakena » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:48 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The most that'll happen is another Tiananmen and they'll stick around, imo.
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:We'll see how much that freedom matters when the PLA crushes it under tank tread and we just sit back and watch : ^ )

by The Rich Port » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:31 pm

by Fartsniffage » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:41 pm
The Rich Port wrote:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-seals-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-navy-secretary-backs-seals-expulsion-review-despite-trump-objection-idUSKBN1XW2A2
Looks like Donald Trump is going to have to replace the entire senior administration of the Navy, because they don't want this Navy SEAL back, Richard Spencer included.
Makes you wonder just how atrocious the guy's behavior was that Trump figured he was a good guy. My guess is, simply posing with a teenaged ISIS fighter's corpse isn't even the worst of it.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-g ... ng-2019-11
Also... Yeah. Because a fucking active duty soldier wearing his uniform to a formal hearing is suspicious.
Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.

by Vassenor » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:49 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.

by Gormwood » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:09 pm
The Rich Port wrote:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-seals-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-navy-secretary-backs-seals-expulsion-review-despite-trump-objection-idUSKBN1XW2A2
Looks like Donald Trump is going to have to replace the entire senior administration of the Navy, because they don't want this Navy SEAL back, Richard Spencer included.
Makes you wonder just how atrocious the guy's behavior was that Trump figured he was a good guy. My guess is, simply posing with a teenaged ISIS fighter's corpse isn't even the worst of it.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-g ... ng-2019-11
Also... Yeah. Because a fucking active duty soldier wearing his uniform to a formal hearing is suspicious.
Methinks the GOP and Trump only respect veterans and the military only when they're bootlicking ass kissers.

by Gormwood » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Aureumterra III, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Beyaz Toros, El Lazaro, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hurdergaryp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Temecula, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Republica de Sierra Nevada, San Lumen, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, The Merry-Men, Valrifall, Worble Grubblo
Advertisement