LGBT nation-state?

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

I absolutely support this. We can ship off our sodomites, get back their non-gay children. It's a win-win.

They're not here spreading their rot and propagandising, and they have their little sex-state to do whatever they want.

For people so hellbent on stopping reproduction between different races, I'm surprised you're not stopping reproduction between two genders.

[SD_Film Artists]

Let's call it "Rainbow Israel"

That will trigger many anti-Zionists and closet anti-semites. Rainbonistan perhaps? Rainbowvostok?

[Estanglia]

Ignoring how unfeasible it is, I'd much rather try to make the entire world safe for LGBT people than give them their own country so homophobic nations can just send them there and never have to change.

[Vaukiai]

Let's call it "Rainbow Israel"

Good joke!

If you want a decadent country where all LGBTs live, then seize Israel, change its name to IsraHell and we teach a lesson to the big-nosed Judeo-Masons!

[Vaukiai]

Let's call it "Rainbow Israel"

That will trigger many anti-Zionists and closet anti-semites. Rainbonistan perhaps? Rainbowvostok?

And what's wrong with that? Have they done something good for us? No.

[SD_Film Artists]

What the actual fuck are you talking about?

Degenerationist transhuman methods of insemination do not work.

I for one support asexual birthing pods, bonus points if you are infused with the DNA of the God-Emperor of Mankind.

[The New California Republic]

What the actual fuck are you talking about?

Degenerationist transhuman methods of insemination do not work.

Strange that, because many couples have had healthy children through artificial insemination. Methinks you have no idea what you are talking about in that regard.

[Vaukiai]

Ignoring how unfeasible it is, I'd much rather try to make the entire world safe for LGBT people than give them their own country so homophobic nations can just send them there and never have to change.

Never.

[Kalosia]

LGBT people are so politically and culturally diverse that, even if one was created through all legal means, it probably wouldn't last very long, or at least it would be prone to skirmishes and conflict.

Things like racism, xenophobia, and identity politics can continue to exist even within the LGBT community.

[Vaukiai]

Degenerationist transhuman methods of insemination do not work.

Strange that, because many couples have had healthy children through artificial insemination. Methinks you have no idea what you are talking about in that regard.

Healthy children with never-heard-of diseases.

[Vaukiai]

Degenerationist transhuman methods of insemination do not work.

I for one support asexual birthing pods, bonus points if you are infused with the DNA of the God-Emperor of Mankind.

Heterosexual intercourse is the only way to reproduce.

[The New California Republic]

Strange that, because many couples have had healthy children through artificial insemination. Methinks you have no idea what you are talking about in that regard.

Healthy children with never-heard-of diseases.

You are talking complete nonsense. Artificial insemination is a tried and tested method.

[Blueflarst]

Given how LGBT people, as a perennial minority, are made to endure persecution and discrimination in almost every country in the world, I'm starting to think that, like the Jews before them, LGBT people should be entitled to a nation-state all to themselves where they are the demographic majority and reproduction occurs via artificial means. This LGBT majority could be sustained via mass immigration of LGBT refugees as well as restrictions on non-LGBT immigration. Such a state could be carved out in an otherwise deeply anti-LGBT part of the world, such as Chechnya or Uganda, and heavily armed and funded by LGBT-friendly states. The previous, deeply anti-LGBT inhabitants could be compelled to move out by force as punishment for their wanton persecution of LGBT people, similar to what happened to the Arabs when they attempted to annihilate the nascent Jewish state of Israel in 1948. Zionism for LGBT people sounds like a terrific idea.

Given that any offspring of LGBT people are likely to be mostly non-LGBT and mass immigration is the only way to sustain an LGBT demographic majority in the long run, such a nation-state can only exist insofar as persecution against LGBT people continues to persist and there is a sufficient desire for LGBT people to make aliyah, and non-LGBT offspring don't begin to massively outnumber their LGBT parents. Even if LGBT people ultimately cease to be the majority, the nation would be the most LGBT-friendly in the world for historical reasons, and could officially remain as a symbolic LGBT nation-state and a refuge for LGBT people fleeing persecution around the world.

What say you NSG? Is this a practical idea or is it too unrealistic and unsustainable in the long run? Would you support the idea of a nation-state and a refuge for LGBT people fleeing persecution around the world and asserting their fundamental and inherent right to exist, or would you consider it, like Zionism before it, to be a form of "racism" and an experiment in "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" by "illegal LGBT settlers" engaging in "land theft" and "dispossession", given that the previous inhabitants would be forced to make room for a new state as punishment for their anti-LGBT crimes and bigotry? Is opposition to the existence of an LGBT nation-state homophobic and transphobic? Should the previous inhabitants be entitled to wage all-out war and engage in terroristic violence against LGBT people and the LGBT state in order to "reclaim" their territory from the "queer running dogs of Western imperialists"? Should there be a global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against the LGBT nation-state?

I'm posting this here because I can't find an LGBT discussion thread anywhere. Only a trans discussion thread currently exists.

I believe this i would never allow such state to exist.
I do not want Sodoma 2.0

[The New California Republic]

I for one support asexual birthing pods, bonus points if you are infused with the DNA of the God-Emperor of Mankind.

Heterosexual intercourse is the only way to reproduce.

Except that's a complete lie.

[Estanglia]

I for one support asexual birthing pods, bonus points if you are infused with the DNA of the God-Emperor of Mankind.

Heterosexual intercourse is the only way to reproduce.

Artificial insemination would like to have a word with you.

[Vaukiai]

Given how LGBT people, as a perennial minority, are made to endure persecution and discrimination in almost every country in the world, I'm starting to think that, like the Jews before them, LGBT people should be entitled to a nation-state all to themselves where they are the demographic majority and reproduction occurs via artificial means. This LGBT majority could be sustained via mass immigration of LGBT refugees as well as restrictions on non-LGBT immigration. Such a state could be carved out in an otherwise deeply anti-LGBT part of the world, such as Chechnya or Uganda, and heavily armed and funded by LGBT-friendly states. The previous, deeply anti-LGBT inhabitants could be compelled to move out by force as punishment for their wanton persecution of LGBT people, similar to what happened to the Arabs when they attempted to annihilate the nascent Jewish state of Israel in 1948. Zionism for LGBT people sounds like a terrific idea.

Given that any offspring of LGBT people are likely to be mostly non-LGBT and mass immigration is the only way to sustain an LGBT demographic majority in the long run, such a nation-state can only exist insofar as persecution against LGBT people continues to persist and there is a sufficient desire for LGBT people to make aliyah, and non-LGBT offspring don't begin to massively outnumber their LGBT parents. Even if LGBT people ultimately cease to be the majority, the nation would be the most LGBT-friendly in the world for historical reasons, and could officially remain as a symbolic LGBT nation-state and a refuge for LGBT people fleeing persecution around the world.

What say you NSG? Is this a practical idea or is it too unrealistic and unsustainable in the long run? Would you support the idea of a nation-state and a refuge for LGBT people fleeing persecution around the world and asserting their fundamental and inherent right to exist, or would you consider it, like Zionism before it, to be a form of "racism" and an experiment in "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" by "illegal LGBT settlers" engaging in "land theft" and "dispossession", given that the previous inhabitants would be forced to make room for a new state as punishment for their anti-LGBT crimes and bigotry? Is opposition to the existence of an LGBT nation-state homophobic and transphobic? Should the previous inhabitants be entitled to wage all-out war and engage in terroristic violence against LGBT people and the LGBT state in order to "reclaim" their territory from the "queer running dogs of Western imperialists"? Should there be a global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against the LGBT nation-state?

I'm posting this here because I can't find an LGBT discussion thread anywhere. Only a trans discussion thread currently exists.

I believe this i would never allow such state to exist.
I do not want Sodoma 2.0

Agree. And much less in the Land of God, Europe.

[The Free Joy State]

Ignoring how unfeasible it is, I'd much rather try to make the entire world safe for LGBT people than give them their own country so homophobic nations can just send them there and never have to change.

You see, this is really is the best idea all round.

No need to displace anyone, no need to move people (who may prefer not to leave their country of birth) across the world and away from their loved ones, and we all get a more tolerant world. What could be better?

[Vaukiai]

Heterosexual intercourse is the only way to reproduce.

Artificial insemination would like to have a word with you.

That's a really bad way.

[Estanglia]

Artificial insemination would like to have a word with you.

That's a really bad way.

But it's still a way.

So your statement is wrong.

[The New California Republic]

Artificial insemination would like to have a word with you.

That's a really bad way.

You have yet to say why.

[New Bremerton]

Let's call it "Rainbow Israel"

Good idea.

[Vaukiai]

Heterosexual intercourse is the only way to reproduce.

Except that's a complete lie.

It's the truth. Artificial transhuman insemination does not work.

[Blueflarst]

I absolutely support this. We can ship off our sodomites, get back their non-gay children. It's a win-win.

They're not here spreading their rot and propagandising, and they have their little sex-state to do whatever they want.

No you are wrong you would allow the creation of a Sodoma state
They would spread their influence more

[Vaukiai]

That's a really bad way.

You have yet to say why.

Artifical children are born with many defects.

[Estanglia]

Except that's a complete lie.

It's the truth. Artificial transhuman insemination does not work.

You have yet to say why.

Artifical children are born with many defects.

Source please.