Right-Wing Discussion Thread XVIII: Hyena Central Command 憶ラ

[Napkizemlja]

Much like how backwoods English rednecks can create a civilization out of North America but Spanish aristocrats can't do shit in Latin America.

When has Spain ever been good at anything?

*Looks at the Americas*
I'd say they were pretty alright at conquistadoring.

[Neko-koku]

Yes, except for...Chile, Uruguay and Argentina that are only 20-30% native genetically.

Do you wonder why Latin America seems weirdly controlled by new immigrants? From an HBD point of view it is very easy to explain.

Yes, of course.

My theory is that due to Latin Europeans being prone to ethnic and race mixing (same for China) as they tend to be assimilationist peoples pretty much everyone becomes part Amerind and even part African after several generations which does have detrimental effect on performance. Hence the only people free from such genes and the harm they cause tend to be new immigrants and their children such as Kirchner, Bolsonaro, Fujimori, etc.

[Camelone]

The most interesting topic about Hawaii is whether Japanese folks do better than white folks in terms of per capita income or vice versa. Different sources disagree but the difference is very minor..like at most 0.5% either way.

Well, from what I understand, there are many mixed race people born in Hawaii, especially among those whose roots there go back many generations.
Also, I think Hawaii should secede from the US and restore its old monarchy. Does anyone here agree with me?

I'm going to make a rather weird and incredibly crazy suggestion right now, which I am fully aware is crazy but I'm going to throw out anyways. Why not have the royal family of Hawaii become the royal family of America?
...
I've been up to long writing papers.

[The Wasatch]

Yes, of course.

My theory is that due to Latin Europeans being prone to ethnic and race mixing (same for China) as they tend to be assimilationist peoples pretty much everyone becomes part Amerind and even part African after several generations. Hence the only people free from such genes tend to be new immigrants and their children such as Kirchner, Macri, Bolsonaro, Fujimori, etc.

Your conceptions of race are disturbingly misinformed. The idea that an ethnicity can be innately more productive than others is repulsive, even as satire.

[Neko-koku]

My theory is that due to Latin Europeans being prone to ethnic and race mixing (same for China) as they tend to be assimilationist peoples pretty much everyone becomes part Amerind and even part African after several generations. Hence the only people free from such genes tend to be new immigrants and their children such as Kirchner, Macri, Bolsonaro, Fujimori, etc.

Your conceptions of race are disturbingly misinformed. The idea that an ethnicity can be innately more productive than others is repulsive, even as satire.

You are a moralist who can not understand reality. Instead you imagine the world in the image of your morals.

Factually accurate and morally upright are separate concepts..

[The Wasatch]

Your conceptions of race are disturbingly misinformed. The idea that an ethnicity can be innately more productive than others is repulsive, even as satire.

You are a moralist who can not understand reality. Instead you imagine the world in the image of your morals.

Factually accurate and morally upright are separate concepts..

There is nothing factually accurate about the racism you espouse. Do even 5 minutes research on genetics, diversity, and biology and you will see that the idea that certain ethnicities are inherently superior to others is laughably inaccurate.

[Neko-koku]

You are a moralist who can not understand reality. Instead you imagine the world in the image of your morals.

Factually accurate and morally upright are separate concepts..

There is nothing factually accurate about the racism you espouse. Do even 5 minutes research on genetics, diversity, and biology and you will see that the idea that certain ethnicities are inherently superior to others is laughably inaccurate.

Why the hell is "diversity" in the same category as genetics and Biology? Genetics is a part of Biology. Where shall diversity fit then? Hmmm...like muh German Physics in Nazi Germany and muh Maoism in China, that is, propaganda that should be discarded.

[Neko-koku]

I don't need to do some muh research on....uh..."National Socialist Knowledge about Jewry"...or...."muh equality of humanity" or...."muh falsehood of evilution".

[Kowani]

Youwhatnow.

You’re basically the Kirito to my Kayaba. You get my references.

Okay, that I get.

[The Wasatch]

There is nothing factually accurate about the racism you espouse. Do even 5 minutes research on genetics, diversity, and biology and you will see that the idea that certain ethnicities are inherently superior to others is laughably inaccurate.

Why the hell is "diversity" in the same category as genetics and Biology?

I meant to suggest that the distribution of traits and genetics throughout the human population is negligible. ~85% of the genetic expressions in humans can be found in any population. The other 15% relates to arbitrary distinctions such as skin color, and not any mental functions. Compare this to the 70% needed for a subspecies. Race is a concept that holds no scientific merit. Even early biologists recognized this: just look at Alfred Russel Wallace's comments on the matter. Genetics only further proves that race is purely a societal construct. Do some research before you start making such dangerous claims.

[The Wasatch]

I don't need to do some muh research on....uh..."National Socialist Knowledge about Jewry"...or...."muh equality of humanity" or...."muh falsehood of evilution".

The modes of evolution and natural selection provide the proof that race doesn't exist. Do you even know the difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism?

[Neko-koku]

Why the hell is "diversity" in the same category as genetics and Biology?

I meant to suggest that the distribution of traits and genetics throughout the human population is negligible. ~85% of the genetic expressions in humans can be found in any population. The other 15% relates to arbitrary distinctions such as skin color, and not any mental functions. Compare this to the 70% needed for a subspecies. Race is a concept that holds no scientific merit. Even early biologists recognized this: just look at Alfred Russel Wallace's comments on the matter. Genetics only further proves that race is purely a societal construct. Do some research before you start making such dangerous claims.

No scientific merit? Then tell me why do humans from different tribes have very different Y chromosome haplogroups.

[Neko-koku]

I don't need to do some muh research on....uh..."National Socialist Knowledge about Jewry"...or...."muh equality of humanity" or...."muh falsehood of evilution".

The modes of evolution and natural selection provide the proof that race doesn't exist. Do you even know the difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism?

Of course I do.

Egalitarianism has always been pro-social nonsense though.

[The Wasatch]

The modes of evolution and natural selection provide the proof that race doesn't exist. Do you even know the difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism?

Of course I do.

Egalitarianism has always been pro-social nonsense though.

Eugenics and so-called "scientific" racism are two of the greatest shams known to the sciences. Heck, even the flat earth theory is more sensible than eugenics. When Galton is the greatest scientific mind to back your "hypothesis," you know that there is an issue.

[Neko-koku]

Of course I do.

Egalitarianism has always been pro-social nonsense though.

Eugenics and so-called "scientific" racism are two of the greatest shams known to the sciences. Heck, even the flat earth theory is more sensible than eugenics. When Galton is the greatest scientific mind to back your "hypothesis," you know that there is an issue.

The future will prove me right.

[The Wasatch]

Eugenics and so-called "scientific" racism are two of the greatest shams known to the sciences. Heck, even the flat earth theory is more sensible than eugenics. When Galton is the greatest scientific mind to back your "hypothesis," you know that there is an issue.

The future will prove me right.

Galton, the inventor of eugenics, own research proved him wrong. Ever heard of regression toward the mean? Hopefully the people of the future will be keener in understanding just how meritless race as a "scientific" concept and eugenics are.

[Neko-koku]

The future will prove me right.

Galton, the inventor of eugenics, own research proved him wrong. Ever heard of regression toward the mean? Hopefully the people of the future will be keener in understanding just how meritless race as a "scientific" concept and eugenics are.

If SSA can be fixed then we should as hell should get rid of statistical racial discrimination. Until that happens, nope.

[Kowani]

Galton, the inventor of eugenics, own research proved him wrong. Ever heard of regression toward the mean? Hopefully the people of the future will be keener in understanding just how meritless race as a "scientific" concept and eugenics are.

If SSA can be fixed then we should as hell should get rid of statistical racial discrimination. Until that happens, nope.

Imagine not understanding agriculture, biology, history, or economics this badly.

[Hanafuridake]

The modes of evolution and natural selection provide the proof that race doesn't exist. Do you even know the difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism?

Of course I do.

Egalitarianism has always been pro-social nonsense though.

Aren't you the poster always talking about individualism and freedom?

[Nea Byzantia]

Well, I am Catholic and would never believe anything as dangerous and ridiculous as that! It actually strikes me as parody.

Well there's your problem; you're not trad enough to be a True Catholic^TM. You probably accept the Second Vatican Council as valid, you filthy modernist.

/sarcasm, for goodness sake

None of you are REALLY Catholic; after all, you sided with the Pope when he attempted to usurp headship of the Church in 1054...We Orthoboos are the actual One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

[Hanafuridake]

Well there's your problem; you're not trad enough to be a True Catholic^TM. You probably accept the Second Vatican Council as valid, you filthy modernist.

/sarcasm, for goodness sake

None of you are REALLY Catholic; after all, you sided with the Pope when he attempted to usurp headship of the Church in 1054...We Orthoboos are the actual One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

This is actually your real opinion though.

[Xuloqoia]

Of course I do.

Egalitarianism has always been pro-social nonsense though.

Aren't you the poster always talking about individualism and freedom?

But Hana, what you need to understand is that you've forsaken your East Kekistani roots trying to pursue an authoritarian and Mugabist (which is redundant due to the fact that they're one and the same) ideological path. You need to wake up to the truths of the cruel universe we live in. Personally, I recommend Atlas Shrugged.

/sarcasm, in case y'all couldn't tell

[Salus Maior]

You expected what exactly out of a trad catholic?

Well, I am Catholic and would never believe anything as dangerous and ridiculous as that! It actually strikes me as parody.

I know plenty of families that base themselves on traditional gender roles, that are very happy and as far as I can tell, healthy.

Of course, relationships aren't easy no matter how you configure them.

[Genivaria]

Eugenics and so-called "scientific" racism are two of the greatest shams known to the sciences. Heck, even the flat earth theory is more sensible than eugenics. When Galton is the greatest scientific mind to back your "hypothesis," you know that there is an issue.

The future will prove me right.

If you gave a damn about how science actually worked you would want EVIDENCE to prove you right.

[Totally Not OEP]