Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion?

[Pacomia]

They have a right to express their opinion, but they should be prepared for whatever comes about from expressing said opinion.

Sounds like North Korea.

No it doesn’t.

[Neko-koku]

Sounds like North Korea.

No it doesn’t.

There is freedom to scream "FUCK KIM JONG-UN!!" in North Korea, just not freedom from consequences of Kim not liking it.

[Tupolite]

There are a great many opinions that threaten the cohesion of civilized Western nations and should be unequivocally censored for the public benefit. Unfortunately, these opinions occupy the mainstream at present.

[Pacomia]

No it doesn’t.

There is freedom to scream "FUCK KIM JONG-UN!!" in North Korea, just not freedom from consequences of Kim not liking it.

I don’t think that that was what Volkish Amerika had in mind when they said that.

[Neko-koku]

There is freedom to scream "FUCK KIM JONG-UN!!" in North Korea, just not freedom from consequences of Kim not liking it.

I don’t think that that was what Volkish Amerika had in mind when they said that.

It's fairly similar. There should be no consequences of speech.

[Volkish Amerika]

No it doesn’t.

There is freedom to scream "FUCK KIM JONG-UN!!" in North Korea, just not freedom from consequences of Kim not liking it.

I do wonder at times what is going on inside your head, but I'm somewhat afraid of finding out...

[Neko-koku]

There is freedom to scream "FUCK KIM JONG-UN!!" in North Korea, just not freedom from consequences of Kim not liking it.

I do wonder at times what is going on inside your head, but I'm somewhat afraid of finding out...

I didn't invent this idea.

[Volkish Amerika]

I do wonder at times what is going on inside your head, but I'm somewhat afraid of finding out...

I didn't invent this idea.

Yes, but you were the one who said it...

[Neko-koku]

I didn't invent this idea.

Yes, but you were the one who said it...

Well, I just fucking hate collectivism.

[Pacomia]

I don’t think that that was what Volkish Amerika had in mind when they said that.

It's fairly similar. There should be no consequences of speech.

I believe the “consequences” were the public not liking it, not being sent to a labour camp.

[Neko-koku]

It's fairly similar. There should be no consequences of speech.

I believe the “consequences” were the public not liking it, not being sent to a labour camp.

I believe people should be allowed to say whatever they want. If you don't like it you can get earplugs.

[Volkish Amerika]

Yes, but you were the one who said it...

Well, I just fucking hate collectivism.

You've made that quite clear, but pray tell how is that relevant to the discussion?

[Pacomia]

I believe the “consequences” were the public not liking it, not being sent to a labour camp.

I believe people should be allowed to say whatever they want. If you don't like it you can get earplugs.

Sure, I 100% agree. I think that other people should be allowed to not like it, though.

[Neko-koku]

I believe people should be allowed to say whatever they want. If you don't like it you can get earplugs.

Sure, I 100% agree. I think that other people should be allowed to not like it, though.

Sure

[Neko-koku]

Well, I just fucking hate collectivism.

You've made that quite clear, but pray tell how is that relevant to the discussion?

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions to the point of stopping them from being around is collectivism

[Volkish Amerika]

You've made that quite clear, but pray tell how is that relevant to the discussion?

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions is collectivism

No it's people responding, as they should, to bullshit.

[Neko-koku]

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions is collectivism

No it's people responding, as they should, to bullshit.

Is heliocentrism bullshit? Is evolution bullshit?

[Black Moon Sodality]

No, it would only encourage them.

[Pacomia]

You've made that quite clear, but pray tell how is that relevant to the discussion?

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions to the point of stopping them from being around is collectivism

Don’t say that word. I can’t stand that word.

[Samudera Darussalam]

You've made that quite clear, but pray tell how is that relevant to the discussion?

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions to the point of stopping them from being around is collectivism

No, it's different, Neko.

[Neko-koku]

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions to the point of stopping them from being around is collectivism

Don’t say that word. I can’t stand that word.

I don't think people should be able to censor other people

[Volkish Amerika]

No it's people responding, as they should, to bullshit.

Is heliocentrism bullshit? Is evolution bullshit?

Are you okay Neko-koku? You seem like you're not entirely here tonight.

[Pacomia]

Don’t say that word. I can’t stand that word.

I don't think people should be able to censor other people

And I don’t think you can walk into MY house and say “collectivism”.

[Pacomia]

Is heliocentrism bullshit? Is evolution bullshit?

Are you okay Neko-koku? You seem like you're not entirely here tonight.

Eh, he’s always like that. Just a bit more belligerent today, I guess.

[Neko-koku]

People mobbing up against unpopular opinions to the point of stopping them from being around is collectivism

No, it's different, Neko.

Well, it is. For example if I say "cats rock!" in a society of cat-haters then it is an unpopular opinion. A mob stopping it from being around is collectivism because it is a crowd violating individual rights (free speech) and is of course censorship.