MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

[Loben The 2nd]

Can we just end this shit on the note that ownership and deployment of 340 kiloton yield B61's should be permitted to the general populace, in the spirit of ending this experiment as fast as possible?

yes.

[Farnhamia]

Can we just end this shit on the note that ownership and deployment of 340 kiloton yield B61's should be permitted to the general populace, in the spirit of ending this experiment as fast as possible?

Let's not and say we did.

[Telconi]

And the Senate just confirmed a white supremacist and islamaphobe and homophobe to the 2nd circuit who has never tried a case in his life. How do these people sleep at night? It would be better if the Senate was rendered unable to function for awhile.

werent you saying a while ago that shutting down the government is a stupid move.

He also said that disrespecting elected officials meant someone hated "Free and fair elections"

[Northern Davincia]

The American government has been mocking the constitution for decades. People only care now because orange man bad.
Your intentions are only made clearer when you find judges you disagree with to be terrible people.

Bumbling along is arguably better than having both legs broken.

And the Senate just confirmed a white supremacist and islamaphobe and homophobe to the 2nd circuit who has never tried a case in his life. How do these people sleep at night? It would be better if the Senate was rendered unable to function for awhile.

"Everyone I don't like is a white supremacist, Islamophobic, and homophobic."
Don't fall for lies so quickly.

[San Lumen]

And the Senate just confirmed a white supremacist and islamaphobe and homophobe to the 2nd circuit who has never tried a case in his life. How do these people sleep at night? It would be better if the Senate was rendered unable to function for awhile.

"Everyone I don't like is a white supremacist, Islamophobic, and homophobic."
Don't fall for lies so quickly.

Thats not what I said and you know it.

here's your proof of my statement: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... trump.html

[Loben The 2nd]

werent you saying a while ago that shutting down the government is a stupid move.

He also said that disrespecting elected officials meant someone hated "Free and fair elections"

wow.

disrespecting elected officials? that is the american past time.

[Loben The 2nd]

"Everyone I don't like is a white supremacist, Islamophobic, and homophobic."
Don't fall for lies so quickly.

Thats not what I said and you know it.

here's your proof of my statement: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... trump.html

ok?

[Northern Davincia]

"Everyone I don't like is a white supremacist, Islamophobic, and homophobic."
Don't fall for lies so quickly.

Thats not what I said and you know it.

here's your proof of my statement: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... trump.html

>Slate
Got any real sources?

[San Lumen]

He also said that disrespecting elected officials meant someone hated "Free and fair elections"

wow.

disrespecting elected officials? that is the american past time.

Not what I said either

[Telconi]

wow.

disrespecting elected officials? that is the american past time.

Not what I said either

Denying past statements is the bread and butter of politics, you ought to run for elected office.

[Zurkerx]

Nearly half in poll say they struggle to determine if information is true.

Not surprising considering the fake stuff going around. However, this is the concerning part:

Democrats said they were more likely to lean on scientists and academics to determine if a piece of information is true, while Republicans said they are more likely to trust what they hear from President Trump.

[Neutraligon]

Nearly half in poll say they struggle to determine if information is true.

Not surprising considering the fake stuff going around. However, this is the concerning part:

Democrats said they were more likely to lean on scientists and academics to determine if a piece of information is true, while Republicans said they are more likely to trust what they hear from President Trump.

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

[Northern Davincia]

Nearly half in poll say they struggle to determine if information is true.

Not surprising considering the fake stuff going around. However, this is the concerning part:

Democrats said they were more likely to lean on scientists and academics to determine if a piece of information is true, while Republicans said they are more likely to trust what they hear from President Trump.

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

We're advanced enough that I can't sell radium water as a health product.

[Telconi]

Nearly half in poll say they struggle to determine if information is true.

Not surprising considering the fake stuff going around. However, this is the concerning part:

Democrats said they were more likely to lean on scientists and academics to determine if a piece of information is true, while Republicans said they are more likely to trust what they hear from President Trump.

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

Rather this is an issue depends on the scientist, some aren't worth listening to.

[The Black Forrest]

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

Rather this is an issue depends on the scientist, some aren't worth listening to.

Some cases that is true. However, Neutraligon is correct. Americans in general have problem listening to scientists.

[The Black Forrest]

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

We're advanced enough that I can't sell radium water as a health product.

Are we? You will find more then a few people who will use it if the label says it’s a health product.

[San Lumen]

Thats not what I said and you know it.

here's your proof of my statement: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... trump.html

>Slate
Got any real sources?

That's not a real source?

[Galloism]

Nearly half in poll say they struggle to determine if information is true.

Not surprising considering the fake stuff going around. However, this is the concerning part:

Democrats said they were more likely to lean on scientists and academics to determine if a piece of information is true, while Republicans said they are more likely to trust what they hear from President Trump.

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

There have been some problems.

[Telconi]

>Slate
Got any real sources?

That's not a real source?

Almost as real as Breitbart.

[Telconi]

America has had an issue with listening to scientists for a while now.

There have been some problems.

Which is an interesting point. Science, in it's essence, deals with facts, and therefore is trustworthy. Scientists, on the other hand, are people, subject to all of the failings thereof.

[Vassenor]

and that's coercion how?

You'd be bringing the entire Senate to a grinding halt to procure a vote against the will of the senators in office. I suggest you indulge in fewer fantasies where Republicans are rendered completely powerless.

You mean like how Mitch has ground the Senate to a halt by refusing to allow any Democrat-passed House bills to be put to vote?

[Kowani]

There have been some problems.

Which is an interesting point. Science, in it's essence, deals with facts, and therefore is trustworthy. Scientists, on the other hand, are people, subject to all of the failings thereof.

Now this is a deepity.

[Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States]

There have been some problems.

Which is an interesting point. Science, in it's essence, deals with facts, and therefore is trustworthy. Scientists, on the other hand, are people, subject to all of the failings thereof.

Which would be a valid point if scientists were criticised for their methods, which can be found in each paper. However, this is not the case. Scientists are mainly criticised for being scientists, usually with no actual material argument being made about a specific study.

“You are a scientist, and therefore I will mistrust your work, but I won’t actually go i to the study to see what was wrong. I just assume it is”

[Gormwood]

An interesting analysis of the downplayed implication of Trump trying to extort political favor from Ukraine

[Telconi]

Which is an interesting point. Science, in it's essence, deals with facts, and therefore is trustworthy. Scientists, on the other hand, are people, subject to all of the failings thereof.

Which would be a valid point if scientists were criticised for their methods, which can be found in each paper. However, this is not the case. Scientists are mainly criticised for being scientists, usually with no actual material argument being made about a specific study.

“You are a scientist, and therefore I will mistrust your work, but I won’t actually go i to the study to see what was wrong. I just assume it is”

So it's a valid point, thank you.