Ah, sorry, I meant to say exterminate native populations, break treaties, and murder strikers in mass
I'm a citizen of the U.S but I don't reflect its interests in what way whatsoever
Advertisement
by Tekeristan » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:06 am
by Novus America » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:13 am
by The South Falls » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:13 am
by Novus America » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:21 am
The South Falls wrote:Forever wars mean more money for the MIC but fuck the troops that come back, apparently.
by Page » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:25 am
by Tekeristan » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:30 am
Page wrote:So can we finally stop pretending this is about "border security" and "THE LAW" and admit our government wants to stop all immigration regardless of how legal it is?
by Novus America » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:35 am
Page wrote:So can we finally stop pretending this is about "border security" and "THE LAW" and admit our government wants to stop all immigration regardless of how legal it is?
by Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:44 am
Novus America wrote:Page wrote:So can we finally stop pretending this is about "border security" and "THE LAW" and admit our government wants to stop all immigration regardless of how legal it is?
Considering over a million immigrate a year, no.
Also this is naturalization, not immigration. These people had already immigrated to the US.
Because 40 people failed a security clearance that would have allowed faster citizenship process (they still can apply for citizenship by other means) you cannot indeed this to mean it is an attempt to ban all immigration.
by Page » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:51 am
Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana wrote:Novus America wrote:
Considering over a million immigrate a year, no.
Also this is naturalization, not immigration. These people had already immigrated to the US.
Because 40 people failed a security clearance that would have allowed faster citizenship process (they still can apply for citizenship by other means) you cannot indeed this to mean it is an attempt to ban all immigration.
I hate how globalists try to normalize illegal immigration with arguments like this
by Herador » Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:57 am
Page wrote:Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana wrote:I hate how globalists try to normalize illegal immigration with arguments like this
Ah, "globalist", an impossibly vague, meaningless term to describe anyone who doesn't agree with you. What does "globalist" mean? Does it mean communists? Does it mean Jews? Does it mean politicians you hate? Does it mean the media?
Because the way I've seen this term thrown around, it's all or any of the above plus many other things.
Then there's postmodernism too, another term that's ubiquitous to the point of meaninglessness.
by Gormwood » Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:05 am
by Gormwood » Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:07 am
Saiwania wrote:The mistake in my view, was promising them US citizenship in the first place. Any Chinese from the PRC are untrustworthy I'd say. In lieu of giving them citizenship, I'm more in favor of giving them $100 to $1,000 each. Enough so they can travel well enough but their experience not being a total loss.
by Page » Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:09 am
Herador wrote:Page wrote:
Ah, "globalist", an impossibly vague, meaningless term to describe anyone who doesn't agree with you. What does "globalist" mean? Does it mean communists? Does it mean Jews? Does it mean politicians you hate? Does it mean the media?
Because the way I've seen this term thrown around, it's all or any of the above plus many other things.
Then there's postmodernism too, another term that's ubiquitous to the point of meaninglessness.
Globalist means any individual with basic compassion for another that lives more than 50 miles away in any direction.
by Novus America » Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:12 am
Gormwood wrote:Sure feels and sounds like as Donny Trump policy. Especially the part about stiffing people who do service for you.
Hopefully there will be less foreigners willing to join up with the U.S. military, at least while Donny is still in office.
by Gagium » Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:14 am
Novus America wrote:Gormwood wrote:Sure feels and sounds like as Donny Trump policy. Especially the part about stiffing people who do service for you.
Hopefully there will be less foreigners willing to join up with the U.S. military, at least while Donny is still in office.
40 people failing to get a security clearance and you automatically assume it still me conspiracy from the top? Seems a big logical leap there.
by Ethel mermania » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:11 pm
by Greed and Death » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:12 pm
Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana wrote:US and China don’t have the best relations rn, a Chinese citizen in the military could be a spy, no one wants to take risks
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:13 pm
by Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:18 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Total dick move.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:22 pm
by New haven america » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:24 pm
by The South Falls » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:24 pm
New haven america wrote:Also, Trump has promised that any child born to US service people overseas won't automatically be US citizens.
It's like he's trying to lower recruitment numbers or something...
by Greed and Death » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:25 pm
New haven america wrote:Also, Trump has promised that any child born to US service people overseas won't automatically be US citizens.
It's like he's trying to lower recruitment numbers or something...
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:26 pm
New haven america wrote:Also, Trump has promised that any child born to US service people overseas won't automatically be US citizens.
It's like he's trying to lower recruitment numbers or something...
by Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana » Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:28 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana wrote:That citizens of a foreign country which has extremely tense relations are discharged? How’s that a dick move and not a logical just-to-be-safe decision?
How is it there fault that there country of origin has tense relations with the US?
They clearly liked the US enough to support it, that's why they wanted citizenship in the first place.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Dogmeat, Emotional Support Crocodile, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Hurdergaryp, Juansonia, Neo-American States, Plan Neonie, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, The Huskar Social Union, Tungstan
Advertisement