MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

[Ifreann]

Trump can do no wrong. I am convinced at this point he's likely getting reelection unless there is a recession.

Verifiably false, he can always nominate Merrick Garland to SCOTUS.

He's more likely to nominate Don Jr.

---

Any of their 2016 candidates would have been better for them than Donald Trump.

If by 'better for them' you mean better for the Democrats. Then yes. The Republicans needed to change. They did.

The fact that Democrats see this as cultishness will always confuse me.

I mean better for the Republicans. They have gained four years of presidential power, but at what cost?

[Aclion]

If by 'better for them' you mean better for the Democrats. Then yes. The Republicans needed to change. They did.

The fact that Democrats see this as cultishness will always confuse me.

I mean better for the Republicans. They have gained four years of presidential power, but at what cost?[/quote]
Splitting the democrat party, and shedding neoconservativism.

[Telconi]

Verifiably false, he can always nominate Merrick Garland to SCOTUS.

He's more likely to nominate Don Jr.

---

If by 'better for them' you mean better for the Democrats. Then yes. The Republicans needed to change. They did.

The fact that Democrats see this as cultishness will always confuse me.

I mean better for the Republicans. They have gained four years of presidential power, but at what cost?

Well that's not so bad then.

[Telconi]

Verifiably false, he can always nominate Merrick Garland to SCOTUS.

Yes, because a centrist who has actively avoided making sweeping changes in policy from the bench would be the worst thign in the world. People act like he is some sort of hyper leftist. He is, at best, just left of center and is well regarded by legal professionals for being so damn boring in his opinions.

Yes. We need sweeping changes. Some status quo empty suit isn't helpful in the slightest, and he's a lefty to boot, so if he did make any stands they'd be wrong.

[Seangoli]

If by 'better for them' you mean better for the Democrats. Then yes. The Republicans needed to change. They did.

The fact that Democrats see this as cultishness will always confuse me.

I mean better for the Republicans. They have gained four years of presidential power, but at what cost?

Splitting the democrat party, and shedding neoconservativism.[/quote]

To put it bluntly, the Democrat party looks very similar to the Republican party circa 2012-2014. And look at em now. The Democrats rested on their laurels, and hoped the Republicans would eat themselves alive. But much like the Republicans, the ridiculous Democrat have already burned out.

And if you think the Republicans have shed neocons, you best be prepared to be sore when Trump is eventually gone.

[Seangoli]

Yes, because a centrist who has actively avoided making sweeping changes in policy from the bench would be the worst thign in the world. People act like he is some sort of hyper leftist. He is, at best, just left of center and is well regarded by legal professionals for being so damn boring in his opinions.

Yes. We need sweeping changes. Some status quo empty suit isn't helpful in the slightest, and he's a lefty to boot, so if he did make any stands they'd be wrong.

One of his dissents involved first Amendment protections to journalists and government coercion to force them to divulge sources.

If that's wrong, I don't want to be right.

[Telconi]

Yes. We need sweeping changes. Some status quo empty suit isn't helpful in the slightest, and he's a lefty to boot, so if he did make any stands they'd be wrong.

One of his dissents involved first Amendment protections to journalists and government coercion to force them to divulge sources.

If that's wrong, I don't want to be right.

Indeed.

[Ifreann]

I mean better for the Republicans. They have gained four years of presidential power, but at what cost?

Splitting the democrat party, and shedding neoconservativism.

Invigorating the opposition and having their own people sent to prison.

[The Emerald Legion]

Splitting the democrat party, and shedding neoconservativism.

Invigorating the opposition and having their own people sent to prison.

Not really. The Democrats aren't invigorated. They're Hysteric. There's a difference.

[Cannot think of a name]

Aaaand here's this asshole. State of the Union time. What's on your bingo card?


State of the Union is strong is the free space.

[The Wasatch]

Aaaand here's this asshole. State of the Union time. What's on your bingo card?


State of the Union is strong is the free space.

I wonder if it will be as entertaining as "American Carnage?"

[Albrenia]

More like State of the Divide, amirite?

[Cannot think of a name]

"The state of our union is stronger than ever before..."


Is it?

[Nobel Hobos 2]

Aaaand here's this asshole. State of the Union time. What's on your bingo card?


State of the Union is strong is the free space.

You think? How about "the State of the Union is Florida" for a little joke to start.

EDIT: Damn. I might have to watch it.

[Cannot think of a name]

Who is this sloppy old dude with money sticking out where a handkerchief goes?

[The Black Forrest]

12000 new factories are being built? Where?

401K plans have increased in value 60-100 %?

Of course space force....

[Cannot think of a name]

Every time they cut to the military guys they all look like they're going, "Cut away from us..."




"I want to look down on the world" is a super villain line.

[Nobel Hobos 2]

Whenever Pelosi thinks something is lie or exaggeration she winces or shakes her head. Quite a lot of the time though she's just looking at her pad, she's not sure, or can't disagree.

She needs to take a tip from journalists and use a pen. "Make a note of that".

She's also made a few comments to Pence, once it was almost audible in the President's mic and Pence was pissed. Mostly he just smirks.

[Cannot think of a name]

The only thing that's going to be more tedious than this blovating is going to be the inevitably awkward, halting, and poorly staged Democratic response because the responses to every state of the union are awkward, halting, and poorly staged. Usually with someone whose rise in the party is about to end in a ball of whatever it is they did that late night comedians make fun of for the next two days.

Fuck charter schools.

Oh, that's some stunting, right there. Give a kid a scholarship straight through the SOTU.

"No child should be forced to send their kid to a failing government school."

You could fund the sch-

"How is that going to make Betsy richer?"

[Nobel Hobos 2]

Trump thanked his wife, but he's still not done. Poor form!

[Cannot think of a name]

Whenever Pelosi thinks something is lie or exaggeration she winces or shakes her head. Quite a lot of the time though she's just looking at her pad, she's not sure, or can't disagree.

She needs to take a tip from journalists and use a pen. "Make a note of that".

She's also made a few comments to Pence, once it was almost audible in the President's mic and Pence was pissed. Mostly he just smirks.

I think she has a copy of the script and is checking it against what he actually said.

[Nobel Hobos 2]

"We will never let socialism destroy American healthcare"

[Nobel Hobos 2]

I think she has a copy of the script and is checking it against what he actually said.

Very plausible

[Liriena]

lmao at all of congress cheering for Guaido, South America's #1 cuck

[Cannot think of a name]

"We will never let socialism destroy American healthcare"

"If I have to abuse all my power to do it!"