NATION

PASSWORD

Unacceptable Restrictions in Relationships?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:16 am

The New California Republic wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:You're still getting gratification from the image of the person, which would be no different if they were standing ten feet in front of you, as the image in your brain is also "merely" an image.

Nope. There is an extra layer of disconnect.

Even so, it is not so disconnected that you are not imagining intercourse with the other person to gain sexual pleasure.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Esheaun Stroakuss
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: May 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Esheaun Stroakuss » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:17 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:It's a depiction of a person, not a person as such.

You're still getting gratification from the image of the person, which would be no different if they were standing ten feet in front of you, as the image in your brain is also "merely" an image.


...but if I were to stand ten feet from Leolulu she'd kick me out of her house and call the police.
For: Socialism, Democracy, LGBT+, BLM, Freedom of Speech, Marxist Theory, Atheism, Freedom of/from Religion, Universal Healthcare
Against: Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Fascism/Nazism, Authoritarianism, TERFs, Tankies, Neoliberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism

Esheaun Stroakuss is leaderless.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:17 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Esheaun Stroakuss wrote:
There is a big difference between thinking, "cor, I'd do him/her/it" to actually having sex with them. Just because you've already ordered doesn't mean you can't look at the menu.

If you're imagining sex with the person and stimulating the thought, then you've already been disloyal.

That is absurd. Just because you think sex with someone would be enjoyable does not mean your cheating.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:18 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Nope. There is an extra layer of disconnect.

Even so, it is not so disconnected that you are not imagining intercourse with the other person to gain sexual pleasure.

Thinking and doing are different things. Just like the image of a person naked is different than that person being naked in front of you.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:18 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:It's a depiction of a person, not a person as such.

You're still getting gratification from the image of the person, which would be no different if they were standing ten feet in front of you, as the image in your brain is also "merely" an image.

IF you’re fine with your partner watching porn but would be upset at them going to a strip club, then you’re being inconsistent here.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:19 am

Andsed wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:If you're imagining sex with the person and stimulating the thought, then you've already been disloyal.

That is absurd. Just because you think sex with someone would be enjoyable does not mean your cheating.

Thinking sex with someone would be enjoyable is one thing, pleasuring yourself to the thought of sex with that person is another.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Esheaun Stroakuss
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: May 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Esheaun Stroakuss » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:19 am

Diopolis wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:You're still getting gratification from the image of the person, which would be no different if they were standing ten feet in front of you, as the image in your brain is also "merely" an image.

IF you’re fine with your partner watching porn but would be upset at them going to a strip club, then you’re being inconsistent here.


Depends on the scenario, but tbh I wouldn't want to go to a strip club and neither would my wife. We're not strip club people.
For: Socialism, Democracy, LGBT+, BLM, Freedom of Speech, Marxist Theory, Atheism, Freedom of/from Religion, Universal Healthcare
Against: Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Fascism/Nazism, Authoritarianism, TERFs, Tankies, Neoliberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism

Esheaun Stroakuss is leaderless.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:20 am

The New California Republic wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Even so, it is not so disconnected that you are not imagining intercourse with the other person to gain sexual pleasure.

Thinking and doing are different things. Just like the image of a person naked is different than that person being naked in front of you.

I disagree. If you would take sexual pleasure from the image of someone, then that is, imo, not morally different from having actual sex with that person.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Esheaun Stroakuss
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: May 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Esheaun Stroakuss » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:20 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Andsed wrote:That is absurd. Just because you think sex with someone would be enjoyable does not mean your cheating.

Thinking sex with someone would be enjoyable is one thing, pleasuring yourself to the thought of sex with that person is another.


What if you're using that person as an avatar/proxy for what you want to do with your partner? Or what if you're imagining a threesome with them and your partner?
For: Socialism, Democracy, LGBT+, BLM, Freedom of Speech, Marxist Theory, Atheism, Freedom of/from Religion, Universal Healthcare
Against: Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Fascism/Nazism, Authoritarianism, TERFs, Tankies, Neoliberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism

Esheaun Stroakuss is leaderless.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:20 am

Each relationship is an individual situation and different circumstances may call for different approaches. If all parties contribute informed consent without being under duress, restrictions are acceptable. I would personally not consent to rules like the ones discussed in the OP, but that doesn't mean they can't be undertaken by any group of people.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:21 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Thinking and doing are different things. Just like the image of a person naked is different than that person being naked in front of you.

I disagree. If you would take sexual pleasure from the image of someone, then that is, imo, not morally different from having actual sex with that person.

Much in the way that imagining eating a whole pizza is not different from eating a whole pizza with regards to health, yes.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:22 am

Esheaun Stroakuss wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Thinking sex with someone would be enjoyable is one thing, pleasuring yourself to the thought of sex with that person is another.


What if you're using that person as an avatar/proxy for what you want to do with your partner? Or what if you're imagining a threesome with them and your partner?

Both of those are morally wrong. Masturbation in-general is wrong.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:22 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Esheaun Stroakuss wrote:
What if you're using that person as an avatar/proxy for what you want to do with your partner? Or what if you're imagining a threesome with them and your partner?

Both of those are morally wrong. Masturbation in-general is wrong.

Why?
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:22 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Thinking and doing are different things. Just like the image of a person naked is different than that person being naked in front of you.

I disagree. If you would take sexual pleasure from the image of someone, then that is, imo, not morally different from having actual sex with that person.

Alright, I guess we'll just need to leave it at that. You are wrong tho, in that imagining and doing is not morally equivalent.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:23 am

Cekoviu wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Both of those are morally wrong. Masturbation in-general is wrong.

Why?

Because it is using another person for sexual gratification, i.e. as an object for one's own pleasure. It is fundamentally selfish.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:25 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Why?

Because it is using another person for sexual gratification, i.e. as an object for one's own pleasure.

I think you have masturbation and sex confused, my dude.
It is fundamentally selfish.

As is everything else people do.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Rainbowsix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 745
Founded: Nov 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rainbowsix » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:28 am

my gf makes me have 2 show messages and not 2 have friends... todays our anniversary we've been dating since 1/29/18 and she still doesnt trust me can someone possibly help me with why she doesnt? is it like past issues? is it me?
This nation doesn't represent my views... this nation represents what I imagine the game Rainbow Six Siege would be like if made into a country
Freedom is never free, so remember those who died for it
My political view down here (updated 2/25/20)
https://www.isidewith.com/profile/4179624586/parties

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:29 am

Cekoviu wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Because it is using another person for sexual gratification, i.e. as an object for one's own pleasure.

I think you have masturbation and sex confused, my dude.
It is fundamentally selfish.

As is everything else people do.

Even using the image of another person for sexual gratification is fundamentally using the other person as an object of one's fantasy.

Many things we do are for sake of charity and love.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17503
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:30 am

Rainbowsix wrote:my gf makes me have 2 show messages and not 2 have friends... todays our anniversary we've been dating since 1/29/18 and she still doesnt trust me can someone possibly help me with why she doesnt? is it like past issues? is it me?


Break up. That is extremely unhealthy.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Rainbowsix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 745
Founded: Nov 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rainbowsix » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:31 am

Page wrote:
Rainbowsix wrote:my gf makes me have 2 show messages and not 2 have friends... todays our anniversary we've been dating since 1/29/18 and she still doesnt trust me can someone possibly help me with why she doesnt? is it like past issues? is it me?


Break up. That is extremely unhealthy.

idk if i should i dont wanna be alone... she treats me good n everything its just those restrictions.. ive never spoke 2 any1 about this
This nation doesn't represent my views... this nation represents what I imagine the game Rainbow Six Siege would be like if made into a country
Freedom is never free, so remember those who died for it
My political view down here (updated 2/25/20)
https://www.isidewith.com/profile/4179624586/parties

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:31 am

Rainbowsix wrote:my gf makes me have 2 show messages and not 2 have friends... todays our anniversary we've been dating since 1/29/18 and she still doesnt trust me can someone possibly help me with why she doesnt? is it like past issues? is it me?

Dump her if you're not okay with her violating your privacy and controlling your life.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:I think you have masturbation and sex confused, my dude.

As is everything else people do.

Even using the image of another person for sexual gratification is fundamentally using the other person as an object of one's fantasy.

You're assuming masturbation requires porn, but it doesn't.
Many things we do are for sake of charity and love.

I've talked about why this is wrong before, so I see no need to rehash it.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:32 am

Rainbowsix wrote:
Page wrote:
Break up. That is extremely unhealthy.

idk if i should i dont wanna be alone... she treats me good n everything its just those restrictions.. ive never spoke 2 any1 about this

This is basically saying "she treats me well except no, she doesn't."
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Rainbowsix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 745
Founded: Nov 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rainbowsix » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:33 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Rainbowsix wrote:idk if i should i dont wanna be alone... she treats me good n everything its just those restrictions.. ive never spoke 2 any1 about this

This is basically saying "she treats me well except no, she doesn't."

like shes there 4 me n everything i just dont understand why shes so uptight with me it makes me feel like its something i did
This nation doesn't represent my views... this nation represents what I imagine the game Rainbow Six Siege would be like if made into a country
Freedom is never free, so remember those who died for it
My political view down here (updated 2/25/20)
https://www.isidewith.com/profile/4179624586/parties

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:34 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Rainbowsix wrote:my gf makes me have 2 show messages and not 2 have friends... todays our anniversary we've been dating since 1/29/18 and she still doesnt trust me can someone possibly help me with why she doesnt? is it like past issues? is it me?

Dump her if you're not okay with her violating your privacy and controlling your life.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Even using the image of another person for sexual gratification is fundamentally using the other person as an object of one's fantasy.

You're assuming masturbation requires porn, but it doesn't.
Many things we do are for sake of charity and love.

I've talked about why this is wrong before, so I see no need to rehash it.

Whether it's a mental or physical image, it doesn't matter.

You can talk about it, but you're still mistaken.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:34 am

Rainbowsix wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:This is basically saying "she treats me well except no, she doesn't."

like shes there 4 me n everything i just dont understand why shes so uptight with me it makes me feel like its something i did

She might just have baggage from previous relationships.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asclepio, Daphomir, Decolo, Dumb Ideologies, Federalna Zapadoslawia, MauzerX, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Nouveau Yathrib, Nu Elysium, Pasong Tirad, Shamhnan Insir, Southern Burkina Faso, Tungstan, Tur Unitind

Advertisement

Remove ads