Bill Weld is running. The VP Candidate of Johnson's
Advertisement
by Loben The 2nd » Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:31 pm
Luminesa wrote:Gormwood wrote:
And you wonder why you got the boot.
And uh, you know, things like calling me a “sanctimonious ‘c***’” Soooo yeah. Ouch?
Who even is running from the Republican Party, beside Trump? I very clearly missed any additions to the race. Then again, I have been trying my best to ignore all the news I get from the NYT, because it’s about nothing but impeachment. I’m also too lazy to unsubscribe to the NYT.
by The East Marches II » Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:39 pm
by Luminesa » Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:50 pm
Loben The 2nd wrote:Luminesa wrote:And uh, you know, things like calling me a “sanctimonious ‘c***’” and essentially hoping I get raped. Soooo yeah. Ouch?
Who even is running from the Republican Party, beside Trump? I very clearly missed any additions to the race. Then again, I have been trying my best to ignore all the news I get from the NYT, because it’s about nothing but impeachment. I’m also too lazy to unsubscribe to the NYT.
what the shit?
by Northern Davincia » Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:56 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Bear Stearns » Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:16 pm
Napkizemlja wrote:Valrifell wrote:
The punchline is, of course, that y'all like to say Gormwood has some weird fetish
Not that this, or Gauth in general, has anything to do with the thread but tbf it is accurate given the offsite posts I bore witness to where rage posts against NSGers had an unhealthy level of sexual imagery.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:27 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:Napkizemlja wrote:Not that this, or Gauth in general, has anything to do with the thread but tbf it is accurate given the offsite posts I bore witness to where rage posts against NSGers had an unhealthy level of sexual imagery.
My old nation had wild accusations about me generally being a rapist and a woman-hater because I opened up about my relationship with my parents.
by Blargoblarg » Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:35 pm
by Pasong Tirad » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:03 am
by Telconi » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:04 am
by Munkcestrian Republic » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:05 am
by Telconi » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:16 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I think that, if he gets the Democratic nomination, Bernie will win West Virginia.
by True Refuge » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:23 am
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by Munkcestrian Republic » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:27 am
Telconi wrote:Munkcestrian Republic wrote:I think that, if he gets the Democratic nomination, Bernie will win West Virginia.
Highly unlikely, anything positive Bernie brings to the table is outweighed by the negatives. West Virginia will almost certainly go to Trump, and by similar margins as in 2016.
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:30 am
by Munkcestrian Republic » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:57 am
by Telconi » Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:02 am
by Kowani » Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:32 am
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:32 am
Munkcestrian Republic wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Well, it's December with no Democratic candidate and I can't find any polls on West Virginia specifically.
https://tulchinresearch.com/wp-content/ ... -Final.pdf
by True Refuge » Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:41 am
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by Telconi » Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:46 am
by True Refuge » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:09 am
Telconi wrote:True Refuge wrote:
Are they not doing that?
One-line open-ended questions aren’t good openers. They’re difficult to engage with because there’s no detail to them. I don’t know what your opinion is or what you’re basing your original question on.
Doing what? Representing the people they don't represent? I think the answer to that is self evident.
"One does not need to be surprised then, when 26 years later the outrageous slogan is repeated, which we Marxists burned all bridges with: to “pick up” the banner of the bourgeoisie. - International Communist Party, Dialogue with Stalin.
by Idzequitch » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:09 am
by Telconi » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:21 am
True Refuge wrote:Telconi wrote:
Doing what? Representing the people they don't represent? I think the answer to that is self evident.
?
“Or the ones inside their district” suggests you’re talking about people within the districts. That’s what the question was about.
In full form, the question was “are not they not representing the people in their district?”.
by The Rich Port » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:56 am
Idzequitch wrote:Well. With Sestak and Bullock gone, we're "down" to 16 "major" Democratic candidates.
I would argue that Williamson, Bennet, Delaney, and even Castro shouldn't be viewed as major candidates at this point, and frankly, there's no reason why any of them should stay in the race. I would argue that Booker and Gabbard should also drop out as it seems their messages aren't resonating with Democratic voters. Also Bloomberg and Patrick should never have joined and the sooner they're forced to drop back out, the better.
So yes there are 16 major candidates, but if you want to narrow that down to those who have even the slightest of slight chances of getting nominated, there's probably six. Maybe eight if you want to be extra generous and include Yang and Klobuchar.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Neu California, Pingu 2nd, Tarsonis, Unmet Player
Advertisement