Bear Stearns wrote:I predict that Trump will win all states he won in 2016 plus Maine and New Hampshire if Biden, Warren, or Buttigieg are the nominee.
This is a goofy prediction.
Advertisement
by Valrifell » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:16 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:I predict that Trump will win all states he won in 2016 plus Maine and New Hampshire if Biden, Warren, or Buttigieg are the nominee.
by Gormwood » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:21 pm
Valrifell wrote:Pasong Tirad wrote:This is the only correct electoral map.
Finally a correct opinion.
by Czechostan » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:27 pm
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
by Ngelmish » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:33 pm
by Idzequitch » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:26 am
by Page » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:54 am
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
by Idzequitch » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:59 am
Page wrote:Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.
At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.
Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.
by Talvezout » Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:06 am
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:54 am
Talvezout wrote:(Image)
All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)
Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)
Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)
Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)
I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed
In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.
by Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 7:59 am
Czechostan wrote:Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
A very generous prediction. I foresee the map as looking more like this:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/kLAQZ
Idzequitch wrote:Honestly, I look at the electoral map and get worried. I think if I were to find a semi-likely scenario where Trump loses, this map seems like the best path.Disclaimer: It's early and things change. I may be totally wrong In the end, but here's what I think currently.
In the elections I can remember, OH, NC, VA, amd FL were touted as the most important swing states. While all four of those are still varying levels of up in the air right now, I don't think that's the set to look at anymore.
In my view, the most vital and important states now are FL, PA, MI, and WI. If Trump takes FL, I think the Dems will probably need to flip all of the other three. Alternatively, if the Dems flip FL, they may be able to get away with only one of the other three. If Trump takes both PA and FL, the Dem is likely in major trouble.
I see IA, OH, NC, AZ, and GA as likely Trump wins.
I see CO, NV, NH, MN, and VA as likely Dem wins.
Idzequitch wrote:Page wrote:
This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.
At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.
Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.
It's incredible to me that people on the Dem side are willing to be this overconfident again just three years removed from 2016....
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 8:02 am
Zurkerx wrote:Czechostan wrote:A very generous prediction. I foresee the map as looking more like this:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/kLAQZ
Yours is much more plausible but I still have doubts (at the moment) that a Democrat can win in North Carolina or Ohio, with the latter becoming increasingly reddish. I think once we have the nominee, we'll be able to focus much more on who can win what States.Idzequitch wrote:Honestly, I look at the electoral map and get worried. I think if I were to find a semi-likely scenario where Trump loses, this map seems like the best path.Disclaimer: It's early and things change. I may be totally wrong In the end, but here's what I think currently.
In the elections I can remember, OH, NC, VA, amd FL were touted as the most important swing states. While all four of those are still varying levels of up in the air right now, I don't think that's the set to look at anymore.
In my view, the most vital and important states now are FL, PA, MI, and WI. If Trump takes FL, I think the Dems will probably need to flip all of the other three. Alternatively, if the Dems flip FL, they may be able to get away with only one of the other three. If Trump takes both PA and FL, the Dem is likely in major trouble.
I see IA, OH, NC, AZ, and GA as likely Trump wins.
I see CO, NV, NH, MN, and VA as likely Dem wins.
Yeah, FL, PA, MI, and WI are the States to aim for now and I do agree with the States Trump/Dem are likely to win. And yes, they'll need one of the Rust Belt States if they win Florida, which shouldn't be hard: I see Michigan going blue this time.Idzequitch wrote:It's incredible to me that people on the Dem side are willing to be this overconfident again just three years removed from 2016....
It seems some haven't learn their lessons from 2016. It's also the same lunacy that some Trump supporters hold: their respective candidate will win in a landslide. It's quite clear that for some, they hold the outlook of AOC, who thinks and views the entire country is somehow progressive based on her district. Thus, it's better to see what each individual State looks and stands rather than relying on national polls because these "progressive" policies have many layers of how far people want to go, especially on issues like healthcare and all.
by Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:04 am
by Jerzylvania » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:14 am
Talvezout wrote:(Image)
All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)
Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)
Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)
Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)
I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed
In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:36 am
Jerzylvania wrote:Talvezout wrote:(Image)
All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)
Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)
Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)
Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)
I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed
In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.
Your map is close but Trump also loses IA and WI and is not reelected.
by Ngelmish » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:47 am
Page wrote:Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
This is almost the same as my Sanders vs. Trump prediction except I truly think Bernie Sanders would narrowly take Georgia through a combination of a strong black vote, population growth in Atlanta, and previously disillusioned white working class coming out to vote. Only Bernie can do this, no other Dem has a shot at Georgia.
At this point, Warren could win but of the swing states she won't get Iowa, Indiana, and Arizona.
Biden, it will come down to the Midwest and could go either way. Biden would certainly win the popular vote by millions but he might lose the EC just like Clinton. I'd expect a similar scenario for Buttigieg but with even worse odds than Biden.
by Perisno » Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:56 am
Pro: Limited Government, Laissez-Faire Economy, Pro-Life, Nationalism, Legal Drugs, Equity, Military, Intervention, Constitution, Tax Cuts, Tradition, Family, Assimilation, UBI
Neutral: LGBT, Religion, Climate
Anti: Establishment, Illegal Immigration, Welfare, Monopolies, Same-sex Marriage, Socialism, Communism, Multi-culturalism, Progressivism,
by Gormwood » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:05 am
by Zurkerx » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:17 am
Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:29 am
Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.
by Perisno » Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:06 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Gormwood wrote:Man, so many going "Help me Bernie-Wan Kenobi, you're our only hope." And yet Clinton was howled at for supposedly being coronated.
Dammit get your Star Wars analogies straight, they're giving me nerd twitch. Kenobi didn't lead the rebellion (even if he was a general in the Republic during the Clone Wars) and wasn't asked for a leadership position. They just wanted the Jedi back.
Pro: Limited Government, Laissez-Faire Economy, Pro-Life, Nationalism, Legal Drugs, Equity, Military, Intervention, Constitution, Tax Cuts, Tradition, Family, Assimilation, UBI
Neutral: LGBT, Religion, Climate
Anti: Establishment, Illegal Immigration, Welfare, Monopolies, Same-sex Marriage, Socialism, Communism, Multi-culturalism, Progressivism,
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:50 pm
Perisno wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Dammit get your Star Wars analogies straight, they're giving me nerd twitch. Kenobi didn't lead the rebellion (even if he was a general in the Republic during the Clone Wars) and wasn't asked for a leadership position. They just wanted the Jedi back.
Leia still asked for Obi-Wan Kenobi's help.
by Major-Tom » Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:55 pm
Blargoblarg wrote:Since everyone is sharing map predictions, here's one of my more conservative predictions of how it might go if it's Bernie vs Trump:
https://www.270towin.com/maps/oPWNo
by Talvezout » Thu Dec 12, 2019 2:06 pm
Jerzylvania wrote:Talvezout wrote:(Image)
All things considered, I'm betting that this is gonna be the most likeliest result of the 2020 election. Trump wins a narrow EC victory, while losing by as much as 5 million pop votes (very narrow victories in AZ, NC, IA, GA, and WI)
Down the ballot, Dems hold the House (like 1 or two seats are gained, as Petersen and Van Drew flip to Reps but GA-7, IL-13, NC-2, NC-6, TX-24, TX-23, TX-22, TX-21 and TX-31 all flip to Dems)
Senate, Democrats make a gain of 1-2 seats, or possibly tie the Senate (Jones's seat flips to Reps, while Gardner, McSally, (and possibly Collins and Tillis) all flip to Dems)
Governor's, Dems manage to tie control of Governors (Sununu wins by a narrow margin, while Dems hold Montana and narrowly win West Virginia)
I also have more political wonkery, but that's for a another day. I can also explain some of my decisions if needed
In other words, Dems narrowly lose to Trump but build on their suburban gains.
Your map is close but Trump also loses IA and WI and is not reelected.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, Hidrandia, Keltionialang, Kinqueven, Likhinia, New Temecula, Verkhoyanska, Yasuragi
Advertisement