It's almost as if there is a correlation between media support and poll performance. It explains why the media was so shocked when Trump won.
Advertisement
by Bear Stearns » Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:42 pm
by Duhon » Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:43 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:Tulsi Gabbard just trashed Hillary Clinton publicly after Hillary suggested she was a Russian asset and it was glorious.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:48 pm
by Northern Davincia » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:03 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Izandai » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:05 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:12 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:19 pm
:thumbsup:Tulsi wrote:It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:23 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:
The media has pushed the Russian conspiracy onto her multiple times before Clinton brought it up.
For example...
by Valrifell » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:30 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Valrifell wrote:
A common talking point from people outside the ideological lockstep of the party not doing so hot in the polls.
And it's also a valid talking point. Once Ron Paul was getting popular, Fox News shut him out. A similar thing is being done to Gabbard, but more malicious.
by Valrifell » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:33 pm
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:38 pm
Valrifell wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:
It's almost as if there is a correlation between media support and poll performance. It explains why the media was so shocked when Trump won.
Y'all need to stop using the term "the media" incorrectly. Minor note but a pet peeve, you mean the news media.
Said as if Trump was somehow a threat to their oligopoly, if anything he was a boon. Regardless they're too stupid and self-interested to collude on a scale you accuse and allide to, and one of larger syndicates for news media, Sinclair, has a known pro-Trump bent.
So, shucks, there goes your boogeyman I guess. Now you'll have to come up with actual arguments.
Les Moonves wrote:"It may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS,"
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Northern Davincia » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:40 pm
Ifreann wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:The media has pushed the Russian conspiracy onto her multiple times before Clinton brought it up.
For example...
And are they doing that because of a Clinton-led conspiracy against Gabbard? How would we distinguish that from sincere reporting of buzz around Russia supporting Gabbard?
Valrifell wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:And it's also a valid talking point. Once Ron Paul was getting popular, Fox News shut him out. A similar thing is being done to Gabbard, but more malicious.
So your argument is that the corporate media is shutting down isolationist candidates because *mumble* *mumble*
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Northern Davincia » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by South Odreria 2 » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:46 pm
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says
by Valrifell » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:53 pm
by Valrifell » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:55 pm
South Odreria 2 wrote:Gabbard's attacks are obviously way overboard and stupid, but it shows how petty and vindictive Clinton is that she still wants revenge on the only candidate that supported Sanders last time.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:59 pm
Valrifell wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Being a moderate is fringe?
From your perspective I imagine Gabbard would seem moderate. Then again, I've never been one to trust judgements from right-libertarians with frogs in their profile pics.
Gabbard isn't reflective of the standard views of your average Democrat. Which is a problem, since she wants to win an election of (mostly) Democrats.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by The Andromeda Archipelago » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:00 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:And "acting presidential" lmfao that is an elitist smokescreen that people throw up in place of having an actual position. Who cares that your policies are horrible as long as you speak like an Ivy Leaguer and use the correct buzzwords.
As someone who works in banking, I see that bullshit every day, and it's really not that impressive.
by The Andromeda Archipelago » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:08 pm
Valrifell wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Being a moderate is fringe?
From your perspective I imagine Gabbard would seem moderate. Then again, I've never been one to trust judgements from right-libertarians with frogs in their profile pics.
Gabbard isn't reflective of the standard views of your average Democrat. Which is a problem, since she wants to win an election of (mostly) Democrats.
by Valrifell » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:08 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Valrifell wrote:
From your perspective I imagine Gabbard would seem moderate. Then again, I've never been one to trust judgements from right-libertarians with frogs in their profile pics.
Gabbard isn't reflective of the standard views of your average Democrat. Which is a problem, since she wants to win an election of (mostly) Democrats.
It wasn't a problem when she won in a heavily Democratic state.
by Telconi » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:09 pm
The Andromeda Archipelago wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:And "acting presidential" lmfao that is an elitist smokescreen that people throw up in place of having an actual position. Who cares that your policies are horrible as long as you speak like an Ivy Leaguer and use the correct buzzwords.
As someone who works in banking, I see that bullshit every day, and it's really not that impressive.
It's a tragic sign of the times that once common qualities like basic dignity are dismissed as bullshit.
It's a tragic sign of the times that someone who claims to work in banking sees basic dignity as nothing more than "an elitist smokescreen."
I feel profoundly sorry for you. Maybe, when you finally gain some basic dignity, you'll understand why.
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:27 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Ifreann wrote:And are they doing that because of a Clinton-led conspiracy against Gabbard? How would we distinguish that from sincere reporting of buzz around Russia supporting Gabbard?
I wouldn't imagine it to be strictly Clinton-led. Clinton is contributing to the conspiracy, absolutely. If there is genuine reporting on the issue, there will be actual evidence asserting a link between Gabbard and Russia.
Being anti-war is not a link.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Basaviya, Shrillland, Tillania, Yursy
Advertisement