Antifa

[Scomagia]

Reminder that there's no law forbidding the establishment of worker owned businesses.

What's preventing the establishment of such businesses? Where I live there's a cooperative convenience store chain that does well and a regional bulk food chain that is worker owned. I'm unaware of any rule, implied or otherwise, that prevents the establishment of more.

[Ifreann]

This is the first I've heard of it.

Consult your local library.

"Where can I find books on stereotypes about Marxists?"

[Scomagia]

Consult your local library.

"Where can I find books on stereotypes about Marxists?"

I wasn't aware the historical actions of Marxists constituted stereotypes but whatever it takes to apologize for a murderous ideology, I guess.

But lets get away from the apologism and back on topic.

[Bear Stearns]

Reminder that there's no law forbidding the establishment of worker owned businesses.

Do you even know what an ESOP is?

Employee-owned businesses are very common.

[Bear Stearns]

Yes, a CEO just does nothing all day and totally does not have the image of an entire company resting on their decisions or anything

Reminder that CEO pay isn’t actually tied to company performance.

Their salaries aren't, but bonuses are. And their employment is entirely tied to their performance, and the standards they are held to are much higher, hence why the turnover rate for CEOs is extremely high. They are fired and replaced all the time.

[Bear Stearns]

Who says I was talking about specific people? Not everything is a veiled insult of other random people.

But yeah, mostly CEOs. Not all of them, but boy, are some of them corrupt.

What makes you think the average CEO slacks off all day? I imagine being ultimately responsible for the good management of a large company is very stressful.

It is incredibly stressful. Imagine being the CEO of General Electric right now.

[Bear Stearns]

What's preventing the establishment of such businesses? Where I live there's a cooperative convenience store chain that does well and a regional bulk food chain that is worker owned. I'm unaware of any rule, implied or otherwise, that prevents the establishment of more.

The main problem with employee-owned businesses is that it is hard to grow them beyond a certain size (they don't scale well), mostly because they lack a more unified strategic vision and are not flexible structure (they cannot adapt to changes as quickly).

[Aureumterra]

EX ANTIFA MEMBER WANTS GROUP LABELED A 'DOMESTIC TERRORISM' THREAT, CLAIMS THEY'RE TRYING TO 'HURT' AND 'HARASS'

[Vassenor]

EX ANTIFA MEMBER WANTS GROUP LABELED A 'DOMESTIC TERRORISM' THREAT, CLAIMS THEY'RE TRYING TO 'HURT' AND 'HARASS'

Welp. One person said it so it must be true.

[Purgatio]

EX ANTIFA MEMBER WANTS GROUP LABELED A 'DOMESTIC TERRORISM' THREAT, CLAIMS THEY'RE TRYING TO 'HURT' AND 'HARASS'

Welp. One person said it so it must be true.

Why not address the substance of the ex-member's argument then? That this is a group and movement with a dangerous, radical political ideology that actively encourages, endorses and incites violence against any individual arbitrarily and capriciously labelled a 'fascist' by their members?

[Ifreann]

Welp. One person said it so it must be true.

Why not address the substance of the ex-member's argument then? That this is a group and movement with a dangerous, radical political ideology that actively encourages, endorses and incites violence against any individual arbitrarily and capriciously labelled a 'fascist' by their members?

Fox News interviewed an employee of a conservative think-tank. Why exactly should anyone take what he has to say seriously?

[Purgatio]

Why not address the substance of the ex-member's argument then? That this is a group and movement with a dangerous, radical political ideology that actively encourages, endorses and incites violence against any individual arbitrarily and capriciously labelled a 'fascist' by their members?

Fox News interviewed an employee of a conservative think-tank. Why exactly should anyone take what he has to say seriously?

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

[Estanglia]

Fox News interviewed an employee of a conservative think-tank. Why exactly should anyone take what he has to say seriously?

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

The most the source says about Antifa is;

"But unfortunately, once you get into Antifa and you start realizing that what they're doing is not right," he continued. "They're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people. And you know, the reason I left Antifa was because I started asking questions and as soon as I asked questions, they started harassing me."

Which isn't exactly a bombshell to drop on us, and provides nothing about its internal workings.

[Necroghastia]

Fox News interviewed an employee of a conservative think-tank. Why exactly should anyone take what he has to say seriously?

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

He obviously doesn't go too much into detail, then.

[Bear Stearns]

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

The most the source says about Antifa is;

"But unfortunately, once you get into Antifa and you start realizing that what they're doing is not right," he continued. "They're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people. And you know, the reason I left Antifa was because I started asking questions and as soon as I asked questions, they started harassing me."

Which isn't exactly a bombshell to drop on us, and provides nothing about its internal workings.

It's not like there's that much of a story behind being a low level street gang.

"They were violent weirdos, that's why I left" is basically all that needs to be said.

[Purgatio]

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

The most the source says about Antifa is;

"But unfortunately, once you get into Antifa and you start realizing that what they're doing is not right," he continued. "They're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people. And you know, the reason I left Antifa was because I started asking questions and as soon as I asked questions, they started harassing me."

Which isn't exactly a bombshell to drop on us, and provides nothing about its internal workings.

A guy who used to be in ANTIFA as a member is telling us "they're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people", that's firsthand testimony as to the sinister and insidious motives of this homegrown terrorist movement.

[Estanglia]

The most the source says about Antifa is;



Which isn't exactly a bombshell to drop on us, and provides nothing about its internal workings.

A guy who used to be in ANTIFA as a member is telling us "they're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people", that's firsthand testimony as to the sinister and insidious motives of this homegrown terrorist movement.

You say that like Antifa even bothered to try to hide its 'sinister and insidious' motives.

They've been blatant basically from the start. It's nothing new. We don't need former Antifa to tell us something that has been plain as day.

[Aureumterra]

Because he used to be ANTIFA and presumably has personal insight into how terrible and sociopathic the group and its members are and the movement's internal workings

He obviously doesn't go too much into detail, then.

I assume he’s talking about Rose City Antifa

[Cappuccina]

EX ANTIFA MEMBER WANTS GROUP LABELED A 'DOMESTIC TERRORISM' THREAT, CLAIMS THEY'RE TRYING TO 'HURT' AND 'HARASS'

Welp. One person said it so it must be true.

Tfw people don't view Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization.

[Purgatio]

A guy who used to be in ANTIFA as a member is telling us "they're trying to hurt people, they're trying to harass people", that's firsthand testimony as to the sinister and insidious motives of this homegrown terrorist movement.

You say that like Antifa even bothered to try to hide its 'sinister and insidious' motives.

They've been blatant basically from the start. It's nothing new. We don't need former Antifa to tell us something that has been plain as day.

Have you read this thread so far? There's clearly no shortage of people who need convincing that ANTIFA is a sinister and dangerous organisation. If you already knew that, good for you, but other people have yet to acknowledge the reality of the situation.

[Estanglia]

You say that like Antifa even bothered to try to hide its 'sinister and insidious' motives.

They've been blatant basically from the start. It's nothing new. We don't need former Antifa to tell us something that has been plain as day.

Have you read this thread so far? There's clearly no shortage of people who need convincing that ANTIFA is a sinister and dangerous organisation. If you already knew that, good for you, but other people have yet to acknowledge the reality of the situation.

I have been reading the thread and it seems that most who repeatedly posted have expressed that Antifa is violent, and that Antifa isn't an organisation.

[Nova Cyberia]

EX ANTIFA MEMBER WANTS GROUP LABELED A 'DOMESTIC TERRORISM' THREAT, CLAIMS THEY'RE TRYING TO 'HURT' AND 'HARASS'

I guess he must be a fascist now. /s

[Vassenor]

Welp. One person said it so it must be true.

Tfw people don't view Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization.

Do we need to have the discussion about how it's not an organisation, much less a domestic terrorist one, and this is all just a transparent attempt to justify outlawing anti-Trump protests again?

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Have you read this thread so far? There's clearly no shortage of people who need convincing that ANTIFA is a sinister and dangerous organisation. If you already knew that, good for you, but other people have yet to acknowledge the reality of the situation.

I have been reading the thread and it seems that most who repeatedly posted have expressed that Antifa is violent, and that Antifa isn't an organisation.

Quite, there is a dangerous element in the ideology but like you said, Antifa is not an organization.

[Nova Cyberia]

Tfw people don't view Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization.

Do we need to have the discussion about how it's not an organisation, much less a domestic terrorist one, and this is all just a transparent attempt to justify outlawing anti-Trump protests again?

White supremacism isn't an organization either.