NATION

PASSWORD

2019-2020 US Election Megathread III: Biden VS Biden

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you think had the best performance at tonight’s debate?

Bernie
65
62%
Buttigieg
12
11%
Warren
11
10%
Biden
5
5%
Steyer
4
4%
Klobuchar
8
8%
 
Total votes : 105

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:16 pm

Bear Stearns wrote:I predict that Trump will win all states he won in 2016 plus Maine and New Hampshire if Biden, Warren, or Buttigieg are the nominee.


This is a goofy prediction.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:18 pm



Finally a correct opinion.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:21 pm

Valrifell wrote:


Finally a correct opinion.

Please Clap.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:27 pm

Gormwood wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
Finally a correct opinion.

Please Clap.

Applauds

User avatar
Czechostan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1210
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Czechostan » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:27 pm

Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo

A very generous prediction. I foresee the map as looking more like this:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/kLAQZ
Last edited by Czechostan on Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ngelmish
Minister
 
Posts: 3071
Founded: Dec 06, 2009
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ngelmish » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:33 pm

Yeah, as a resident Hoosier, the idea that Indiana would flip for Sanders (or really any Democratic nominee) is totally ludicrous. Especially if Mike Pence is still on the ticket. People misread Obama's '08 win -- that was lightning in a bottle.

As for delusional and unprovable GE election predictions, I think the map is going to be a lot closer in electoral votes, closer to 2004 than any of our subsequent elections.

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17033
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:26 am

Honestly, I look at the electoral map and get worried. I think if I were to find a semi-likely scenario where Trump loses, this map seems like the best path.

Disclaimer: It's early and things change. I may be totally wrong In the end, but here's what I think currently.

In the elections I can remember, OH, NC, VA, amd FL were touted as the most important swing states. While all four of those are still varying levels of up in the air right now, I don't think that's the set to look at anymore.

In my view, the most vital and important states now are FL, PA, MI, and WI. If Trump takes FL, I think the Dems will probably need to flip all of the other three. Alternatively, if the Dems flip FL, they may be able to get away with only one of the other three. If Trump takes both PA and FL, the Dem is likely in major trouble.

I see IA, OH, NC, AZ, and GA as likely Trump wins.

I see CO, NV, NH, MN, and VA as likely Dem wins.
Last edited by Idzequitch on Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17485
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:54 am

Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo


This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.

At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.

Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17033
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:59 am

Page wrote:
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo


This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.

At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.

Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.

It's incredible to me that people on the Dem side are willing to be this overconfident again just three years removed from 2016....
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Talvezout
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5381
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Talvezout » Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:06 am

Image

All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)

Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)

Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)

Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)

I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed :p



In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.
Last edited by Talvezout on Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
talveziobiblio.org.tz


User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:54 am

Talvezout wrote:(Image)

All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)

Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)

Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)

Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)

I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed :p



In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.

If people in Madison and Milwaukee get off their butts the latter especially Wisconsin will flip

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12341
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 7:59 am

Czechostan wrote:
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo

A very generous prediction. I foresee the map as looking more like this:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/kLAQZ


Yours is much more plausible but I still have doubts (at the moment) that a Democrat can win in North Carolina or Ohio, with the latter becoming increasingly reddish. I think once we have the nominee, we'll be able to focus much more on who can win what States.

Idzequitch wrote:Honestly, I look at the electoral map and get worried. I think if I were to find a semi-likely scenario where Trump loses, this map seems like the best path.

Disclaimer: It's early and things change. I may be totally wrong In the end, but here's what I think currently.

In the elections I can remember, OH, NC, VA, amd FL were touted as the most important swing states. While all four of those are still varying levels of up in the air right now, I don't think that's the set to look at anymore.

In my view, the most vital and important states now are FL, PA, MI, and WI. If Trump takes FL, I think the Dems will probably need to flip all of the other three. Alternatively, if the Dems flip FL, they may be able to get away with only one of the other three. If Trump takes both PA and FL, the Dem is likely in major trouble.

I see IA, OH, NC, AZ, and GA as likely Trump wins.

I see CO, NV, NH, MN, and VA as likely Dem wins.


Yeah, FL, PA, MI, and WI are the States to aim for now and I do agree with the States Trump/Dem are likely to win. And yes, they'll need one of the Rust Belt States if they win Florida, which shouldn't be hard: I see Michigan going blue this time.

Idzequitch wrote:
Page wrote:
This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.

At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.

Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.

It's incredible to me that people on the Dem side are willing to be this overconfident again just three years removed from 2016....


It seems some haven't learn their lessons from 2016. It's also the same lunacy that some Trump supporters hold: their respective candidate will win in a landslide. It's quite clear that for some, they hold the outlook of AOC, who thinks and views the entire country is somehow progressive based on her district. Thus, it's better to see what each individual State looks and stands rather than relying on national polls because these "progressive" policies have many layers of how far people want to go, especially on issues like healthcare and all.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 8:02 am

Zurkerx wrote:
Czechostan wrote:A very generous prediction. I foresee the map as looking more like this:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/kLAQZ


Yours is much more plausible but I still have doubts (at the moment) that a Democrat can win in North Carolina or Ohio, with the latter becoming increasingly reddish. I think once we have the nominee, we'll be able to focus much more on who can win what States.

Idzequitch wrote:Honestly, I look at the electoral map and get worried. I think if I were to find a semi-likely scenario where Trump loses, this map seems like the best path.

Disclaimer: It's early and things change. I may be totally wrong In the end, but here's what I think currently.

In the elections I can remember, OH, NC, VA, amd FL were touted as the most important swing states. While all four of those are still varying levels of up in the air right now, I don't think that's the set to look at anymore.

In my view, the most vital and important states now are FL, PA, MI, and WI. If Trump takes FL, I think the Dems will probably need to flip all of the other three. Alternatively, if the Dems flip FL, they may be able to get away with only one of the other three. If Trump takes both PA and FL, the Dem is likely in major trouble.

I see IA, OH, NC, AZ, and GA as likely Trump wins.

I see CO, NV, NH, MN, and VA as likely Dem wins.


Yeah, FL, PA, MI, and WI are the States to aim for now and I do agree with the States Trump/Dem are likely to win. And yes, they'll need one of the Rust Belt States if they win Florida, which shouldn't be hard: I see Michigan going blue this time.

Idzequitch wrote:It's incredible to me that people on the Dem side are willing to be this overconfident again just three years removed from 2016....


It seems some haven't learn their lessons from 2016. It's also the same lunacy that some Trump supporters hold: their respective candidate will win in a landslide. It's quite clear that for some, they hold the outlook of AOC, who thinks and views the entire country is somehow progressive based on her district. Thus, it's better to see what each individual State looks and stands rather than relying on national polls because these "progressive" policies have many layers of how far people want to go, especially on issues like healthcare and all.

I find it hard to see Trump getting Michigan or Pennsylvania again. Wisconsin is the one that worries me. It will depend on people in Madison and Milwaukee getting off their butts. Milwaukee especially

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12341
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:04 am

Elizabeth Warren targets Buttigieg and Biden as she seeks to regain momentum in Iowa.

Hmm, just what I thought. She was doing good in the beginning but her passiveness couldn't sustain her momentum as she fluctuates between 2nd and 4th now. That is despite her announcing her own healthcare plan, which she tip-toed on the issue for months. It's good she's going on the attack but it might be a bit too late. We shall see how she does in the debate.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Jerzylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14843
Founded: Aug 10, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Jerzylvania » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:14 am

Talvezout wrote:(Image)

All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)

Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)

Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)

Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)

I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed :p



In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.


Your map is close but Trump also loses IA and WI and is not reelected.
Donald Trump has no clue as to what "insuring the domestic tranquility" means

The Baltimore Orioles are shocking the baseball world!

Jerzylvania is the NFL Picks League Champion in 2018 and in 2020 as puppet Traffic Signal and AGAIN in 2023 as puppet Joe Munchkin !!!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87269
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:36 am

Jerzylvania wrote:
Talvezout wrote:(Image)

All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)

Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)

Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)

Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)

I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed :p



In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.


Your map is close but Trump also loses IA and WI and is not reelected.

if turnout in Dane and Milwaukee county is like what we got last year Trump likely loses the state narrowly

User avatar
Ngelmish
Minister
 
Posts: 3071
Founded: Dec 06, 2009
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ngelmish » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:47 am

Page wrote:
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo


This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.

At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.

Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.


While your typical ideological need to overestimate Sanders' electoral appeal is wrong as usual (and no, it's nothing to do with policy, in his case his weaknesses are political) I really just have to reemphasize, Indiana is not a swing state. Not by a long shot.

User avatar
Perisno
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: May 01, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Perisno » Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:56 am

Warren is starting to drop, she has reached her peak, a lot of most recent polls have her at 10-11%. Buttigieg may keep rising, but I think he's gonna drop soon as well. A silver tongue can only do so much for a candidate who has so little substance. Yang is doing better than most people think, many polls have him anywhere from 2, to 11 percent. He's a definite dark horse, his support is only growing, and he plans on being aggressive in the next debate. Bernie is also on the rise, polling in first place in a most recent polls. From what I can tell, the race will be Buttigieg v Biden v Bernie v Yang. I think Bernie is likeliest to win the nomination however, and would probably win over Trump.
Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest -and you all know it! Please don't feel so stupid or insecure,it's not your fault

YANG2020

Pro: Limited Government, Laissez-Faire Economy, Pro-Life, Nationalism, Legal Drugs, Equity, Military, Intervention, Constitution, Tax Cuts, Tradition, Family, Assimilation, UBI
Neutral: LGBT, Religion, Climate
Anti: Establishment, Illegal Immigration, Welfare, Monopolies, Same-sex Marriage, Socialism, Communism, Multi-culturalism, Progressivism,

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:05 am

Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12341
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:17 am

Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.


Ideologs have an interesting interpretation of their preferred candidate, whether it be Sanders or Clinton. Of course, Sanders people hate Clinton so to them, the crown isn't deserving to such a moderate. Sanders has a shot but we shall see what he can do in these next two months.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:29 am

Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.

Dammit get your Star Wars analogies straight, they're giving me nerd twitch. Kenobi didn't lead the rebellion (even if he was a general in the Republic during the Clone Wars) and wasn't asked for a leadership position. They just wanted the Jedi back.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Perisno
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: May 01, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Perisno » Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:06 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.

Dammit get your Star Wars analogies straight, they're giving me nerd twitch. Kenobi didn't lead the rebellion (even if he was a general in the Republic during the Clone Wars) and wasn't asked for a leadership position. They just wanted the Jedi back.


Leia still asked for Obi-Wan Kenobi's help.
Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest -and you all know it! Please don't feel so stupid or insecure,it's not your fault

YANG2020

Pro: Limited Government, Laissez-Faire Economy, Pro-Life, Nationalism, Legal Drugs, Equity, Military, Intervention, Constitution, Tax Cuts, Tradition, Family, Assimilation, UBI
Neutral: LGBT, Religion, Climate
Anti: Establishment, Illegal Immigration, Welfare, Monopolies, Same-sex Marriage, Socialism, Communism, Multi-culturalism, Progressivism,

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:50 pm

Perisno wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Dammit get your Star Wars analogies straight, they're giving me nerd twitch. Kenobi didn't lead the rebellion (even if he was a general in the Republic during the Clone Wars) and wasn't asked for a leadership position. They just wanted the Jedi back.


Leia still asked for Obi-Wan Kenobi's help.

Yeah, but he's reaching for the 'chosen one' vibe and that's strictly Skywalker.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15697
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Major-Tom » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:55 pm

Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo


This is a fantasy at best, an absolute parody of electoral politics at worst.

User avatar
Talvezout
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5381
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Talvezout » Thu Dec 12, 2019 2:06 pm

Jerzylvania wrote:
Talvezout wrote:(Image)

All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)

Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)

Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)

Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)

I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed :p



In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.


Your map is close but Trump also loses IA and WI and is not reelected.


Yeah, I have a feeling the map is gonna be like that pretty much. The only questions is who wins WI, IA, PA, AZ, and NE-2. Those states (and district) could very much determine the election.

Also honestly, it's gonna be hard for any party to win in a landslide like 64'/72'/80'/84'. Politics is way more partisan and stratified, barring something like David Duke somehow getting nominated for one of the two main parties.
Last edited by Talvezout on Thu Dec 12, 2019 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
talveziobiblio.org.tz


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, Hidrandia, Keltionialang, Kinqueven, Likhinia, New Temecula, Verkhoyanska, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads