It's a yes or no question.
Advertisement
by Fartsniffage » Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:34 pm
by Chernoslavia » Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:37 pm
Gormwood wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
And so was Obama, doesn't mean I have to like either.
You were all "America, FUCK YEAH!!" when Trump ordered a drone strike on Suleimani but when Trump dismisses the damage inflicted by the retaliatory missile strike you suddenly don't like him. That's rather convenient for you.
by Neu California » Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:49 am
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:27 am
Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
by Ifreann » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:31 am
Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
by Imperial Joseon » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:31 am
Ifreann wrote:Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
The wall need another wall to protect it from the wind.
by San Lumen » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:08 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
Turns out that we were getting the inflection wrong. He said "We'll build a wall and Mexico will pay for it" and we thought he meant money, but no...he was saying "We'll build a wall and Mexico will pay for it." Like a super villain would say it.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:26 am
Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
by Gormwood » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:02 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
Yet this massive waste of money, partly the reason why the Trump presidency has added even more to the US debt, is going to stop all the illegals from crossing the border? It can't even stop the big bad wolf from huffing and puffing and blowing the wall down.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:07 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
Yet this massive waste of money, partly the reason why the Trump presidency has added even more to the US debt, is going to stop all the illegals from crossing the border? It can't even stop the big bad wolf from huffing and puffing and blowing the wall down.
by Zurkerx » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:08 am
Neu California wrote:Part of Trump's border wall blew over in strong winds
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51307868
Here in the golden state, even the winds hate The Donald
by Gormwood » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:08 am
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Yet this massive waste of money, partly the reason why the Trump presidency has added even more to the US debt, is going to stop all the illegals from crossing the border? It can't even stop the big bad wolf from huffing and puffing and blowing the wall down.
Speaking of not stopping smugglers... https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51304861
by Vassenor » Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:48 am
by Fahran » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:53 am
by Fahran » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:57 am
by Valrifell » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:58 am
Fahran wrote:A wall has its uses but a far more useful investment would be in raising standards of enforcement and in funding more, better equipped, and more desirable personnel to detain illegal immigrants, process them in a humane way, and expedite deportation or greenlighting for residency. We have increased resources to address the stream of refugees arriving from Central America and it has led to more undocumented persons living in the United States without adequate resources to succeed and realize the American dream and, beyond that, to the inhumanities and atrocities committed by ICE and private organizations involved in immigration. As long as the alternatives are open borders or treating immigrants like animals, we're not going to get sound policy.
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:59 am
Fahran wrote:A wall has its uses but a far more useful investment would be in raising standards of enforcement and in funding more, better equipped, and more desirable personnel to detain illegal immigrants, process them in a humane way, and expedite deportation or greenlighting for residency. We have increased resources to address the stream of refugees arriving from Central America and it has led to more undocumented persons living in the United States without adequate resources to succeed and realize the American dream and, beyond that, to the inhumanities and atrocities committed by ICE and private organizations involved in immigration. As long as the alternatives are open borders or treating immigrants like animals, we're not going to get sound policy.
by Gormwood » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:01 am
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:Fahran wrote:A wall has its uses but a far more useful investment would be in raising standards of enforcement and in funding more, better equipped, and more desirable personnel to detain illegal immigrants, process them in a humane way, and expedite deportation or greenlighting for residency. We have increased resources to address the stream of refugees arriving from Central America and it has led to more undocumented persons living in the United States without adequate resources to succeed and realize the American dream and, beyond that, to the inhumanities and atrocities committed by ICE and private organizations involved in immigration. As long as the alternatives are open borders or treating immigrants like animals, we're not going to get sound policy.
If you want to deport all people incapable of living the American dream, the US would be left with a population the size of Denmark’s.
by Ifreann » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:05 am
Fahran wrote:Also, escalating the proxy war with Iran after repeated escalations and aggravations from Iran was not as unsound as left-wing pundits have made it out to be and has not brought us to the cusp of outright conventional war. Iran retaliated as expected but it's not as though they weren't having their proxies try to kill Americans and Iraqis previously. A weak-kneed response does not behoove us in this situation. And isn't anti-imperialist. It's merely appeasement in the face of Iranian hegemonic ambitions.
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:05 am
Fahran wrote:Also, escalating the proxy war with Iran after repeated escalations and aggravations from Iran was not as unsound as left-wing pundits have made it out to be and has not brought us to the cusp of outright conventional war. Iran retaliated as expected but it's not as though they weren't having their proxies try to kill Americans and Iraqis previously. A weak-kneed response does not behoove us in this situation. And isn't anti-imperialist. It's merely appeasement in the face of Iranian hegemonic ambitions.
by Fahran » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:06 am
Valrifell wrote:The fun part is nobody is advocating for open borders and your position sounds oddly close to the Democratic one.
Ifreann wrote:Pretending that no one was injured in an attack that in fact injured dozens of US service members requires the strongest of knees.
by Gormwood » Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:08 am
Ifreann wrote:Fahran wrote:Also, escalating the proxy war with Iran after repeated escalations and aggravations from Iran was not as unsound as left-wing pundits have made it out to be and has not brought us to the cusp of outright conventional war. Iran retaliated as expected but it's not as though they weren't having their proxies try to kill Americans and Iraqis previously. A weak-kneed response does not behoove us in this situation. And isn't anti-imperialist. It's merely appeasement in the face of Iranian hegemonic ambitions.
Pretending that no one was injured in an attack that in fact injured dozens of US service members requires the strongest of knees.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Floofybit, Google [Bot], Hekp, Hurdergaryp, Ineva, Khoikhoia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Oiriu, South Neviersia, Taiqar, The Two Jerseys, Uvolla
Advertisement