SF declares NRA a terrorist organization

[Greater vakolicci haven]

I mean, conservatives in the US go around labeling every small, broad left-wing group as terroristic, so if SF wants to label an organization that facilitates and is complicit in large-scale gun violence as a dangerous group, so be it.

It's more intellectually honest then saying some asinine, truly moronic shit like "SPLC are terrorists" or my personal favorite "ANTIFA = Fascists!"

SPLC is a hate group, not a terrorist one. The NRA teaches responsible gun ownership. One dogwhistles and turns people against each other, one tries to keep people safe.

[Nova Cyberia]

It's almost like...

I'm comparing gun free zones to gun free zones

---

Why do car bombings only happen at military checkpoints in Iraq? There are military checkpoints in America.

Car bombings don't only happen at military checkpoints in Iraq.

---

Where was this claim made?

Gun free zone = Advertisement that everyone is defenseless and and all you can shoot buffet.
After all 98% off all the mass shootings are done in GFZ.

---

A gun free zone bans civilians from having any guns.
You do not understand what a gun free zone is.

The police are civilians.

And nobody claimed gun free zones are the cause of mass shootings anyways.

Gun free zone = Advertisement that everyone is defenseless and and all you can shoot buffet.
After all 98% off all the mass shootings are done in GFZ.

*clears throat*

Wrong.

In general, a civilian is "a person who is not a member of the military or of a police or firefighting force".

[Telconi]

It's almost like...

I'm comparing gun free zones to gun free zones

---

Why do car bombings only happen at military checkpoints in Iraq? There are military checkpoints in America.

Car bombings don't only happen at military checkpoints in Iraq.

---

Where was this claim made?

Gun free zone = Advertisement that everyone is defenseless and and all you can shoot buffet.
After all 98% off all the mass shootings are done in GFZ.

---

A gun free zone bans civilians from having any guns.
You do not understand what a gun free zone is.

The police are civilians.

And nobody claimed gun free zones are the cause of mass shootings anyways.

Gun free zone = Advertisement that everyone is defenseless and and all you can shoot buffet.
After all 98% off all the mass shootings are done in GFZ.

A reasonable person could ascertain the context of Grinning Dragon's statement and realize that it was a statement specific to occurrences in the United States. Secondly, his statement never alluded that gun free zones were the cause, only the preferred targets.

[Rojava Free State]

As a Dutch person, I can tell you that we don't allow guns. Only registered hunters, sportshooters and police are allowed to carry/ own a gun. And only police can carry a gun in public.
Farmers are allowed to have air guns to kill pests like hare, rats and pigeons.

We don't have random, multiple shootings. Only criminals
who accidentally shoot civilians, but most are liquidations of the criminals.
We don't shoot our house mates when they return late at night and we mistake them for burglars.

I have a pretty good aim, irl, on fairs I ll win the prizes which I want, I hit those pesky hares/ pigeons.
But I don't have guns in my house, since I no longer live on the farm.

So listen to those extreme lefties, get rid of those guns.

https://injury.research.chop.edu/violen ... Xvul1NcKdM

The Netherlands was never as dangerous as America in recent times, long before gun control was even a thing. When you actually look at countries where violent crime was out of control such as Venezuela and Honduras and brazil, gun control failed.

[Rojava Free State]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

[Ifreann]

---

Car bombings don't only happen at military checkpoints in Iraq.

---

---

The police are civilians.

*clears throat*

Wrong.

In general, a civilian is "a person who is not a member of the military or of a police or firefighting force".

Of course it would be Merriam-Webster.

[Paddy O Fernature]

As a Dutch person, I can tell you that we don't allow guns. Only registered hunters, sportshooters and police are allowed to carry/ own a gun. And only police can carry a gun in public.
Farmers are allowed to have air guns to kill pests like hare, rats and pigeons.

We don't have random, multiple shootings. Only criminals
who accidentally shoot civilians, but most are liquidations of the criminals.
We don't shoot our house mates when they return late at night and we mistake them for burglars.

I have a pretty good aim, irl, on fairs I ll win the prizes which I want, I hit those pesky hares/ pigeons.
But I don't have guns in my house, since I no longer live on the farm.

So listen to those extreme lefties, get rid of those guns.

https://injury.research.chop.edu/violen ... Xvul1NcKdM

Yeah, no thanks. I'm pretty content with my fully semi automatic weapon of mass assault and my high capacity clipazines, thank you very much.

[Grand Britannia]

As a Dutch person, I can tell you that we don't allow guns. Only registered hunters, sportshooters and police are allowed to carry/ own a gun. And only police can carry a gun in public.
Farmers are allowed to have air guns to kill pests like hare, rats and pigeons.

We don't have random, multiple shootings. Only criminals
who accidentally shoot civilians, but most are liquidations of the criminals.
We don't shoot our house mates when they return late at night and we mistake them for burglars.

I have a pretty good aim, irl, on fairs I ll win the prizes which I want, I hit those pesky hares/ pigeons.
But I don't have guns in my house, since I no longer live on the farm.

So listen to those extreme lefties, get rid of those guns.

https://injury.research.chop.edu/violen ... Xvul1NcKdM

Yeah, no thanks.

It's "tiny, mostly homogenous country pretends their situation is 100% comparable to the US" part 2.

[West Leas Oros 2]

The "Far Left" doesn't want to take away guns. As a "far-leftist" myself, I advocate for arming all working people. San Francisco isn't a leftwing city of any sort. It's an American capitalist city, just like any other American city like Columbus, NYC, or Carson, except SF has a lot more gentrification going on (you know, what literally pushes poor people out of the city).

This. So much this. "The Left" doesn't hate guns, the bourgeois Democrats do.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Yeah, no thanks.

It's "tiny, mostly homogenous country pretends their situation is 100% comparable to the US" part 2.

Yes, it is very rediculous.

[Bear Stearns]

The answer to solving gun crime in America is so ridiculously simple, I even made a function for it:

f(13) = 52

[LiberNovusAmericae]

No, I'm taking about those who push for gun rights.

Such as the Redneck Revolt group?

Maybe. I don't know much about them.

[Cekoviu]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

[Grand Britannia]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

We banned drugs, they still come through Mexico.

We ban guns, I'm sure the cartels will love this development.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

We banned drugs, they still come through Mexico.

We ban guns, I'm sure the cartels will love this development.

The libs understand that when it comes to drugs, but many cannot seem to make the connection that banning guns is no different.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

They're all major points of contention between the parties.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

They are similar in one way. Banning them pushes them underground.

[Cekoviu]

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

They're all major points of contention between the parties.

And?

[Grand Britannia]

We banned drugs, they still come through Mexico.

We ban guns, I'm sure the cartels will love this development.

The libs understand that when it comes to drugs, but many cannot seem to make the connection that banning guns is no different.

More money for the Cartels, less guns for civilians, surely everyone wins.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

They're all major points of contention between the parties.

And?

They also all involve complex issues that al can't be answered with,"Ban them!"

[LiberNovusAmericae]

The libs understand that when it comes to drugs, but many cannot seem to make the connection that banning guns is no different.

More money for the Cartels, less guns for civilians, surely everyone wins.

Reminds me of the Australian gun black market.

[Rojava Free State]

I love how republicans and democrats pick and choose which bans will and won't work. Democrats oppose the war on drugs but think a gun ban would work while republicans oppose taking guns away but often support banning abortion.

I don't think you can ban speech, guns, drugs or abortion, which is why I don't think we ought to fight these battles. You're never gonna successfully disarm Americans when there's more guns in this nation than people. It just won't happen

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

Yes they are. They are things people wanna ban but fail to actually stop

Abortion bans fail
Drug bans fail
Banning certain speech fails
Banning guns failed in Latin America

[Grand Britannia]

"If you want to prevent abortions fix why people need abortions!"

Me: well if we helped fix the issue we have with mental health and gang violence we would solve much of gun violence t-

"NO BAN THEM"

[Cekoviu]

It's almost like none of those are remotely similar.

Yes they are. They are things people wanna ban but fail to actually stop

Abortion bans fail
Drug bans fail
Banning certain speech fails
Banning guns failed in Latin America

That's the case with banning literally anything, up to and including murder and rape. That shows nothing.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Yes they are. They are things people wanna ban but fail to actually stop

Abortion bans fail
Drug bans fail
Banning certain speech fails
Banning guns failed in Latin America

That's the case with banning literally anything, up to and including murder and rape. That shows nothing.

You would say that abortion, drug use, free speech, and gun ownership are as bad as murder and rape then.