Michigan City Council Candidate: Keep Community white

[Neko-koku]

For Singapore there are two failure modes: Japanization and South Africanization. Japanization is preventable by allowing Japans to exist and encouraging Japan-minded people to emigrate to Japans. South Africanization is preventable by having selective immigration criteria to prevent any form of little Gaborone from emerging in Singapore to begin with.

[Bear Stearns]

Ostensibly an American is someone who is a citizen of the United States.

But from a cultural standpoint, what is an American? The people of this country have very little in common with each other, and what once considered to be the traditional American culture is now considered racist. So what cultures do Americans have? Some vague commitment to "freedom" or "diversity"? Those aren't cultures, those are ideologies. What do we have in common in terms of ethnicity, language, religion, and customs? These are things that define what a nation is. We can't even agree on what ours are, because there is no "we".

There is no American.

Singapores require having no shared culture at all while Japans require having shared ethnicities, languages, customs etc.

So basically the problem is whether America should be Japan or Singapore. Of course most people would vote for Japan. As I said before, Singapore is for very few people. Most people don't psychologically want Singaporization.

Also it would be impossible to make a continent-sized Singapore actually work.

[Neko-koku]

Singapores require having no shared culture at all while Japans require having shared ethnicities, languages, customs etc.

So basically the problem is whether America should be Japan or Singapore. Of course most people would vote for Japan. As I said before, Singapore is for very few people. Most people don't psychologically want Singaporization.

Also it would be impossible to make a continent-sized Singapore actually work.

Of course because there aren't that many Singapore-minded people in the world. Singapores need to be independent city states, hopefully islands. They also need to be far away from any place Japans claim. Palau for example is a fairly good location for another Singapore.

[The Intergalactic Banking Guild]

Off topic—I know—but I was always under the assumption that the fact American “culture” is hard to define as America has always valued a rugged individualism over a encompassing culture. Hence why trying to put Americans into a well defined and bordered “culture” is impossible.

As for the topic, kinda cringe someone thinks that interracial marriage is bad in a post civil-rights America. Another candidate into the trashbin

[Bear Stearns]

Off topic—I know—but I was always under the assumption that the fact American “culture” is hard to define as America has always valued a rugged individualism over a encompassing culture.

Even that is controversial to say.

[Bear Stearns]

Also it would be impossible to make a continent-sized Singapore actually work.

Of course because there aren't that many Singapore-minded people in the world. Singapores need to be independent city states, hopefully islands. They also need to be far away from any place Japans claim. Palau for example is a fairly good location for another Singapore.

New York and San Francisco could be good candidates for Singapore-tier places.

[Neko-koku]

Of course because there aren't that many Singapore-minded people in the world. Singapores need to be independent city states, hopefully islands. They also need to be far away from any place Japans claim. Palau for example is a fairly good location for another Singapore.

New York and San Francisco could be good candidates for Singapore-tier places.

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

[Estanglia]

Yay, another radical nutjob.

[Pacomia]

New York and San Francisco could be good candidates for Singapore-tier places.

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

Toronto?

I also think that Singapore and Japan aren’t the only options. The US isn’t an equal mix of cultures, but it sure isn’t culturally homogeneous either, and it’s doing fine. Something where two-thirds to three-quarters of the population is one ethnicity works too.

[Neko-koku]

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

Toronto?

Much better, yes. Well, why not Vancouver if we have to have a Singapore on the continent?

Although because there are always a lot of Japan-minded people worldwide I almost exclusively prefer small Pacific Islands. For example purchasing an island from Marshall Islands may be good.

[Saiwania]

Yes! Finally a prominent woman out there that is fighting the good fight for the right values. She would have my full support, but it'd be quite a difficult and long fight if she's going up against the forces of Liberalism and the media that embraces all that is wrong in this world.

[Pacomia]

Toronto?

Much better, yes. Well, why not Vancouver if we have to have a Singapore on the continent?

Although because there are always a lot of Japan-minded people worldwide I almost exclusively prefer small Pacific Islands.

I hate Vancouver. Such a weird and boring city.

[Bear Stearns]

New York and San Francisco could be good candidates for Singapore-tier places.

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

San Francisco is currently a shithole but I was refering more to its location and infrastructure. It can easily be made into a Singapore if you just toss out the bums, troublemakers, and current politicians.

And New York was becoming a Singapore-tier place under Giuliani and Bloomberg, but de Blasio seems keen on reversing this.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

Hawaii and Alaska are too far away from anything.

Other good Singapore-tier places (based on their locations alone more than anything) would be Havana and New Orleans.

[Bear Stearns]

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

Toronto?

Based on infrastructure and people, yes, but based on location, it's a bit too inland, and if you're going to go inland, then Chicago and Detroit are much better geographically.

I also think that Singapore and Japan aren’t the only options. The US isn’t an equal mix of cultures, but it sure isn’t culturally homogeneous either, and it’s doing fine.

I think we are witnessing the end of this.

[Neko-koku]

Yes. However They are currently little South Africas. Moreover these two cities are indefensible. Any mob or gang can probably ruin them.

San Francisco is currently a shithole but I was refering more to its location and infrastructure. It can easily be made into a Singapore if you just toss out the bums, troublemakers, and current politicians.

And New York was becoming a Singapore-tier place under Giuliani and Bloomberg, but de Blasio seems keen on reversing this.

Due to the problem of South Africanization I don't support establishing any Singapores in Continental United States. It is either Hawaii (too hot?) or Alaska (too cold?).

Hawaii and Alaska are too far away from anything.

Other good Singapore-tier places (based on their locations alone more than anything) would be Havana and New Orleans.

Well, both San Francisco and New York are inherently little South Africas. I don't think they can ever be fixed without genetic editing.

I agree with you on locations, however it is extremely hard to fix South Africas without genetic editing.

Singapores require a moderate form of implicit East Kekistanism (i.e. keep certain folks out) to work. Without implicit East Kekistanism it is very easy for them to degenerate into South Africas. Japans are ethnonationalist hence can easily make sure that they won't become South Africas or Botswanas. Singapores on the other hand require HBD-based immigration policy to keep themselves Singapores.

[Pacomia]

Toronto?

Based on infrastructure and people, yes, but based on location, it's a bit too inland, and if you're going to go inland, then Chicago and Detroit are much better geographically.

I also think that Singapore and Japan aren’t the only options. The US isn’t an equal mix of cultures, but it sure isn’t culturally homogeneous either, and it’s doing fine.

I think we are witnessing the end of this.

True. Japans will stay Japans, Singapores will stay Singapores, and Americas could really go either way. The US itself is becoming a Singapore (might become a South Africa instead if not well-handled, though), others could become Japans.

[Neko-koku]

Based on infrastructure and people, yes, but based on location, it's a bit too inland, and if you're going to go inland, then Chicago and Detroit are much better geographically.



I think we are witnessing the end of this.

True. Japans will stay Japans, Singapores will stay Singapores, and Americas could really go either way. The US itself is becoming a Singapore (might become a South Africa instead if not well-handled, though), others could become Japans.

The problem...is that there are almost no Singapores in America. Even the Silicon Valley is only Singapore within the company offices. The streets are still South African. Even Cupertino is not safe from South Africanization. Look at San Francisco. How Singaporean is that?

America is a mixture of Japans, South Africas and Botswanas. What's even worse is that almost no major faction in America understands Singaporism. To them there are only Japans, South Africas and Botswanas in the world! SJWs believe that Japans are evil and that Batswana need to be allowed into America to make it a giant South Africa. Trads believe that Japans are good (rightfully) and that Batswana need to be kept out of America or segregated from the Japanese in South African areas of America.

[San Lumen]

How are you going to create an ethnostate in the United States? Who is us referring too?

What defines an American to you?

Us = STEM folks

The conflict between Japan-minded folks and Singapore-minded folks are essentially townie-gownie conflicts. Townies have asabiyyah while gownies have knowledge and tech.

>What defines an American to you?

I'm not even American.

>How are you going to create an ethnostate in the United States?

I have no idea. Maybe we should just make Hawaii a gownie-land or something and keep all kinds of racial, ethnic and religious militants out. The Silicon Valley and maybe Wall Street need to be relocated to Hawaii.

How about no? Why would you relocate them? Who are you to tell people where they can live?

[Bear Stearns]

True. Japans will stay Japans, Singapores will stay Singapores, and Americas could really go either way. The US itself is becoming a Singapore (might become a South Africa instead if not well-handled, though), others could become Japans.

The problem...is that there are almost no Singapores in America. Even the Silicon Valley is only Singapore within the company offices. The streets are still South African. Even Cupertino is not safe from South Africanization. Look at San Francisco. How Singaporean is that?

America is a mixture of Japans, South Africas and Botswanas. What's even worse is that almost no major faction in America understands Singaporism. To them there are only Japans, South Africas and Botswanas in the world! SJWs believe that Japans are evil and that Batswana need to be allowed into America to make it a giant South Africa. Trads believe that Japans are good (rightfully) and that Batswana need to be kept out of America.

It would be more helpful if you used neutral/technical terms instead of Japans/Singapores/South Africas because your average person isn't going to catch what you mean by them.

[Neko-koku]

Us = STEM folks

The conflict between Japan-minded folks and Singapore-minded folks are essentially townie-gownie conflicts. Townies have asabiyyah while gownies have knowledge and tech.

>What defines an American to you?

I'm not even American.

>How are you going to create an ethnostate in the United States?

I have no idea. Maybe we should just make Hawaii a gownie-land or something and keep all kinds of racial, ethnic and religious militants out. The Silicon Valley and maybe Wall Street need to be relocated to Hawaii.

How about no? Why would you relocate them? Who are you to tell people where they can live?

Because tribalism is not good for business and America is full of that on both sides.

[Neko-koku]

The problem...is that there are almost no Singapores in America. Even the Silicon Valley is only Singapore within the company offices. The streets are still South African. Even Cupertino is not safe from South Africanization. Look at San Francisco. How Singaporean is that?

America is a mixture of Japans, South Africas and Botswanas. What's even worse is that almost no major faction in America understands Singaporism. To them there are only Japans, South Africas and Botswanas in the world! SJWs believe that Japans are evil and that Batswana need to be allowed into America to make it a giant South Africa. Trads believe that Japans are good (rightfully) and that Batswana need to be kept out of America.

It would be more helpful if you used neutral/technical terms instead of Japans/Singapores/South Africas because your average person isn't going to catch what you mean by them.

Well, they will be even madder if I use HBD terms.

[Saiwania]

How about no? Why would you relocate them? Who are you to tell people where they can live?

People who're anti-choice politically speaking. Those who won't agree to freedom of movement and won't embrace the absurd liberal values and internationalist order it is trying to impose. Those whom nationalism and tradition speaks more to.

[Bear Stearns]

Us = STEM folks

The conflict between Japan-minded folks and Singapore-minded folks are essentially townie-gownie conflicts. Townies have asabiyyah while gownies have knowledge and tech.

>What defines an American to you?

I'm not even American.

>How are you going to create an ethnostate in the United States?

I have no idea. Maybe we should just make Hawaii a gownie-land or something and keep all kinds of racial, ethnic and religious militants out. The Silicon Valley and maybe Wall Street need to be relocated to Hawaii.

How about no? Why would you relocate them? Who are you to tell people where they can live?

And you mentioned genetic editing are you a white supremacist?

I've noticed that most of your argumentation is either an appeal to authority (usually the law) or tunnel-visioned literalism. It's very bizarre.

He's obviously not saying he's going to tell everyone in Silicon Valley to get up and relocate.

[Bear Stearns]

It would be more helpful if you used neutral/technical terms instead of Japans/Singapores/South Africas because your average person isn't going to catch what you mean by them.

Well, they will be even madder if I use HBD terms.

Japans: nation-states
Singapores: trade hubs/financial centers
South Africas: shitholes

[Neko-koku]

How about no? Why would you relocate them? Who are you to tell people where they can live?

People who're anti-choice politically speaking. Those who won't agree to freedom of movement and won't embrace the absurd liberal values and internationalist order it is trying to impose. Those whom nationalism and tradition speaks more to.

Yes. You belong to a white Japan and it is good for everyone for you to be in a Japan.