Political and Religious Survey

[Kowani]

Well, I was just going to say the Anarcho-Fascist, but since you offered…

Is Anarcho-Fascism (AnFash, perhaps?) even a real ideology?

EDIT: Apparently it is!

Wikipedia does have to list everything, even nonsense…

[Hammer Britannia]

Politically, I consider myself "fuck if I know". I like freedom and all, but to what extent I am not sure. I wouldn't even consider myself anti-socialist anymore.

Religiously, I consider myself a follower of the Hellenism Religion. How I got here is deeply personal and I think stating what happened would lead to me being locked up in an insane asylum somewhere, but it is what I believe.

[Xuloqoia]

Is Anarcho-Fascism (AnFash, perhaps?) even a real ideology?

EDIT: Apparently it is!

Wikipedia does have to list everything, even nonsense…

No more nonsensical then embracing materialism/physicalism to such a degree that you become an edgelord supreme.

That was a just a joke m8, plz no ban

[Xuloqoia]

Banter and snark aside, it's about time that I get around to filling this survey out.

Religion: In a strictly theological sense, my beliefs are fundamentally deistic in character, with bits of Platonic and Spinozan thought sprinkled in for flavor. However, in a practical sense my beliefs are akin to a Hobbes-flavored form of statolatry. Do allow me to explain. Since I view God as a detached "watchmaker" of sorts with regard to the events that transpire in Its Creation, I've oft taken to de facto worship and exaltation of Civilization and the State(and by extension the bureaucratic and industrial institutions that comprise Civilization and the State), in that I find them to be what prevents most folks from sinking to the barbarity of a war of all against all.

Politics: My political views flow naturally from said viewpoint, in what some have called a "secular theocracy" of sorts (a label which I have wholeheartedly embraced). Others I've interacted with have described my politics as a form of technocratic "utopian socialism" akin to that espoused by pre-Marxist thinkers like Henri de Saint-Simon. If you wish to know, the closest polity currently in existence to my views is Singapore (albeit not by much) and the closest candidate to my views in the current "Race to the White House" is Andrew Yang. Another key aspect of my politics is an idiosyncratic form of either nationalism or globalism depending on who you ask, very roughly analogous to the Imperial Japanese concept of "Hakko Ichiu", in which I seek for the unification of the world under one benevolent regime.

There. I've done the survey. It's done. It's over. I did it.

[GLDF]

Religion: Hermetic Paganism with satanist influences (LHP)
Politics: Dark accelerationism
Economics: Third Positionism

This is the most ideological edge something can convey in so few words and without going into details of being a regular old neo-nazi.

Politically, I consider myself "fuck if I know". I like freedom and all, but to what extent I am not sure. I wouldn't even consider myself anti-socialist anymore.

Religiously, I consider myself a follower of the Hellenism Religion. How I got here is deeply personal and I think stating what happened would lead to me being locked up in an insane asylum somewhere, but it is what I believe.

What's the point in religion if you no longer believe anything?

[Hammer Britannia]

Politically, I consider myself "fuck if I know". I like freedom and all, but to what extent I am not sure. I wouldn't even consider myself anti-socialist anymore.

Religiously, I consider myself a follower of the Hellenism Religion. How I got here is deeply personal and I think stating what happened would lead to me being locked up in an insane asylum somewhere, but it is what I believe.

What's the point in religion if you no longer believe anything?

What?

[Dumb Ideologies]

I used to be a militant atheist type because I've never had any sort of "religious" experience and religion has often been used as an excuse for war, persecution etc.

Because I overthink everything I've obviously ended up moving away from that extreme viewpoint. At the very least religion is a powerful force in motivating some people to do good things as well as bad, and faith is a great comfort for a lot of people.

In the face of so many people believing for so long it's difficult to outright 100% deny the possibility of a lot of people genuinely having spiritual experiences of some kind. I think I am a relatively good person, but if it is impossible for humans to understand a God then it's possible that the complete nothing and silence I feel in a spiritual sense is due to having been judged some way unworthy. I still don't believe but I've moved to more of an agnostic atheist position because to some degree it's just not possible to know in the negative.

[Emulation White]

I used to be a militant atheist type because I've never had any sort of "religious" experience and religion has often been used as an excuse for war, persecution etc.

Because I overthink everything I've obviously ended up moving away from that extreme viewpoint. At the very least religion is a powerful force in motivating some people to do good things as well as bad, and faith is a great comfort for a lot of people.

In the face of so many people believing for so long it's difficult to outright 100% deny the possibility of a lot of people genuinely having spiritual experiences of some kind. I think I am a relatively good person, but if it is impossible for humans to understand a God then it's possible that the complete nothing and silence I feel in a spiritual sense is due to having been judged some way unworthy. I still don't believe but I've moved to more of an agnostic atheist position because to some degree it's just not possible to know in the negative.

Hello, I find your post intriguing and thought I would interject. Morality seems to be a rationale of yours about spirituality so I will share with you a limited conception about aspects of God if they might assist your consideration. My conception of God is that it embodies all positive and negative experience and can be represented as a Yin and Yang, both "good" and "evil", two parts of an inseperable whole. So if I were to put this in Abrahamic terms, the concept of Satan is really just a facet of God, not a separate entity, just another shade in God's infinite spectrum. At first I was curious about faith from an academic and generally spiritual curiosity, and then it was suffering that drew me close. Perhaps the emptiness is a test for you, will you stand in the dark waiting for a sign or will you be the one to spark the flame of discovery?

[Zyris]

Religion: Christian, Fundamentalist Baptist

Politics: Conservative.

1. Small governments are good.
2. Pro Israel nationalistically, anti Israel Religiously, because that is where the antichrist will reveal himself.
3. Social Leftist stances are destructive to society.

[Libertas Omnium Maximus]

Religion
Non-Denominational Christian. I align myself most primarily with the Lutheran church but frequently attend Catholic mass.

Polotics
Social: Center-Right
Economic: Right
Role of Government: Libertarian-Center

Key beliefs
[list=]
[*]Active belief in God
[*]Gun Rights
[*]Small, limited, decentralized government
[*]Loosly regulated Capitalism
[*]Anti-Abortion (save for when the mother's life is directly threatened)
[*]Self-sufficiency
[*]Anti-large social safety net
[*]Closed Borders (merit-based entry)
[*]Constitutional Originalism
[*]"America First" Policies [/list]

[Kiruri]

voilà

[Dumb Ideologies]

I used to be a militant atheist type because I've never had any sort of "religious" experience and religion has often been used as an excuse for war, persecution etc.

Because I overthink everything I've obviously ended up moving away from that extreme viewpoint. At the very least religion is a powerful force in motivating some people to do good things as well as bad, and faith is a great comfort for a lot of people.

In the face of so many people believing for so long it's difficult to outright 100% deny the possibility of a lot of people genuinely having spiritual experiences of some kind. I think I am a relatively good person, but if it is impossible for humans to understand a God then it's possible that the complete nothing and silence I feel in a spiritual sense is due to having been judged some way unworthy. I still don't believe but I've moved to more of an agnostic atheist position because to some degree it's just not possible to know in the negative.

Hello, I find your post intriguing and thought I would interject. Morality seems to be a rationale of yours about spirituality so I will share with you a limited conception about aspects of God if they might assist your consideration. My conception of God is that it embodies all positive and negative experience and can be represented as a Yin and Yang, both "good" and "evil", two parts of an inseperable whole. So if I were to put this in Abrahamic terms, the concept of Satan is really just a facet of God, not a separate entity, just another shade in God's infinite spectrum. At first I was curious about faith from an academic and generally spiritual curiosity, and then it was suffering that drew me close. Perhaps the emptiness is a test for you, will you stand in the dark waiting for a sign or will you be the one to spark the flame of discovery?

I can see your approach, but I think you need that creative spark of either genius or madness (combined with a particularly strong inner confidence) if you're going to take intuitive leaps on such matters. My strength has always been in understanding and being able to summarise other people's abstract principles and theory in a concise and relatively easy-to-understand way. Where I go wrong is whenever I try and either come up with my own ideas or try to take other people's and apply them in practice. Databases don't invent things. So I feel as though this may be a difficult approach for me.

[Xuloqoia]

voilà

If we're to share 8values results, then here you go I guess...

[Emulation White]

Hello, I find your post intriguing and thought I would interject. Morality seems to be a rationale of yours about spirituality so I will share with you a limited conception about aspects of God if they might assist your consideration. My conception of God is that it embodies all positive and negative experience and can be represented as a Yin and Yang, both "good" and "evil", two parts of an inseperable whole. So if I were to put this in Abrahamic terms, the concept of Satan is really just a facet of God, not a separate entity, just another shade in God's infinite spectrum. At first I was curious about faith from an academic and generally spiritual curiosity, and then it was suffering that drew me close. Perhaps the emptiness is a test for you, will you stand in the dark waiting for a sign or will you be the one to spark the flame of discovery?

I can see your approach, but I think you need that creative spark of either genius or madness (combined with a particularly strong inner confidence) if you're going to take intuitive leaps on such matters. My strength has always been in understanding and being able to summarise other people's abstract principles and theory in a concise and relatively easy-to-understand way. Where I go wrong is whenever I try and either come up with my own ideas or try to take other people's and apply them in practice. Databases don't invent things. So I feel as though this may be a difficult approach for me.

I see, it's just the way your rhetoric struck me, it feels like it has an undercurrent of wanting or curiosity on the matter. Like you, I also consider myself to have an analytical personality. When I started reading the Holy Books of Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, much of it was analytical hunger; a drive to expand the database, if you will. If you do have any tinge of curiosity about you regarding spirituality, just remember; what you read is yours alone, what you do or don't implement or learn is your business. You are not obliged to practice anything. Nothing is done in error and even if you were to walk away, at least you depart with more knowledge and a larger bank of data than when you arrived. Maybe there is more to you than what is visible at the moment, maybe finding it just takes a leap of faith.

[Dumb Ideologies]

I can see your approach, but I think you need that creative spark of either genius or madness (combined with a particularly strong inner confidence) if you're going to take intuitive leaps on such matters. My strength has always been in understanding and being able to summarise other people's abstract principles and theory in a concise and relatively easy-to-understand way. Where I go wrong is whenever I try and either come up with my own ideas or try to take other people's and apply them in practice. Databases don't invent things. So I feel as though this may be a difficult approach for me.

I see, it's just the way your rhetoric struck me, it feels like it has an undercurrent of wanting or curiosity on the matter. Like you, I also consider myself to have an analytical personality. When I started reading the Holy Books of Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, much of it was analytical hunger; a drive to expand the database, if you will. If you do have any tinge of curiosity about you regarding spirituality, just remember; what you read is yours alone, what you do or don't implement or learn is your business. You are not obliged to practice anything. Nothing is done in error and even if you were to walk away, at least you depart with more knowledge and a larger bank of data than when you arrived. Maybe there is more to you than what is visible at the moment, maybe finding it just takes a leap of faith.

Hmm. Something to think on. Thanks for the consideration. I'm certainly curious about it, but your way of framing it never occurred to me.

[Emulation White]

I see, it's just the way your rhetoric struck me, it feels like it has an undercurrent of wanting or curiosity on the matter. Like you, I also consider myself to have an analytical personality. When I started reading the Holy Books of Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, much of it was analytical hunger; a drive to expand the database, if you will. If you do have any tinge of curiosity about you regarding spirituality, just remember; what you read is yours alone, what you do or don't implement or learn is your business. You are not obliged to practice anything. Nothing is done in error and even if you were to walk away, at least you depart with more knowledge and a larger bank of data than when you arrived. Maybe there is more to you than what is visible at the moment, maybe finding it just takes a leap of faith.

Hmm. Something to think on. Thanks for the consideration. I'm certainly curious about it, but your way of framing it never occurred to me.

No problem. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to speak your mind. Whatever your decisions, I wish you light on your path. I would be curious to any change or development you would would be open to sharing, so feel free to drop in as you please.

[Kowani]

Religion: Christian, Fundamentalist Baptist

Politics: Conservative.

1. Small governments are good.
2. Pro Israel nationalistically, anti Israel Religiously, because that is where the antichrist will reveal himself.
3. Social Leftist stances are destructive to society.

I’m not sure how exactly you can go “small government!” and simultaneously support Israel.

[Sovaal]

Religion: Christian, Fundamentalist Baptist

Politics: Conservative.

1. Small governments are good.
2. Pro Israel nationalistically, anti Israel Religiously, because that is where the antichrist will reveal himself.
3. Social Leftist stances are destructive to society.

I’m not sure how exactly you can go “small government!” and simultaneously support Israel.

That's why I support carpet bombing the entire Holy Land with recreational nuclear weapons.

[Nakena]

Religion: Hermetic Paganism with satanist influences (LHP)
Politics: Dark accelerationism
Economics: Third Positionism

This is the most ideological edge something can convey in so few words and without going into details of being a regular old neo-nazi.

Thanks ill take that as compliment. But see, I don't care about racist bullshit. So no, I have to disappoint ya.

[Czechostan]

Religiously, I am an agnostic atheist.

My political views in three points:
1. I value systems thinking and reject approaches which focus on isolated individuals.
2. I believe identity to be socially constructed and in a constant state of flux.
3. I believe we are capable of changing our circumstances.

[A Cornstar]

religion-Syncretism subsumed by nominally Catholic Christianity

politics-conservative
1.no strong convictions on diplomacy vs militarism, economics, or state power vs individual rights (it's all way too variable).
2. my concerns are beauty and virtue: the preservation of traditional culture, integrity, quality of life and miscellany like anime and memes(many of which contain hidden knowledge of the big ticket items).

[Kowani]

Religiously, I am an agnostic atheist.

My political views in three points:
1. I value systems thinking and reject approaches which focus on isolated individuals.
2. I believe identity to be socially constructed and in a constant state of flux.
3. I believe we are capable of changing our circumstances.

I like you even more now.

[Nakena]

Religion: Agnostic Atheist

Politics:
- People are not meaningfully "equal" in ability or intelligence, and so hierarchy in society is inevitable and desirable. However, The political and social system reflects the permanent interests of narrow sections of society (bankers, landlords, business owners) and in a way that is unethical and does not reflect the common good -"democracy" is a duplicitous false promise. An element of "bottom-up" democracy should be maintained, but on a non-party basis.
- Fairer ownership structures should be constitutionally mandated and rigorously enforced, along with integrationist cultural policies, to encourage a cohesive and well-managed society.
- While constantly (re-)building the nation, the state should cooperate and coordinate with others to resolve common issues, particularly at the regional level.

Didn read that until now. That is quite anti-egalitarian of you. I would not have expected. ;D

[West Leas Oros 2]

Religion: Atheist. The logical leaps necessary to find God are too great to be viable, and the burden of proof lies on the believer, not the non-believer. I apply that the simplest solution is that there is no God, because God has a tendency to defy universal laws.

Politics:
-Marxism and Dialectical Materialism are my chosen philosophies, and I believe that many things in human history can be accurately defined through the lens of material relations and class conflict.

-I oppose any sort of illogical hatreds of ethnic groups, sexual identities, genders, or other biological identities, given that they have no basis for existing. This applies to all hatreds, regardless of who it is directed towards.

-I tend to believe the role of the state should be as minimal as possible, yet a stateless society at this point in human history is illogical and dangerous. The state should exist only to protect the rights of its citizens, and people should be allowed to do anything that does not infringe on the rights of others.

[The Huskar Social Union]

Cant remember if i posted already or not, couldnt be bothered to cbeck

Religion: Atheist heathen monster, used to be a cataholic.

Politics: Socialist is probably the best term to describe me i guess. So evil red menance mans. Im also an Irish Nationalist.