MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

[The Rich Port]

He should have used a needle gun.

Well here's hoping that they don't need to get a new balloon, or else the jerk is going to end up paying way more in restitution.

That balloon cost upwards of $6,000 to design and custom make, if not more.

[Nakena]

Well here's hoping that they don't need to get a new balloon, or else the jerk is going to end up paying way more in restitution.

That balloon cost upwards of $6,000 to design and custom make, if not more.

I am sure theres enough crowdfunders for both patchwork and legal defenses if it comes down to it.

[The Rich Port]

Well here's hoping that they don't need to get a new balloon, or else the jerk is going to end up paying way more in restitution.

That balloon cost upwards of $6,000 to design and custom make, if not more.

I am sure theres enough crowdfunders for both patchwork and legal defenses if it comes down to it.

All the legal defense money in the world doesn't help when they stupidly confess to the crime live on air, is it.

[Professor Irwin Corey]

Well here's hoping that they don't need to get a new balloon, or else the jerk is going to end up paying way more in restitution.

That balloon cost upwards of $6,000 to design and custom make, if not more.

I am sure theres enough crowdfunders for both patchwork and legal defenses if it comes down to it.

Therefore the jerk just wasted his money, time and everyone else's. He's so now.

[Crockerland]

Pretty sure that was a joke.

Was it though. Feel it in your gut and feel nauseated.

In other news, the Trump Baby assassin has been released on an $2500 bond. He was triggered by the balloon, and therefore felt the need to commit heinous property damage. What an amazing argument. I'm sure that'll go great in court for his felony mischief charge.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... tta-take-a

Man, and I thought the GoFundMe page for Digital Homicide was a scam.

It's his right to abort the Trump Baby Balloon if he so chooses, that's a private medical decision no government or law enforcement agency has any part in, as per Roe v. Wade.

[Cannot think of a name]

Best people etc.

Though my favorite part is this:

In a 2017 video posted on her nonprofit's website, Chang can be heard describing her work while a Time magazine cover with her face on it scrolls past.

"Here you are on Time magazine, congratulations! Tell me about this cover and how it came to be?" asks the interviewer, who hosts a YouTube show.

"Well, we started using drone technology in disaster response and so that was when the whole talk of how is technology being used to save lives in disaster response scenarios, I suppose I brought some attention to that," Chang said.

The interviewer says Chang brought the Time cover to the interview as an example of her work.

Time magazine spokesperson Kristin Matzen said the cover is "not authentic."

No wonder she got hired, that's a classic Trump move.

[Gormwood]

Was it though. Feel it in your gut and feel nauseated.

In other news, the Trump Baby assassin has been released on an $2500 bond. He was triggered by the balloon, and therefore felt the need to commit heinous property damage. What an amazing argument. I'm sure that'll go great in court for his felony mischief charge.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... tta-take-a

Man, and I thought the GoFundMe page for Digital Homicide was a scam.

It's his right to abort the Trump Baby Balloon if he so chooses, that's a private medical decision no government or law enforcement agency has any part in, as per Roe v. Wade.

If he was the one carrying the Trump Baby to term instead of someone else you would have an actual point as opposed to a flat shitpost.

[The Rich Port]

It's his right to abort the Trump Baby Balloon if he so chooses, that's a private medical decision no government or law enforcement agency has any part in, as per Roe v. Wade.

If he was the one carrying the Trump Baby to term instead of someone else you would have an actual point as opposed to a flat shitpost.

Indeed, a truly, most unsophisticated shitpost, dear boy.

Some would say... Poverty-stricken and immigrant.

[Eric Ciaramella]

#literallywho

Supposedly the whistleblower. Because endangering a potential whistleblower is OK if you're Republican.

And naming Julian Assange, Edward Snowden (among others) was somehow okay. You can't have it both ways. Both parties try and shield the evidence of their corruption, and in this case it is no different. The Democrats are doing everything to shield themselves and this is no different.

[Gormwood]

Supposedly the whistleblower. Because endangering a potential whistleblower is OK if you're Republican.

And naming Julian Assange, Edward Snowden (among others) was somehow okay. You can't have it both ways. Both parties try and shield the evidence of their corruption, and in this case it is no different. The Democrats are doing everything to shield themselves and this is no different.

Wow, an account fresh out of the oven! Are you truly that scared of being tied to an opinion?

[Eric Ciaramella]

And naming Julian Assange, Edward Snowden (among others) was somehow okay. You can't have it both ways. Both parties try and shield the evidence of their corruption, and in this case it is no different. The Democrats are doing everything to shield themselves and this is no different.

Wow, an account fresh out of the oven! Are you truly that scared of being tied to an opinion?

I quit NS a while back. I came back just for this. Why waste time trying to remember passwords when this name is available?

[The Rich Port]

Wow, an account fresh out of the oven! Are you truly that scared of being tied to an opinion?

I quit NS a while back. I came back just for this. Why waste time trying to remember passwords when this name is available?

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Also, who the fuck said Edward Snowden should have been PROSECUTED for it, let alone named?

[Gormwood]

I quit NS a while back. I came back just for this. Why waste time trying to remember passwords when this name is available?

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Plus the Democrats didn't stir up a frenzy around Assange or Snowden implying they wanted their base to lynch them. Just arrested and brought to trial.

[The East Marches II]

I quit NS a while back. I came back just for this. Why waste time trying to remember passwords when this name is available?

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Also, who the fuck said Edward Snowden should have been PROSECUTED for it, let alone named?

Every big talking head on CNN the day that business broke tbh. The Obama administration had a giant fit and pulled out all the stops to discredit him. Only to have Mr. Obama say by the end of it "we need to have a conversation". Pathetic really.

[Valrifell]

Snowden and Assange also technically aren't legally protected whistleblowers since they broke the law to do it.

[Eric Ciaramella]

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Plus the Democrats didn't stir up a frenzy around Assange or Snowden implying they wanted their base to lynch them. Just arrested and brought to trial.

How is "arrest them and bring them to trial" better than being open and public with information? I am fully aware I don't know who the whistleblower is, but it is massively hypocritical for our representatives to refuse transparency like this. We deserve to know what is going on! Anything less is corruption.

[Proctopeo]

Snowden and Assange also technically aren't legally protected whistleblowers since they broke the law to do it.

Honestly that's a dumb rule.

[The East Marches II]

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Plus the Democrats didn't stir up a frenzy around Assange or Snowden implying they wanted their base to lynch them. Just arrested and brought to trial.

No, they just got allies to almost break all diplomatic norms by storming a consulate and tore off their good masks in a fit rage. It was really top tier to witness. Thank Goodness Obama went after so many whistleblowers and journalists. That's not worrisome now that Trump runs the show!

[Gormwood]

Plus the Democrats didn't stir up a frenzy around Assange or Snowden implying they wanted their base to lynch them. Just arrested and brought to trial.

How is "arrest them and bring them to trial" better than being open and public with information? I am fully aware I don't know who the whistleblower is, but it is massively hypocritical for our representatives to refuse transparency like this. We deserve to know what is going on! Anything less is corruption.

The whistleblower followed proper protocol. Snowden and Assange sure as fuck didn't. Nice try though.

[Ifreann]

Best people etc.

Though my favorite part is this:

In a 2017 video posted on her nonprofit's website, Chang can be heard describing her work while a Time magazine cover with her face on it scrolls past.

"Here you are on Time magazine, congratulations! Tell me about this cover and how it came to be?" asks the interviewer, who hosts a YouTube show.

"Well, we started using drone technology in disaster response and so that was when the whole talk of how is technology being used to save lives in disaster response scenarios, I suppose I brought some attention to that," Chang said.

The interviewer says Chang brought the Time cover to the interview as an example of her work.

Time magazine spokesperson Kristin Matzen said the cover is "not authentic."

No wonder she got hired, that's a classic Trump move.

Grift recognise grift.

[Valrifell]

Snowden and Assange also technically aren't legally protected whistleblowers since they broke the law to do it.

Honestly that's a dumb rule.

Yeah, it is. But here we are.

[Greater Miami Shores]

I quit NS a while back. I came back just for this. Why waste time trying to remember passwords when this name is available?

You don't even know if that's the fucking guy.

Trump supporters have been wrong about this before... And many times before that.

Also, who the fuck said Edward Snowden should have been PROSECUTED for it, let alone named?

I can see The Rich Ports Posts and he can see mine, and I can technically post to this nation. Rich Port, I think we might have diplomatic RP relations with one of my main Miami nations. or we did not officially declare it so. I have to check my main nations to be sure. But I did post to you once for diplomatic relations a long time ago, years ago.

Eric Ciaramella is considered to be the whistleblower by Republicans and Real Clear Investigations. Granted by right wing organizations. But I would not expect leftists organizations to out the real whistleblower who ever the real whistleblower is:

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com ... 20996.html

I might post more posts on this issue in the near future.

For the Record just in case: Eric Ciaramella is not one of my over 153 Plus nations I use to RP with, not evade any foe list, ignore list or puppet wank anything. I would be more, dumb, stupid and foolish than I am, if I were to do this under the circumstances and under any circumstances.

[The East Marches II]

Snowden and Assange also technically aren't legally protected whistleblowers since they broke the law to do it.

Mr. Snowden exposed a security apparatus that the Stasi would have been jealous of and which both parties support (granted one of them claimed to dismantle it at the time). Nothing would have saved him and no party would have gone to the mat for him. As for Mr. Assange, telling the truth and doing real reporting is something the Obama administration liked to come down hard on. If your line on these people is raw legalism, then it is a mealy mouthed and cowardly position.

[Eric Ciaramella]

How is "arrest them and bring them to trial" better than being open and public with information? I am fully aware I don't know who the whistleblower is, but it is massively hypocritical for our representatives to refuse transparency like this. We deserve to know what is going on! Anything less is corruption.

The whistleblower followed proper protocol. Snowden and Assange sure as fuck didn't. Nice try though.

"Follow proper protocol" = "Give the corrupt establishment a chance to silence them first."

[Zurkerx]

Snowden and Assange also technically aren't legally protected whistleblowers since they broke the law to do it.

Indeed, especially since they spread classified information, which is illegal. In the case of Snowden, he could have easily blown the whistle that the Government was spying on its own people. He did, however, then proceeded to hand over classified information to our enemies, including Russia. In no shape or form should either these two individuals get it.