NationStates

Galloism wrote:

Bombadil wrote:
Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

Notably, what he proposed isn't gun control, any more than banning political speech online is containing extremism.

He proposed rebooting the failed AWB. Bans.

Beto went above and beyond the AWB. He's openly calling for confiscation, no Dem at the national level has had the gall to do that. They've always said you'll be able to keep anything you currently own but just not buy any new ones.

Beto says you'll have no choice to turn it in, and that would not end well.

San Lumen wrote:

Telconi wrote:
It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Sorry, not going to fuss over the freedoms of people who's entire schtick is destroying freedoms. He wants to have his rights respected he can learn some human decency.

Telconi wrote:

San Lumen wrote:We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Sorry, not going to fuss over the freedoms of people who's entire schtick is destroying freedoms. He wants to have his rights respected he can learn some human decency.

That's a long line of people who's rights are being thrown in the gutter under your definitions.
You're sure you aren't going to in it?

Uiiop wrote:

Telconi wrote:
Sorry, not going to fuss over the freedoms of people who's entire schtick is destroying freedoms. He wants to have his rights respected he can learn some human decency.

That's a long line of people who's rights are being thrown in the gutter under your definitions.
You're sure you aren't going to in it?

Yes.

Telconi wrote:

Uiiop wrote:That's a long line of people who's rights are being thrown in the gutter under your definitions.
You're sure you aren't going to in it?

Yes.

Pragmatically speaking you know that isn't how that works out.
Maybe your "Should" ought to be where no one is able to destroy freedoms rather getting a vengeance kick of them.

Imma leave this right here


Does anyone know if there’s a recording of the climate debate online?

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:Imma leave this right here
(Image)

Does anyone know if there’s a recording of the climate debate online?

Polls that drills down that spefic stats of "Which agenda is bad enough to drive away votes" would be nice.

People opposing shit does not matter if they care about other things more.

Galloism wrote:

Kowani wrote:What’re they gonna do, shut off their mike?

I guess they wouldn't have the chutzpah to do that.

Does anyone hear regan laughing
also if I were in one of these debates one must have would be a wireless amp mic for exactly that occasion

Uiiop wrote:

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:Imma leave this right here
(Image)

Does anyone know if there’s a recording of the climate debate online?

Polls that drills down that spefic stats of "Which agenda is bad enough to drive away votes" would be nice.

People opposing shit does not matter if they care about other things more.

also these polls are useless if they don't go into the specifics of the policies. Like a green new deal can mean basicly anything from cap and trade to AOC's political clown car

Vermin Supreme 2020?

Pacomia wrote:Vermin Supreme 2020?

Giant Meteor is better.

Uiiop wrote:

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:Imma leave this right here
(Image)

Does anyone know if there’s a recording of the climate debate online?

Polls that drills down that spefic stats of "Which agenda is bad enough to drive away votes" would be nice.

People opposing shit does not matter if they care about other things more.

It's a pretty vague chart all in all, and depending on how that stuff is defined can make huge differences.

Blargoblarg wrote:

Pacomia wrote:Vermin Supreme 2020?

Giant Meteor is better.

This but unironically.

Aclion wrote:

Galloism wrote:I guess they wouldn't have the chutzpah to do that.

Does anyone hear regan laughing
also if I were in one of these debates one must have would be a wireless amp mic for exactly that occasion

Uiiop wrote:Polls that drills down that spefic stats of "Which agenda is bad enough to drive away votes" would be nice.

People opposing shit does not matter if they care about other things more.

also these polls are useless if they don't go into the specifics of the policies. Like a green new deal can mean basicly anything from cap and trade to AOC's political clown car

Has anyone actually explained how AOC's plan won't work or is everyone just crowing about how bad it is because the GOP told them it was bad because reasons?

Vassenor wrote:

Aclion wrote:Does anyone hear regan laughing
also if I were in one of these debates one must have would be a wireless amp mic for exactly that occasion


also these polls are useless if they don't go into the specifics of the policies. Like a green new deal can mean basicly anything from cap and trade to AOC's political clown car

Has anyone actually explained how AOC's plan won't work or is everyone just crowing about how bad it is because the GOP told them it was bad because reasons?

Has anyone said it won't work?

Telconi wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Has anyone actually explained how AOC's plan won't work or is everyone just crowing about how bad it is because the GOP told them it was bad because reasons?

Has anyone said it won't work?

>post being responded to literally calls it a political clown car

Pretty sure calling it a joke implies it won't work.

Vassenor wrote:

Telconi wrote:
Has anyone said it won't work?

>post being responded to literally calls it a political clown car

Pretty sure calling it a joke implies it won't work.

Jokes work, car pulls up, bunch of clowns get out.

Telconi wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
>post being responded to literally calls it a political clown car

Pretty sure calling it a joke implies it won't work.

Jokes work, car pulls up, bunch of clowns get out.

So what makes it an apt description then if it's not saying it won't work?

Or are you just arguing in circles rather than having to admit to being wrong?

Vassenor wrote:

Telconi wrote:
Jokes work, car pulls up, bunch of clowns get out.

So what makes it an apt description then if it's not saying it won't work?

Or are you just arguing in circles rather than having to admit to being wrong?

I would guess that calling it a joke means that it's a joke.

Telconi wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
So what makes it an apt description then if it's not saying it won't work?

Or are you just arguing in circles rather than having to admit to being wrong?

I would guess that calling it a joke means that it's a joke.

And what makes it a joke?

Because you're kind of proving my point here.

Vassenor wrote:

Telconi wrote:
I would guess that calling it a joke means that it's a joke.

And what makes it a joke?

Because you're kind of proving my point here.

I can't speak for why Aclion thinks it's a joke.

You had a point?

Telconi wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
And what makes it a joke?

Because you're kind of proving my point here.

I can't speak for why Aclion thinks it's a joke.

You had a point?

That you're arguing in circles so you don't have to admit being wrong.

Vassenor wrote:

Telconi wrote:
I can't speak for why Aclion thinks it's a joke.

You had a point?

That you're arguing in circles so you don't have to admit being wrong.

Wrong about what? I asked a question, how can asking a question be incorrect?

Telconi wrote:

San Lumen wrote:We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Sorry, not going to fuss over the freedoms of people who's entire schtick is destroying freedoms. He wants to have his rights respected he can learn some human decency.

Your free to not vote for him. He has a right to say what he did and not be thrown in prison. That’s what a dictatorship would do. Going by your past statements any elected official who disagrees with you should be jailed

The Northeast's powerful Working Families Party has endorsed Warren: https://www.yahoo.com/news/elizabeth-warren-picks-key-endorsement-162702772.html

Farnhamia wrote:

Eternal Lotharia wrote:I think Harris has the intellect to be the next surprise dropout.



Thread please, Farn.


Still taking break tho.

Done.

And "Beto's Revenge" doesn't thrill me but whatever.

Agree. Lousy name for a thread which is suppose to be about candidates.

________'s Revenge is way too WWF. Can we fix this?