NATION

PASSWORD

2019-2020 US Election Megathread III: Biden VS Biden

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you think had the best performance at tonight’s debate?

Bernie
65
62%
Buttigieg
12
11%
Warren
11
10%
Biden
5
5%
Steyer
4
4%
Klobuchar
8
8%
 
Total votes : 105

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:57 am

Zurkerx wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:I'm starting to think she might do this. She gets a good showing in early states, takes the last bit of air out of Biden the same way Clinton and Giuliani and Dean lost momentum in early primaries after being front runners, and with her leading as people's second choice she gets the bump as candidates throw in the towel...she might just pull this shit off. I wonder if they're trying to figure out what to offer Biden to bow out gracefully. Obviously not the Vice Presidency again.

Wait, is that even possible? Is there a term limit on the vice presidency?


There are no term limits on a Vice President so he can be selected again to be VP. However, I seriously doubt she would do that given his age, mental health, and the fact she wants someone more ideologically closer to her. Not to mention, adding a younger person on the ticket will help too, like a Buttigieg, Stacey Abrams, Klobuchar, or someone else.

https://www.history.com/news/election-1 ... presidents

I think Buttigieg would be a great VP.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:26 am

Zurkerx wrote:Also, and this is breaking, Bernie Sanders undergoes procedure for artery blockage. While he's relatively healthy, I suspect the likes of Trump and others will use his age to show his "health problems". Regardless, let's hope he gets better.


Age and health really are an issue with some of these candidates. But I wouldn't wish harm on Bernie. Let's hope he gets better.

San Lumen wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
There are no term limits on a Vice President so he can be selected again to be VP. However, I seriously doubt she would do that given his age, mental health, and the fact she wants someone more ideologically closer to her. Not to mention, adding a younger person on the ticket will help too, like a Buttigieg, Stacey Abrams, Klobuchar, or someone else.

https://www.history.com/news/election-1 ... presidents

I think Buttigieg would be a great VP.


I would love a Warren/Buttigieg ticket.
Last edited by USS Monitor on Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Loben The 2nd
Senator
 
Posts: 4410
Founded: Apr 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben The 2nd » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:38 am

USS Monitor wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Also, and this is breaking, Bernie Sanders undergoes procedure for artery blockage. While he's relatively healthy, I suspect the likes of Trump and others will use his age to show his "health problems". Regardless, let's hope he gets better.


Age and health really are an issue with some of these candidates. But I wouldn't wish harm on Bernie. Let's hope he gets better.

San Lumen wrote:I think Buttigieg would be a great VP.


I would love a Warren/Buttigieg ticket.


hell by some metrics it would be the most diverse ticket ever.
no quarter.
Satisfaction guaranteed.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41692
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:39 am

USS Monitor wrote:I would love a Warren/Buttigieg ticket.

I wouldn't hate it.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:42 am

Pasong Tirad wrote:Praying for Bernie's speedy recovery.

Also, on a totally unrelated note, anyone know how someone can donate their living, beating heart? Asking for a friend.


Through the Bernie website, you could write "my actual heart" in lieu of, say, $27. Bernie needs our energy!

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41692
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:11 am

Ha ha...ha...haha...ha...
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday appeared to revel in the ongoing political maelstrom in the U.S., jokingly admitting to plans for future election meddling.

When asked whether Russia would interfere in the 2020 election cycle, Putin leaned into the microphone onstage and mimicked a whisper: “I’m going to tell you a secret. Yes, sure. We’re going to do that. Don’t tell anybody.”

Shut the fuck up, dude.

The rest of it, just to be clear his context:
The quip at the Russian Energy Week panel elicited laughter and applause as Putin discussed why he believes the allegations made by former special counsel Robert Mueller, who concluded that Moscow mounted an aggressive effort to disrupt the 2016 presidential election, were untrue.

“The fact that myself and Mr. Trump have a close relationship doesn’t mean that it’s in any way affecting the current political environment within the U.S.,” he said. “We see that (the United States) is trying to use any pretext to attack Mr. Trump, and now they’re even trying to use Ukraine.”

He maintained that while he has a good relationship with Trump “built on trust,” Russia did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election, citing focus on issues within his own country.

“We have our own problems,” he said. “We invest immense resources into implementing our own goals in our own country. Why would we interfere anywhere?”
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Loben The 2nd
Senator
 
Posts: 4410
Founded: Apr 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben The 2nd » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:12 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:Ha ha...ha...haha...ha...
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday appeared to revel in the ongoing political maelstrom in the U.S., jokingly admitting to plans for future election meddling.

When asked whether Russia would interfere in the 2020 election cycle, Putin leaned into the microphone onstage and mimicked a whisper: “I’m going to tell you a secret. Yes, sure. We’re going to do that. Don’t tell anybody.”

Shut the fuck up, dude.


dont think thats going to intimidate him much.
no quarter.
Satisfaction guaranteed.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41692
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:24 am

Loben The 2nd wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Ha ha...ha...haha...ha...

Shut the fuck up, dude.


dont think thats going to intimidate him much.

Well. That certainly put me in my place.



Moving on...
An actual Warren plan I'm not really that big a fan of.
Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren today proposed a steep new tax on “excessive” lobbying.

Corporations and trade associations would face levies of as much as 75 percent on the money they spend lobbying the federal government. Warren said the idea is designed to simultaneously reduce the power of lobbyists while also generating billions in revenue that she says would be earmarked for shoring up federal agencies that face "significant lobbying activity" and support offices for Congress like the CBO.

Okay, sure. It makes lobbying more expensive. So...it means that big money lobbiests will spend more and smaller groups who use lobbying as a way to petition government get priced out at a certain level. It's the ones on the big end, with the money to burn, that abuse the system and those are the ones that view fines and fees and judgements as the price of doing business.

It's one of those things that I think we get lost on, where what the idea has become, how it gets used, is bad but the central idea is not.

The stock market is rife with abuse and serves itself, but at its principle it is a chance to spread risk in investment while giving regular workers a chance to build their finances and benefit from investment. The idea isn't to burn Wall Street to the ground, it's to return it to that core principle, protect that average investor so that someone who works on maybe a fixed income or not necessarily a growth job and can put aside some money can use that to improve their lives through investing and companies can find the capital they need.

Lobbying is how you petition government. That you can send someone to represent your needs to government isn't inherently wrong, but that access can and has been abused. I don't think this stops it, it just adds a line item on the ledger of those who would abuse it while making it more difficult for those who use the system the way it was intended.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:30 am

Yeah, a "lobbying tax" sounds nice and progressive onnpaper but it's actually a real bad idea.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Nea Byzantia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5185
Founded: Jun 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Nea Byzantia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:33 am


User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41692
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:35 am

Nea Byzantia wrote:

So what happens I wonder, if Bernie kicks the can?

We mourn, there are retrospectives about the life of service that he led, people say nice things about him and the affect he's had on the discourse over the last few years, and then the election continues.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:38 am

Nea Byzantia wrote:

So what happens I wonder, if Bernie kicks the can?


Then he's out of the race. Pretty simple.

Let's hope he doesn't kick the can, though. I don't want him dead.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:45 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:Ha ha...ha...haha...ha...
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday appeared to revel in the ongoing political maelstrom in the U.S., jokingly admitting to plans for future election meddling.

When asked whether Russia would interfere in the 2020 election cycle, Putin leaned into the microphone onstage and mimicked a whisper: “I’m going to tell you a secret. Yes, sure. We’re going to do that. Don’t tell anybody.”

Shut the fuck up, dude.

The rest of it, just to be clear his context:
The quip at the Russian Energy Week panel elicited laughter and applause as Putin discussed why he believes the allegations made by former special counsel Robert Mueller, who concluded that Moscow mounted an aggressive effort to disrupt the 2016 presidential election, were untrue.

“The fact that myself and Mr. Trump have a close relationship doesn’t mean that it’s in any way affecting the current political environment within the U.S.,” he said. “We see that (the United States) is trying to use any pretext to attack Mr. Trump, and now they’re even trying to use Ukraine.”

He maintained that while he has a good relationship with Trump “built on trust,” Russia did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election, citing focus on issues within his own country.

“We have our own problems,” he said. “We invest immense resources into implementing our own goals in our own country. Why would we interfere anywhere?”

Putin's only going with the flow. After all his sugar baby Donny said it was okay the first time around and he's counting on it again.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:48 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Nea Byzantia wrote:So what happens I wonder, if Bernie kicks the can?

We mourn, there are retrospectives about the life of service that he led, people say nice things about him and the affect he's had on the discourse over the last few years, and then the election continues.

And people will ironically and unironically say the healthcare system was rigged against Bernie. Then the other candidates fight for the Bernie Bros.
Last edited by Gormwood on Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10958
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:53 am

Gormwood wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:We mourn, there are retrospectives about the life of service that he led, people say nice things about him and the affect he's had on the discourse over the last few years, and then the election continues.

And people will ironically and unironically say the healthcare system was rigged against Bernie. Then the other candidates fight for the Bernie Bros.


Or believe he was intentionally killed. Them conspiracy theories are bound to pop up.

Valrifell wrote:Yeah, a "lobbying tax" sounds nice and progressive onnpaper but it's actually a real bad idea.


It's a terrible idea and one I don't see passing at all. There are better ways to restrict lobbying, especially among the big cash ones.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:59 am

Zurkerx wrote:
Gormwood wrote:And people will ironically and unironically say the healthcare system was rigged against Bernie. Then the other candidates fight for the Bernie Bros.


Or believe he was intentionally killed. Them conspiracy theories are bound to pop up.

With the DNC being the popular suspect.

Valrifell wrote:Yeah, a "lobbying tax" sounds nice and progressive onnpaper but it's actually a real bad idea.


It's a terrible idea and one I don't see passing at all. There are better ways to restrict lobbying, especially among the big cash ones.

At least Warren hasn't been proven to be inflexible and could change the idea. An actual proposal is better than nebulous promises.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41692
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:46 am

Gormwood wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
Or believe he was intentionally killed. Them conspiracy theories are bound to pop up.

With the DNC being the popular suspect.


It's a terrible idea and one I don't see passing at all. There are better ways to restrict lobbying, especially among the big cash ones.

At least Warren hasn't been proven to be inflexible and could change the idea. An actual proposal is better than nebulous promises.

Yeah, I mean, make no mistake, it's not a "Well that's it for Warren & me" thing. I'm bound to disagree with her on a few things. And hopefully by the time she's in office she'll have a better idea.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:06 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Gormwood wrote:With the DNC being the popular suspect.


At least Warren hasn't been proven to be inflexible and could change the idea. An actual proposal is better than nebulous promises.

Yeah, I mean, make no mistake, it's not a "Well that's it for Warren & me" thing. I'm bound to disagree with her on a few things. And hopefully by the time she's in office she'll have a better idea.


I expect that proposal to get lost in the shuffle.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:11 pm

USS Monitor wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Yeah, I mean, make no mistake, it's not a "Well that's it for Warren & me" thing. I'm bound to disagree with her on a few things. And hopefully by the time she's in office she'll have a better idea.


I expect that proposal to get lost in the shuffle.


Probably. She wakes up and pisses plans, tbh. And that is wonderful, to have a candidate who has detailed and intricate policy proposals, but I suspect many of the more niche ones will ultimately be lost, as you said.

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:36 pm

Let the howling begin!

Joe Biden's 2020 gun safety plan would reinstate assault weapons ban

The big picture: Biden's plan would ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, but it would not call for a mandatory assault weapons buyback program as Beto O'Rourke has proposed.

  • Instead, it gives those who own such guns two choices: sell the weapons to the government or register them under the National Firearms Act.

    Other policies in Biden's plan:

  • Mandating universal background checks for all gun sales, except for gifts between close family members.
  • Closing the "boyfriend," "hate crime," "fugitive from justice," and "Charleston" loopholes in the current federal background check system.
  • Ending the online sales of guns.
  • Incentivizing states to implement gun licensing programs of their own.
  • Calling on Congress to appropriate $50 million to accelerate research on causes and prevention of gun violence at the CDC and NIH.
  • Prohibiting the use of federal funds to arm or train educators to use guns in schools.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:07 pm

Gormwood wrote:Let the howling begin!

Joe Biden's 2020 gun safety plan would reinstate assault weapons ban

The big picture: Biden's plan would ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, but it would not call for a mandatory assault weapons buyback program as Beto O'Rourke has proposed.

  • Instead, it gives those who own such guns two choices: sell the weapons to the government or register them under the National Firearms Act.

    Other policies in Biden's plan:

  • Mandating universal background checks for all gun sales, except for gifts between close family members.
  • Closing the "boyfriend," "hate crime," "fugitive from justice," and "Charleston" loopholes in the current federal background check system.
  • Ending the online sales of guns.
  • Incentivizing states to implement gun licensing programs of their own.
  • Calling on Congress to appropriate $50 million to accelerate research on causes and prevention of gun violence at the CDC and NIH.
  • Prohibiting the use of federal funds to arm or train educators to use guns in schools.


Suddenly several lifelong Republican posters will come out of the woodwork, "I was gonna vote for Biden!" they will say, "I swear! That is, until he pulled this!"
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Ngelmish
Minister
 
Posts: 3062
Founded: Dec 06, 2009
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ngelmish » Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:38 pm

Valrifell wrote:


Suddenly several lifelong Republican posters will come out of the woodwork, "I was gonna vote for Biden!" they will say, "I swear! That is, until he pulled this!"


More likely the line will be that this proves Democrats are going to lose tons of gettable votes... despite the fact that the votes they lose over proposals like this are already baked in as, "Not Democrat."

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:43 pm

Valrifell wrote:


Suddenly several lifelong Republican posters will come out of the woodwork, "I was gonna vote for Biden!" they will say, "I swear! That is, until he pulled this!"


Implying anyone is surprised by this.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:52 pm

Ngelmish wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
Suddenly several lifelong Republican posters will come out of the woodwork, "I was gonna vote for Biden!" they will say, "I swear! That is, until he pulled this!"


More likely the line will be that this proves Democrats are going to lose tons of gettable votes... despite the fact that the votes they lose over proposals like this are already baked in as, "Not Democrat."

And they'll act like weapon registration is the same as mutant registration.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:06 pm


Great. I love failed policies that we've proven don't actually help.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Algueneia, Based Illinois, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Dimetrodon Empire, Kenmoria, Prackin Kelew, Rhodevus, Ryemarch, USS Monitor

Advertisement

Remove ads