Donnie getting triggered means the Republicans get primaried by the MAGAForce.
Advertisement
by Gormwood » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:31 pm
by Crockerland » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:31 pm
by Fartsniffage » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:32 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Vassenor wrote:So has the pro-Trump narrative moved beyond "There was no quid pro quo and even if there was that isn't illegal and if it was illegal then it's not applicable to the President because reasons"?
Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
by The East Marches II » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:32 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
Trump has the power through the AG to order an investigation into the Bidens. Why hasn't he?
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:33 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Not how to do that.Eric Ciaramella wrote:Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
No part of Biden's involvement is obscured.
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:33 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by The East Marches II » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:34 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Gormwood wrote:Donnie getting triggered means the Republicans get primaried by the MAGAForce.
I’ll be honest. I don’t know which band is funnier when triggered anymore. This ride has been a clusterfuck since 2016. At this point, all I can do is eat pop corn, sparkling water and laugh.
by Gormwood » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:34 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
Trump has the power through the AG to order an investigation into the Bidens. Why hasn't he?
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:35 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Gormwood wrote:Donnie getting triggered means the Republicans get primaried by the MAGAForce.
I’ll be honest. I don’t know which band is funnier when triggered anymore. This ride has been a clusterfuck since 2016. At this point, all I can do is eat pop corn, sparkling water and laugh.
by The East Marches II » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:36 pm
Gormwood wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Trump has the power through the AG to order an investigation into the Bidens. Why hasn't he?
It's almost as if he's more interested in kneecapping Biden's candidacy than actually cracking down on corruption. Which given how Biden is doing so far looks like another disastrous waste of money on Trump's part.
by Zurkerx » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:37 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Vassenor wrote:So has the pro-Trump narrative moved beyond "There was no quid pro quo and even if there was that isn't illegal and if it was illegal then it's not applicable to the President because reasons"?
Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:39 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:Trump: "I want you to investigate possible corruption of a former member of our government."
Democrats: "QUID PRO QUO!! CORRUPTION!!"
Honestly people, if you want to investigate Trump go ahead. Let us investigate Biden. I want transparency everywhere, regardless of political affiliation.
Soliciting a foreign government to get dirt on a political opponent is illegal: The FEC says so:§ 30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition. It shall be unlawful for—
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing
of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a
contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or
local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the
meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a
foreign national.
(b) As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means—
(1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section
611(b) of title 22,24 except that the term “foreign national” shall not
include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a
national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act) and who is not lawfully admitted for
permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.25
Foot notes:
24: 22 U.S.C. § 611(b) provides:
“(b) The term “foreign principal” includes—
(1) a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;
(2) a person outside of the United States, unless it is established that such person is an individual and
a citizen of and domiciled within the United States, or that such person is not an individual and is
organized under or created by the laws of the United States or of any State or other place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States and has its principal place of business within the United States; and
(3) a partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized
under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.”
25: 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20) provides: “(20) The term lawfully admitted for permanent residence means the
status of having been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an
immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed.”
by Gormwood » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:41 pm
by Fartsniffage » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:41 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Soliciting a foreign government to get dirt on a political opponent is illegal: The FEC says so:§ 30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition. It shall be unlawful for—
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing
of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a
contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or
local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the
meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a
foreign national.
(b) As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means—
(1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section
611(b) of title 22,24 except that the term “foreign national” shall not
include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a
national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act) and who is not lawfully admitted for
permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.25
Foot notes:
24: 22 U.S.C. § 611(b) provides:
“(b) The term “foreign principal” includes—
(1) a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;
(2) a person outside of the United States, unless it is established that such person is an individual and
a citizen of and domiciled within the United States, or that such person is not an individual and is
organized under or created by the laws of the United States or of any State or other place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States and has its principal place of business within the United States; and
(3) a partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized
under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.”
25: 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20) provides: “(20) The term lawfully admitted for permanent residence means the
status of having been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an
immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed.”
So you can't investigate corruption if you might benefit politically. Got it.
by The East Marches II » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:41 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Soliciting a foreign government to get dirt on a political opponent is illegal: The FEC says so:§ 30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition. It shall be unlawful for—
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing
of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a
contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or
local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the
meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a
foreign national.
(b) As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means—
(1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section
611(b) of title 22,24 except that the term “foreign national” shall not
include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a
national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act) and who is not lawfully admitted for
permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.25
Foot notes:
24: 22 U.S.C. § 611(b) provides:
“(b) The term “foreign principal” includes—
(1) a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;
(2) a person outside of the United States, unless it is established that such person is an individual and
a citizen of and domiciled within the United States, or that such person is not an individual and is
organized under or created by the laws of the United States or of any State or other place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States and has its principal place of business within the United States; and
(3) a partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized
under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.”
25: 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20) provides: “(20) The term lawfully admitted for permanent residence means the
status of having been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an
immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed.”
So you can't investigate corruption if you might benefit politically. Got it.
by Fartsniffage » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:45 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Edit: Also, Biden is clearly in violation of this law. This is literally what he did. He asked a Ukraine official to halt the investigation of the company his son was working at and directly profited from it. How is that not corrupt? How does that not warrant investigation?
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:46 pm
Gormwood wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:
Indeed. We already know there was corruption there: "If that guy isn't fired by the time I get on that plane, you aren't getting the money."
The guy who was sitting on his ass on investigating corruption, especially in Burisma (the oil company Hunter Biden was a board member on). So you're saying Joe Biden was trying to cover up Hunter's corruption by trying to get the guy doing nothing to investigate possible corruption of the company Hunter Biden was a board member on fired so that the investigation could proceed?
by Fartsniffage » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:48 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Gormwood wrote:The guy who was sitting on his ass on investigating corruption, especially in Burisma (the oil company Hunter Biden was a board member on). So you're saying Joe Biden was trying to cover up Hunter's corruption by trying to get the guy doing nothing to investigate possible corruption of the company Hunter Biden was a board member on fired so that the investigation could proceed?
Dude, that's not what happened. If the guy was doing nothing Joe Biden would have just ignored it. He got involved because he didn't want his son to be investigated. Why else would he want the guy fired?
by Spirit of Hope » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:48 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:48 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:Edit: Also, Biden is clearly in violation of this law. This is literally what he did. He asked a Ukraine official to halt the investigation of the company his son was working at and directly profited from it. How is that not corrupt? How does that not warrant investigation?
Stop lying dude, it doesn't look good.
by Gormwood » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:49 pm
Eric Ciaramella wrote:Gormwood wrote:The guy who was sitting on his ass on investigating corruption, especially in Burisma (the oil company Hunter Biden was a board member on). So you're saying Joe Biden was trying to cover up Hunter's corruption by trying to get the guy doing nothing to investigate possible corruption of the company Hunter Biden was a board member on fired so that the investigation could proceed?
(Image)
Dude, that's not what happened. If the guy was doing nothing Joe Biden would have just ignored it. He got involved because he didn't want his son to be investigated. Why else would he want the guy fired?
by Fartsniffage » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:49 pm
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:53 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:
Dude, that's not what happened. If the guy was doing nothing Joe Biden would have just ignored it. He got involved because he didn't want his son to be investigated. Why else would he want the guy fired?
The whole Western world wanted the guy fired. Because he wasn't investigating corruption in Ukraine. Biden was relaying a message from Obama that was fully supported by the EU. Those are the facts.
by Eric Ciaramella » Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:54 pm
Gormwood wrote:Eric Ciaramella wrote:
Dude, that's not what happened. If the guy was doing nothing Joe Biden would have just ignored it. He got involved because he didn't want his son to be investigated. Why else would he want the guy fired?
"If I get the company Hunter is a board member on investigated then they won't investigate Hunter."
You missed out on a career in law enforcement.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, IC-Wave, Tiami
Advertisement