NATION

PASSWORD

Is being overweight really unhealthy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Thepeopl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1561
Founded: Feb 24, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Thepeopl » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:07 am

I think the "big pharma is evil" stems from selling dietary products which can cause harm to your health and they don't work in the long run. Because being morbid obese can only be cured by lifestyle changes. No crash diet will do that.
It can be easier to maintain a diet when you have group therapy and friends/ family who support you.

It can help to buy only saucer plates and small glasses.
Eat 1 sandwich, do something else and if you are still hungry after 20 minutes, eat another.
Eat salads, nuts, vegetables, seaweed, but again only small portions. Try to lock up snacks/ sweets. If you are on the couch and the bag of crisps is next to you, chances are it will be empty before long. If you have to walk to the cupboard, fill a small bowl ( 1 hand of crisps), seal the bag, put it back in the cupboard, grab your bowl
Take it to the couch, eat it there. Then , if you still want more, repeat. It helps you get some extra exercise and will help eat less.

Go for walks, take a dog, make bets/ deals with friends to loose x pounds per month, start cooking yourself with products from your own garden. Use less salt, drink water, tea or coffee without sugar.

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5349
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:10 am

Takso wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
As long as an equal tax is put on artificial sweeteners like aspartame. I'd much rather be fat than have cancer.


That is categorically false. Aspartame is not considered a threat to human health and actually could be used to fight the obesity epidemic.

Wikipedia article on Aspartame wrote:The safety of aspartame has been studied since its discovery and is one of the most rigorously tested food ingredients. Aspartame has been deemed safe for human consumption by over 100 regulatory agencies in their respective countries, including the United States Food and Drug Administration, UK Food Standards Agency, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Health Canada, and Australia-New Zealand.

As of 2017, reviews of clinical trials showed that using aspartame (or other non-nutritive sweeteners) in place of sugar reduces calorie intake and body weight in adults and children.

A 2017 review of metabolic effects by consuming aspartame found that it did not affect blood glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, calorie intake, or body weight, while high-density lipoprotein levels were higher.


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame ... th_effects

As for the cancer, 'Reviews have found no association between aspartame and cancer.[7][8][10][28][29] This position is supported by multiple regulatory agencies like the FDA[30] and EFSA as well as scientific bodies such as the National Cancer Institute.[31] The EFSA and FDA state that aspartame is safe for human consumption.[6][32]'

The idea it causes cancer seems to stem from an article from the Environmental Health Perspective, some kind of medical peer-reviewed journal. Although I couldn't find anything on their legitimacy, one of their most recent articles appears to be some kind of fear-mongering in which a mixture of unnamed 'environmental chemicals' and socioeconomics can lead to autism. Which is bullshit, as Autism develops in the womb.
Last edited by Hammer Britannia on Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
Antityranicals
Minister
 
Posts: 2471
Founded: May 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Antityranicals » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:13 am

By definition, overweight means being heavier than is healthy, and therefore it is unhealthy. But someone being "heavy" does not mean that they are overweight, and I do believe the modern definition of overweight is far too broad.
Compass: Right: 9.94, Libertarian: -5.84
Catholic Libertarian. Gov't has no authority, all authority is from God. God grants us free will, gov't should not infringe upon it. Legislating morality is wrong. Only exception is protecting rights to life, liberty, and property. Abortion is killing an infant, one of the few things gov't should prevent. Pro-Trump, he's been an effective weapon against real enemies of freedom: The Left, but I wish he were more for free trade, more against deficits. Unrestrained capitalism is a great thing; it does wonders for standards of living of everyone, especially the poor.
HS student in the USA. Male. XC runner, 17:30 5k, 4:59 mile. I enjoy singing, sushi, eating large quantities of food, and eating large quantities of sushi.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11517
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:22 am

Takso wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
As long as an equal tax is put on artificial sweeteners like aspartame. I'd much rather be fat than have cancer.


That is categorically false. Aspartame is not considered a threat to human health and actually could be used to fight the obesity epidemic.

Wikipedia article on Aspartame wrote:The safety of aspartame has been studied since its discovery and is one of the most rigorously tested food ingredients. Aspartame has been deemed safe for human consumption by over 100 regulatory agencies in their respective countries, including the United States Food and Drug Administration, UK Food Standards Agency, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Health Canada, and Australia-New Zealand.

As of 2017, reviews of clinical trials showed that using aspartame (or other non-nutritive sweeteners) in place of sugar reduces calorie intake and body weight in adults and children.

A 2017 review of metabolic effects by consuming aspartame found that it did not affect blood glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, calorie intake, or body weight, while high-density lipoprotein levels were higher.


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame ... th_effects


Hammer Britannia wrote:As for the cancer, 'Reviews have found no association between aspartame and cancer.[7][8][10][28][29] This position is supported by multiple regulatory agencies like the FDA[30] and EFSA as well as scientific bodies such as the National Cancer Institute.[31] The EFSA and FDA state that aspartame is safe for human consumption.[6][32]'

The idea it causes cancer seems to stem from an article from the Environmental Health Perspective, some kind of medical peer-reviewed journal. Although I couldn't find anything on their legitimacy, one of their most recent articles appears to be some kind of fear-mongering in which a mixture of unnamed 'environmental chemicals' and socioeconomics can lead to autism. Which is bullshit, as Autism develops in the womb.



Very interesting! I may still avoid it more out of habit, but that's good to know anyway.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:24 am, edited 3 times in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67
Science Under Attack
Autism/Aspergers
History of Games
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.


Charlie Brooker wrote:It's spider season. Every year, right about now, thousands of the godless eight-legged bastards emerge from the bowels of hell (or the garden, whichever's nearest) with the sole intention of tormenting humankind. Spider season is like a live-action version of the videogame Doom.

User avatar
Takso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Aug 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Takso » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:40 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Takso wrote:
That is categorically false. Aspartame is not considered a threat to human health and actually could be used to fight the obesity epidemic.



Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame ... th_effects


Hammer Britannia wrote:As for the cancer, 'Reviews have found no association between aspartame and cancer.[7][8][10][28][29] This position is supported by multiple regulatory agencies like the FDA[30] and EFSA as well as scientific bodies such as the National Cancer Institute.[31] The EFSA and FDA state that aspartame is safe for human consumption.[6][32]'

The idea it causes cancer seems to stem from an article from the Environmental Health Perspective, some kind of medical peer-reviewed journal. Although I couldn't find anything on their legitimacy, one of their most recent articles appears to be some kind of fear-mongering in which a mixture of unnamed 'environmental chemicals' and socioeconomics can lead to autism. Which is bullshit, as Autism develops in the womb.



Very interesting! I may still avoid it more out of habit, but that's good to know anyway.


It's refreshing to see someone change their perspective based on discovering new evidence. Thank you for keeping an open mind. Nothing wrong with avoiding aspartame.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 106877
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:43 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Takso wrote:Unhealthy food should be taxed for the sake of public health, sugary beverages at 10-20%



As long as an equal tax is put on artificial sweeteners like aspartame. I'd much rather be fat than have cancer.

Unless you are diabetic, then the aspartame is much better for you than sugar.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Thepeopl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1561
Founded: Feb 24, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Thepeopl » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:00 pm

Takso wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:



Very interesting! I may still avoid it more out of habit, but that's good to know anyway.


It's refreshing to see someone change their perspective based on discovering new evidence. Thank you for keeping an open mind. Nothing wrong with avoiding aspartame.

I don't eat/ drink sweeteners like aspartame, stevia or sucralose, I really don't like the taste.

And it doesn't work for weight loss in the long term

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929

Tl;dr the body expects calories when there is a sweet taste, so overtime sweet foods are no longer associated with calories, and the body will not signal it is satiated, so you eat more.

User avatar
Risastorstein
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 401
Founded: Oct 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Risastorstein » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:08 pm

A little bit of meat on the bones isn't dangerous in my opinion. Obesity is however.

User avatar
Takso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Aug 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Takso » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:18 pm

Thepeopl wrote:
Takso wrote:
It's refreshing to see someone change their perspective based on discovering new evidence. Thank you for keeping an open mind. Nothing wrong with avoiding aspartame.

I don't eat/ drink sweeteners like aspartame, stevia or sucralose, I really don't like the taste.

And it doesn't work for weight loss in the long term

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929

Tl;dr the body expects calories when there is a sweet taste, so overtime sweet foods are no longer associated with calories, and the body will not signal it is satiated, so you eat more.


From that analysis:
"Evidence from RCTs does not clearly support the intended benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners for weight management, and observational data suggest that routine intake of nonnutritive sweeteners may be associated with increased BMI and cardiometabolic risk. Further research is needed to fully characterize the long-term risks and benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners."

Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.

"The take-home message is artificially sweetened drinks aren’t a silver bullet for weight loss. But if you drink a lot of sugary drinks and think a diet version might help you cut down on sugar, that’s a good step and is very unlikely to do you any harm."

"Despite the theories, the European Food Safety Authority have ruled that artificial sweeteners in food and drink pose no threat to our health if consumed within daily allowances. For aspartame, this is equivalent to 15 cans of diet coke. That’s a stark contrast to what we know about the harms of having too much sugar."

Source: Cancer Research UK
https://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.or ... ight-loss/

EDIT: That's 15 cans daily. Way higher than what would be okay for alternatives. Meaning, the diet coke option is not harmful and in fact the use of aspartame is safe.
Last edited by Takso on Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Thepeopl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1561
Founded: Feb 24, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Thepeopl » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:35 pm

Takso wrote:
Thepeopl wrote:I don't eat/ drink sweeteners like aspartame, stevia or sucralose, I really don't like the taste.

And it doesn't work for weight loss in the long term

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929

Tl;dr the body expects calories when there is a sweet taste, so overtime sweet foods are no longer associated with calories, and the body will not signal it is satiated, so you eat more.


From that analysis:
"Evidence from RCTs does not clearly support the intended benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners for weight management, and observational data suggest that routine intake of nonnutritive sweeteners may be associated with increased BMI and cardiometabolic risk. Further research is needed to fully characterize the long-term risks and benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners."

Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.

"The take-home message is artificially sweetened drinks aren’t a silver bullet for weight loss. But if you drink a lot of sugary drinks and think a diet version might help you cut down on sugar, that’s a good step and is very unlikely to do you any harm."

"Despite the theories, the European Food Safety Authority have ruled that artificial sweeteners in food and drink pose no threat to our health if consumed within daily allowances. For aspartame, this is equivalent to 15 cans of diet coke. That’s a stark contrast to what we know about the harms of having too much sugar."

Source: Cancer Research UK
https://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.or ... ight-loss/

EDIT: That's 15 cans daily. Way higher than what would be okay for alternatives. Meaning, the diet coke option is not harmful and in fact the use of aspartame is safe.


The point of the article is: by eating/drinking light products, people are going to eat/ drink more. Because the body isn't getting as much calories as it is expecting.

And because people think, see this isn't fattening so I can eat/ drink more.

Same as roads which are perceived as dangerous, are actually safer, because people will drive more carefully there.

User avatar
Takso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Aug 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Takso » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:56 pm

Thepeopl wrote:
Takso wrote:
From that analysis:
"Evidence from RCTs does not clearly support the intended benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners for weight management, and observational data suggest that routine intake of nonnutritive sweeteners may be associated with increased BMI and cardiometabolic risk. Further research is needed to fully characterize the long-term risks and benefits of nonnutritive sweeteners."

Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.

"The take-home message is artificially sweetened drinks aren’t a silver bullet for weight loss. But if you drink a lot of sugary drinks and think a diet version might help you cut down on sugar, that’s a good step and is very unlikely to do you any harm."

"Despite the theories, the European Food Safety Authority have ruled that artificial sweeteners in food and drink pose no threat to our health if consumed within daily allowances. For aspartame, this is equivalent to 15 cans of diet coke. That’s a stark contrast to what we know about the harms of having too much sugar."

Source: Cancer Research UK
https://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.or ... ight-loss/

EDIT: That's 15 cans daily. Way higher than what would be okay for alternatives. Meaning, the diet coke option is not harmful and in fact the use of aspartame is safe.


The point of the article is: by eating/drinking light products, people are going to eat/ drink more. Because the body isn't getting as much calories as it is expecting.

And because people think, see this isn't fattening so I can eat/ drink more.

Same as roads which are perceived as dangerous, are actually safer, because people will drive more carefully there.


As long as they drink within the daily allowance, it's fine and is actually better than drinking actual sugar. That's my point.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:14 pm

Hammer Britannia wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
Is this an American joke that I'm too European to understand? The NHS could do with getting some cheaper medication but other than that I don't understand why "bIG pHaRma" is such a boogyman.

Scapegoatism

tl;dr: "Healthcare is expensive in the states for reasons beyond my comprehention, therefore it's evil and cannot be trusted."

It's essentially anti-science. It's the reason why we have anti-vaxxers, homoeopathy nuts, and people who believe smoking is A-OK

Funny you should mention that. The Chinese are such a high-IQ nationality that they dominate over the west in education. They still smoke like crazy. Almost as if it's the medical profession's own fault that no one believes them anymore.

Science is not just science. Science that's been hijacked by special interests deserves much; if not most; of the skepticism it gets.

Ideally we should return to science, but first step first is to purge it of all special-interest influence. If they can't do it, and people continue not to believe them, it's their own damn fault.

That said, I already addressed in the OP why special interests are no excuse for anti-vax beliefs in particular.
Last edited by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha on Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Deltia-
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 112
Founded: Jul 13, 2019
Capitalizt

Postby Deltia- » Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:18 pm

Yes. This "body positive" nonsense is just causing early death. Don't get me wrong, being underweight is also unhealthy. If you're overweight, drop the McDonalds' and hit the gym. If you're underweight, pick up the McDonalds.
Federal Kingdom of Deltia | Bundskongsriik Avontiken
A PMT de facto minarchist mafia state in OTL Poland that's Anglo-German and under a nominal constitutional monarchy with workhouses, coke legalization, a fast-growing economy with blackjack (and hookers!)
Overview | Monarch | Riikskanzler | Parties
(09/24/2020)Der Weld:Boris Johnson arrested after buying crystal meth  Now Playing:Juice WRLD, Marshmello - Come and Go 
Stonks: ADV 35 - +0.2%|CAC- -0.1%|FTSE- +0.4%|DAX- +0.3%
A 13.4 civilization, according to this index.(Tier: 7|Level: 2|Type: 5)
Each good reply, Alisa will gain 1% sanity. Counting: -20
YL/AL thing for me
Vanquish the summerposters!
Dibs on the next sig and best flag threads.

No NS stats
ADV 35=Deltian stock index

User avatar
Takso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Aug 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Takso » Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:21 pm

Deltia- wrote:Yes. This "body positive" nonsense is just causing early death. Don't get me wrong, being underweight is also unhealthy. If you're overweight, drop the McDonalds' and hit the gym. If you're underweight, pick up the McDonalds.


I think changing your diet is a lot more important than hitting the gym, not that exercise doesn't help. I don't think anyone should pick up fast food.

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1078
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Republic of Fore » Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:49 pm

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Hammer Britannia wrote:Scapegoatism

tl;dr: "Healthcare is expensive in the states for reasons beyond my comprehention, therefore it's evil and cannot be trusted."

It's essentially anti-science. It's the reason why we have anti-vaxxers, homoeopathy nuts, and people who believe smoking is A-OK


Makes sense :/

Fun story. A while back the FDA, a government agency that regulates food and medications announced homeopathic products would have to be sold with a label stating there's no actual evidence that they work. A good 90% of the response to this on many social media sites was soccer moms shrieking that the government had been paid off by ebil corporations who want to poison our kids.

User avatar
Imperium of Dragonia
Attaché
 
Posts: 96
Founded: Jan 05, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Imperium of Dragonia » Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:52 pm

We've reached the equivalent of peak anti-vaxx levels now, if people are unironically asking if being a fatass is unhealthy.
Yeah yeah, keep being body-positive, those Whoppers and 15 pounds of Hershey bars in your purse will put you in the ground in about five years, but we need to promote boy positivity!.
Ze mod double standard iz prevalent
Scomagia wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Do not call for the killing of people here. I'm sure you meant it as a joke. It wasn't funny.

It was funny, actually.

NSG: Where you can joke as an actual communist about "liquidating" the bourgeoisie but a joke about assassinating a strongman tyrant is somehow a bridge too far. :roll:

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53011
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:55 am

Takso wrote:Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.

Except for explosive diarrhoea.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53011
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:59 am

Deltia- wrote:If you're underweight, pick up the McDonalds.

No.
Eating lots of junk food to increase one's own mass is a great way to stress kidneys, liver, and bowels. If you're underweight, eat healthy, but in greater amount... and anyway ALWAYS ASK A PROFESSIONAL FFS.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 106877
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:28 am

Risottia wrote:
Takso wrote:Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.

Except for explosive diarrhoea.


That will help lose some weight.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11517
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:30 am

Takso wrote:Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.


And 16 cans?
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67
Science Under Attack
Autism/Aspergers
History of Games
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.


Charlie Brooker wrote:It's spider season. Every year, right about now, thousands of the godless eight-legged bastards emerge from the bowels of hell (or the garden, whichever's nearest) with the sole intention of tormenting humankind. Spider season is like a live-action version of the videogame Doom.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37477
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:36 am

Do you mean by fat mass or muscle mass? Cause there's a big difference.

Technically most of the strongest men in the world are overweight or obese if we're going strictly by the BMI, so which one we talkin' about?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2020

That's all folks~

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5349
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:50 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Takso wrote:Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.


And 16 cans?

You really shouldn't be drinking sixteen cans of anything, even water to an extent.
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
Thepeopl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1561
Founded: Feb 24, 2019
Democratic Socialists

Postby Thepeopl » Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:12 am

Takso wrote:Certainly not a "silver bullet" for weight loss, but not necessarily contributing to the obesity epidemic. Overall, you can safely consume 15 cans of diet coke with aspartame with no threat to health.


Yes, exactly my point."because of aspartame you can drink 15 cans" this means 4.95 litres per day. Way too much fluid for any human being.

And don't forget that aspartame is also in a lot of solid foods.
So ppl will have heard: I can drink 15 cans per day, and will ignore the fact that 15 cans of liquid is not healthy.
And they will eat additional aspartame/ sorbitol/ stevia etc. Which they won't add to the maximum dose.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16481
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Cekoviu » Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:45 am

Imperium of Dragonia wrote:We've reached the equivalent of peak anti-vaxx levels now, if people are unironically asking if being a fatass is unhealthy.
Yeah yeah, keep being body-positive, those Whoppers and 15 pounds of Hershey bars in your purse will put you in the ground in about five years, but we need to promote boy positivity!.

There's a difference between being overweight and a "fatass."
RWDT - REST IN POWER
David Hume fangirl, massive Tuvaboo, anti-imperialist, and Castroist socialist. Also a sex-negative SWERF, traditionalist SJW, and Anglo-Catholic Episcopalian.
/tʃɛ'koʊ.vi:.ju:/ (check-OH-vee-you)

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16797
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:06 am

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
Hammer Britannia wrote:Scapegoatism

tl;dr: "Healthcare is expensive in the states for reasons beyond my comprehention, therefore it's evil and cannot be trusted."

It's essentially anti-science. It's the reason why we have anti-vaxxers, homoeopathy nuts, and people who believe smoking is A-OK

Funny you should mention that. The Chinese are such a high-IQ nationality that they dominate over the west in education. They still smoke like crazy. Almost as if it's the medical profession's own fault that no one believes them anymore.

Science is not just science. Science that's been hijacked by special interests deserves much; if not most; of the skepticism it gets.

Ideally we should return to science, but first step first is to purge it of all special-interest influence. If they can't do it, and people continue not to believe them, it's their own damn fault.

That said, I already addressed in the OP why special interests are no excuse for anti-vax beliefs in particular.

And lung cancer rates don’t track smoking rates in the general population very well.
Proudly anti-mask, moderately anti-vax.
Economic left -3.88, authoritarian 6.15
Thoughts
Abortion is not healthcare.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -SARS-, Enormous Gentiles, Greed and Death, Heloin, Hfhbsd, Kohr, Kortunal, Libertas Omnium Maximus, Menche, Nobel Hobos 2, Phaenix, Saiwania, Salus Maior, State of Pennsylvania, The Black Forrest, The Royal Kingdom of Quebec, The Two Jerseys, Tysoania, Uiiop, United Latin American States, Waitin on yall, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads