NationStates

Vaukiai wrote:

New Bremerton wrote:
Transhumanism is a thing, which I totally support. Unless you mean transgender?

That's satanic and also goes in line with LGBT and whatever judeomasonic degeneracy.

Hail Satan

Vaukiai wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:A 1.2% difference that is attributable to other factors doesn't validate your claim.

Again excuses.

Cool, think that if you want, but it still doesn't back up your claim.

Vaukiai wrote:

The Free Joy State wrote:Science =/= Excuses.

It's merely facts.

These are clear excuses.

What's more healthy, a mega-processed genetically modified food, or an exquisite food directly coming from the farm?

You understand? Reproduction works just like that.

Except it doesn't.

1.2% is a very small difference that you are blowing so far out of proportion that you make it sound like 100% of babies from artificial insemination have defects.

Vaukiai wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:A 1.2% difference that is attributable to other factors doesn't validate your claim.

Again excuses.

Again, lies.

Galborea wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:That's satanic and also goes in line with LGBT and whatever judeomasonic degeneracy.

Hail Satan

Just one thing, do not complain the day where you get in hell.

Vaukiai wrote:

Galborea wrote:Hail Satan

Just one thing, do not complain the day where you get in hell.

It's going to be great. Hell's where all the fun people are

The New California Republic wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Again excuses.

Cool, think that if you want, but it still doesn't back up your claim.

Natural = better.

Vaukiai wrote:

Galborea wrote:Hail Satan

Just one thing, do not complain the day where you get in hell.

Sounds sexy

Vaukiai wrote:

The Free Joy State wrote:Science =/= Excuses.

It's merely facts.

These are clear excuses.

What's more healthy, a mega-processed genetically modified food, or an exquisite food directly coming from the farm?

You understand? Reproduction works just like that.

Assisted reproduction is not the same at all. Some methods are highly non-invasive. And the reasons I gave were listed in the linked report.

Here's the direct quote:

In the study, 7.2 percent of babies born after IVF had a birth defect, compared with about 6 percent of babies conceived naturally. However, most of the increased risk of birth defects could be explained by parental factors, such as the mother's age, smoking status and conditions during pregnancy.

There is the data. Accept it or not.

I am yet to see yours', incidentally.

Alvecia wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Just one thing, do not complain the day where you get in hell.

It's going to be great. Hell's where all the fun people are

Same for you. You will learn later.

Vaukiai wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:Cool, think that if you want, but it still doesn't back up your claim.

Natural = better.

*incorrect buzzer sounds*

The Free Joy State wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:These are clear excuses.

What's more healthy, a mega-processed genetically modified food, or an exquisite food directly coming from the farm?

You understand? Reproduction works just like that.

Assisted reproduction is not the same at all. Some methods are highly non-invasive. And the reasons I gave were listed in the linked report.

Here's the direct quote:

In the study, 7.2 percent of babies born after IVF had a birth defect, compared with about 6 percent of babies conceived naturally. However, most of the increased risk of birth defects could be explained by parental factors, such as the mother's age, smoking status and conditions during pregnancy.

There is the data. Accept it or not.

I am yet to see yours', incidentally.

EXCUSES!

Alvecia wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Natural = better.

*incorrect buzzer sounds*

NATURAL = BETTER

Galborea wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Just one thing, do not complain the day where you get in hell.

Sounds sexy

Not joking, I'm serious.

Vaukiai wrote:

Alvecia wrote:It's going to be great. Hell's where all the fun people are

Same for you. You will learn later.

How old are you, 70? Shouldn't you be harassing kids on college campuses with hateful banners or some crap?

Galborea wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Same for you. You will learn later.

How old are you, 70? Shouldn't you be harassing kids on college campuses with hateful banners or some crap?

I'm much younger, not even 40.

Vaukiai wrote:

Galborea wrote:Sounds sexy

Not joking, I'm serious.

Well everybody else thinks you're hilarious. Hail Satan.

Vaukiai wrote:

The Free Joy State wrote:Assisted reproduction is not the same at all. Some methods are highly non-invasive. And the reasons I gave were listed in the linked report.

Here's the direct quote:

In the study, 7.2 percent of babies born after IVF had a birth defect, compared with about 6 percent of babies conceived naturally. However, most of the increased risk of birth defects could be explained by parental factors, such as the mother's age, smoking status and conditions during pregnancy.

There is the data. Accept it or not.

I am yet to see yours', incidentally.

EXCUSES!

Keep yelling that.

I'm sure something will change eventually.

Vaukiai wrote:

Galborea wrote:How old are you, 70? Shouldn't you be harassing kids on college campuses with hateful banners or some crap?

I'm much younger, not even 40.

That's even sadder.

Galborea wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Not joking, I'm serious.

Well everybody else thinks you're hilarious. Hail Satan.

Everybody, do not complain later.

Vaukiai wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:Cool, think that if you want, but it still doesn't back up your claim.

Natural = better.

You're able to say this shit thanks to artificially manufactured items.
You're probably alive thanks to some medical treatment somewhere along your lifespan that featured synthesized medication.
You're very likely living in a home constructed partially of artificial or manufactured materials.

If you want to fuck off into the wilderness, be my guest.

Vaukiai wrote:

New Bremerton wrote:
Transhumanism is a thing, which I totally support. Unless you mean transgender?

That's satanic and also goes in line with LGBT and whatever judeomasonic degeneracy.

NO IT IS NOT

You are attacking my positions now the transhumanism does not go in the same line than the gay rights go.

Transhumanism (abbreviated as H+ or h+) is an international philosophical movement that advocates for the transformation of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies to greatly enhance human intellect and physiology.

Nogodia wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:Natural = better.

You're able to say this shit thanks to artificially manufactured items.
You're probably alive thanks to some medical treatment somewhere along your lifespan that featured synthesized medication.
You're very likely living in a home constructed partially of artificial or manufactured materials.

If you want to fuck off into the wilderness, be my guest.

I am talking about reproduction, do not try to hijack my talk.

Vaukiai wrote:

Galborea wrote:Well everybody else thinks you're hilarious. Hail Satan.

Everybody, do not complain later.

I want a collab with you and Rod Dreher that would be fucking amazing.

Blueflarst wrote:

Vaukiai wrote:That's satanic and also goes in line with LGBT and whatever judeomasonic degeneracy.

NO IT IS NOT

You are attacking my positions now the transhumanism does not go in the same line than the gay rights go.

Transhumanism (abbreviated as H+ or h+) is an international philosophical movement that advocates for the transformation of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies to greatly enhance human intellect and physiology.

It is satanic because breaks out the God's order.